Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 September 1

< August 31	September 2 >

September 1

Template:User still believes in handshake agreements

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:User still believes in handshake agreements (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

I've now come to the personal view that, that after creating this template, it may be misleading. My perception is that the template content, while suggesting a general lack of fulfilment of the intentions at the time when the Rabin/Arafat picture was taken, may suggest the major problem as being the removal of Rabin from the situation. Key figures put much of the blame on the collapse of 2000 Camp David Summit on Arafat and, I don't think, when looking at the image this that many people would naturally make that assumption. Gregkaye (talk) 22:19, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete under WP:CSD#G7 because Gregkaye is the creator and only significant contributor. If, for some reason, it's not speedyable, Procedural close as wrong venue - this is a userbox, which are handled at WP:MFD. --Redrose64 (talk) 08:50, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Largest cities of Guyana

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:41, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Largest cities of Guyana (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

single-use data template which is presented like a navbox (it isn't) and takes up far too much space. Can easily be collapsed into a simpler bit of code. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 20:39, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete Frietjes (talk) 17:52, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete after substitution or replacement with simpler code —PC -XT + 21:00, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Friendly association football tournaments in Cyprus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:42, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Friendly association football tournaments in Cyprus (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per WP:NENAN. Only four links, not a useful aid to navigation at the moment and as it deals with friendly tournaments, unclear as to how notable all the redlinks are. Fenix down (talk) 09:45, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep WP:NENAN is not a policy it is an opinion. WP:ANOEP is just as valid. Op47 (talk) 09:47, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ANOEP explicitly says that the goal is to have a navbox in every article that the reader might find useful. The reason this box is here is precisely because it is not useful as it contains only a very small number of links directly relevant to the subject matter. Fenix down (talk) 13:49, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep all. Useful navigation between similar articles. It was no consensus in previous discussion. NickSt (talk) 14:01, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per past consensus in March 2013 and June 2013. Serves no purpose. Giant Snowman 11:49, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:17, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete, connects too few articles to be useful, easily replaced by some see also links, and duplicates the corresponding category. Frietjes (talk) 17:53, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as premature and I see little use for it —PC -XT + 20:52, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per past consensus; as GiantSnowman has included above. JMHamo (talk) 19:57, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Friendly association football tournaments in Greece

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:43, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Friendly association football tournaments in Greece (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per WP:NENAN. Only four links, not a useful aid to navigation. One link only tangentially related and the red links are of dubious notability. Fenix down (talk) 08:29, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep WP:NENAN is not a policy it is an opinion. WP:ANOEP is just as valid. Op47 (talk) 09:47, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ANOEP explicitly says that the goal is to have a navbox in every article that the reader might find useful. The reason this box is here is precisely because it is not useful as it contains only a very small number of links directly relevant to the subject matter. Fenix down (talk) 13:57, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Navigation between more than 5 tournaments. NickSt (talk) 13:06, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Redlinks don't count! this is still not a useful aid to navigation. Happy to withdraw if you can actually link to existing articles of relevance. Fenix down (talk) 13:12, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per past consensus in March 2013 and June 2013. Serves no purpose. Giant Snowman 11:50, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:17, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete, connects too few articles to be useful, easily replaced by some see also links, and duplicates the corresponding category. Frietjes (talk) 17:54, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as premature —PC -XT + 00:31, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per past consensus; as GiantSnowman has included above. JMHamo (talk) 19:57, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Friendly association football tournaments in Iceland

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:44, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Friendly association football tournaments in Iceland (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per WP:NENAN. Only four links, two of which are tangential. not a useful aid to navigation at the moment and as it deals with friendly tournaments, unclear as to how notable all the redlinks are. Fenix down (talk) 09:47, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep WP:NENAN is not a policy it is an opinion. WP:ANOEP is just as valid. Op47 (talk) 09:47, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ANOEP explicitly says that the goal is to have a navbox in every article that the reader might find useful. The reason this box is here is precisely because it is not useful as it contains only a very small number of links directly relevant to the subject matter. Fenix down (talk) 13:49, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete this one per prior consensus. Frietjes (talk) 22:55, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep all. Useful navigation between similar articles. It was no consensus in previous discussion. NickSt (talk) 14:01, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Iceland was not discussed in the previous discussion, no consensus claim is fundamentally incorrect. Fenix down (talk) 14:05, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per past consensus in March 2013 and June 2013. Serves no purpose. Giant Snowman 11:48, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:17, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per prior consensus —PC -XT + 21:03, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per past consensus; as GiantSnowman has included above. JMHamo (talk) 19:57, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Friendly association football tournaments in Northern Ireland

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:45, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Friendly association football tournaments in Northern Ireland (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per WP:NENAN. Only three links, two of which are tangential, not a useful aid to navigation at the moment and as it deals with friendly tournaments, unclear as to how notable all the redlinks are. Fenix down (talk) 09:51, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep WP:NENAN is not a policy it is an opinion. WP:ANOEP is just as valid. Op47 (talk) 09:47, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ANOEP explicitly says that the goal is to have a navbox in every article that the reader might find useful. The reason this box is here is precisely because it is not useful as it contains only a very small number of links directly relevant to the subject matter. Fenix down (talk) 13:24, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete this one per prior consensus. Frietjes (talk) 22:52, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Useful navigation between similar articles. NickSt (talk) 13:55, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per past consensus in March 2013 and June 2013. Serves no purpose. Giant Snowman 11:45, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:17, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per prior consensus —PC -XT + 22:45, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per past consensus; as GiantSnowman has included above. JMHamo (talk) 19:57, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Friendly association football tournaments in the Republic of Ireland

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:46, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Friendly association football tournaments in the Republic of Ireland (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per WP:NENAN. Only four links, two of which are tangential, not a useful aid to navigation at the moment. Fenix down (talk) 09:52, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep WP:NENAN is not a policy it is an opinion. WP:ANOEP is just as valid. Op47 (talk) 09:47, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ANOEP explicitly says that the goal is to have a navbox in every article that the reader might find useful. The reason this box is here is precisely because it is not useful as it contains only a very small number of links directly relevant to the subject matter. Fenix down (talk) 13:24, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete this one per prior consensus. Frietjes (talk) 22:51, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Useful navigation between similar articles. NickSt (talk) 13:55, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per past consensus in March 2013 and June 2013. Serves no purpose. Giant Snowman 11:45, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:17, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per prior consensus —PC -XT + 22:46, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per past consensus; as GiantSnowman has included above. JMHamo (talk) 19:57, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Friendly association football tournaments in Israel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:48, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Friendly association football tournaments in Israel (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per WP:NENAN. Only four links, two of which are tangential. not a useful aid to navigation at the moment and as it deals with friendly tournaments, unclear as to how notable the redlinks are. Fenix down (talk) 09:47, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep WP:NENAN is not a policy it is an opinion. WP:ANOEP is just as valid. Op47 (talk) 09:47, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ANOEP explicitly says that the goal is to have a navbox in every article that the reader might find useful. The reason this box is here is precisely because it is not useful as it contains only a very small number of links directly relevant to the subject matter. Fenix down (talk) 13:25, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete this one per prior consensus. Frietjes (talk) 22:54, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep all. Useful navigation between similar articles. It was no consensus in previous discussion. NickSt (talk) 14:01, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Israel was not discussed in the previous discussion, no consensus claim is fundamentally incorrect. Fenix down (talk) 14:05, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per past consensus in March 2013 and June 2013. Serves no purpose. Giant Snowman 11:48, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:17, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per prior consensus —PC -XT + 22:48, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per past consensus; as GiantSnowman has included above. JMHamo (talk) 19:57, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Friendly association football tournaments in Kazakhstan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:49, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Friendly association football tournaments in Kazakhstan (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per WP:NENAN. Only three links, two of which are tangential. not a useful aid to navigation at the moment. Fenix down (talk) 09:48, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep WP:NENAN is not a policy it is an opinion. WP:ANOEP is just as valid. Op47 (talk) 09:47, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ANOEP explicitly says that the goal is to have a navbox in every article that the reader might find useful. The reason this box is here is precisely because it is not useful as it contains only a very small number of links directly relevant to the subject matter. Fenix down (talk) 13:25, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete this one per prior consensus. Frietjes (talk) 22:54, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep all. Useful navigation between similar articles. It was no consensus in previous discussion. NickSt (talk) 14:00, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Kazakhstan was not discussed in the previous discussion, no consensus claim is fundamentally incorrect. Fenix down (talk) 14:05, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per past consensus in March 2013 and June 2013. Serves no purpose. Giant Snowman 11:48, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:17, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per prior consensus —PC -XT + 22:50, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per past consensus; as GiantSnowman has included above. JMHamo (talk) 19:57, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Friendly association football tournaments in Liechtenstein

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:50, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Friendly association football tournaments in Liechtenstein (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per WP:NENAN. Only three links, two of which are tangential, not a useful aid to navigation at the moment. Fenix down (talk) 09:49, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep WP:NENAN is not a policy it is an opinion. WP:ANOEP is just as valid. Op47 (talk) 09:47, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ANOEP explicitly says that the goal is to have a navbox in every article that the reader might find useful. The reason this box is here is precisely because it is not useful as it contains only a very small number of links directly relevant to the subject matter. Fenix down (talk) 13:25, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete this one per prior consensus. Frietjes (talk) 22:53, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep all. Useful navigation between similar articles. It was no consensus in previous discussion. NickSt (talk) 13:59, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Liechtenstein was not discussed in the previous discussion, no consensus claim is fundamentally incorrect. Fenix down (talk) 14:04, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per past consensus in March 2013 and June 2013. Serves no purpose. Giant Snowman 11:47, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:17, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per prior consensus —PC -XT + 22:51, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per past consensus; as GiantSnowman has included above. JMHamo (talk) 19:57, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Friendly association football tournaments in Luxembourg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:50, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Friendly association football tournaments in Luxembourg (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per WP:NENAN. Only three links, two of which are tangential, not a useful aid to navigation at the moment. Fenix down (talk) 09:49, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep WP:NENAN is not a policy it is an opinion. WP:ANOEP is just as valid. Op47 (talk) 09:47, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ANOEP explicitly says that the goal is to have a navbox in every article that the reader might find useful. The reason this box is here is precisely because it is not useful as it contains only a very small number of links directly relevant to the subject matter. Fenix down (talk) 13:25, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete this one per prior consensus. Frietjes (talk) 22:53, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep all. Useful navigation between similar articles. It was no consensus in previous discussion. NickSt (talk) 13:59, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Luxembourg was not discussed in the previous discussion, no consensus claim is fundamentally incorrect. Fenix down (talk) 14:04, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per past consensus in March 2013 and June 2013. Serves no purpose. Giant Snowman 11:47, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:17, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per prior consensus (Note: Even though this one was not nominated, it actually was mentioned in the prior discussion, as a template with one-two links that "must be deleted.") —PC -XT + 22:56, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per past consensus; as GiantSnowman has included above. JMHamo (talk) 19:57, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Friendly association football tournaments in Malta

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:51, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Friendly association football tournaments in Malta (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per WP:NENAN. Only three links, two of which are tangential not a useful aid to navigation at the moment. Fenix down (talk) 09:50, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep WP:NENAN is not a policy it is an opinion. WP:ANOEP is just as valid. Op47 (talk) 09:47, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ANOEP explicitly says that the goal is to have a navbox in every article that the reader might find useful. The reason this box is here is precisely because it is not useful as it contains only a very small number of links directly relevant to the subject matter. Fenix down (talk) 13:24, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete this one per prior consensus. Frietjes (talk) 22:52, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep all. Useful navigation between similar articles. It was no consensus in previous discussion. NickSt (talk) 13:59, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Malta was not discusse in the previous discussion, no consensus claim is fundamentally incorrect. Fenix down (talk) 14:03, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per past consensus in March 2013 and June 2013. Serves no purpose. Giant Snowman 11:46, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:17, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per prior consensus (Note: Even though this one was not nominated, it actually was mentioned in the prior discussion, as a template with one-two links that "must be deleted.") —PC -XT + 22:58, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per past consensus; as GiantSnowman has included above. JMHamo (talk) 19:57, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Friendly association football tournaments in Moldova

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:51, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Friendly association football tournaments in Moldova (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per WP:NENAN. Only three links, two of which are tangential, not a useful aid to navigation at the moment. Fenix down (talk) 09:51, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep WP:NENAN is not a policy it is an opinion. WP:ANOEP is just as valid. Op47 (talk) 09:47, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ANOEP explicitly says that the goal is to have a navbox in every article that the reader might find useful. The reason this box is here is precisely because it is not useful as it contains only a very small number of links directly relevant to the subject matter. Fenix down (talk) 13:24, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete this one per prior consensus. Frietjes (talk) 22:52, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Useful navigation between similar articles. NickSt (talk) 13:56, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per past consensus in March 2013 and June 2013. Serves no purpose. Giant Snowman 11:46, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:17, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per prior consensus (Note: Even though this one was not nominated, it actually was mentioned in the prior discussion, as a template with one-two links that "must be deleted.") —PC -XT + 22:59, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per past consensus; as GiantSnowman has included above. JMHamo (talk) 19:57, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Friendly association football tournaments in Slovakia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:51, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Friendly association football tournaments in Slovakia (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per WP:NENAN. Only four links, two of which are tangential, not a useful aid to navigation at the moment. Fenix down (talk) 09:53, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep WP:NENAN is not a policy it is an opinion. WP:ANOEP is just as valid. Op47 (talk) 09:47, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ANOEP explicitly says that the goal is to have a navbox in every article that the reader might find useful. The reason this box is here is precisely because it is not useful as it contains only a very small number of links directly relevant to the subject matter. Fenix down (talk) 13:23, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete this one per prior consensus. Frietjes (talk) 22:51, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Useful navigation between similar articles. NickSt (talk) 13:53, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per past consensus in March 2013 and June 2013. Serves no purpose. Giant Snowman 11:45, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:17, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per prior consensus (The protest in the prior discussion against the intention to nominate the rest of these did not include this template.) —PC -XT + 23:04, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per past consensus; as GiantSnowman has included above. JMHamo (talk) 19:57, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Friendly association football tournaments in Slovenia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:51, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Friendly association football tournaments in Slovenia (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per WP:NENAN. Only three links, two of which are tangential, not a useful aid to navigation at the moment. Fenix down (talk) 09:54, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep WP:NENAN is not a policy it is an opinion. WP:ANOEP is just as valid. Op47 (talk) 09:47, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ANOEP explicitly says that the goal is to have a navbox in every article that the reader might find useful. The reason this box is here is precisely because it is not useful as it contains only a very small number of links directly relevant to the subject matter. Fenix down (talk) 13:23, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete this one per prior consensus. Frietjes (talk) 22:50, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep all. Potentially many links in each navbox. NickSt (talk) 13:44, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - potentially, but at the moment there is only one, how is this a useful aid to navigation? Fenix down (talk) 13:48, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per past consensus in March 2013 and June 2013. Serves no purpose. Giant Snowman 11:44, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:17, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per prior consensus (The protest in the prior discussion against the intention to nominate the rest of these did not include this template.) —PC -XT + 23:06, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per past consensus; as GiantSnowman has included above. JMHamo (talk) 19:57, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Friendly association football tournaments in Turkey

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:52, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Friendly association football tournaments in Turkey (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per WP:NENAN. Only four links, two of which are tangential not a useful aid to navigation at the moment and as it deals with friendly tournaments, unclear as to how notable the redlink is. Fenix down (talk) 09:55, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep WP:NENAN is not a policy it is an opinion. WP:ANOEP is just as valid. Op47 (talk) 09:47, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally ANOEP explicitly says that the goal is to have a navbox in every article that the reader might find useful. The reason this box is here is precisely because it is not useful as it contains only a very small number of links directly relevant to the subject matter. Fenix down (talk) 13:21, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete this one per prior consensus. Frietjes (talk) 22:50, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep all. Potentially many links in each navbox. NickSt (talk) 13:43, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - potentially, but at the moment there is only two, how is this a useful aid to navigation?

Delete per past consensus in March 2013 and June 2013. Serves no purpose. Giant Snowman 11:44, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:17, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as there are too few main articles to warrant a navbox: I count two or maybe three... —PC -XT + 00:40, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per past consensus; as GiantSnowman has included above. JMHamo (talk) 19:57, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Friendly association football tournaments in Wales

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:52, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Friendly association football tournaments in Wales (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per WP:NENAN. Only three links, two of which are tangential, not a useful aid to navigation at the moment and as it deals with friendly tournaments, unclear as to how notable the redlink is. Fenix down (talk) 09:57, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep WP:NENAN is not a policy it is an opinion. WP:ANOEP is just as valid. Op47 (talk) 09:47, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ANOEP is just an opinion, followed by just a few users. The Banner talk 22:13, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally ANOEP explicitly says that the goal is to have a navbox in every article that the reader might find useful. The reason this box is here is precisely because it is not useful as it contains only a very small number of links directly relevant to the subject matter. Fenix down (talk) 13:21, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete this one per prior consensus. Frietjes (talk) 22:49, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep all. Potentially many links in each navbox. It was no consensus in that discussion. NickSt (talk) 13:43, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - potentially, but at the moment there is only one, how is this a useful aid to navigation? Fenix down (talk) 13:47, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per past consensus in March 2013 and June 2013. Serves no purpose. Giant Snowman 11:44, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:17, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per prior consensus (The protest in the prior discussion against the intention to nominate the rest of these did not include this template.) —PC -XT + 23:08, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per past consensus; as GiantSnowman has included above. JMHamo (talk) 19:57, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:A-League All Stars Game

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:51, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:A-League All Stars Game (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per WP:NENAN. Only three links, not a useful aid to navigation at the moment. Fenix down (talk) 08:18, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep WP:NENAN is not a policy it is an opinion. WP:ANOEP is just as valid. Op47 (talk) 09:47, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ANOEP explicitly says that the goal is to have a navbox in every article that the reader might find useful. The reason this box is here is precisely because it is not useful as it contains only a very small number of links directly relevant to the subject matter. Fenix down (talk) 14:00, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Useful template. NickSt (talk) 14:08, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - serves no purpose as it does not navigate between enough notable topics. Giant Snowman 11:53, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:17, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete, connects too few articles to be useful, easily replaced by some see also links, and duplicates the corresponding category. Frietjes (talk) 17:55, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as premature —PC -XT + 01:41, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Audi Cup

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:47, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Audi Cup (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per WP:NENAN. Only four links, not a useful aid to navigation at the moment. Fenix down (talk) 08:20, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep WP:NENAN is not a policy it is an opinion. WP:ANOEP is just as valid. Op47 (talk) 09:47, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ANOEP explicitly says that the goal is to have a navbox in every article that the reader might find useful. The reason this box is here is precisely because it is not useful as it contains only a very small number of links directly relevant to the subject matter. Fenix down (talk) 14:00, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Five links now. NickSt (talk) 12:57, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Back to three, those links you added had nothing to do with the Audi Cup. Fenix down (talk) 13:14, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - serves no purpose as it does not navigate between enough notable topics. Giant Snowman 11:53, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:17, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment — Of all of these, I'd probably keep this one first —PC -XT + 01:44, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep for now, as this has a bit of use, and I assume it has potential for expansion. (If it has no such potential, this !vote should be disregarded.) As an alternative, I do not object to deletion for now and recreation when it can be expanded. —PC -XT + 01:59, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:CFU Women's Caribbean Cup

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:46, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:CFU Women's Caribbean Cup (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per WP:NENAN. Only three links, not a useful aid to navigation at the moment. Fenix down (talk) 08:20, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ANOEP explicitly says that the goal is to have a navbox in every article that the reader might find useful. The reason this box is here is precisely because it is not useful as it contains only a very small number of links directly relevant to the subject matter. Fenix down (talk) 13:58, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep WP:NENAN is not a policy it is an opinion. WP:ANOEP is just as valid. Op47 (talk) 09:47, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Useful template. NickSt (talk) 14:07, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - serves no purpose as it does not navigate between enough notable topics. Giant Snowman 11:52, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:17, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete, connects too few articles to be useful, easily replaced by some see also links, and duplicates the corresponding category. Frietjes (talk) 17:56, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as premature/unuseful —PC -XT + 01:46, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Football Impact Cup

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:57, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Football Impact Cup (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per WP:NENAN. Only three links, not a useful aid to navigation at the moment. Fenix down (talk) 08:27, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep WP:NENAN is not a policy it is an opinion. WP:ANOEP is just as valid. Op47 (talk) 09:47, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ANOEP explicitly says that the goal is to have a navbox in every article that the reader might find useful. The reason this box is here is precisely because it is not useful as it contains only a very small number of links directly relevant to the subject matter. Fenix down (talk) 13:58, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Five links now. NickSt (talk) 12:56, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Back to three now, the links you added had nothing to do with the football impact cup. Fenix down (talk) 13:13, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - serves no purpose as it does not navigate between enough notable topics. Giant Snowman 11:52, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:17, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete, connects too few articles to be useful, easily replaced by some see also links, and duplicates the corresponding category. Frietjes (talk) 17:56, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Serves no purpose with the amount of links it has included. JMHamo (talk) 21:18, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as unuseful —PC -XT + 03:22, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Long Teng Cup

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 05:05, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Long Teng Cup (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per WP:NENAN. Only three links, not a useful aid to navigation at the moment. Fenix down (talk) 08:40, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep WP:NENAN is not a policy it is an opinion. WP:ANOEP is just as valid. Op47 (talk) 09:47, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ANOEP explicitly says that the goal is to have a navbox in every article that the reader might find useful. The reason this box is here is precisely because it is not useful as it contains only a very small number of links directly relevant to the subject matter. Fenix down (talk) 13:57, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Five links now. NickSt (talk) 13:05, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Back to three, the FA link is not directly relate to the Cup (why not add a link to the country article if you're going to do that) and the Peace cup Link is wholly unrelated to the Long Teng Cup.

Delete - serves no purpose as it does not navigate between enough notable topics. Giant Snowman 11:52, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:17, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete, connects too few articles to be useful, easily replaced by some see also links, and duplicates the corresponding category. Frietjes (talk) 17:56, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as unuseful —PC -XT + 04:08, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Mohammed bin Rashid International Football Championship

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 05:01, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Mohammed bin Rashid International Football Championship (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per WP:NENAN. Only three links, not a useful aid to navigation at the moment. Fenix down (talk) 08:41, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep WP:NENAN is not a policy it is an opinion. WP:ANOEP is just as valid. Op47 (talk) 09:47, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ANOEP explicitly says that the goal is to have a navbox in every article that the reader might find useful. The reason this box is here is precisely because it is not useful as it contains only a very small number of links directly relevant to the subject matter. Fenix down (talk) 13:57, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Five links now. NickSt (talk) 12:54, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Back to three now, the two links you added are completely unrelated to the Mohammed bin Rashid International Football Championship. Fenix down (talk) 13:09, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - serves no purpose as it does not navigate between enough notable topics. Giant Snowman 11:52, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:17, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete, connects too few articles to be useful, easily replaced by some see also links, and duplicates the corresponding category. Frietjes (talk) 17:57, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as premature/unuseful —PC -XT + 01:48, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:United Tournament

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 05:07, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:United Tournament (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per WP:NENAN. Only four links, not a useful aid to navigation at the moment. Fenix down (talk) 09:42, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep WP:NENAN is not a policy it is an opinion. WP:ANOEP is just as valid. Op47 (talk) 09:47, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ANOEP explicitly says that the goal is to have a navbox in every article that the reader might find useful. The reason this box is here is precisely because it is not useful as it contains only a very small number of links directly relevant to the subject matter. Fenix down (talk) 13:55, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Five links now. NickSt (talk) 12:52, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - links added are not directly related to the subject the box is supposed to help the user navigate. Fenix down (talk) 13:55, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - serves no purpose as it does not navigate between enough notable topics. Giant Snowman 11:51, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:17, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete, connects too few articles to be useful, easily replaced by some see also links, and duplicates the corresponding category. Frietjes (talk) 17:57, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as unuseful —PC -XT + 04:13, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:UNIFFAC Cup

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 05:06, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:UNIFFAC Cup (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per WP:NENAN. Only two links, not a useful aid to navigation. Fenix down (talk) 09:42, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep WP:NENAN is not a policy it is an opinion. WP:ANOEP is just as valid. Op47 (talk) 09:47, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ANOEP explicitly says that the goal is to have a navbox in every article that the reader might find useful. The reason this box is here is precisely because it is not useful as it contains only a very small number of links directly relevant to the subject matter. Fenix down (talk) 13:56, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Five links now. NickSt (talk) 13:03, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - redlinks don't count, this is still not a useful aid to navigation. Fenix down (talk) 13:08, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - serves no purpose as it does not navigate between enough notable topics. Giant Snowman 11:51, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:17, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete, connects too few articles to be useful, easily replaced by some see also links, and duplicates the corresponding category. Frietjes (talk) 17:57, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as unuseful —PC -XT +

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Frederick Keys managers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:44, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Frederick Keys managers (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

WP:NENAN. Frederick Keys are a mid-level minor league team. Being their manager isn't defining of the people in this box. ...William 17:06, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Not sure being a major team is a pre-requisite for the usefulness of a navbox. This contains a significant number of blue links and appears a useful aid to navigation for people interested in reading about the Frederick Keys and associated subjects. Fenix down (talk) 07:25, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Ravindra Prabhat

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Plastikspork (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ravindra Prabhat (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Delete the template, as non of the red links (many deleted post Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hindi Blogging ka Itihas) are notable enough to be blue-links any time soon. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 05:32, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete not enough working links. Frietjes (talk) 17:58, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as useless, without working links —PC -XT + 23:10, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.