User talk:SimonX
|
AfD nomination of List of recent automobile models by type
[edit]An editor has nominated List of recent automobile models by type, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of recent automobile models by type and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 13:14, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of List of cars
[edit]An editor has nominated List of cars, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of cars and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 18:01, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
Your edits constitute a big help. Thanx. For my own use (not because I question them), what was your source? Trekphiler (talk) 15:12, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
- "$200-$700" Ouch. Thanks for the tip, tho; I can interlibrary loan it. (Fortunately, I've also got a flatbed scanner...& it'd be just for my use.) Clymer's got an amazing amount of info for a skinny little coffe table book. BTW, have you looked at your local newspaper's back issues? If the ads in it are anything like the ones Clymer reproduced, it should be possible to get stub pages off the info in the ads. (I did it from Clymer.) Keep up the good work. Maybe some year, all those red links'll get filled in... Ciao. Trekphiler (talk) 18:31, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
- I've been looking at your date adds. If you've still got Kimes & Clark handy, can you check & change some things? I'm wondering if these are the correct names, & if they are, change the main link so, when (if) the page is created, it won't need to be moved: Kalamazoo (or Michigan?), Kane-Pennington (or just Pennington?), Keene Steamobile (or just Keene?), Kinnar or Kinnear?, Kirk (builder of the Yale model? or Yale a separate company?), Konigslow (builder of the Ottokar? or Ottokar a separate company?), L.P.C. (builder of the Lewis? or Lewis a separate company?), Maxim-Goodridge Electric (builder of the Lenox?), Puritan Steam (builder of the Locke?). To be clear, my thinking is, if they're builders of identified models, move the model to the fn & change the main WL to the builder, so (say) change Lenox to Maxim-Goodridge. If the history's a bit convoluted (& I don't doubt some are...), I'd try & link all the related companies to a "master page", the oldest company. And go right back to "A" (I just thought of this at "K"...). Thanx. (I'm waiting on interlibrary loan, or I'd start myself...) Oh, BTW, if you've dabbed out companies with dates, where they're footnoted "one of two", go ahead & del the fn; it's not needed, if it's clear there are 2 (or 3, or 5) different ones. (I put in "one of" because Clymer didn't date them.) Trekphiler (talk) 13:32, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
- Looking at your date adds again. It's got to be tedious, so a few words of encouragement. It's looking good. At this rate, you'll be done before the blasted interlibrary loan comes thru. Hope moral support's enough. Trekphiler (talk) 02:13, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
- Two questionable deletes
- Zabardust
- Decauville (before 1926)[1]
- Given Clymer makes a few mistakes, could be Decauville was French; could also have been a French branch plant, no? And Zabardust has been in the page a long time, but it makes me think it could be a branch of an Italian/Swiss (can't recall which). If you've got better info, leave 'em out & let me know not to put 'em back? Trekphiler (talk) 03:24, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
- My copy of Kimes & Clark just came in (Yay!) & no Decauville. Ignore my last; I should have bothered to look it up in my own sources, first, even before K&C got here. (No mention of a U.S. branch...) Open mouth. Insert foot. Trekphiler (talk) 23:06, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
- Two questionable deletes
- Looking at your date adds again. It's got to be tedious, so a few words of encouragement. It's looking good. At this rate, you'll be done before the blasted interlibrary loan comes thru. Hope moral support's enough. Trekphiler (talk) 02:13, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
- I've been looking at your date adds. If you've still got Kimes & Clark handy, can you check & change some things? I'm wondering if these are the correct names, & if they are, change the main link so, when (if) the page is created, it won't need to be moved: Kalamazoo (or Michigan?), Kane-Pennington (or just Pennington?), Keene Steamobile (or just Keene?), Kinnar or Kinnear?, Kirk (builder of the Yale model? or Yale a separate company?), Konigslow (builder of the Ottokar? or Ottokar a separate company?), L.P.C. (builder of the Lewis? or Lewis a separate company?), Maxim-Goodridge Electric (builder of the Lenox?), Puritan Steam (builder of the Locke?). To be clear, my thinking is, if they're builders of identified models, move the model to the fn & change the main WL to the builder, so (say) change Lenox to Maxim-Goodridge. If the history's a bit convoluted (& I don't doubt some are...), I'd try & link all the related companies to a "master page", the oldest company. And go right back to "A" (I just thought of this at "K"...). Thanx. (I'm waiting on interlibrary loan, or I'd start myself...) Oh, BTW, if you've dabbed out companies with dates, where they're footnoted "one of two", go ahead & del the fn; it's not needed, if it's clear there are 2 (or 3, or 5) different ones. (I put in "one of" because Clymer didn't date them.) Trekphiler (talk) 13:32, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
<--I should've kept quiet about deletes, you're doing a great job. I've got my own source for Decauville, & it says nothing about a U.S. branch plant, which is what I was thinking it was, per the Mercedes & Napier plants (which I didn't recall ever hearing of before). The Zabardust I suspected much the same, a brand I'm unfamiliar with; seeing it's in neither Clymer (who did pretty good) nor Kimes, take it out. As for trucks, I'd happily see them broken out. Have you posted the question to the Automobile project talk page? You might get help with it. Chances are, you'll get a few gripes over lack of notability of such a list; if you've got more than one source, it'd help. (Have you seen Great Trucks? It's just a coffee table book, but it mentions quite a few rare brands, and if all you need is a mention...) I'd also suggest linking out of a truck list to as many existing articles as you can, & back-linking to the truck list from as many places as you reasonably can, before you put up the obscure stuff. Also, have a glance at my defense here; not to brag, but it pre-empted an AfD challenge, which is the idea. If it comes to a vote, you've got mine. Keep on...truckin'? Trekphiler (talk) 23:09, 18 April 2008 (UTC) (P.S. I should've asked, what's the title & author of the new book? I can just see myself starting a list of Canadian car & truck companies! 23:47, 18 April 2008 (UTC))
- If you're taking out the trucks, let me set up a separate subpage you can dump 'em into; I'll try a list, & I'd hate for the info to get lost entirely. I'm not that busy I can't organize & prowl for it a bit. Trekphiler (talk) 01:32 & 01:34, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
- If you're taking out the trucks, you can also move them here; I started it with you in mind, & I'm watching the page. Trekphiler (talk) 20:36, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
Harvard (automobile)
[edit]Thank you for your informative notes. Interesting stuff. It's frustrating that when so much contemporary printed source material was produced concerning the twentieth century - massively more than for any earlier century, we still have such trouble (1) accessing it and (2) sifting truth from the other stuff. Is that a paradox or merely a challenge? Regards Charles01 (talk) 07:28, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
{{British Leyland}}
[edit]This template has reached far beyond its original scope of simply monitoring British Leyland. There is a propopsal for renaming it on its talk page which, as you are a contributor to the template, I hope you will participate in. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 07:53, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 10
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Danish West Indies, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Argosy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 11
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of automobile manufacturers, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages JCB and Escort (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 12
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of automobile manufacturers of the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Valiant (automobile). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
July 2015
[edit]Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Brass Era car may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- *[[Oldsmobile|Olds Motor Works]] (Detroit, Michigan])
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:33, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
Europe 10,000 Challenge invite
[edit]Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 20
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tatra 87, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Graf Zeppelin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Thanks
[edit]Hi SimonX, thanks for your recognition, its encouraging to know that people might appreciate what I edit. I enjoyed many of your User icons on your User-page and have borrowed a few - hope you don't mind. Cheers, Philby NZ (talk) 00:45, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
The article List of Asian automobile manufacturers has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
As per WP:NOTDIR
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Davidelit (Talk) 11:03, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]- ^ Clymer, p.206.