User talk:YudsWiki2003

Has this user made a silly mistake? Click on the trout to notify him!

February 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Linux kernel has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Linux kernel was changed by YudsWiki2003 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.879293 on 2017-02-17T01:23:44+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:23, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

YudsWiki2003, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi YudsWiki2003! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Hi
On the Linux page you changed the release description from sixteenth LTS to seventeeth LTS.
Any reason for this? sources?
GruensFroeschli (talk) 07:04, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the clear up. I somehow missed that 3.16 became LTS in between.
GruensFroeschli (talk) 13:26, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Hello, I'm SummerPhDv2.0. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Thomas & Friends (series 2), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please see WP:KIDSTVDATES. SummerPhD^v2.0 02:33, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Thomas & Friends (series 3). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. SummerPhD^v2.0 02:37, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Thomas & Friends (series 2), you may be blocked from editing. This is a British show. SummerPhD^v2.0 13:54, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Thomas & Friends (series 7). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If you continue to make unsourced, unexplained changes to dates in articles, you will be blocked from editing. Please see WP:KIDSTVDATES. SummerPhD^v2.0 21:30, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! SummerPhD^v2.0 21:33, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Thomas & Friends (series 2) while logged out. Making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. SummerPhD^v2.0 23:20, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

He's quarreled with me too. I've had to notice that he tries to force his opinion as well as his interpretations of the Wiki rules on everyone and is not ready to discuss. --Maxl (talk) 22:05, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Power management keys. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:09, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April Fools' was over! It was an April Fools' Day AfD! (Or was it?) - YudsWiki2003

April 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Thomas & Friends (series 1). If you make unsourced/unexplained date changes again, you will be blocked from editing. SummerPhD^v2.0 15:43, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are about to be blocked for unsourced changes/disruptive editing. Once your block has expired, please discuss the issue before continuing. - SummerPhD^v2.0 00:14, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. KMF (talk) 00:25, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NeilN ^{talk to me} 00:28, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

YudsWiki2003 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was just fixing some Thomas articles YudsWiki2003 (talk) 00:50, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:35, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Admins can still see the deleted pages you created. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 00:53, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Thomas & Friends (series 3). Again, please do not change dates in articles without explaining where the correct dates came from or citing a reliable source. Please see WP:KIDSTVDATES. SummerPhD^v2.0 19:36, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It clearly says on the article "...which was first broadcast for the U.S. in 1991 as part of Shining Time Station, and followed a year later for the U.K. YudsWiki2003 (talk) 20:04, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

1) Your edit did not include anything to explain why you were changing the dates. In the future, please explain your edit with an edit summary or by citing a reliable source.

2) Before your edit, the article gave one date while the text implied a different date. You changed the date given to match what the text implied. How did you determine which was right and which was wrong? (It would seem to be equally likely that the date was right and the text was wrong) - SummerPhD^v2.0 20:36, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The text was right and the date was wrong. YudsWiki2003 (talk) 20:54, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a source for that? How would anyone looking at your edit have any idea what you were doing? - SummerPhD^v2.0 23:33, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Thomas & Friends does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! SummerPhD^v2.0 20:38, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. (See also 190.199.38.35.) SummerPhD^v2.0 01:22, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't log out. Someone must have logged me out. YudsWiki2003 (talk) 22:36, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have edited while logged out repeatedly. You will need to check that you are logged in BEFORE editing.

Given your extensive history of trying to change the country of origin for Thomas -- against all sources, advice and discussions -- this edit was a really bad idea. Do not change the country of origin for any Thomas related article without discussion beforehand. If you do, you will end up discussing your editing at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. While I am not an admin, I feel quite confident that you will be blocked from editing. If you do not understand why we say it is a British show, we can discuss the issue. If you just want to say it is an American show or otherwise change the information, there is nothing to discuss. - SummerPhD^v2.0 04:11, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked indefinitely

I've blocked your account indefinitely for making unsourced changes. PhilKnight (talk) 00:46, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

YudsWiki2003 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm very sorry! I'll revert the changes on the Thomas and Friends articles when I get unblocked! (If I get unblocked.) :,( YudsWiki2003 (talk) 00:54, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, but you've had months of being told to stop making changes without providing reliable sources to back them up (including in at least one case, repeatedly making the same unsourced and incorrect change after being told to stop) - just look at all the warnings on this talk page - and you have paid no attention whatsoever . I suggest the WP:Standard Offer is the best you can hope for now - and I think it will do you good to spend six months doing other things than editing Wikipedia. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:15, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

YudsWiki2003, please disclose any other accounts you have used on Wikipedia. —DoRD (talk) 11:43, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
DoRD, what does "disclose" mean? YudsWiki2003 (talk) 11:53, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Please tell us about any other accounts you might have used. —DoRD (talk) 12:03, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  - I have an old Wikipedia account named YudsWikipedia2003 but I forgot the password of that account and speedily deleted the sandbox and user page of said account. So I don't use that account anymore. YudsWiki2003 (talk) 12:07, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  - I am blocked indefinitely? What a bad way to treat a newcomer! YudsWiki2003 (talk) 21:54, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    - Unfortunately, we have little alternative when an editor simply refuses to listen to or act on months of warnings, newcomer or not. However, indefinite does not mean infinite, it just means the length of time is currently unknown. I'm suggesting that the WP:Standard offer is your most likely chance of success, but if you don't like that you can make a new unblock request any time you want and see if another admin will be more accommodating. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 22:07, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request 3

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

YudsWiki2003 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want to edit my user page and sandbox. YudsWiki2003 (talk) 23:52, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You can't while you're blocked. PhilKnight (talk) 00:46, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Why can't I edit anything except my talk page? YudsWiki2003 (talk) 21:46, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Because that's how a block works, and it is not technically possible for an admin to change it. And you really do need to stop this now and leave Wikipedia alone for the minimum 6-month WP:SO period, or you are likely to lose the ability to edit even this talk page. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 22:20, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas and Friends-related question

One last edit on my talk page until I get unblocked: SummerPhDv2.0, how could FOUR (instead of two) episodes of Thomas and Friends (season 1) be aired on the same day (November 27th, 1984)? Any sources? YudsWiki2003 (talk) 00:33, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request 4

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

YudsWiki2003 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My block is blocking another user account (who never did any "Disruptive editing") on a different computer on the same IP address. YudsWiki2003 (talk) 14:52, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

There are no grounds here to consider lifting your block. Yamla (talk) 15:06, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock request 5

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

YudsWiki2003 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "YudsWiki2003". The reason given for YudsWiki2003's block is: "Disruptive editing".

Blocking administrator: PhilKnight (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: You are not autoblocked, you are directly blocked. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:57, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

But my block is blocking some other computers on the same IP address, despite being a direct block. YudsWiki2003 (talk) 19:06, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If any other users are affected then they can appeal themselves. Five appeals without showing an understanding of why you have been blocked is sufficient so I am revoking your talk page access.Just Chilling (talk) 00:45, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]