User talk:Yamama3000

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Yamama3000, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Kamikaze 07:39, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion warning[edit]

A tag has been placed on Black Pride (Gang), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be a biographical account about a person, group of people, or band, but it does not indicate how or why he/she/they is/are notable. If you can indicate why Black Pride (Gang) is really notable, I advise you to edit the article promptly, and also put a note on Talk:Black Pride (Gang). Any admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles. You might also want to read our general biography criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that admins should wait a while for you to assert his/her/their notability, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and then immediately add such an assertion. It is also a very good idea to add citations from reliable sources to ensure that your article will be verifiable. MER-C 10:44, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please attribute your use of ABS informaton in the Thai Australian article. If you need advice please click the link "attributable to a reliable source" below the edit box.Garrie 23:09, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Bang (nightclub)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Bang (nightclub), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Mattinbgn/ talk 20:31, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Lara Kappler, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Mattinbgn/ talk 21:48, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article, which you made, is now being considered for deletion. While your contributions are appreciated, this article is believed to not be appropriate for inclusion on wikipedia.You may see the deletion debate here. Please do not take the request for deletion personally, or take its deletion (if it is, infact, deleted) too harshly. Good luck --Anonymous Dissident Utter 14:00, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Yamama3000. Thanks for placing the {{hangon}} tag on the above article. As the article is not a candidate for speedy deletion I have removed the tag. You can follow the link to the discussion left by Anonymous Dissident above to have your say. I would say it is likely the article will be kept. -- Mattinbgn/ talk 07:42, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on The Green Room (venue), by Grahamec (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because The Green Room (venue) is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting The Green Room (venue), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate The Green Room (venue) itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 03:25, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hispanics in Australia and Chilean Australian issues[edit]

Hello! The reason I added the unreferenced and POV tags on these particular articles is due to the fact that the statements provided does not provide references or footnotes such as facts or citations to support claims. I have no issues towards that country or the Chilenos, but I am only doing my job, to rid POV's in articles and provide an accurate informations in all articles as much as possible. If, up to dated references is provided, then you can remove the tags. Thanks! - Ramírez 01:15 June 30, 2007 (UTC)

File:PFlogo.svg Hi! I've seen you editing Powderfinger related articles, and would like to invite you to join WikiProject Powderfinger, an effort by Wikipedians to improve the band's coverage on the encyclopedia. Please consider signing up here.

Giggy UCP 02:43, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Powderfinger - July Newsletter[edit]

File:PFlogo.svg
The Powderfinger WikiProject Newsletter
Issue I - July 2007
WikiProject Powderfinger News
Discussions & Collaborations
  • There's currently a discussion as to your favourite Powderfinger works, with potential for collaboration. You can join in the discussion here
  • It's been proposed that a more consistent method of collaboration is implemented. You can have your say, and suggest articles for collaboration, on the talk page.

In other music news...
If you would like this newsletter delivered in a different format next month, or if you don't wish to receive it, please see here.

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter was delivered by ENewsBot · 20:02, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Nicole Stubbins[edit]

A tag has been placed on Nicole Stubbins requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Jasynnash2 (talk) 12:44, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Demographics of Australia[edit]

Hi - I noticed you have worked on a couple of articles such as Uruguayan Australian. I thought you might be interested the project at Wikipedia:WikiProject Demographics of Australia which is covering these articles and the associated discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Demographics of Australia‎ Regards --Matilda talk 07:02, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs[edit]

Hello Yamama3000! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 941 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

  1. Jasmin Geisel - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  2. Natalie Hill - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:07, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Demographics of Australia[edit]

Template:Demographics of Australia has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:45, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Gibraltarian Australian has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Barryob (Contribs) (Talk) 22:45, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Fiesta de la Hispanidad, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fitzroy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 4[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Belarusian Australian, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Victoria (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:32, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Lists of Australian locations with large ethnic community has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

given that each and every person in the country is of an ethnicity one may conclude that all localities have a community of 100% of various ethnicities, rendering this article inherently illogical

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crusoe8181 (talk) 08:32, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 23[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Demographics of Brisbane, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Taiwanese. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of Asian Australian communities has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Completely unsourced, no basis for inclusion on the list

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WWGB (talk) 11:46, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamama3000: I have added sources to address the issue initially brought up and to prevent the deletion of the page. Most of them however, are not in the preferred references template but they still address the issue nevertheless. (101.160.160.144 (talk) 00:08, 10 May 2017 (UTC))[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from List of Italian-American neighborhoods into List of Italian-Australian communities. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:15, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete discussion[edit]

An article you created Kosovan Australians is a candidate for deletion.Resnjari (talk) 11:45, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ugandan Australians for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ugandan Australians, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ugandan Australians until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Irish Australian flag.gif[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Irish Australian flag.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 00:26, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]