User talk:Twilson r

Next article / Women in Red coverage improvement program

Hi T Wilson, I saw you wrote an article lately on a major female figure in Irish arts, Noelle Campbell-Sharp. Good karma! But the fact that someone so prominent in multiple fields only gets an article in their 70s shows the difficulty in achieving coverage. If you’re not a sportsperson! So I just wanted to say “please keep it up” with a special focus, if it’s not too pushy, on female figures. Maybe some of those painters who took residencies at Cill Rialaig? Or a writer not yet covered, as I see you also did an article on the nearby Anam Cara? I don’t know how many repeat visits occur in this places but between those two alone there must be at least a couple of thousand artists and writers to consider. And a small suggestion, as I see you participated at least once. Could you tag any female articles to the Women in Red article creation drive? High five 91.193.178.124 (talk) 07:56, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello, welcome to Wikipedia. Great to see another editor adding to Ireland-related articles here (you might want to check out the Irish Wikipedians' notice board where editors collaborate on Ireland-related articles).

You might find these links helpful in creating new pages or helping with the above tasks: How to edit a page, How to write a great article, Naming conventions, Manual of Style. You should read our policies at some point too.

If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump, or ask me on User_talk:Sarah777. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

You can introduce yourself on the new users page.
If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username.
You can sign your name using three tildes, like this: ~~~. If you use four, you can add a datestamp too.
If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the Articles for deletion page. There is also a Deletion review page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted.

(Sarah777 01:32, 18 April 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Thank you, Sarah777. I am afraid I do not have my own access, and so only get here every 2 or 3 weeks but I do think that this is an interesting and worthwhile idea. It is very good to hear about the Irish Wikipedian area, as I had not come across this. In fact, such features might be better highlighted, although I have to say I tend to take an in-at-the-deep-end rather than read-the-manual-cover-to-cover approach anyway.

I notice that one or two of my edits seem to have generated some discussion, good, though I am wary of one or two conclusions - Dollymount is, e.g. not separate from Clontarf, while I see a sort of consensus on that page has left it as some kind of ambiguous place. Admittedly, though, this is hard in Ireland, where formal boundaries do become blurred, often for property sale reasons, and are confused by pointing to information from bodies, whether private map makers, the Ordnance Survey or An Post, who don't make such decisions. And there are occasional new areas formed, such as Donaghmede, and perhaps Bayside, though the latter does not appear on most OS maps of the last thirty years, just a great big Kilbarrack, all the way to Sutton.

Anyway, such is the nature of team work, and I shall now do some Dublin North browsing and editing for today.

Small note, this: If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in Wikipedia:Changing attribution for an edit is no longer available, and I can well understand why. I only made two or three edits before signing-up anyway.

Not sure if I should sign these posts on my own page but am beginning to think so. Sorry if I missed doing this correctly with the other few replies. Twilson r 11:55, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Old Map

This map is used to give the location of all the following areas:

   * Raheny
   * Artane, Dublin
   * Clontarf, Dublin
   * Bayside, Dublin
   * Kilbarrack
   * Killester
   * Dollymount

Obviously the map describes the situation nearly 110 years ago. Dollymount is now a built-up suburb; as is Killester, which is missing from the map. Artane is spelt differently and most of the map is rural.

It is fine to use an old and outdated map for some historical reference but the current OS maps are the ones to tell what the places are called today?

Also I'm not sure if using the same map repeatedly in so many articles is good practice. Generally speaking, if you are going to make a change that will impact on multiple articles it is best to discuss it first. Each area in an article should be the centre of a map showing where it is. Regards (Sarah777 01:32, 18 April 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Please see above re. Dollymount, a group of streets in Clontarf. The map in question is what I had to work with but I have asked someone to help with scans for each relevant area, which is indeed a good idea. In terms of accuracy, it does show Killester, and has a clarity about the districts. And OS maps do not set out to show definitive areas, whereas maps up to the early 20th century tended to show the formal Civil Parishes and their sub-units.

In terms of making edits to multiple articles, is there an appropriate place to raise such a question? I am looking at the Irish Wikipedian section you helpfully pointed out in another window, and I am not sure I quite see one.

Thanks again and looking forward to learning more.

One small further point would be that OS maps since Independence are, I believe, still in copyright, and so unavailable, as are most modern maps. Luckily, the pre-independence OS maps are out of copyright, as Crown Copyright has expired on them. Now if I just had some to scan.

Taney Parish

Hi Mr Wilson; sorry to hear you not so mobile - but as I said, great work. I live just up the road from Taney and could easily take some photos; any pointers as to what would be best to photograph for the article; the Parish Church I presume, and after that? (Don't say the "Luas Bridge"!!). Regards, keep well, Sarah, Sandyford (Sarah777 02:10, 13 July 2007 (UTC))[reply]

ps, We have an "Irish solution to an Irish problem" with Dollymount and similar areas; it is categorised now as part of Clontarf and also as a suburb in it's own right. Seems to work so far - there are lots of Dollymount situations across the City. (Sarah777 02:16, 13 July 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Thank you, Sarah, and also the fellow contributor who posted the new Church. As the Old Church has its own article, I think the other "targets" from which we might select would be: the parish school (one of the largest Church of Ireland schools) at Sydenham Villas, the site of the old parish facilities at Eglinton Terrace and Old Rectory Park housing development, with the Parish Tennis Club grounds and the proposed site of the nursing home.

I am glad to hear something was done with Dollymount, and I see someone has also acted on the "tween" area of Harmonstown.

Regards, Twilson r 07:13, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Hello, can you please add your sources to Maam Valley? Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 13:55, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reminder, and I will do that. I meant to get back to the article within a day or two, having launched it less polished than I would have liked. Twilson r (talk) 08:49, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fingal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lusk (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Request for help

Mr / Ms Wilson, I see you got a couple of articles going for Ireland this year. I wonder:- would you consider doing something for Irish cycling, where the whole organiser side of the sport, except one famous person, is missing? The history is complex and messy but a set of 10-20 articles, new, or much expanded, would be possible. If yes, I'd be pleased to provide some materials. Photographs could be harder, but as I understand these are not mandatory, at least for Starter articles. The topic has been coming up for some time now on "talk" pages, and I am sure others would lend a hand once a start was made. Thanks. 83.220.236.10 (talk) 06:28, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the compliment. I'm only here occasionally these days, but I think I see what you mean, and I will add it to my to-do list. I have an article on Japanese metalwork to finish, but sure, I cycled back in the Sixties and Seventies and could research at the library, if the old health holds up. I think the article volume on famous riders of the past is "light" overall, and maybe more could be done on women in cycling too. There was at least one who both cycled and took club, provincial and national roles, Liz Corcoran.Twilson r (talk) 09:45, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for recent articles, one small fix

Hello TWilson (hope I'm doing that right, not sure if alternatively there's a surname Twilson I have not met), and great to see you back lately, and with new articles filling in gaps in the encyclopedia. On the latest, it really struck me, especially as I was checking something on Ninette de Valois recently, that I could not name a single male ballet person in Ireland (and only a few females, but at least I know they are there), so well done! One small fix, if you would - the draft of one article is creating a presence in a category, which drafts should not, of course. If you could remove that it would be excellent. Keep up the good work and if you ever have spare time, and fitness, WP Ireland has plenty to do. Best,SeoR (talk) 08:52, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you SeoR and I will fix that error right away. I am happy to be back, occasionally, and am already working on a next article. I thank you for the prompt rating of, and improvements to, the article. Twilson r (talk) 10:02, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Twilson r. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Tarja Owens

Thanks for creating Tarja Owens. A New Page Patroller Rosguill just tagged the page as having some issues to fix, and wrote this note for you:

As this article is a biography of a living person, all content should be cited to reliable sources. Uncited content may be removed without warning.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here and ping me. Or, for broader editing help, you can talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 06:41, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I thank Rosguill for the suggestion. I looked at the article afresh, and indeed I erred in not doing more and better work on references. I will address this.Twilson r (talk) 12:16, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Andrew Wilson (ballet dancer)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Andrew Wilson (ballet dancer). I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Keep up the good work!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 05:50, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Rosguill:Thanks, and I thank you also for catching my reference-in-need-of-work work on a previous article.Twilson r (talk) 15:58, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tony Lally, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cabra (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Thanks for creating Cill Rialaig. User:Lefcentreright while examining this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Article is in good shape. Keep contributing!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Lefcentreright}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer. Lefcentreright (talk) 16:27, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Lefcentreright:Many thanks, Lefcentreright. I have noticed that the review process can take anything from hours to months, so I really appreciate the prompt review, which reassures me that I am on the right track. I have one more article recently released, and hope to release two more in the week ahead. Twilson r (talk) 08:51, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Noelle Campbell-Sharp

On 10 September 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Noelle Campbell-Sharp, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Noelle Campbell-Sharp has led the Cill Rialaig project, hosting over 5,000 artists on residencies in County Kerry, Ireland, since 1991? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Noelle Campbell-Sharp. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Noelle Campbell-Sharp), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I appreciate all those involved in the process, my first experience was made comfortable. Twilson r (talk) 06:27, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A survey to improve the community consultation outreach process

Hello!

The Wikimedia Foundation is seeking to improve the community consultation outreach process for Foundation policies, and we are interested in why you didn't participate in a recent consultation that followed a community discussion you’ve been part of.

Please fill out this short survey to help us improve our community consultation process for the future. It should only take about three minutes.

The privacy policy for this survey is here. This survey is a one-off request from us related to this unique topic.

Thank you for your participation, Kbrown (WMF) 10:45, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:People associated with Raheny has been nominated for renaming

Category:People associated with Raheny, which you created, has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 21:49, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]