Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 August 24

< August 23	August 25 >

August 24[edit]

Template:Linggo Binggo sa Umaga[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 16:48, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Linggo Binggo sa Umaga (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Linggo Bingo sa Gabi (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. Frietjes (talk) 18:13, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as total navbox overkill. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:40, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Mother and Son[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 16:49, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Mother and Son (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

not enough links, articles are already well connected. Frietjes (talk) 18:05, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom and WP:NENAN. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:41, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Neighbors[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 16:49, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Neighbors (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

could probably be deleted per this discussion. Frietjes (talk) 18:01, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per previous discussion: redundant to links in the infobox. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:44, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Must break[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 16:51, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Must break (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. Frietjes (talk) 17:56, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as redundant to {{Split-apart}} or any other split template. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:51, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Maiden voyage sinkings[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:00, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Maiden voyage sinkings (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not needed anymore because we not have an article that lists all ships lost during in their maiden voyage as suggested in its AfD The templates in each ship article can easily be replaced by the Maiden Voyage article. The Legendary Ranger (talk) 17:26, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - provides an easy method of navigation between articles. Mjroots (talk) 21:31, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Imagescoll[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 16:52, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Imagescoll (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

poor title and redundant to template:scroll box. Frietjes (talk) 17:23, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:2003–04 Turkish Cup[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was deleted at author request. JohnCD (talk) 12:30, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2003–04 Turkish Cup (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

those yearly templates are redundant at that years cup article and not needed on any club article. i'm for deleting old ones and maybe keeping/moving the most recent one to "Turkish Cup finalists" Koppapa (talk) 17:04, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, you are welcome to delete all of them. Just leave Template:Turkish Cup intact. That one covers the current season. — Ekin^(talk·@) 17:07, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Cabuyao City[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:04, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cabuyao City (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to {{City of Cabuyao}}. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:56, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: {{Cabuyao City}} is a template particularly for the barangays of Cabuyao only. It shows only the list of barangays of Cabuyao, with their respective locations within the city.
Keep: By removing the list of barangays in {{City of Cabuyao}} to have no redundancy. Like {{Valenzuela City}} and {{Legislative districts of Valenzuela City}} -Othanwiki2009 (talk)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Gen-class-bones[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:57, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Gen-class-bones (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. DH85868993 (talk) 15:25, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Thisuser2[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:57, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Thisuser2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only used in User:Astatine-210. Subst and delete? DH85868993 (talk) 15:14, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:IRmap-named[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:17, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:IRmap-named (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Similar/related templates created by the same user: {{IRmap}}, {{Irmapping}} and {{Irmaprim}} were deleted in 2007 and 2008. DH85868993 (talk) 15:11, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Products[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:17, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Products (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Delete. All the links are piped and none of the target articles are actually about products (AFAIK). -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 01:55, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There's little rationale for such a broadly-scoped template. We don't need to interlink every single type of product. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 08:33, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Arab republics[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:16, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Arab republics (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Delete. Yemen is no longer an "Arab Republic", and Syria is soon to not be one. This template is redundant and can not consist of one ailing and collapsing government. حرية (talk) 20:05, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and because it is now a template with only one entry. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 20:44, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Also because the category it links is completely meaningless. Arab Republic is a silly official name that doesn't really reflect the reality of the country (as if Syria and Yemen have ever been republics, and this is the kind of stupid official name that Qaddafi would have used) - this is every bit as ridiculous as a template listing People's Republics. Ego White Tray (talk) 03:23, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Note Please note that the term "Arab Republic" is terminology specific to the political ideology of Ba'athism. That is to say, the template has nothing to do with countries/governments in the Arab world which claim to be or happen to be republics. This is an important point to make as recent edits to the template have been confused as to the origin of the term and the template's purpose. حرية (talk) 10:08, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.