Jump to content

User talk:Sulfurboy/Archive 25

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 20←Archive 23Archive 24Archive 25Archive 26Archive 27Archive 28

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Andreas_Brugger

Hello Sulfurboy,

I've added references to my article in English on Andreas Brugger - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Andreas_Brugger. It contains more or less the same content as the article in German. I would like to see it published in the interest of the academic community and general public, and in the course of time I will add more substance. Also it needs a link to the interlanguage column on the left - which I haven't been able to carry out.

Thanks.

John (Wikipub) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikipub (talk • contribs) 16:29, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

Wikipub, As stated on your talk page, you need to provide WP:RS reliable sources to demonstrate notability WP:GNG Sulfurboy (talk) 22:26, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

Hello Sulfurboy,

I've added references to my article in English on Gallus Moosbrugger - https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gallus_Moosbrugger. Please undelete. It contains more or less the same content as the article in German. I would like to see it published in the interest of the academic community and general public, and in the course of time I will add more substance. Also it needs a link to the interlanguage column on the left - which I haven't been able to carry out.

Thanks.

John (Wikipub) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikipub (talk • contribs) 17:06, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

Wikipub, See above reply. Sulfurboy (talk) 22:26, 24 May 2020 (UTC)


Hello Sulfurboy,

Excuse me, but as I see it there are sufficient background sources to justify both articles. I’ve seen a lot less in other articles or so-called “stubs”. Please publish or guide me to a second opinion administrator.


Article on “Gallus Moosbrugger” (with reference to one of the standard authors of Vorarlberg, Western Austria – Franz Michael Felder).

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Many thanks for the acceptance. Thought it would take at least a week of waiting. Here's a star Krazyfilmer123 (talk) 23:30, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Vorsham

hello, i'm not related to this artist. i don't know why you thought i'm paid. how can i prove it to you? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rakachak (talk • contribs) 23:41, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

Rakachak, If you don't know the artist, then how were you able to take this picture [1] that you claim is your own work? Sulfurboy (talk) 23:43, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

How to submit a draft for review?

Hello User:Sulfurboy, I have followed your instructions and moved my next article which I want to submit for review to a draft file: Draft:New York at Night (Willie Nile Album). Now, how do I request a review of the draft? Thank you for your help BuffaloBob (talk) 01:36, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

Regarding Draft:revel Partners

Hello Sulfurboy, I have a question regarding my recent submission which you declined: Draft:revel Partners

Thank you for your quick review. I am new to Wikipedia and appreciate your guidance.

Your feedback says that the draft gives the impression I have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting this topic. However, I have no connection to the subject and I am in no way compensated for this or any other edits. I would like to continue working on this draft and plan to add more sources for a more objective and encyclopedic tone. Can I go on editing the draft or are there any more steps I need to take to assure you there is no conflict of interest? Thanks! BetaCookie (talk) 13:25, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

BetaCookie, Is there a reason then that your username shares the same name as a company that provides tools for SEO and marketing? Sulfurboy (talk) 13:32, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
Sulfurboy, honestly, no reason at all... believe it or not, I just found out about this company upon your question. I actually created this account in October 2019 and used it to contribute to the German Wikipedia. The company with the same name seems not to even have been around that long. I realize this looks bad. But again, all I can do is assure you I am not affiliated with this company! BetaCookie (talk) 13:50, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

draft:Lukanand Kshetrimayum

I've rejected it this time. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:11, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

Straight Talk Wireless Draft Rejection

Hi Sulfurboy,

Apologies to be having this conversation again, but I submitted an article for review, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Straight_Talk_Wireless, and it was rejected again for reading like an advertisement. If you're willing to discuss, I'd love to know how we can improve the page. I'm sure you noticed that I made significant updates to the page in an effort make it more neutral and less of an incentive to readers, removing details on how to purchase and activate service, removing price details and removing claims that TracFone is the largest prepaid service provider. I also added sources to corroborate the information included. As you know, I've been asked to create this page as part of my job, so I just want to see that page go live however possible. I don't expect this page to sneak by reading like an advertisement, and our client understands that as well. I genuinely thought the page adhered to guidelines much better than previous attempts. So, I'd appreciate any guidance on how to improve the page.

Take care, Frank FrankWS875 (talk) 14:20, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

FrankWS875, You didn't remove details about how to purchase the service. It's literally mentioned in the second sentence of the article. The article has been CSD'd twice now and rejected which means it will not be considered further at this time. As already advised in the stern warning on your talk page, continuing to attempt to use Wikipedia for advertising will likely lead to you being outright banned from the site. Please stop. I would advise reporting back to your employer that you all need to do a better job of understanding our policies first before attempting to participate in black hat SEO/paid editing. Sulfurboy (talk) 19:05, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Sulfurboy, I understand, and I appreciate the time you took to review the page again. Hopefully, I can reestablish good faith. 16:05, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Wikipub (talk) 22:02, 26 May 2020 (UTC) 26 May 2020

Animal Products in Pharmaceuticals, Updated page

Dear Sulfurboy,

In regards to the animal products in pharmaceuticals page, [2] I have made all of the changes you suggested and want to move forward with the article. Specifically, I added insulin and premarin to the active ingredients section, added a definition of pharmaceuticals to the first paragraph, added three citations about the relationship between animal products in pharmaceuticals to various religious, ethical, and cultural, groups, and made other edits inline with your suggestions. Please let me know if there is anything else I can do to get this article approved. This is a notable topic that is part of public and scientific discourse and should be part of Wikipedia as well. I am interested in hearing your thoughts on next steps to move this article forward.

Regards,

Skubydoo (talk) 01:01, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Skubydoo, I've approved the article. There's a small chance of blowback, but I think you've done enough to keep it neutral and scientifically backed. Cheers. Sulfurboy (talk) 02:27, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Don't forget to move articles with unnecessary disambiguators

Hey, I came across Al-Najm al-Thaqib (missile) and saw that you had reviewed it. Since we don't have any other articles by this title, you should have moved it to Al-Najm al-Thaqib as part of your review. I've gone ahead and done it so there's no need for further action on your part. signed, Rosguill talk 18:47, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Rosguill, Thanks for catching it, I missed it. Sulfurboy (talk) 02:28, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

AIC draft

Hi Sulfurboy. I've read your comments on my talk page and I believe I've actioned your request properly. Could you possibly confirm? Swright-aic (talk) 15:43, 15 May March 2020 (AEST)


Dear SulfurBoy,

Thank you so much for promptly reviewing my Afc: Lilian Ajayi-Ore; and most importantly, for your professional feedback why the afc was declined due to 'peacock' terms. I have reworked the article and re-posted it for another review. Keep up the good job! Best Regards, Ozonyiawiki (talk) 10:24, 27 May 2020 (UTC) Ozonyiawiki

Articles for Creation: List of reviewers by subject notice

Hi Sulfurboy, you are receiving this notice because you are listed as an active Articles for Creation reviewer.

Recently a list of reviewers by area of expertise was created. This notice is being sent out to alert you to the existence of that list, and to encourage you to add your name to it. If you or other reviewers come across articles in the queue where an acceptance/decline hinges on specialist knowledge, this list should serve to facilitate contact with a fellow reviewer.

To end on a positive note, the backlog has dropped below 1,500, so thanks for all of the hard work some of you have been putting into the AfC process!

Sent to all Articles for Creation reviewers as a one-time notice. To opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. Regards, Sam-2727 (talk)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Draft Article: Talitha Espiritu

Hi sulfurboy, I just created a draft page for talitha espiritu. Her name appears on many articles discussing Ferdinand Marcos's martial law in the Philippines. I think the gathered sources are reliable. Is there any other way to prove her notability? I am writing a series on Filipino academics for wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nicparra (talk • contribs) 20:56, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Literature

  • Walter Methlagl: Der Traum des Bauern – Franz Michael Felder. Bregenz, 1984.
  • Wilhelm Meusburger: Die "Käsgrafen" - am Beispiel der Gebrüder Moosbrugger (Schnepfau, Thüringen, Mailand), 2001.
  • Dirk Strohmann: Gallus Moosbrugger - ein manchesterliberaler Ausbeuter? Bregenzerwald-Heft Jg. 31, 2012, S. 34 - 38.
  • Dieter Seibert: Bregenzerwald- und Lechquellengebirge [alpin]: ein Führer für Täler, Hütten und Berge. Bergverlag Rother, 2008.


Article on “Andreas Brugger“:

Literature

  • Hubert Hosch: Andreas Brugger 1737 - 1812. Maler von Langenargen. Ein Beitrag zur Kunstgeschichte des Bodenseegebietes und seiner Umgebung zwischen Barock und Romantik.

Jan Thorbecke Verlag, Sigmaringen, 1987.

  • Gottlieb Merkle: Andreas Brugger. Der Meister und sein Werk. Kressbronner Jahrbuch. Kressbronn, 1986, S. 86-94.
  • Paul Beck: Schwäbische Biographien. 27. Andreas Brugger, Maler aus Kreßbronn. In: Diöcesanarchiv von Schwaben. 18. Jg. 1900, S. 166 f.

Literatur

  • Hubert Hosch: Andreas Brugger 1737 - 1812. Maler von Langenargen. Ein Beitrag zur Kunstgeschichte des Bodenseegebietes und seiner Umgebung zwischen Barock und Romantik.

Jan Thorbecke Verlag, Sigmaringen, 1987.

  • Gottlieb Merkle: Andreas Brugger. Der Meister und sein Werk. Kressbronner Jahrbuch. Kressbronn, 1986, S. 86-94.
  • Paul Beck: Schwäbische Biographien. 27. Andreas Brugger, Maler aus Kreßbronn. In: Diöcesanarchiv von Schwaben. 18. Jg. 1900, S. 166 f.

Regarding Yuva Unstoppable

NO

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Hello sulfurboy I am a little new to Wikipedia your two tags for and at this page are now resolved by some users and changed it please help me the remove it from the page.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Michael Sempert

Please just resubmit if you believe the issues in the article have been corrected.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).== Michael Sempert ==

Hi Sulfurboy, Thanks for your edits and feedback to "Michael Sempert."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Michael_Sempert

I had meant to completely remove the discogs, wiki and imdb on the last pass, but somehow my changes didn't stick. My apologies for that. At this point all the citations are either magazines (including music blogs), newspapers or online tracking databases (Tunefind, Whatsong, Songkick) which I believe would fall under "e-commerce." Thanks in advance for your help with the page.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Request on 16:29:57, 28 May 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by Vanitaapplebum


Hi. I am reaching out to ask about the Bashiri Asad draft that was declined. I would like clarification on the resources I provided for this article. Soul Tracks, Afropunk.com, Nuvo, Post and Courier, Indianapolis Recorder and WFYI are all independent media sources with reporters on staff. Please explain further. I would like to figure out how to fix it. Vanitaapplebum (talk) 16:29, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

Vanitaapplebum (talk) 16:29, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

Vanitaapplebum, If you want to use external links to establish notability then they need to be properly incorporated as references. All media sources have "reporters on staff", that doesn't demonstrate notability. Soul Tracks is basically a blog site, it's nice to use a reference, but does very little to establish notability. Sulfurboy (talk) 08:51, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for your patience. I have used the Afropunk, Post and Courier and Indy Recorder as a reference for the appropriate albums. I left the WFYI article as an external reference. I removed some of the SoulTracks articles. Should I remove them all? Should I go ahead and resubmit it for review or is there more I should do? Again, thank you for your guidance. Vanitaapplebum (talk) 23:25, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Rejected Draft:British Nuclear Medicine Society: Reason WP:SIGCOV

Hello, Three pints

1. I think this button on your talk page "Click here to start a new topic" is having some technical issue. I tried to post a message couple of times; however, it only got published once in the middle of the post. I think it got deleted by yourself as it did not follow the rules listed on this page.

2. Thanks for rejecting the Draft:British Nuclear Medicine Society  Courtesy link: Draft:British Nuclear Medicine Society. I have updated the page and would be thankful if you can have a casual look and suggest if it addresses the WP:SIGCOV issue, or if needs more work?

3. This article on EANM has only 10 references and is successfully published on Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Association_of_Nuclear_Medicine. My article on BNMS is very similar, with over 40 references.

Thanks Earthianyogi (talk) 10:48, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Earthianyogi, Looks as if this has been moved to mainspace by a fellow editor. Let me know if you have further questions. Sulfurboy (talk) 08:49, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Ahmed Emara

I hope you are doing well. I need some help for Draft:Ahmed Emara which you had shifted to a draft. Could you help me correct the errors in it.

Kindly waiting for your reply.

Thank YouTerminatorwil (talk) 16:47, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Terminatorwil, Please see WP:BUILDER. Fixing your article is your responsibility. If you have questions about specific policies then I am happy to help with that. Sulfurboy (talk) 08:48, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Review Manoj Tiger

I don't respond to request to review specific articles. If you have a specific policy based question, I am happy to help with that.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Recently I have create a article named Manoj Tiger, I request to you please review this article. Thank You Pk41946 (talk) 09:26, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

NZ music history rejection

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


I can't for the life of me understand your logic in rejecting https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Universal_Music_New_Zealand Notability: it's the largest record company in New Zealand by a large margin and its catalogue includes much of the nation's musical legacy, which is the subject of a substantial reissue program. It really matters and seems to clearly fit the notability provisions of Wikipedia per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(organizations_and_companies). It is also directly responsible for the biggest selling female act in the world in 2015, Lorde.

This history and the importance of this company is supported by a multitude of independent links that include Billboard magazine, NZ company records, and multiple specific mentions in http://www.AudioCulture.co.nz links. AudioCulture is the definitive history of New Zealand music, funded by the NZ Govt, and the work on that site come from the nation's leading music historians, all acting independently. It doesn't get any more authoritative and yet you state "Zero standalone notability established" which is simply untrue. Perhaps it's intentional but this does feel like at best a cursory rejection without any real oversight. Perhaps talk to some of the NZ Music taskforce on Wiki who will explain why you are wrong. In NZ music terms it truly does not get any more "notable". Snig27 (talk) 08:35, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Snig27, The billboard article does not show WP:SIGCOV of the company and only mentions them in passing. NZ holds records on all incorporated companies, that doesn't make them notable. The audioculture articles talk about HMV and EMI. A company absorbing notable companies does not make the absorbing company notable. Notability cannot be inherited. Any time there is a spinoff article of a company's subsidiary, substantial independent WP:SIGCOV must be shown to pass WP:NCORP. And like I said, zero sigcov is shown. I would recommend reaching out at Talk:Universal Music Group to gain consensus for a spinoff article and seek the help of fellow editors to find better sources. Cheers Sulfurboy (talk) 08:47, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi, I've reviewed WP:SIGCOV and WP:NCORP and this seems to clearly fit both notability and sigcover per those links. Talk:Universal Music Group are not the right people to talk with as they cover, as you say, subsidiaries and such. This is about a company in a small country that has inherited the vast bulk of the nation's musical legacy and is actively - as in now - preserving and reissuing this catalogue at some cost to the company and using this to create a sense of legacy for NZ's musicians and future generations. It's hard to overstate how important that this is to New Zealanders culturally.

The source (no it wasn't just EMI and HMV pages) is both published and authoritative - it doesn't get any more authoritative and frankly, dismissing this is incredibly culturally insulting for NZ. They show how this catalogue came together and allowed the local branch of the multi-national to undertake this process. Once again, please talk the NZ music taskforce. The UMG is not the right place at all. Thank you. Snig27 (talk) 09:23, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Snig27, Not once is UMG mentioned in the audio culture sources. I get that you think it's notable. I haven't even said that it isn't notable. All I've said is the sources do not demonstrate notability. Instead of working to find better sources, you've instead twice low key accused me of prejudice. I don't have the time or patience to put up with that kind of drama, nor do other editors on wikipedia. Take it elsewhere. Sulfurboy (talk) 11:13, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Upneet Lalli

Hello SulfurBoy, I have read the reasons for the decline of my article on Upneet Lalli. Link to the article is here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Upneet_Lalli I agree that the article with links to things the subject has written does not demonstrate notability but other than her published columns from link 5 through 24, the remaining links from 1 through 4 and 28 though 29 and link 31 demonstrate notability of the subject and these are reliable secondary sources. I am a bit new to wiki so if you could help me a bit, it would be sincerely appreciated. Thanks VS 14:45, 31 May 2020 (UTC)SoodVaishaliVS 14:45, 31 May 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by SoodVaishali (talk • contribs)

Draft:Back Market2

I have deeply changed Draft:Back Market and put it in Draft:Back Market/2, to avoid a mess between which was the original text and which one is the deeply modified. Can you see it when you can, please?. BoldLuis (talk) 11:35, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

BoldLuis, Please don't create multiple instances of the same article. This can be viewed as disruptive editing. Sulfurboy (talk) 01:58, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
It was not my intention, but to avoid disruptive editing, deleting a lot of text from the original article. If it is OK, I can put the second version instead of the first one. I used the precaution principle. BoldLuis (talk) 02:10, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
BoldLuis, Unfortunately, both instances have been rejected by a fellow editor. As such, they will not be considered further at this time. Please do not continue creating new instances of it. Sulfurboy (talk) 02:17, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
I have deleted all commercial "advertising" in the original draft. So, it is a completely new version. 02:20, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Request on 09:03:22, 31 May 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by Littlepenguin100


Hello, thanks for the review and your comment. He has played at team listed on WP:FPL. Boston River in Uruguay belonged to Uruguayan Segunda División, as well as Khon Kaen F.C. in Thailand belonged to Thai League 1. Thanks.


Littlepenguin100 (talk) 09:03, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Littlepenguin100, Which sources show credibly that he's played for either team. If one of them is in a foreign language let me know so I can translate it. Sulfurboy (talk) 11:15, 31 May 2020 (UTC)


Sulfurboy (talk) 07:31, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Sulfurboy, this source

https://www.transfermarkt.com/club-atletico-boston-river/transfers/verein/18074/saison_id/2008

shows credibly that he played for Boston River. Thanks.

Littlepenguin100 (talk)

Jean Margain

Thanks for your work. Among others you moved the draft Jean Margain by User:Jairon Levid Abimael Caál Orozco to the main space. The article, like so many other drafts by that user, is very problematic, to say the least. In short: The draft should not have been moved to the main space. I have cleaned up the most irrititating mistakes and pseudo-references, yet it is still not a useful contribution to wikipedia and it is said that a person like Margain is in fact dishonoured by such a stub. Have a nice day, --Qumranhöhle (talk) 08:22, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Qumranhöhle, You seem to have a mistaken understanding about AfC. We do not hold back articles for cleanup concerns, particularly when a subject clearly passes an SSG or GNG. Sulfurboy (talk) 08:40, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
Probably different language versions may have a different understanding of quality and what should be part of wikipedia and what not. If you think that drafts with pseudo-references that come close to fake references should be part of wikipedia, then we may have a different understanding of wikipedia as well. Have a nice day, --Qumranhöhle (talk) 09:06, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Articles for Creation barnstar
For dedicated and tireless contribution at WP:AFC  ~ Amkgp ✉ 17:52, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Explosive Removal and Destruction Service (EOD) (Belgium)|

Hi Sulfurboy,

I am still writing the Page, and I am having difficulty with the citations, Also I have another Page waiting in draft that I submitted "JAGER'S TE PAARD (ISTAR) BATTALION also about the Belgium Armed Forces do you have any idea when it will be in Wikipeadia.

Kind Regards,

Please review WP:RS and WP:GNGSulfurboy (talk) 00:42, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

Dear Sulfurboy,

Other submission waht you said was reviewed and declined that is not an Article. So can you review my submission? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sachi1307 (talk • contribs) 06:05, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

Okhee Lee submission - footnotes

Hi Sulfurboy, thank you for your review of the article about Okhee Lee, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Okhee_Lee I reviewed your suggestions, reworked the footnotes and published the changes. Since then citation bot paid a visit. I leave it up to you to decide where it stands at this points. All the best, Mel — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mel Lichtenheld (talk • contribs) 19:18, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Frank Opperman (actor)

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Don't worry, I mentioned this and just thought that you should know. See Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Resolution.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 19:27, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

Ianmacm, I mean, I'm who started the ANI, so not sure if you needed to notify me ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Sulfurboy (talk) 20:11, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
It's a long thread and I should probably have pinged you. Sorry.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 22:08, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

Notice

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:The Cat 2020. Eumat114 formerly TLOM (Message) 03:53, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Bornholm Cable

Hello! You asked me to add a couple of references, see Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2020_April_19#12:16:39,_19_April_2020_review_of_draft_by_Per_W. I have done so, both about the ownership, the outages of the cable and the prevention of damage. Also I noticed that it is specifically mentioned by a Swedish ministry. So now the article has improved. Hopefully that's enough to show its relevance. BTW, now when I have looked at AfC and on the talk pages of some of the reviewers, I like the patience that you have with some editors. Per W (talk) 09:14, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Per W, Approved. Cheers - Sulfurboy (talk) 09:20, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
Thanks! I also found some more information to other articles. So this review has been fruitful. Per W (talk) 10:27, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Question about my article

Hey Sulfurboy, thank you for moving my article to Draft:Flighthouse. It has been a while since I've gone through the Articles for Creation process so I appreciate you guiding me through it. I have a question - does the draft look ok to you? I did my best to draft it up but if you have any notes, that would be much appreciated for me to improve my editing skills. Thank you in advance and hope you are staying safe. Grimothy29 (talk) 00:34, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Grimothy29, I haven't reviewed your article. I just moved it to the correct place. Please note that reviews can take up to five weeks. Sulfurboy (talk) 01:57, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
@Sulfurboy: Got it. Thanks. Grimothy29 (talk) 18:12, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Re: Mike Greenhaus

Thank you for taking the time to review my bio of Journalist Mike Greenhaus, Editor-in-Chief of Relix Magazine (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Mike_Greenhaus) I appreciate your feedback You commented that my submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage. However, I provided three (and have since added a fourth) references on the subject from third party independent outlets on the subject I am writing about that were approved as qualifying by another Wikipedia Editor (1292simon) last week. I appreciate your feedback on my article Caryplace7 (talk) 19:15, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Caryplace7, The comments by Chris in the latest review fully encapsulate my ongoing concerns. Sulfurboy (talk) 00:15, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

Thank you once again for taking a look at my biography of Journalist Mike Greenhaus, Editor-in-Chief of Relix Magazine (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Mike_Greenhaus) This is my first bio, though I have added references and edit over 100 other articles, so I am still learning how to do this properly. Chris' comments suggested that a majority of the references I cited were by the subject I was writing about when in fact NONE of the links are by him, nor from the magazine he edits (expect the masthead as proof of his current position) The four articles I cited as best references had all been cleared as OK by another editor and are focused specifically on the subject of my bio. In addition, the other articles cite him as an expert reference which according to my research is the type of articles that should be included as proof of notability. I understood I have perhaps too many references; I was trying to balance a mix of articles focused solely on Mr. Greenhaus with citations on his work from larger references. Please let me know how I can improve. Thank you so much Caryplace7 (talk) 01:08, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

Hey Sulfurboy I reached out to The Teahouse for some guidance on improving my article and they recommended having a talk with you and the editor who approved the notability of the subject I wrote on, verified my three sources and vetted it to make sure it was not a conflict of interest. Would you be willing to speak with him? I am happy to improve the bio I wrote I just wanted to make sure I am not moving backward in my approval process. Caryplace7 (talk) 18:17, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

A goat for you!

Print the insults (from at least two editors), and feed them to the herbivore, who is also a papyrivore.

Robert McClenon (talk) 18:31, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Robert McClenon, Haha, thank you. This is exactly what I needed. Sulfurboy (talk) 19:01, 3 June 2020 (UTC)


Rocketlaunches_organization

I think at old version of your userpage you had picture with long hair. I opened here section i think about my article of rocketlaunches_foundation as I observed was deleted here as made researches about kulczyk foundation and at native speaker org was marked as contested for speedy deletion.

As long as I observed team from rocketlaunchesfoundation start to make own newspapers, bought new welding equipment and plan to make researches in metal folding into propellant tank.

I think it is great way to gather reliable, secondary sources for this foundation either other organizations which

Even though if i write i think kulczyk_foundation should be deleted i cant convince you because they had reputation, power gained ex-ante from parents.

I think it is not fair also for owners as their "monopol" here at wikipedia and power gained from parents and long time for other organizations and foundation [and very often money gained by work [very often starting from scratch botton dealing with worst aggression, fights physical and other privelages gained in poorest area]] whom spend own money by crowd funding and volunteering to have same privelages like for example kulczyk_foundation. Wanted to write more but due to multitasking will leave only that here

Much love:> keep things together. — Preceding


--It is 3 rd when i got disguised ,misfired from my meaningful post but like you can see i take lessons from it as i do not open new section just write in same bracket.

Instead of writing in same manner and topic i would rather develop other ideas ,quality,service and everything what is good than play jealosu/admiration game and posts

Improving kindness even though had ending of much love:> keep things together but can improve it adding much coffee and flowers :<

Portablepowerstation (talk) 10:29, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

unsigned comment added by Portablepowerstation (talk • contribs) 17:31, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Portablepowerstation, I'm sorry, but I think there might be a language barrier issue going on here. Can you just post what you're trying to say in your native language and I'll try to figure out a way to translate it? Sulfurboy (talk) 09:20, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

Could I ask you to reconsider the severity of a rejection?

I've just edited Draft:Rikkeisoft. The creator, KyleVietnam, left a note further up this page, and as he mention's there had asked for advice on the article at Oshwah's talk page. He's also talked with me on my talk, and asked for advice at the Teahouse. The article was originally draftified because a new page patroller considered it unduly promotional and suspected an undeclared COI, but the references include major newspapers and I see no reason to assume these are mere press releases, or that the editor's denial of a COI motive is untrue. It might be good to ask experienced editors who can read Vietnamese and Japanese to take a look at the sources, but in any case, I'd like to ask you to reconsider using the "unsuitable for Wikipedia" template on the first submission of the article, and thereby giving the editor no good way to resubmit the draft after these and possible future changes. Could you please replace it with a regular rejection with "resubmit" button? Yngvadottir (talk) 04:58, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

Yngvadottir, This has been changed to a decline. This was primarily rejected due to it being at best a press release with only slight puff. Articles that only list awards and routine employee counts and branches provides little if any encyclopedic value. Your perceived notion of my ability to read or not read Vietnamese and Japanese sources has virtually no bearing on this fact. If your plan is to continue to overhaul it, then go for it. Although, in it's current state it would likely be declined again by a fellow reviewer. I'm still going to switch it as an extension of AGF. However, in the future, you might want to note that rejections aren't always considered permanent, but instead an indication that a large overhaul would be needed, which this would still need. You're always welcome to switch it on your own if it's done in good faith. Cheers Sulfurboy (talk) 13:36, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
Thanks, I wouldn't have dared, but consider how it looks to the editor, who's still new (I believe this is their first article). And I've seen AfC reviewers complaining when someone uses {{submit}}, the old way to put something up for re-review. I mention the languages because I don't read them, so can't judge how good the news references actually are. Thanks again. Yngvadottir (talk) 15:57, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

Request on 15:15:11, 2 June 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by Rnagfn


Hey! I hope you are doing well. I have written the article on an Engineering stream that was taught as an M.Tech course in IIT(ISM), Dhanbad in India. I believe the article will add value to Wikipedia. I have used all the credible sources that I thought is useful for the topic. Can you please guide me more? Thanks & Regards!


Rnagfn (talk) 15:15, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

Rnagfn, Educational programs such as this are almost never notable. If you want to include a bit about it on the school's page that would probably be more appropriate. I don't really have any suggestions as I feel there's virtually no chance of establishing notability to warrant a standalone article. Sulfurboy (talk) 17:11, 2 June 2020 (UTC)


Hey, Sulfurboy! Good Morning! I understand. I need you to understand I have written this article based on the electrical engineers who are working in mines. The electrical engineers in mines are known as Mine Electrical Engineers. If you check the Intro, History, and Mine Electrical Engineering Profession sections you will surely understand. Also, they (mine electrical engineers) go through the same subjects (which I have mentioned in the curriculum section) at the time of training. I have done my M.Tech in Mine Electrical Engineering from IIT(ISM), Dhanbad and I am working in mines as a Mine Electrical Engineer. I feel that people should know about this profession that's why I have written this article. If you want me to add some points, I will definitely add those points. I am new to Wikipedia and I need your help. I will wait for your further guidance. Thanks & Regards! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rnagfn (talk • contribs) 03:56, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Rnagfn, Perhaps I can help. An article on the profession as an enginering specialty might be valuable. it could mention--just mention--each of the relevant universities which offer a degree in that specialization. Content on the curriculum at a particular university is not relevant--the place for such content is on the university's web site. Content containing a list of all the other engineering specialties at a particular university is not relevant here. DGG ( talk ) 04:06, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

Hey, Sulfurboy and DGG! Good Evening! Thanks for your clarification. I have removed those sections and submitted it once again for re-review. Thanks & Regards! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rnagfn (talk • contribs) 16:35, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

Draft: Mike Makowsky

Hey Sulfurboy! I hope you're doing well. I appreciated your feedback last month regarding my sources on my draft. I made some substantial changes. If you have time (I don't want to assume that you do), can you let me know if they look alright? Thank you! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Mike_Makowsky (Hope California (talk) 00:58, 5 June 2020 (UTC))

Hope California, Hi, please just resubmit if you feel you have made substantial improvements. I'm going to be quite busy till later this weekend. Sulfurboy (talk) 13:49, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
SulfurboyAlright, sounds good! I appreciate it and take care of yourself. Hope California (talk) 16:50, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

Request on 01:39:10, 7 June 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by Harryboulton


Thanks for your review.

Is this a case where differing countries' Wikipedia disagree on notability? I can't myself pinpoint the discrepancy between Wikipedia:Notability and Wikipedia:Relevanzkriterien, and there is no clear guidance for notability with specific regard for chess players on de.wikipedia (no chess WikiProject equivalent). Eric Rosen's page on de.wikipedia.

It seems bizarre that a player with more relevance and notablility in English speaking countries is not deemed notable enough yet in Germany he is deemed notable. Perhaps a flaw/discrepancy between en.wikipedia and de.wikipedia? I propose to rewrite this German article as an English translation and tag with a translation template. Would this be worthwhile? And or else should the relevance/notability be amended/added in the German Schachspieler category or should this be discussed on de.wikipedia? (I use both).

Harryboulton (talk) 01:39, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

Harryboulton, The English and German wikipedia's have completely different notability guidelines and are two separate projects entirely. In general, the German wiki has much looser guidelines for notability. If you want to see a rough guidance of chess notability guidelines you can review WP:NCHESS Sulfurboy (talk) 02:26, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

Defaultsort

In this edit to Zuby (rapper) you added a DEFAULTSORT of "(rapper), Zuby". Presumably you were using an automated system which couldn't handle a disambiguated minimum: please remember to check your edits. Thanks. I noticed it because it sorted under "(" in the stubs category while I was stub-sorting. Thanks. PamD 05:30, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

"Significant Coverage"

Hello Sir/Ma'am

I am new to Wiki, and I don't understand what is meant by "significant coverage". My article on Brian Wright is supported by NBC Sports, ESPN, and SLAM magazine, all of which are reputable sources in the sports world. Additionally, Mr. Wright is the general manager for one of the most well known NBA basketball teams, so why exactly is he "a person not yet shown to meet notability guidelines".

Thank you for the clarification. Hope you are doing well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spurs Fan For Life (talk • contribs) 05:04, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

Spurs Fan For Life, Announcements of hirings/firings and what not are considered WP:ROUTINE and do not denote notability. Sulfurboy (talk) 05:16, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

Albrechts of Rothenburgob der Tauber

Dear Sulfurboy

Ref: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:The_Albrechts_of_Rothenburg_ob_der_Tauber_(1493-1806)

I've just got around to re-editing a page you rejected a couple of months ago. I've been removing the peacock terms (I've probably still got some to go) and am about to start on the references, which were another area of highlighted concern.

There are a lot of references of various types, so before I embark upon a wholesale cull, I was wondering if you could indicate if it is all references that are a problem or only certain types.

Many thanks in advance for your help.

Thanks

--DrThommo (talk) 03:24, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

Geoff — Preceding unsigned comment added by DrThommo (talk • contribs) 00:19, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

DrThommo, Looks good enough to be published. It's now live. The next thing you need to fix is the formatting of the page, particularly the section headers. Please see WP:MOS and the WP:TEAHOUSE if you need help. I'd do it, but I'm unfortunately about to sign off for the night. Sulfurboy (talk) 05:08, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your help., much appreciated. I'll clean the section headers and general formatting up tomorrow. --DrThommo (talk) 06:32, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

Janićije Đurić

You accepted this article, but all the references are short references without full references. I suggest you install Svick's script per these instructions to see those missing references in the future. Cheers. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 21:48, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

Draft: Suresh Jayaram :

Hi Can you tell me specifically which part did not meet wiki standards, perhaps that will give me a chance to understand and not repeat it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Factedits (talk • contribs) 00:29, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

Herb Weiss Article

Hi Sulfurboy, We're trying to post an entry about a prolific local writer. It's in the same spirit as some of his colleagues, and we put a lot of effort into making the edits suggested by the first reviewer. You labeled it as "Contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia," but we can't figure out why that might be. Can you be a bit more specific? I have no idea what to change right now.

Thanks very much for any information that could help! MotifPublisher (talk) 05:27, 10 June 2020 (UTC) Mike

Hello friend

I love you man <3 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sebastian-solberg (talk • contribs) 15:35, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

Inappropriate Page Warning - Help needed

Dear Sulfurboy, I have received your warning on my talk page about the articles Draft:Univista Insurance and Draft:Ivan Herrera. You mentioned I have published paid without going through the AFC process. I am using WP:PAID and also the {{connected contributor (paid)}} template on Draft:Univista Insurance. I have to add that disclosure to the Draft:Ivan Herrera as well. Can you please advise what I am doing wrong and point me in the right direction? . I feel stuck and can't move forward on my article, I'm just trying to learn on my own, and it's been hard so far. Your input and guide would be appreciated.Vladperez (talk) 21:02, 10 June 2020 (UTC)Vladperez

Adjustment 28 FEB UArchitects

Dear Sulfurboy,

We have submitted the adjustments to your comment, and would like to publish this page with your approval as it took almost half a year. The adjustments and link to draft are placed below.


Link to draft : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:UArchitects

This is the new section :

UArchitects is a Dutch architectural office founded by the architect and owner of the company Misak Terzibasiyan. Established in 2003 in Eindhoven, Netherlands, the staff consists of a group of multinational architects and designers.

In 2015, for the project Spilcentrum 't Hofke in Eindhoven the firm won the prestigious biennial Dirk Roosenburg prize. In 2017, the biennial Victor de Stuers prize was won by UArchitects for the IKC de Geluksvogel in Maastricht.[1]

Most of UArchitects' projects are within the fields of villas, social housing, apartments, schools, sport facilities, multi-functional buildings and city planning. Some of these projects are published in magazines, books and exhibitions.

Kind regards, 

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Meimaar.93 (talk • contribs) 08:35, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

Quick Question

Hello, Is there any such thing as an AFC log? I mean just like a personal CSD, PROD & AFD log can be created. Is there any such thing as an AFC log? I mean can a personal AFC log be activated/created.Celestina007 (talk) 21:57, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

Celestina007, Not that I'm aware of. If anyone would know of such a thing, it would probably be Primefac Sulfurboy (talk) 21:58, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Sulfurboy, Ah! That makes sense. I figured I’d ask someone more experienced than I was in AFC reviewing & for some reason your name came to my head instantaneously. Celestina007 (talk) 22:02, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

About my submissions today

Hello sir, I need to be my Wikipedia page created reference to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Pranjal_Shinde as it is required at India level for my projects. I am a very popular web developer and blogger at my district level thus people mainly search for me outside of the district. sending some attachments developed by me for proofs : https://actypingpdf.blogspot.com/?m=0 https://actypingarticle.blogspot.com/ https://actypingakola.blogspot.com/?m=0 here is my CV for proof being an IIT student : https://15c15c5c-aa75-4829-872b-e483bc512c64.filesusr.com/ugd/cc0742_9865166baef746b6a0a03355e3c76588.pdf Looking forward for your positive response..Thanks in advance

Wikipedia is not here for you to post your resume. Sulfurboy (talk) 07:12, 13 June 2020 (UTC)


With regards to User:KLoGiZ

Hi, with regards to User:KLoGiZ, noted that his articles are concentrated around Jeremy Au who founded Draft:CozyKin, Conjunct Consulting. Per your notice at his talkpage, should further editing with Jeremy Au and Conjunct Consulting be considered as per of your original warning for CozyKin? I like to be upfront and note that I prodded both Jeremy Au and Conjunct Consulting and KLoGiZ has deprodded Conjunct Consulting. Thanks --Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 03:32, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Justanothersgwikieditor, Sheesh, I sent them a final warning for being a UPE. and moved Conjunct Consoluting to draftspace. AfD or drafity at a minimum will be needed in my opinion if the PROD is removed from Jeremy Au. If they don't respond to request for declaring for paid editing, it'll probably need to be taken to the COI noticeboard. Ping me if you continue to see them editing without declaring, I'm sort of taking minibreak right now, so I'm only sporadically on to respond to pings. Sulfurboy (talk) 03:46, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Sure. Will ping you if needed. Thanks! --Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 03:53, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi Justanothersgwikieditor, Sulfurboy, I actually sent two prior emails to Sulfurboy directly over the past few weeks with regards to the concern around undisclosed payments, but it seems that they fell by the wayside somehow? Anyway, I just wanted to declare that I'm not an undisclosed paid editor, I'm a new editor and a friend of Jeremy's trying stuff out. Sorry about the UPE issue being raised, and it's been on my mind for the past few weeks. In hindsight, emails may not have been the best way to reach out to you. Sorry about that, I'm still learning! Sulfurboy, I've just sent you another message to follow up on this. --KLoGiZ (talk) 02:58, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
KLoGiZ, Please post all messages to my talk page. I don't typically answer emails unless it's for private matters. You also need to properly disclose your WP:COI Sulfurboy (talk) 03:09, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
Sulfurboy, alright sure. Honestly, now that I know more about the rules now, I don't mind the articles on Jeremy and CozyKin being taken down. I feel bad around accidentally causing Conjunct to be flagged since it has enough notability over the years to merit its own article though. Would disclosing the COI help? --KLoGiZ (talk) 06:18, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sulfurboy/Archive_25&oldid=964382200"