Help desk
< January 18	<< Dec \| January \| Feb >>	January 20 >

Welcome to the Wikipedia Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.

January 19

Restoring a Deleted Article - What to Do About Redirect

This is about Draft:Ammar Campa-Najjar. There was a BLP of this person. It was then deleted pursuant to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ammar Campa-Najjar (2nd nomination) and redirected to2018 United States House of Representatives elections in California. A deletion review endorsed the deletion and noted that the article could be restored if there was new information to establish general notability. The subject does not currently satisfy political notability. There has recently been discussion to the effect that the draft should now be accepted. However, there is currently a redirect, and the redirect says that it is a redirect with history and should not be deleted. What can be done to accept the draft? The usual AFC script will not accept the draft if there is a redirect at the title. Is human action needed? If so, where do I request the human action? Robert McClenon (talk) 01:05, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Robert McClenon: I think at that you can place your request at Wikipedia:Requested_moves/Technical_requests. If necessary, a history merge of the redirect and the new article can be done. RudolfRed (talk) 00:36, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, User:RudolfRed. I requested that. A history merge is required, or at least the redirect says it has history and should not be deleted. Otherwise I would do a Page Move of the redirect into neverland and move the draft and then tag the redirect for G6. Robert McClenon (talk) 08:04, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Getting load-time metrics for a script

I'm currently working on my own anti-vandal tool, and was wondering where I could ask for people to measure how fast it loads? It's usually under half a second for me (After loading it for the first time. If the cache is empty it takes about 2 sec), but I imagine it varies across machines. --MoonyTheDwarf (Braden N.) (talk) 04:46, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Moonythedwarf, Village Pump (Technical) might be a place to try. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 08:49, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Should short descriptions include vital years?

I have been adding short descriptions, and improving (I hope) existing ones. I was under the impression there was a guideline that the short description for a biographical article should include the vital years, or year of birth - but I can't find it documented anywhere. But some of my changes have been reverted, claiming this made the short description too long. So now I'm not sure whether to include them or not. Can anybody please point me to whether there is such a guideline (or did I just imagine it)? --Gronk Oz (talk) 07:45, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gronk Oz, The guidelines are at Wikipedia:Short description (perhaps other guidelines exist, but I've never run across them and couldn't find more). My reading has always been that you should aim for no longer than 40 characters, and that otherwise the guidelines say fairly little. My personal approach has been to only include dates when there is room and it is critical. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 08:54, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@CaptainEek: Thanks for that. I must have been imagining things again...

--Gronk Oz (talk) 09:20, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Gronk Oz: Check out WP:WPSHORTDESC? —[AlanM1(talk)]— 13:50, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks AlanM1 - that was the first place I looked but I can't see an answer there - did I miss it? --Gronk Oz (talk) 22:45, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

page notice: Karsonya Wise Whitehead

I dont understand what is required. I checked the source and each of the notes mentioned about this person has a citation.

Copyright-problem paste 2.svg This article or section may have been copied and pasted from another location, possibly in violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Please review https://www.weaa.org/people/karsonya-wise-whitehead#stream/0 (DupDet · CopyVios) and remedy this by editing this article to remove any non-free copyrighted content and attributing free content correctly, or flagging the content for deletion. Please be sure that the supposed source of the copyright violation is not itself a Wikipedia mirror. (January 2020) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mommado5 (talk • contribs) 08:42, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The notice is not about lack of citations, it's about copyright violation. Specifically, it claims that some part of the article may be a copyright violation of https://www.weaa.org/people/karsonya-wise-whitehead#stream/0 . I'm not seeing that myself; you could take it up with the editor who placed the notice, Souravdas1998. Maproom (talk) 09:31, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Geographical databases question

Hello all- I have been doing work on obscure geographical terms in southern Xinjiang making use primarily of the National Bureau of Statistics of the People's Republic of China's index of minor locations and of GEOnet Names Server in conjunction with old maps, news articles, books and scholarly papers. Are there any other good databases that would include minor locations in this area? Here's what I've worked on today: Jiya Township. Geographyinitiative (talk) 10:13, 19 January 2020 (UTC):[reply]

@Vchimpanzee: Hello all- I am still doing the work that I described above (recent page: Sampul) and would like to point out that I am still actively interested in any responses. Geographyinitiative (talk) 22:51, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Correction of spelling of name Alfredo Versoza

Incorrect name: Alfredo Versoza Correct name: Alfredo Verzosa

Alfredo Versoza

Thank you for reporting this. I've moved the article to Alfredo Verzosa. Maproom (talk) 13:14, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gallery perrow oddity

On c:File:I Wrote a Full Song in 24_Hours-K7r58jQqK8I00227.png and on 18 other images derived from one video the other versions gallery works as expected, four "Blackery with guitar" in one row for a total of five related images in this subset, with a perrow=4 gallery parameter. On enwiki the perrow=4 fails for File:I Wrote a Full Song in 24_Hours-K7r58jQqK8I00227.png and for me, what is the problem, is it only me, does it work for you?
From a teahouse archive: 84.46.53.192 (talk) 12:55, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, IP user. Since nobody replied to the first time, it's a good bet that there is nobody here with both the interest and the knowledge. Help talk:Gallery tag might be a better place to ask, or WP:VPT. --ColinFine (talk) 16:33, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's an idea, some years ago this page was better for technical questions and WP:TEA was mostly a friendly space.(smiley suppressed) –84.46.53.192 (talk) 18:49, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Autoreviewer

In the Portuguese Wikipedia, I'm already a rollbacker and eliminator/deleter (pt.wiki only, basically you can delete and restore pages, and it has the autopatrol function). With that information, is it possible to request Autoreviewer here? GhostP. ^talk 16:15, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, GhostP.. You can certainly request the right: whether an admin will give it you or not, I don't know. Have a look at WP:Autopatrolled#Obtaining the right. --ColinFine (talk) 16:37, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Question of curiosity: least read articles on Wikipedia

Is there any way to find the least popular or least read article on English Wikipedia? By whatever definition we might have. I would assume "fewest number of views for the most extended time" (or something like that). And, if not the least popular, how about a list of the "bottom grouping"? Thanks. Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 16:33, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Joseph A. Spadaro: Any such list would attract kiddevandals. -Arch dude (talk) 17:05, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Arch dude: So...?
AFAIK any information may attract vandals, does it mean we should avoid publishing any information at Wikipedia???

CiaPan (talk) 17:13, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@CiaPan: we should publish those articles. we should not create a list of places on Wikipedia where vandalism is likely to persist. Let's take this offline. See WP:BEANS). -Arch dude (talk) 17:18, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The pageview data is available here but as far as I can see no one has ever made a "least popular" report from it. I for one think this would be very interesting (but might be full of zero view pages). I don't think this would be WP:BEANS-y since the majority of our pages are unpopular and are only overseen by recent changes patrollers anyways. @West.andrew.g, do you think it would be worth it to assemble a one-off report on this? – Thjarkur (talk) 20:39, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The long tail is looooong. I can probably run a report for 2019, although it is likely too long to share in Wikipedia format when we consider articles with <10 or <100 views. What is the use-case? Can we move this to the talk page of WP:5000 or WP:Top_25_Report? I also see the WP:BEANS potential here, as watchlister counts are proportional to views, but at the same time, vandalism that no one sees has minimal impact (soapbox: see my prior research, massive traffic pages are a far greater vulnerability if we measure vandalism impact by viewership). But, as I said, I want to know there is some utility here before I dedicate time to custom reports. West.andrew.g (talk) 01:58, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@West.andrew.g: Thanks. No, this list is not something that I "need". It was just a question of curiosity, as my header indicates. I thought it might already exist somewhere here on Wikipedia. In which case, I would have liked to take a look at it. But, if this is a big project and a lot of work/effort ... no, it is not that important. Like I said, I certainly don't "need" it. I was just curious. If it's quick and easy, I'd like to see it. If it's a lot of work, don't trouble yourself. Thanks. Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 06:03, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Same here, no real utility apart from curiosity. I gave up on making this report for another smaller wiki where I wanted to clean up the unread junk articles and find unintegrated walled gardens, but of course those junk articles aren't really hurting anyone since no one's reading them. – Thjarkur (talk) 15:03, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, all. Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 15:16, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved

Sikh Panth Foundation Day

I would like to notify that the Sikh Foundation day written as 30th March 1699 on the Wikipedia Page but actually according to Sikh history the day was on 13th April 1699 instead of 30th March 1699. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.41.25.21 (talk) 16:45, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please make suggestions for article improvement on the article's talk page, and be sure to include a reference to a reliable source (WP:RS). In this case, the issue may be Old Style and New Style dates. -Arch dude (talk) 17:10, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Technical problem with SVG file

Even after years of editing Wikipedia, I wasn't sure where to post this; let me know if there's some more technically-oriented board to ask this question. I'm trying to upload to Commons a more accurate version of File:RosettaStoneAsPartOfOriginalStele.svg, before an article in which it appears runs as TFA on January 24. When I try, I get an error message:

"<a> elements can only link (href) to data: (embedded file), http:// or https://, or fragment (#, same-document) targets. For other elements, such as <image>, only data: and fragment are allowed. Try embedding images when exporting your SVG. Found <image http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink:href="2974d5a2d85405a5.jpg">

I've asked about this problem on Commons' help desk, but nobody has responded so far. I'm guessing that the error is related to the JPG image of the Rosetta Stone embedded within the SVG (I did not edit the JPG when revising the image), but I don't understand the error message beyond that. A. Parrot (talk) 17:17, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@A. Parrot: your SVG file contains a link to an external URL, and that is (apparently) not allowed, probably due to potential for copyright violations. to cure this you will need to modify the SVG file so that it actually includes the image itself, not a link to it. How you do this will depend on your SVG creation software. Whether to do this at all depends on the copyright status of the image. -Arch dude (talk) 17:26, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Arch dude: Thank you for your prompt reply. I think the original image was File:Rosetta Stone BW.jpeg. I'm not 100% sure about its copyright status, but considering how many other Commons images incorporate it, I hope it's legit. A. Parrot (talk) 18:13, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The file (page you linked to) says it's in the public domain, A. Parrot. --ColinFine (talk) 18:43, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It does, but the uploaders seem to have extracted it from the European Space Agency page and declared it public domain while doing so, on the grounds that the stone itself is public domain. The stone's etched text makes its surface not entirely two-dimensional, which means photos of that surface are technically copyrightable. It shouldn't be a problem, but I've had to worry about the copyright status of so many photos of ancient artwork over the years. A. Parrot (talk) 18:49, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

SVGs with embedded raster files are generally problematic on commons: Users incl. other MediaWiki projects (per InstantCommons) should be able to download and use the SVG without further difficulties: No external links loading tracking pixels or causing havoc in offline scenarios, no giant SVGs with raster files in a data URI, no weird scripts for animations (personal opinions, the policies allow more), etc. Also see lots(!) of SVG help + project files on commons. –84.46.53.192 (talk) 19:05, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@A. Parrot: The URL in the original complaint message was not the Rosetta stone or anything else on Commons: it was a URL at www.w3.org. This means it was likely something your SVG editor added for some obscure reason of its own. Your original technical problem is entirely separate from any copyright issue with an image of the Rosetta Stone. -Arch dude (talk) 20:46, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Arch dude: I see. If I replace that link with an image that's contained within the SVG, such as File:Rosetta_Stone.svg, uploading should work, correct? A. Parrot (talk) 20:56, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@A. Parrot: I can't say without looking at the .svg file source. My speculation is that the www.w3.org URL is unrelated to the image and is elsewhere in the file. If it were not a .jpg, I would guess it was an svg namespace declaration. Examine the source with a text editor and see what you can make of it. -Arch dude (talk) 22:08, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Update: I've successfully uploaded a revised version of the image, so this problem is resolved. Thank you for your help. A. Parrot (talk) 22:07, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Make emoji to send someone to Wikapedia

As above emoji to get user in chat exchange to get them to look up in Wikapedia. I've volunteered for you that's my 3 dollars for years thanks Jeffrey Hansen — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.77.198.13 (talk) 19:41, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Help Desk is for asking about how to edit or use Wikipedia. Do you have a question? Willbb234^Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 20:21, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

contents box on Malagasy Hippopotamus article different then section name

On the contents on Malagasy Hippopotamus box it says 4 Oral legends and the kilopilopitsofycode: mlg promoted to code: mg but the section is named Oral legends and the kilopilopitsofy Why is the contents box different and the other sections are the same in both the box and the article section name — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8805:BC82:2300:41F7:68E0:D557:F8A7 (talk) 21:18, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, IP user. The English Wikipedia and the Malagasy Wikipedia are entirely separate projects, with no influence over each other. Unless by chance there happens to be an editor here who also edits the Malagasy Wikipedia, there is nobody here who has any knowledge of it. You'll need to ask there, I'm afraid. I've just seen that you are talking about the Malagasy hippopotamus article in English Wikipedia. Sorry! Looking at it now. --ColinFine (talk) 21:54, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK, worked round it, by changing the ISO639 3-letter code to the 2-letter one. But it's a bug in {{lang}}: a warning message is appearing where it shouldn't. I will raise it on the template talk page.

Done --ColinFine (talk) 22:12, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not a bug. See Template talk:Lang § Warning message appears when a 3-letter code is used in a section heading..

—Trappist the monk (talk) 23:40, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OBS GREEN EXPRESS ACCOUNT

Dear Sir ,

Please be kind to inform that how much time would this precisely take to update the company info at Wikipedia ,how to insert picture in updation . — Preceding unsigned comment added by 45.124.146.103 (talk) 23:09, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you are promoting your company, it's not happening. --Thegooduser Life Begins With a Smile :) 🍁 23:18, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. We have articles instead of 'accounts' on Wikipedia, so please tell us the precise name of the article about which you are enquiring. It doesn't take long to update an article, but please let us know a bit more precise information. Thank you, Willbb234^Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 23:19, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bruny Island

Recently, I visited the website to see what the origins of Killora, Bruny Island is. I found Adventure Bay's previous name was written as Cooktown. It was Cookville NOT Cooktown. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.213.252.95 (talk) 23:16, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You can tag similar issues directly, example: Special:Diff/928567155/936620862. –84.46.53.116 (talk) 00:14, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To induce an editor to actually change the Bruny Island article instead of adding a "citation needed" tag, you will need to find a published source (see WP:RS) that has your information in it. Even better: find the source and and change the article yourself to fix the name and add the source. -Arch dude (talk) 00:32, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]