User talk:Mightyscience

Hello, Mightyscience, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. We're so glad you're here! Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 17:32, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mightyscience, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Mightyscience! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! Dathus (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:23, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Naomi Sager[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Naomi Sager, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://cs.nyu.edu/cs/faculty/sager/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 11:11, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Naomi Sager[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Naomi Sager requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Whaterss (talk) 11:27, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've declined the deletion request. I think there was a just a bit of confusion as you'd copied Naomi Sager's biography directly from NYU's website, where as we require text to be written in our own words. I've added an additional book source which should help the article on its way - in my view this is a legitimate topic for an encyclopedia based on the subject's pioneering work in natural language processing. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 14:59, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Naomi Sager[edit]

Hello, and thanks for starting an article on Naomi Sager. I see that you were warned about the copy-pasted material and have removed it; that's good. We can probably still use some of that information, as long as we don't use the exact words. I just wanted to let you know that your article is no longer in danger of deletion. A couple of experienced Wikipedians (User:Ritchie333 and myself) are planning to work on the article, to expand it and bring it up to Wikipedia standards. We'd love to have your help in doing that. Naomi Sager sounds like a remarkable woman and she certainly deserves to have an article here. --MelanieN (talk) 17:13, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Naomi Sager[edit]

On 16 March 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Naomi Sager, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Naomi Sager helped develop the first computer program to parse English? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Naomi Sager. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:01, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

YES! :)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Adam Kilgarriff (May 18)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jeraphine Gryphon was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Adam Kilgarriff and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 20:17, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Adam Kilgarriff concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Adam Kilgarriff, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Adam Kilgarriff[edit]

Hello, Mightyscience. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Adam Kilgarriff".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Sam Sailor ^Talk! 14:08, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]