User talk:SergiSmiler

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by when more than 4 sections are present.

Useful Links

You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages.

Getting Started
The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Ronhjones ^(Talk) 02:01, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

El Archivo

¿Te gusta el sistema de archivo que configurar? ¿Es más fácil encontrar las cosas?Mirror Freak 16:31, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sí! Me gusta mucho, es muy sencillo para encontrar las cosas!! Muchas gracias de verdad! ya era algo que necesitaba pero no sabia hacer... jajaja gracias!--SergiSmiler (talk) 13:28, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributions to articles

Looking at your contributions, it is obvious you are not a native speaker of English. You may be more comfortable and productive editing at your native language Wikipedia. If you still want to edit on the English language Wikipedia, I strongly encourage you to use article talk pages to list your proposed change and wait for others to correct the grammar and wording. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 14:37, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I can do that for him if he wants me to. After he edits an article I can copy edit it if that's alright.Mirror Freak 14:41, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for continuing to help ...--SergiSmiler (talk) 15:33, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MirrorFreak. Thanks for volunteering. Why doesn't he post his edits to your talk page so you can edit them before thousands of readers see them. You won't always be editing at the same time as Sergi and text like this shouldn't appear in articles, let alone a WP:GA. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 15:03, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Miley Cyrus. NeilN ^{talk to me} 15:30, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You've been blocked for disruption three times before. If you persist, I will be asking for an indefinite block until you agree not to add barely understandable content to articles. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 15:33, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at We Can't Stop shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. NeilN ^{talk to me} 15:34, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SergiSmiler (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, I want to be locked because although was starting a small edit war, makes no sense. I put some time since the Spanish Wikipedia, well done, now go and deleted, and as I have said, rather than delete, correct it and you're done! Please remove the block if necessary ... I apologize, I'll put it on the talk page, but this makes no sense ... The same translation is not perfect, but can be corrected.--SergiSmiler (talk) 15:42, 25 August 2014 (UTC) ---- Hola, quiero ser bloqueado porque aunque se estaba iniciando una pequeña guerra de ediciones, no tiene ningún sentido. Yo lo puse hace tiempo desde la Wikipedia en español, bien hecho, y ahora van y lo borran, y yo ya lo he dicho, en vez de borrar, corregirlo y ya está! Por favor, quitar el bloqueo… si es necesario pido disculpas, yo mismo lo pondré en la página de discusión, pero esto no tiene sentido… La traducción igual no es perfecta, pero se puede corregir.--SergiSmiler (talk) 15:42, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. PhilKnight (talk) 18:38, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

"The same translation is not perfect, but can be corrected" No. That's not how that works. The article is a WP:GA and if you don't know how to do it correctly the first time then TAKE IT TO THE TALK PAGE. I honestly don't get how you don't understand that by now after all the times you have been talked to and been blocked for your editing. This is an English wikipedia and other editors shouldn't have to correct your edits if you don't know how to translate properly. LADY LOTUS • TALK 15:45, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

MirrorFreak can you please explain to Sergi that he is not blocked but he can't expect other editors to fix his semi-intelligible additions to articles. WP:CIR is worth a read. "Many editors have focused so much on this tenet that they have come to believe that good faith is all that is required to be a useful contributor. Sadly, this is not the case at all. Competence is required as well. A mess created in a sincere effort to help is still a mess." and "If someone's native language is not English and they can't communicate in English well—including discussing things with other editors—consider trying to encourage them to edit a Wikipedia in their own language. Those other-language Wikipedias need help from editors, too." --NeilN ^{talk to me} 15:51, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah. Don't worry, I'll translate for you guys.Mirror Freak 15:55, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Está bien. Así que tu no bloqueado sólo para hacerle saber. Lo que quieren hacer es dejar de hacer ediciones ininteligibles y esperar que otros usuarios puedan arreglarlos. Estoy sacando mi espalda para amigo. Muchos editores han centrado tanto en este principio que han llegado a creer que la buena fe es todo lo que se requiere una contribución útil. Lamentablemente, esto no es el caso en absoluto. Competencia así como se requiere. Creado en un esfuerzo sincero para ayudar a un desastre sigue siendo un desastre."y" Si alguien es nativo idioma no es inglés y no pueden comunicarse bien en inglés — incluyendo discutir cosas con otros editores — cuenta intentando animarlas a editar una Wikipedia en su propio idioma. Las Wikipedias otra lengua necesito ayuda de editores, también". No estoy diciendo que tienes que dejar la wikipedia en inglés, esto es lo que dijeron. Pero vamos, tío, puedes por favor no poner información en artículos y esperar que otros para arreglarlo. Podrá hacerlo, pero sólo házmelo saber antes de agregarla.Mirror Freak 16:02, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pues baya Mirror... todo eso de colaboremos todos juntos es la mayor mentira de Wikipeida... pero bueno, entendido, muchas gracias por seguir ayudando, seguramente estarás un poco enfadado conmigo... lo siento, es que me bloquearon antes de que me diese cuenta de que me habían avisado de que iba a ser bloqueado, y me enfado rápidamente cuando me borran las ediciones... diles que lo siento, que te consultare a ti o en la pagina de discusión, aunque tardan una eternidad, antes de poner algo de lo que no estoy seguro, pero diles que sigo pensando que deberían corregir el pequeño error que haya. Gracias de nuevo.

This might be a dumb question but...why does he not just edit at the Spanish Wikipedia? Obviously that's his native language, why come here to edit if he can't speak it or translate properly? I get he's Cyrus fan but I don't go to the different language Wikipedias to edit on people I'm a fan of simply because I don't speak the language and I know that Google Translate isn't accurate. LADY LOTUS • TALK 16:19, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You want to know because I work in the English Wikipedia? Because I'm a fan of Miley and want major Wikipedias are accurate and complete, because on more than one occasion I have seen that there are things missing or incomplete, my goal is to finish and complete help.--SergiSmiler (talk) 16:25, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

But you're not helping, don't you see that? Which is what has led to you being indefinitely blocked. LADY LOTUS • TALK 16:45, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014: Part II

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for a combination of the proven lack of English competence and persistent edit-warring.. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Drmies (talk) 16:20, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SergiSmiler (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hola de nuevo… siento mucho todo esto, esto no era lo que yo quería… estoy muy arrepentido, solo quería que por una vez Wikipedia reflejara un bonito acto de humildad por parte de Miley para que la gente al leer estos artículos pensaran de una forma un poco más positiva respecto a ella… Repito, quitar el bloqueo por favor, me bloquearon justo antes de poder ponerlo en la página de discusión… entiendo perfectamente que el problema del inglés es serio, pero tampoco creo que sea un motivo lo suficientemente valido como para bloquear a una persona que solo tiene buenas intenciones, para algo esto es una comunidad donde todos tenemos que ayudarnos para conseguir que Wikipedia sea un sitio referente de confianza y validez en internet… respecto a la guerra de edición, pido disculpas y repito lo de más arriba, no me di cuenta de que me avisaron de que iba a ser bloqueado… lo siento mucho… por favor, quitar el bloqueo, o por lo menos poner una fecha límite, unos días, una semana… prefiero ser desbloqueado pero entiendo que mi comportamiento no ha sido el mejor… Espero que sepan ponerse desde mi punto de vista y recapaciten… Gracias. ---- Hello again ... very sorry all this, this was not what I wanted ... I'm so sorry, I just wanted for once Wikipedia reflect a beautiful act of humility by Miley for people to read these articles think of a way a bit more positive about it ... Again, please remove the block, blocked me right before he put it in the discussion page ... I fully understand that English is the problem seriously, but I do not think that is a valid enough reason as to block a person who only has good intentions, for something that is a community where we all need to help to make a reference site Wikipedia is reliable and valid internet about the war ... editing, and I apologize for repeating what above, I did not realize that warned me it was going to be blocked ... I'm sorry ... please remove the block, or at least put a deadline a few days, a week ... I'd rather be unlocked but I understand that my behavior has not been the best ... I hope you get to know from my point of view and reconsider ... Thanks.

Decline reason:

Per WP:Competence and not accepting feedback. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:07, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sorry, but your lack of English skills is a valid enough reason to block as you persisted in adding barely understandable content to articles. You were asked to have someone else do a proper translation before adding material to articles but you ignored that request. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 14:13, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

SSorry to tell you that I do not have to MirroFreak told that I can not translate my edits, indeed, already done twice before writing so look at the reality, and I repeat, the problem can be solved English NeilN.--SergiSmiler (talk) 14:21, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@SergiSmiler:, el problema no es solamente el idioma, violaste la etiqueta de las 3 reversiones, ese fue el motivo por el que fuiste bloqueado, la mala traducción también es uno de lo motivos. En el artículo de Miley Cyrus te revirtieron 3 veces por añadir información mal traducida, y tú te pusiste como un guerrero a revertir igualmente, si una persona revierte tu edición 2 veces, y tú haces lo mismo 2 veces, lo recomendable es no volver a revertir, o llegar aún acuerdo con tal persona, cosa que no hiciste y es por eso que te han bloqueado. No te bloquearon solamente por no saber inglés. Al revertir 3 veces, ya por ese motivo es que te bloquean. y como te dije antes, si vez que una persona revierte tus ediciones 2, y tú hace lo mismo 2 veces, a la tercera solo te puedes ganar un bloqueo de cuenta, así tengas la razón o no.--Damián (talk) 14:35, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pero si ya se que me han bloqueado por la guerra de ediciones! Ya he pedido perdón! Que mas tengo que hacer?!... repito, no era consciente de que iba a ser bloqueado, no me di cuenta, me enfade rápidamente y no supe reaccionar... yo solo veía que me habían borrado la edición porque si... no me di cuenta hasta después que ser bloqueado por la traducción, que sigo pensando que se podría a ver corregido y ya esta... por favor, quitar el bloqueo Damián...--SergiSmiler (talk) 15:48, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@SergiSmiler:, el problema es que estás pidiendo tu desbloqueo, por que crees que es así, creo que debes al menos comprender lo que son las guerras de ediciones; al meno tendrías que explicar aunque sea que hacer en caso de guerras de ediciones, y prometer no volverlo a hacer, no sé exactamente, yo también he sido bloqueado por estos motivos, cuando veas que es así, tienes que controlarte. Esto no es como la wikipedia en español, que tienen más paciencia por generar guerras de ediciones. Y yo no te puedo quitar el bloqueó. No puedes pedir que te desbloqueen, porque sí, y por que lo estás exigiendo. Te recomiendo esperar una semana o unos días. Anteriormente fuiste bloqueado por guerras de ediciones, o no sé muy bien, el porque. Pero exigir que te desbloqueen porque sí, no lograrás nada.--Damián (talk) 15:55, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

--- Please !! Remove the lock! I feel terrible ... I did not realize ... I just saw that erased the edition because if I did not realize the mistake until after haver been blocked ... please, I'm sorry OhNoitsJamie...--SergiSmiler (talk) 15:48, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

SergiSmiler, answer this. Why are you hell-bent on adding content in the "English Wikipedia", when more than three editors have declared your additions as problematic? You want to help, wonderful thought, but why don't you see that you are doing exactly the opposite? You are actually creating problem by not communicating in English, copy-pasting translations from Google to articles and refusal to co-operate. I sincerely believe that Miley's Spanish articles would benefit from your editing so please transfer your edits to the "Spanish Wikipedia". This block is more of a prevention against the WP:Competence that you ensued from your editing, and I believe this needs to be in place, sadly. And all these communications in Spanish in the talk page is also not helping guys. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 16:27, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

First, since I work in the Wikipedia in Spanish, it's more, I began to edit it, but this would looking at English because it has the best reputation, but I noticed that things were missing and was added slowly to be a returning user here. Now I just ask you to forgive me and remove the lock ... I'm very sad about all this ... I repeat, did not know I had been warned ... I get angry and react badly ... please, I'm too sick of both blocking promise of truth, my mother, I'll be more careful in the future ... --SergiSmiler (talk) 16:37, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) You say you are sorry every time you are blocked and that you won't do it again and that's exactly what you do. I've looked at your edits on the Spanish wikipedia and you've been blocked for disruptive editing on there to so it's not like the language barrier is the only problem, the problem is you just being a difficult editor who doesn't learn from their mistakes. LADY LOTUS • TALK 16:32, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lady Lotus, these problems are old ok? I've learned the operation of Wikipedia and I would appreciate you to stop myself as the worst user.--SergiSmiler (talk) 16:37, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Lady Lotus:, I had not checked the Spanish Wikipedia and his contributions before I suggested him to whole-heartedly devote time to the Spanish Wiki. If what you say is true that he has been disruptive there also, then I take back my comments. SergiSmiler, I don't think Wikipedia is a place for you. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 16:35, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

God !!!! Everything that's already old !! I changed !! and if I want to collaborate on Wikipedia can do it, only I need help because this is not necessary to block and ready, things can speak ...--SergiSmiler (talk) 16:38, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Indian, I don't think Wikipedia is a place for you. LADY LOTUS • TALK 16:45, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bro, I stuck up for you. To me my friends and I have a mafia relationship. You don't tell lies, you don't disrespect. And you Sergie have officially disrespected me. Man, Why did you bring problems to the English Wikipedia? Just because you couldn't continue them at the Spanish one?Mirror Freak 16:40, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:IndianBio, this is his talk page for his Spanish wiki account, https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usuario_Discusi%C3%B3n:SergiSmiler . Mirror Freak 16:43, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This seems like a lost case to me, he's not going to change. Oh well, let's move on anyways, I do not think any admin will unblock given the circumstances. At the end I think talk page access will also be revoked. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 16:46, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]