User talk:UltimatePyro

This user may have left Wikipedia. UltimatePyro has not edited Wikipedia since January 5, 2017. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Welcome from Redwolf24

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We as a community are glad to have you and thank you for creating a user account! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
Picture tutorial
How to write a great article
Naming conventions
Manual of Style
Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Wikipedia:Topical index.
User:Redwolf24/Bootcamp My own personal summarized Bootcamp.

Yes some of the links appear a bit boring at first, but they are VERY helpful if you ever take the time to read them.

Remember to place any articles you create into a category so we don't get orphans.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome.

Redwolf24 (Talk) 03:12, 8 September 2005 (UTC) The current date and time is 22 November 2024 T 17:11 UTC.[reply]

P.S. I like messages :-P

Killer Frost

I'll be darned. I check my 'to do' list only to find out this is no longer a redlink! A great article, keep up the good work! :) --InShaneee 09:12, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Deathbolt

Thanks for bolding Deathbolt's given name. I forgot that was part of the WikiComics template.--De 15:51, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey man, justdroppin by

Request for edit summary

Hi. I am a bot, and I am writing to you with a request. I would like to ask you, if possible, to use edit summaries a bit more often when you contribute. The reason an edit summary is important is because it allows your fellow contributors to understand what you changed; you can think of it as the "Subject:" line in an email. For your information, your current edit summary usage is 1% for major edits and 1% for minor edits. (Based on the last 150 major and 150 minor edits outside the Wikipedia, User, Image, and all Talk namespaces.)

This is just a suggestion, and I hope that I did not appear inpolite. You do not need to reply to this message, but if you would like to give me feedback, you can do so at the feedback page. Thank you, and happy edits, Mathbot 03:30, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summary

Hello. Please remember to always provide an edit summary. Thanks and happy editing. Steve block talk 09:25, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

TMNT (2003) Edits

Hey, thanks for expanding the trivia section of the TMNT (2003) episode pages, but I'm looking for some uniformity. Should we label episodes with:

This episode marks the first appearance of...

or

This is the first appearance of...

I really don't know which one I should go with, but thanks for the help. If you'd like to do any plot synopses, I definitely won't mind. :)

Inner City Blues 16:52, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Brick (Comics)

Thanks for the feedback. I couldn't find the relevant issues so had to expand it from memory. Also Thanks for fixing Dr Alchemy (my PC died mid-edit). Palendrom 20:53, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Categories XX of Oz

Please do not re-add those categories to articles. They were deleted after a discussion on the may 9th WP:CFD. Thanks! Syrthiss 21:35, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Harry Hamlin. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Geneb1955^Talk/_CVU 06:22, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

What's your position about the Animated Series Batman? You are totally invited to keep editing, btw.--T-man, the wise 11:02, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Hi, I just noticed your RC on the Tron article and wanted to thank you for improving WP. I saw that you highlighted a link, and I did the same for ENCOM. It looks like ENCOM could easily be merged into the main Tron article since it's just 2 short paragraphs. If I understand things correctly, this would preserve all the info, while helping to streamline WP. What do you think? I've tagged your page on my watchlist, so just reply here. Happy Editing :) Doc Tropics 07:34, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OOPS! I meant the Sark article, NOT the page at Tron. (sheepish grin) Sorry 'bout the confusion. Doc Tropics 07:42, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dang! that still didn't come out right. I was trying to refer to the Sark (Tron) article that you recently edited.

Do you know JD too?

baby Helena

I took her off the Huntress page since she's neither Helena Wayne (that we know of) nor is she Huntress. A one line/link mention of her may be appropriate under Helena Wayne, but frankly it's all spec at this point and doesn't add anything to Huntress artucle. yet. This may be proven differently, but we don't know. -- Ipstenu (talk|contribs) 01:28, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Help Appreciated

Hey, thanks very much for your help with the Solo article, I really apperciate it. RatherBeBiking 02:52, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image for Solo article.

I have a great image for the Solo article, if you know how to put it up? RatherBeBiking 01:13, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ryoko Nagata edit

I'm not sure that "Filmography" is the best title for a section that includes video game credits? Shiroi Hane 23:09, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Man-Thing

Please do not make changes based on assumptions. Look at the cover. What is the series called? --Scottandrewhutchins 10:46, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gift

I filled the info for Read My Lips (Batman: The Animated Series)... Can you format it for me?

Also have you seen the DCAU infoboxes I've been putting in all DCAU appearing characters? What are your thoughts on that? Would you like to modify the design in some way?

I've been following your work, it's really impressive. I totally salute you!!--The Judge 11:09, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of characters appearing in Batman: The Animated Series

Hi, I was working on List of characters appearing in Batman: The Animated Series, but the reversals user covenantd made don't aloud me to continue anymore. He was right about something thoug, the article is too long. Maybe Batman, the Joker and Harley could have "sub"articles, and the artice could be splitted in supporting ast and villains. But over all the info need serious shapping, and formating, specially because the article was copypasted from several others. Thanks beforehand. By the way, I loved the way you worked your magic on "Read my lips"!! thanks a bunch.--The Judge 01:03, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Check the page, Shredderman has been modifying it. He appears to be a rookie. Your talents would be appreciated there.

ALSO: would you mind if I copy the paragraphs at the top of your user page? I also grew up with B:TAS... Actually with the re-runs on the Warner Channel, I born when the series was starting to air on Fox, but it's kinda the same, actually I learned English using the SAP option once I hnew the episodes almos from memory. But I've been a Bruce Timm fan ever since. --The Judge 19:34, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

- I gues The Penguin is one of your favorite villains, mine too. hahahah--The Judge 22:01, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Finished season 0ne. Only 27 to go! Go, Team Venture!!--The Judge 22:23, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The link above doesn't seem to work. :( --164.107.92.120 13:24, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I added the above link to the Batman the Animated series article in case if you meant to get it started, but hadn't yet, as the link should belong there. In any case, great idea, I look forward to seeing the finished result! --164.107.92.120 17:21, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copy and paste move.

Gidday. Your recent edits to the articles Sun Girl (DC comics) and Sun Girl (DC Comics have been undone because they violated the GNU Free Documentation License. Please see Help:Moving a page or contact a Wikipedian Administrator for help before making future attempts at "moving" articles in this fashion. Further failure to follow the proper article moving policies may result in you being blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please respect the contributions of others, rather than ignoring the had work of others. ACS (Wikipedian); Talk to the Ace. See what I've edited. 02:52, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

re: Category:Date of birth missing

Good evening. Per the discussion about privacy concerns expressed at Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons#Privacy of birthdays, date of birth should generally not be added to the biographies of living non-public or semi-public figures. So far, that policy has been interpreted fairly strictly with a pretty high bar being set for the definition of "public figures" who are assumed to have given up their rights to privacy.

By the same token, we should not be adding Category:Date of birth missing to articles unless we have made the case that the person meets the "public figures" threshold. Otherwise, we're just baiting new users into adding content even though the community has already said that we shouldn't include that particular data point. Category:Year of birth missing is okay but the exact date is often not. Thanks for your help. Rossami (talk) 05:35, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

I see that you have received several messages in the past asking you to provide summaries for your edits. This is very important as it allows other users to see at a glance what has been changed. As well, it helps to mark edits as minor when you preform basic copy edits and wikifying. Please try to do this in future, and thank you for your contributions to date. --INTRIGUEBLUE (talk|contribs) 07:09, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Random Smiley Award

For your contributions to Wikipedia and humanity in general, you are hereby granted the coveted Random Smiley Award
originated by Pedia-I
(Explanation and Disclaimer)

--TomasBat (Talk) 23:14, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding edits made to Ryan Cooley

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, UltimatePyro! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule groups\.myspace\.com, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was intended to promote a site you own, are affiliated with, or will make money from inclusion in Wikipedia, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 07:15, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You

UP thank you for your revisions on Ken Foree's wiki, I appreciate the time you spent touching things up !! DC 04:05, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And to the Silver Surfer article. Cool user name. You like the Ultimate or the mainstream version better? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Zuracech lordum (talk • contribs) 06:24, 25 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

No content in Category:Batman: The Animated Series episodes

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Batman: The Animated Series episodes, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Batman: The Animated Series episodes has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Batman: The Animated Series episodes, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 00:00, 23 August 2007 (UTC) [reply]

I e-mailed you some days ago. Did you get it? --20-dude (talk) 21:35, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bucky

Hi, Ult. An edit war is brewing at Bucky, a page on which you've edited, so I'm posting a neutral notice that you may want to comment at Talk:Bucky. See you 'round the Comics Project. --Tenebrae (talk) 00:54, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comics Articles for Deletion

One or more articles you’ve been involved in editing (Melter, Ringer (comics), Ego the Living Planet, or others) has been nominated for deletion. If you feel you can make contributions to the article to improve it and make it worth keeping, please do so. BOZ (talk) 14:56, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An article you've been involved in editing, Crimson Daffodil has been nominated for deletion. If you feel you can make contributions to the article to improve it and make it worth keeping, please do so. BOZ (talk) 14:30, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Blacksmith (comics)

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Blacksmith (comics), to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 20:05, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Graduation (Malcolm in the Middle episode)

Hi - I see you were one of the contributors to the article on the final Malcolm episode, nice work. User TTN, a perennial WP vandal, has been systematically removing individual articles on Malcolm in the Middle, and redirecting to the list of episodes. He recently did so with "Graduation" but I have restored it. Thought you might want to know... Geĸrίtzl (talk) 23:05, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Spider-Man

Hello. :) Since you have been involved in editing the article Spider-Man, I wanted to let you know that we have nominated the article for "Good Article" status. You can view the review page, and if there is anything you can do to make the article better, please do so. :) There are a number of concerns to be addressed and some work to be done, so pitch in if you are able, make any suggestions that you think might be helpful, or at least just be there for moral support. :) BOZ (talk) 01:32, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Hector Barbossa

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Hector Barbossa. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hector Barbossa. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:08, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Jeff Bennett

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Jeff Bennett. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff Bennett. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:06, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 01:28, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Request for your perspective on SOPA

Hi UltimatePyro, there's currently an ongoing discussion about splitting the Stop Online Piracy Act page at Talk:Stop_Online_Piracy_Act#ONGOING_DISCUSSION_-_Splitting_the_Article. You've familiarized yourself with the entry before, and your insight and perspective on the matter would be appreciated. Hope to see you there, Sloggerbum (talk) 23:39, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nicola Peltz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Katara (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:37, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:10, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, UltimatePyro. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, UltimatePyro. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Kid in Town (Nicktoons episode) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect New Kid in Town (Nicktoons episode). Since you had some involvement with the New Kid in Town (Nicktoons episode) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Paper Luigi ^{T • C} 11:56, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Virtuoso (comics)

The article Virtuoso (comics) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable fictional character

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 21:39, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Virtuoso (comics) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Virtuoso (comics) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Virtuoso (comics) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 18:21, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nnamdi (comics)

The article Nnamdi (comics) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 12:13, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Stark Enterprises

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Stark Enterprises requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Skeletor3000 (talk) 21:04, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lock-Up (comics)

The article Lock-Up (comics) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant English-language coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:13, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lock-Up (comics) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lock-Up (comics) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lock-Up (comics) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:08, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Double Down (character)

The article Double Down (character) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability_(fiction) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. Given the near total lack of references (outside a primary source), there is no content to merge; a redirect to List of Flash enemies might be considered as a form of WP:SOFTFDELETE. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:11, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Doctor Alchemy

The article Doctor Alchemy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:PLOT and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Avilich (talk) 20:17, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Iron Heights Penitentiary

The article Iron Heights Penitentiary has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Avilich (talk) 15:24, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Joker's Favor for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joker's Favor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joker's Favor until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Indagate (talk) 07:26, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [reply]

Nomination of Iron Heights Penitentiary for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Iron Heights Penitentiary is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iron Heights Penitentiary until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:16, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]