User talk:Sergeyl1984

Bottom-Up Testing

--Sergeyl1984 (talk) 13:11, 15 January 2009 (UTC)Bottom-Up Testing: An approach to integration testing where the lowest level components are tested first, then used to facilitate the testing of higher level components. The process is repeated until the component at the top of the hierarchy is tested.

Speedy deletion of Levi9

A tag has been placed on Levi9 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. pablo_hablo. 10:33, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

• The main problem was its promotional tone and the text also resembled parts of http://poslovi.infostud.com/predstavljamo/profil-poslodavca/86/Levi9_Global_Sourcing_Balkan/ Try to write from the viewpoint of someone who is not related to the organization to improve it. Also you had two unneccesary references in the original entry. You don't need to add a reference in order to link a name, like Roel Pieper. You can simply do that right in the text. Write the new entry at User:Sergeyl1984/Levi9 and ask me and others for comments before putting it live to avoid another deletion. - Mgm|^(talk) 09:18, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 08:26, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Nearshore Outsourcing (need help and comments)

{{tl:adminhelp}}

Can I put this article "Nearshore Outsourcing" in Wikipedia if the close term Nearshoring is already exist, I would like to create separate page for Nearshore Outsourcing as it is more common and used term in IT spheres and most people use and looking for this one. Also I'm not great about Nearshoring article, as it's not cover the subject.

I'll be very glad if established users can help me. Thanks!

Hi, if Nearshoring and Nearshore Outsourcing are two names for what is basically the same thing, then one should be a redirect to the other; and if you think the existing article could be improved then please help improve it rather than creating an alternative article for the same topic. WereSpielChequers 12:50, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

• Dear WereSpielChequers, thank you for your quick reply, could you please help me with one more question?

Nearshore Outsourcing

Nearshore outsourcing, usually referred as Nearshoring, is a derivative of the business term “offshore outsourcing”, in which various business processes are relocated to foreign, lower-wage countries that is relatively close in distance and time zone than more traditional offshore locations.

The general idea of the Nearshore concept is to reduce the complexity and risks associated with remoteness between customer and provider in “traditional” offshore model and to leverage proximity of the Nearshore destinations with fewer language and cultural barriers and no time zone differences.

Although it is difficult to compete against cheap labor costs in "traditional" outsourcing destinations, there are a number of reasons to make Nearshoring more attractive alternative:

• Time Zone and Geographic proximity
• Cultural Affinity
• Intellectual Property Protection and Immigrations advantages
• Practical Cost advantage

Talk:Nearshoring adminhelp

I've responded to your request for adminhelp in Talk:Nearshoring. --  Chzz  ►  22:01, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

As a few hours have passed, I am going to close this request for now. If you require further help, please either contact me on my own talk page, or put a {{helpme}} or {{adminhelp}} on this page. It is easier to answer your questions on your own talk page than it is in the talk page of the article.

Thanks! --  Chzz  ►  04:19, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

User:Sergeyl1984/Levi9

Hi,

In reply to your query on your talk page; unfortunately, because of your declared conflict of interest, you are strongly advised not to create this article. Please read WP:COI and WP:BESTCOI carefully.

Re. references in other languages - yes, in principle there is no problem with this, as long as they are reliable sources etc. I'm not in a position to evaluate them, however, as I don't speak Dutch; you would have to seek the input of a Dutch wikipedian.

Thanks, --  Chzz  ►  12:34, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

March 2009

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as on user talk:chzz, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you.  Chzz  ►  14:32, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

user page

In User:Sergeyl1984, I think you may have the wrong link for "Software Development Blog", as it currently links to an "easy to navigate MEGA-SITE of Bible, Christian, church & religious information"?

--  Chzz  ►  14:41, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

• opps, sorry for that and thanks for checking :) I made a typo, it's already corrected (Sergeyl1984 (talk) 14:51, 23 March 2009 (UTC))

No problem :-) We're a bit 'hot' on spammy looking links, even on user pages :-) --  Chzz  ►  15:11, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

User talk:Sergeyl1984/Levi9

I thought I'd have a quick check on progress in User talk:Sergeyl1984/Levi9, and have left a comment. --  Chzz  ►  15:10, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

• I agree largely with Chzz and Drmies. Are there any newspaper articles or articles in trade magazines that are not direct press releases of Levi9 or related companies? - Mgm|^(talk) 08:53, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

• Ohh, Hi Mgm, nice to see you again, Yes, seems like they've got Press Releases from the CIO the magazine, but one problem, most of them are in Dutch, can we put it as references?
• Yes, as long as you say they are in Dutch so people know where to get help translating it, it's okay to use Dutch sources. Have a look at WP:CITET. That page contains some templates that help standardizing reference formats and also reminds you to include some key details like publishing date and the date you checked the source for accuracy before you added it to the article. - Mgm|^(talk) 09:15, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the response. Here is the links in Dutch, I appreciate your opinion if they might be used as references :

• Emerce Magazine Offshoring Interview with Bernhard van Oranje, CEO of Levi9,(2005-11-11)[1]
• Computable Award CEO (2007-07-06)[2]
• Computable Outsourcing Panel (2008-11-21) [3]
• CIO of the Year 2008, Bernhard van Oranje in jury of the CIO of the Year Award (2008-10-7) [4]
• Computable Outsourcing Experts (2008-12-19) [5]

(Sergeyl1984 (talk) 10:19, 25 March 2009 (UTC))

• Those sources are interesting for the article about Bernhard, but they don't say anything about the company apart from the fact he's the CEO of it, which you can establish just fine with one source. - Mgm|^(talk) 11:36, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
• The Progress and Compuware sources say something about the company, but they need to be combined with independent sources. Since they work together with Levi9 it is in their interest to say good things about the company, so their reliability could be questioned. They can be used as sources, but they should not be the only ones to avoid such claims. DoubleDutch is again just related to Bernhard and doesn't actually say anything about the company except naming it briefly. - Mgm|^(talk) 12:23, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

nearshoring

Hi Sergey,

Well, you can do what you like, of course--as long as you have the references to back you up. Problem with that list of benefits was a. it came straight from another website (a copyright problem); b. that site was not necessarily a reliable source; and c. it did sound awfully promotional. That latter part, considering the business you're in, you should be careful with--you might be accused of a conflict of interest. Now, having said that, it should not be too difficult to distill some benefits out of the various articles and books (that are reliable, or accepted as such). After all, if it weren't profitable, people wouldn't be doing it. If you look at outsourcing you see that that's been done there, and it doesn't rely on one single source. I'll be glad to help out with either one of these issues. As for that source, I don't think it'll stand up easily since the publisher of the article is itself an outsourcing business--they'll never be accepted as a reliable source, and with good reason. In other words, you cannot use that, for our purposes, to state facts about a concept. You can, of course, use it to make a statement about perceived benefits--but to do that you'd first have to establish some sort of objective overview of benefits. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 22:39, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mirapolys

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Mirapolys, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Par Notability - Product seems have to little (if any) notability to pass WP:PRODUCT

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Excirial ^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 08:07, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Re: Paul Schuyt

Hi Sergey, the article is much better now. I just changed a few more words and removed the tag. ... discospinster _talk 19:31, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Paul Schuyt Logica Nederland.jpeg

Thank you for uploading File:Paul Schuyt Logica Nederland.jpeg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Image Screening Bot (talk) 20:56, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Levi9 Ukraine

The article Levi9 Ukraine has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability. Sources do nothing to establish notability. outsourcing-russia site using invalid ssl certificate.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 13:59, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Mirasoft for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mirasoft is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mirasoft until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Vexations (talk) 14:50, 20 February 2020 (UTC)