User talk:TaxedEnoughAlready
Speedy deletion nomination of Scott Bryson, Jr.[edit]
Hello TaxedEnoughAlready,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Scott Bryson, Jr. for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. JackTracker (talk) 16:37, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
The article Scott Bryson, Jr. has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. - GB fan 17:37, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Scott Bryson, Jr.[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Scott Bryson, Jr., is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. - GB fan 19:24, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Scott Bryson, Jr.[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Scott Bryson, Jr., is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. RA0808 talkcontribs 05:54, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
December 2016[edit]
Hello, I'm Ramaksoud2000. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Vajiralongkorn— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 06:53, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jiang Zemin. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
- If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place
{{Help me}}on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. - The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Jiang Zemin was changed by TaxedEnoughAlready (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.862892 on 2016-12-03T07:00:27+00:00 .
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:00, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Muhammad in Islam, you may be blocked from editing. Kleuske (talk) 11:35, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
Recent edit to Kim Davis (county clerk)[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Kim Davis (county clerk), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 11:52, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
ANI discussion[edit]
Please see WP:ANI#Editor appears to be not here - possible hoax article, calling some religions evil Doug Weller talk 12:47, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
Blocked[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ian.thomson (talk) 13:00, 3 December 2016 (UTC)Political Correctness[edit]
What is political correctness in free wiki TaxedEnoughAlready (talk) 14:23, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
Unblock[edit]
TaxedEnoughAlready (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I was testing the water as a freshman to get to know the rule of Wikipedia by so.Thank you.
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. SQLQuery me! 03:35, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Unblock[edit]
TaxedEnoughAlready (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
It’s not necessary to block me now because I have read the rules and I’ll be mainly working at my personal page,grammer checking and adding citations.
Decline reason:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
TaxedEnoughAlready (talk) 04:26, 4 December 2016 (UTC)