User talk:Ys91620

Deletion discussion about Sagar Savaliya

Hello, Ys91620

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username JamesG5 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Sagar Savaliya, should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sagar Savaliya.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|JamesG5}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

JamesG5 (talk) 09:08, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Savaliya.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Savaliya.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 19:46, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have taken that Image from a newspaper. I have mentioned it in its summary Source:- Dainik Bhaskar Author:-https://www.bhaskar.com/amp/news/GUJ-SUR-OMC-vikas-pagal-ho-gya-hai-slogan-by-sagar-savaliya-befaam-5750858-PHO.html. I have taken it from Independent and credible source which are in public domain. How can be it will be copyrighted? @Whpq: Ys91620 (talk) 01:53, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Savaliya.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Savaliya.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 20:39, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Review deletion of Savaliya.jpg

I have uploaded an image Savaliya.jpg. But it was deleted because of copyright infringement despite that I have mentioned I have taken from a newspaper in its summary such as Source :- Dainik Bhaskar Author :- I have taken it from an independent and credible source which is in public domain. How can be it will be copyrighted? Please help me {{helpme}} Ys91620 (talk) 04:16, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Review deletion of Savaliya.jpg

I have uploaded an image Savaliya.jpg But Ys91620 (talk) 04:18, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

{unblock|reason=you have to trust me. Some of the whitespaces were added by mistake. I was a new editor at that time. Now I know the consequences of those mistakes. Trust me those mistake will never happen in future. I will remain very cautious. You should give me a chance to improve me @Houn:} Ys91620 (talk) 06:42, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Review deletion of Savaliya. jpg

I have uploaded an image Savaliya.jpg. But it was deleted because of copyright infringement despite that I have mentioned. I have taken it from a newspaper in its summary such as Source :- Dainik Bhaskar Author :- https://www.bhaskar.com/amp/news/GUJ-SUR-OMC-vikas-pagal-ho-gya-hai-slogan-by-sagar-savaliya-befaam-5750858-PHO.html

I have taken it from an independent and credible source which is in public domain. How can be it will be copyrighted? Please help me

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Ys91620 (talk) 04:25, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Published photos are still copyrighted and cannot be uploaded to Wikipedia or Wikimedia Commons without a release by the copyright holder. In nearly all cases, taking a photo from a newspaper website is a violation of copyright. You may need to improve your understanding of what the term public domain means in relation to coyright issues. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:37, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ys91620 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, Yamla give me another chance if I will do something again then you will ban me forever @Yamla: Ys91620 (talk) 02:33, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, but this is unpersuasive. Even if we assume that those were all accidents and not ill will, that's quite an error rate, and if we unblocked you just to "ban you forever if you do something again", we would be looking at that next block quite soon. If this is a language issue, you may want to edit the Wikipedia in a language you are more familiar with; see Meta:List of Wikipedias. Huon (talk) 20:55, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Whitespace

Please be more careful with your edits. You are performing edits that solely introduce unnecessary whitespace. This is abusive, so please stop. --Yamla (talk) 16:39, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nitish Kumar. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --Yamla (talk) 11:27, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Hi, Yamla give me another chance. If I will do something again then ban you will block me forever @Yamla: Ys91620 (talk) 10:48, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you wish to be unblocked, make a request. You know how to do this. --Yamla (talk) 13:13, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock me

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ys91620 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have not done any vandalism edition. I have highlighted the name of Tejaswi yadav who has already Wikipedia page in Nitish Kumar page. This is not any deliberate attempt to damage Wikipedia. And I want to highlight Indian Political Action Committee Similar fashion but Indian Political Action Committee does not have any Wikipedia page in doing this whitespace was added by mistake. So I would request you to unblock me. This will never happen in future again. I want to contribute usefully to Wikipedia and make more better platform.Ys91620 (talk) 13:03, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm not sufficiently assured that the problematic behavior will not recur. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 22:55, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This was clear vandalism. This was overlinking and not productive. This was vandalism (or at least, did not match the citation provided, which amounts to the same thing]. This was vandalism. You were warned about your vandalism and decided to continue harming Wikipedia pages. Want to rewrite your unblock request? --Yamla (talk) 13:46, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Those were my mistake. I promise to you this will never happen again future. Unblock me I want to contribute usefully to Wikipedia}} Ys91620 (talk) 14:26, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Then I will never able to edit on Wikipedia. I should stop trying for unblocking @331dot: @Yamla: Ys91620 (talk) 08:55, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That is, of course, your choice. Or you can try to be more convincing towards another administrator. 331dot (talk) 09:22, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock me

{{HI, Yamla give me another chance if I will do something again then you will ban me forever @Yamla:}} Ys91620 (talk) 02:37, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Review deletion of Sagar Savaliya

Hi, Sagar Savaliya should not be deleted. It follows every policy and guidelines of Wikipedia. After Sagar Savaliya nomination for deletion. I have improved this page significantly please check it. So I would request you to review your decision of deletion of Sagar Savaliya @Sandstein: Ys91620 (talk) 10:49, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Any administrator should review. I believe that I should get a chance to correct myself @Yamla: Ys91620 (talk) 05:50, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock me

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Ys91620 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Those were mistake trust me. Why I will vandalism Wikipedia. I am using Wikipedia for more than 10 years. I have recently created an account to contribute usefully to Wikipedia. I have never added any wrong information to Wikipedia. Some whitespaces were added by mistake that was never any intention to vandalism the Wikipedia. You have to trust me this will never happen in future. I will remain very cautious while editing

Accept reason:

I am surprising myself by accepting this - I was not expecting to - but on review, your edits really do look more like incompetence than vandalism. A degree of competence is required to edit here, but I'm prepared to offer you a second chance to edit more carefully. Needless to say, any edits you make are likely to come under close scrutiny, and any further excessive wikilinking or unnecessary spaces are going to see the block reinstated very promptly. Yunshui ^雲 _水 09:19, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Huon: Ys91620 (talk) 13:30, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You already have an open unblock request. Which one of the two do you wish people to review? --Yamla (talk) 13:59, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rather than picking which one of the two you wanted people to review, you opened a third unblock request. As you are unable to figure out how to properly write unblock requests despite five separate attempts, I have revoked talk page access. If your current unblock requests are declined, that leaves you with WP:UTRS. --Yamla (talk) 11:04, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock me

{unblock|reason= Any administrator should review. I believe that I should get an opportunity to correct my mistakes} @Yamla: Ys91620 (talk) 07:04, 28 February 2020 (UTC) Template disabled as this is not an unblock request. Yunshui ^雲 _水 09:19, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You recent edits

It looks remarkably as though you are again trying to circumvent policy by pestering the admin who closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sagar Savaliya. The deletion discussion gave a clear consensus to delete and was closed correctly; User:Sandstein could not have closed it any other way. If you wish to challenge his closure of the discussion you can do so at deletion review (I wouldn't bother; the decision will be endorsed and upheld without a doubt) but my advice would be to forget about writing this article, as the community has clearly judged it unsuitable. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia in this manner, you can expect to be blocked again in short order. Yunshui ^雲 _水 13:26, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Cabayi (talk) 14:09, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock me

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ys91620 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, Cabayi I don't have any other account than this. More than 100 million people lives in Bihar. Might have thousands of people who edit bihar centric topic. you can not say every accounts are mine

Decline reason:

In 12 years I've only ever seen you and Abishek make your distinctive editing error. You've been misusing multiple accounts. Cabayi (talk) 16:40, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock me

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ys91620 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have not multiple accounts. Those editing error happened by mistake. I was a new editor at that time. I was blocked for that. After multiple request I was unblocked. After that never any such editing error happen. I request you to review your decision of blocking me

Decline reason:

I remain unconvinced. Cabayi (talk) 20:34, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Cabayi: Ys91620 (talk) 06:00, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock me

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ys91620 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What should I do to convinced you. ? This is my first account on Wikipedia. I have created this account recently and those errors are happened by mistake. I tried to add Citation in some topics which did have any Wikipedia page in doing this some whitespaces were added by mistake. I was blocked for that. I explained this many times then I was unblocked. I request you to unblock me. I don't have any other Wikipedia account then this

Decline reason:

It's far more distinctive than whitespace and in no way accidental. Cabayi (talk) 13:41, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Cabayi: Ys91620 (talk) 12:57, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]