Jump to content

User talk:Stratojet94

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Speedy deletion nomination of Longmont United Hospital

[edit]

Hello Stratojet94,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Longmont United Hospital for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Lgcsmasamiya (talk) 01:05, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Clown motel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. G S Palmer (talkcontribs) 18:14, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Clown motel

[edit]

Hello Stratojet94,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Clown motel for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Amortias (T)(C) 17:18, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Area 51

[edit]

Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Roxy the dog (resonate) 21:02, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Cheyenne Mountain nuclear bunker, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you!   Bfpage |leave a message  20:56, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Swedish Rhapsody (Numbers Station)

[edit]

The article The Swedish Rhapsody (Numbers Station) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back. Thank you,

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:14, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Numbers station, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 13:21, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015

[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did to Numbers station, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 18:18, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Human sexual activity. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 17:40, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

[edit]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Numbers station. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. DonIago (talk) 21:20, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

[edit]
Hi Stratojet94! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 08:50, Sunday, February 28, 2021 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on User:Stratojet94 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. twotwofourtysix(My talk page and contributions) 01:29, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

[edit]
Hi Stratojet94! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 03:21, Tuesday, June 15, 2021 (UTC)

July 2024

[edit]

Information icon Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Orchastrattor (talk) 19:08, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I’m not adding my own personal analysis, you keep changing the page and adding Israel when there is no evidence that it is a Herrenvolk democracy. Palestinians in the occupied territories are not citizens therefore can not vote in elections. Stratojet94 (talk) 21:27, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please review Wikipedia's core content policy on verification and the discussion already present on Talk:Herrenvolk democracy#Inclusion of Israel in imagebox, the sources explain their rationale as to the classification of Israel as an example of the subject and include information corroborated between multiple reliable sources, whether or not you personally believe the information is true has no impact on the decision of what to include on the page. Further attempts to remove sourced information against consensus will be treated as disruption and edit warring. Orchastrattor (talk) 21:46, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok my apologies I’ll refrain from further edits, cheers Stratojet94 (talk) 22:09, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Stratojet94! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community.

I've noticed that you've expressed an interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Unfortunately, due to a history of conflict and disruptive editing it has been designated a contentious topic and is subject to some strict rules.

The rule that affects you most as a new or IP editor is the prohibition on making any edit related to the Arab–Israel conflict unless you are logged into an account and that account is at least 30 days old and has made at least 500 edits.

This prohibition is broadly construed, so it includes edits such as adding the reaction of a public figure concerning the conflict to their article or noting the position of a company or organization as it relates to the conflict.

The exception to this rule is that you may request a specific change to an article on the talk page of that article or at this page. Please ensure that your requested edit complies with our neutral point of view and reliable sourcing policies, and if the edit is about a living person our policies on biographies of living people as well.

Any edits you make contrary to these rules are likely to be reverted, and repeated violations can lead to you being blocked from editing.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center


Sean.hoyland (talk) 05:24, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

[edit]

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

  • adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
  • comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
  • follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
  • comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
  • refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Sean.hoyland (talk) 05:24, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Including the discussion at Talk:Hamas where your comments have been struck as not allowed there. Doug Weller talk 08:37, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have no right to tell me this, who are you? Stratojet94 (talk) 19:45, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
My apologies, I realize you are an administrator, I will refrain from any future edits. Thank you Stratojet94 (talk) 19:46, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]