User talk:Zach Vega/Archive 14

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Redundant information[edit]

So, why are all the Android articles going around not describing what the phone does? ViperSnake151  Talk  00:05, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know why they don't. I'm just aware that in order for an article on a phone to meet FA status, the article needs to describe what the phone does. In fact, I would suggest that Android articles begin including that information. Zach Vega (talk to me) 00:07, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 16 October 2013[edit]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Ignatius_Mabasa#resubmission[edit]

See my comments.

Hello, Zach Vega. You have new messages at PaucaVerba's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

PaucaVerba (talk) 10:11, 20 October 2013 (UTC)PaucaVerba[reply]

Your note[edit]

Thank you for the first edit day message! It's been seven years. :) Best. Acalamari 17:35, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No problem dude. Your contributions are something to celebrate. Zach Vega (talk to me) 18:08, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Infernaeon Article[edit]

Please explain to me why my article was rejected.

Did you even read the article and follow the references? Your rejection reply says nothing and gives no details on the exact problem.

Did you even look to see this subject is referenced NUMEROUS times on Wikipedia already?

Does Wikipedia not care about relevant information to back up articles that ALREADY EXIST on the site?

This is why people don't take Wikipedia seriously. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MetalMalice (talk • contribs) 23:23, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article still gives no indication as to why it's notable. Zach Vega (talk to me) 22:06, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Let's look at the criteria you are ignoring:

>>"Significant coverage" addresses the topic directly and >>in detail, so that no original research is needed to >>extract the content. Significant coverage is more than >>a passing mention but it need not be the main topic of the source material.[1]

Google the term "Infernaeon" and look at the search results from numerous web sites.

>>"Reliable" means sources need editorial integrity to >>allow verifiable evaluation of notability, per the >>reliable source guideline. Sources may encompass >>published works in all forms and media, and in any >>language. Availability of secondary sources covering the >>subject is a good test for notability.

Numerous metal news sites and outlets have covered this band. Do your homework.

>>"Sources"[2] should be secondary sources, as those >>provide the most objective evidence of notability. >>There is no fixed number of sources required since >>sources vary in quality and depth of coverage, but >>multiple sources are generally expected.[3] Sources >>do not have to be available online and do not have to >>be in English. Multiple publications from the same >>author or organization are usually regarded as a >>single source for the purposes of establishing notability.

This was provided to you. I have yet to see evidence that you did not receive this information.

>>"Independent of the subject" excludes works produced >>by the article's subject or someone affiliated with it. >>For example, advertising, press releases, autobiographies, >>and the subject's website are not considered independent.

The only reference that doesn't meet this is the band's web site. Every other reference is from a reputable news source.

Bands base their entire experience on marketing with their fans. There's no way not to use press release links to indicate notability for a band's years of history. Despite that, other references were provided that do not rely on press releases.

>>"Presumed" means that significant coverage in reliable sources >>creates an assumption, not a guarantee, that a subject >>should be included. A more in-depth discussion might conclude >>that the topic actually should not have stand-alone article—perhaps >>because it violates what Wikipedia is not, particularly the >>rule that Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information.[5]

Again, this topic is linked NUMEROUS TIMES already on Wikipedia. Don't you think you should have some sort of historical reference for a topic you already have available in the public?

Is there anyone else here who can approve this article besides "Zach"? (a 15 year old kid I might add) — Preceding unsigned comment added by MetalMalice (talk • contribs) 09:02, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker)MetalMalice: First off, "15 year old kids" frequently have more time to devote to projects like Wikipedia than adults do and consequently they may be better experts than adults. That said, if you want help with your submission, there is a link to the Help Desk in the beige box on your submission, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Infernaeon. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 16:44, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

davidwr: First off, 15 year old kids shouldn't EVER be in a position of authority. Period. Secondly, it seems the whole notion of something having "notability" is based purely on opinion alone. That being said, and given the lack of clarity in explaining exactly why the subject is _not_ notable, leads me to believe such an individual's lack of judgement could only be due to his age. Was any research done on the subject to come to that conclusion? Did any of you actually follow the reference links? Do you realize this band has been releasing albums for years now with guest producers and appearances from numerous BIG name musicians that ARE ALREADY in articles on Wikipedia? Obviously none of this legwork was done by Zach (or you for that matter.) Again, this is why no one takes Wikipedia as a serious source for information. It's because you have a bunch of kids running it. Unreal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MetalMalice (talk • contribs) 19:09, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FWIW, I have known a number of people 15 years old or even younger participating actively in WP and doing very creditable work. I've known one personally in NYC as young as 12. obviously, there will be some limitations in terms of width of background and depth of education, but the degree of judgment and common sense can be as high as those many times that age. I personally wouldn't have done as well at their age as some of them, but that's a reflection on me, not on them. DGG ( talk ) 09:55, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

AfC - Marine Aquarium Council[edit]

Please forgive me if I'm doing this wrong. This is the first article I've tried to create and I do find it very daunting, dealing with Wikipedia's own jargon to be the least.

This is a link to the article I've tried to create, I believe you've reviewed it this evening:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Marine_Aquarium_Council

When you say it is worded like an advertisement, is it a problem with the text or with the references? or was it a computer script that made the assessment? I can't tell.

I was unable to find a page that dealt with how to spot or correct articles that sound like advertisements. Maybe there is one?

I really have no vested interest in this organization. I live in Toronto, Canada and have no dealings with fish importers or fishermen; I just want to help the next guy who searches the encyclopedia to find the information that I was unable to find on the site.

Thanks. I worked for a good couple hours on that article and now I feel pretty bummed.

Take for example, this article here, existing in the encyclopedia for a while already of a very well-known organization:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heart_and_Stroke_Foundation_of_Canada

This article presents a quantity of facts and data, only one minor one of which is substantiated by an outside source (reference). Also it makes one claim as being the leader a particular field. this also is unsubstantiated. I have noted it on the article, which you may see now. I have made no changes to the article itself.

Please also bear with me, as I did initially have difficulty in having this article turned down by someone less than half my age ;) I say this not to offend, but to state a fact.

I appreciate your time

-Kevin — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50seven (talk • contribs) 02:22, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

50seven (talk) 02:40, 21 October 2013 (UTC)50seven[reply]

"MAC certification is seen by many consumers worldwide to be a sign of environmental stewardship and ethical treatment of marine life" - Can we somehow rephrase this? Zach Vega (talk to me) 22:10, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dream11.com[edit]

Hi,

Wanted to know more about my content which i submitted for dream11.com. Why do you think that its still like advertising. In my opinion, i have included all points which should be present for a page which give information about a company. Can you please let me know how i can further improve my listing — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cricfandream (talk • contribs) 07:30, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Phrases like "is the oldest and the most prestigious" are promotional. Zach Vega (talk to me) 22:32, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

AFC: St. Mary's Church, Noida[edit]

Hello, Zach Vega. You have new messages at ScitDei's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

~~ ScitDeitalk 09:50, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Zach Vega, Is there a hold up with this article, or did you forget about it?~ ScitDeitalk 10:54, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Jim_Leverton[edit]

Thanks for your feedback on my article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Jim_Leverton but I am puzzled why this has been declined. Jim Leverton has made several records for major labels, is already referred to in several other Wiki pages and the citations that I have used are all independent. Where have I gone wrong?

Many thanks

Sally of Kent (talk) 10:52, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The majority of sources can't be from the label, a discography, or a review to establish notability. Zach Vega (talk to me) 16:47, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Zach, reviews can be exactly the sort of sources which we do want to establish notability, provided they provide substantial coverage from 3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online. As for specific good reviewing sources in this field, I'm no judge, but the principle holds in all creative fields. DGG ( talk ) 10:01, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Declining submission[edit]

I have cited the sources using footnotes in my article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Nithin_Raj as I got this message below:- (Declining submission: submission does not contain minimum citations (AFCH)) Please review and let me know if any more changes are required.

You can't source Wikipedia. That would be circular referencing. Zach Vega (talk to me) 16:50, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Drew Wesley Taylor article for submission[edit]

Hi Zach - I am confused about why you rejected my article on Drew Wesley Taylor. I put many footnotes, references and citations to justify the statements in the article. Please explain the issues so I can fix them. Thank you. Local2011 (talk) 15:27, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

We need more third party sources to independently confirm the information on the article. Zach Vega (talk to me) 16:52, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I only used third party sources as the information and i backed up every statement with a reference. Please take a real look at this article and be specific with your feedback as I am committed to meeting your standards for this article. Thank you. Local2011 (talk) 20:18, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Sources 10 through 19 are by Taylor himself. Zach Vega (talk to me) 20:39, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

My article on Gibney Dance wasn't accepted due to "copyrighted information" found on volunteermatch.org. We wrote and manage that profile as well, in which we included our Mission Statement, which I also put in our wikipedia article. How should I proceed and do I need to prove that the information isn't copyrighted? Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gibneydance (talk • contribs) 17:13, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials and be aware of the Wikipedia's Law of Unintended Consequences. Please remember to sign your posts in talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). -- Alexf(talk) 17:23, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ping[edit]

Just so you know if you use Template:Ping like @Blethering Scot: as part of your text reply it sends a notification instead of a talk back. Less messages and clutter but with same effect.Blethering Scot 21:09, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've actually never heard of that template before. Good idea. Thanks! Zach Vega (talk to me) 21:55, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Still an 5th generation iPad.[edit]

For the sake of Wiki readers to know the generation, Wiki should go by generation and not the names Apple pulls out of the air (yes, I know). The 5th gen is still the same screen size (9.7") and resolution as the 4th and 3ed gen, just a smaller case and faster motherboard. =Flightsoffancy (talk) 22:00, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's called the iPad Air, just like the MacBook Air. You could say that it was the 5th generation in the lead though. Zach Vega (talk to me) 22:17, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

IPhone 6C listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect IPhone 6C. Since you had some involvement with the IPhone 6C redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 23:41, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

IPhone 6S listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect IPhone 6S. Since you had some involvement with the IPhone 6S redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 00:11, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Shlohmo[edit]

Hi, Zach. Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Shlohmo which you declined a few days ago meets both WP:MUSICBIO criterion #1 and WP:GNG. Could you please take a second look? 114.164.185.3 (talk) 14:39, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

AFC backlog drive[edit]

I'm challenging you to get to either 400 reviews or 400 re-reviews and a total of 800 points by the end of the drive. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 21:03, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 23 October 2013[edit]

Hi Zach, I'm writing you about this article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/John_Stubbs_%28author%29 you recently assessed for submission. You asked for more references and I have added some but I wondered if you could check the page before I resubmit to see if I've listed them correctly. cheers Flowerpress 14 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Flowerpress14 (talk • contribs) 00:24, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

John Stubbs submission[edit]

Hi Zach, I'm writing you about this article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/John_Stubbs_%28author%29 you recently assessed for submission. You asked for more references and I have added some but I wondered if you could check the page before I resubmit to see if I've listed them correctly. cheers Flowerpress 14 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Flowerpress14 (talk • contribs) 00:27, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Grey School of Wizardry[edit]

Dear Zach Vega: Is there a hold up with this article, or did you forget about it? —Anne Delong (talk) 01:29, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Zach Vega. You have new messages at Fcia0423's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

The Signpost: 30 October 2013[edit]

WikiCup 2014[edit]

Hi, if you haven't already, you should consider signing up for WikiCup 2014. Cheers, --Sp33dyphil ©hatontributions 01:22, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

My submission for THE HUNTERS[edit]

Hello and thanks for your help! I have been hired by the filmmakers to create a page for the TV Movie "The Hunters" -- i re-sumbitted the page citing more sources as instructed. Is there anything else I may do to help make the page acceptable to you? Thanks much! -chris — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gthebinsider (talk • contribs) 19:41, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

AFC reminder[edit]

You placed Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Magical Forms of Transportation in Harry Potter under review on October 17. It has not been edited since. You did the same for Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Nu-Swift International Limited on October 12. That also has not been edited since. Ditto Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Grey School of Wizardry on October 14, again with no edits since. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 21:47, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 06 November 2013[edit]

WP Apple Inc. in the Signpost[edit]

The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Apple Inc. for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. –Mabeenot (talk) 12:26, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Finally![edit]

Hey there! My name is Martin Gonzalez, I'm 15 years old too, and I've been looking everywhere for a wikipedia user that is my age. And looks like I just found one!! Thats so awesome there aren't many teenage Wikipedians haha. And I'm too into all this techy stuff like apple an pc and all that. Its pretty awesome :). Have a good one. Martinillo (talk) 03:15, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A Barnstar for You![edit]

The AFC Backlog Buster Barnstar

Congratulations, Zach Vega! You're receiving The Bronze Wiki and Teamwork Barnstar because you reviewed 705 articles during the recent AFC Backlog elimination drive! Thank you for you contributions to Wikipedia at-large and helping to keep the backlog down. We hope you continue reviewing submissions and stay in touch at the talk page. Thank you and keep up the good work! --Mdann52talk to me! 19:41, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of OS X Mountain Lion[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article OS X Mountain Lion you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cirt -- Cirt (talk) 07:02, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please see my note at Talk:OS X Mountain Lion/GA2, keep me posted on your progress there, — Cirt (talk) 22:57, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Are you going to have a chance to address those preliminary issues soon? — Cirt (talk) 18:35, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Any updates yet regarding Talk:OS X Mountain Lion/GA2? — Cirt (talk) 21:06, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 13 November 2013[edit]

User:Richard.F.Fowler[edit]

I added text to my account home page on the subject of "Satellite DNA." Upon review, it was determined that it was not in encyclopedic format for Wikipedia. I can edit the article for the appropriate format, but I would like to add to the existing article on "Satellite DNA" rather than create a new subject page. How do I add content to an existing article? Thanks Richard.F.Fowler Richard.F.Fowler (talk) 22:21, 18 November 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Richard.F.Fowler (talk • contribs)

About Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/brown rockfish[edit]

Zach, this AfC looks sort of OK to me. The text is a copy-and-paste from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration web-page, but this kind of US government work is (from memory) somehow in the Public Domain, so as long as there is the required attribution it would be OK for Wikipedia. Your thoughts? Pete aka --Shirt58 (talk) 12:00, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 20 November 2013[edit]

Your AFC decline[edit]

Hi,

You declined Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Entrepreneurship Cell, IIT Kanpur because itt already existed in mainspace, whereas it didnt. The article you pointed to was of IIT Kharagpur which is different from IIT Kanpur, which is the subject of the AFC in question. Please check before declining other AFCs. I have reverted your decline.

Regards, TheOriginalSoni (talk) 09:10, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

AFC Backlog Drive[edit]

WikiProject Articles for creation Backlog Elimination Drive[edit]

Hello, Zach Vega:

WikiProject AFC is holding a two month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from December 1st, 2013 – January 31st, 2014.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 2500 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

A new version of our AfC helper script has been released! It includes many bug fixes, new improvements and features, code enhancements, and more. If you want to see a full list of changes, visit the changelog. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks. EdwardsBot (talk) 09:12, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) at 09:12, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 04 December 2013[edit]

Your GA nomination of OS X Mountain Lion[edit]

The article OS X Mountain Lion you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:OS X Mountain Lion for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cirt -- Cirt (talk) 20:32, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Help needed to create this article[edit]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Prashant_ThakurKindly help me ion letting this article to be created — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dkdevesh (talk • contribs) 12:40, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 11 December 2013[edit]

The Signpost: 18 December 2013[edit]

The Signpost: 25 December 2013[edit]

How to resubmit my article for review[edit]

Hi Zach,

First of all, thanks for reviewing my article but just because "Kind of advertisement content" it was disapproved. Now, i have updated it and want to resubmit it again for review. Please review my article again and let me know how can i improve the quality of article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GovindIRC (talk • contribs) 07:09, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 01 January 2014[edit]

Why edit not appearing in the article?[edit]

In Article-https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al_Nasr_Salalah I have edited the 2nd position in the 2nd as second position in the Second but it is not shown in the article... Why? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alhosniomani20 (talk • contribs) 13:18, 4 January 2014‎

The Signpost: 08 January 2014[edit]

The Signpost: 15 January 2014[edit]

The Signpost: 22 January 2014[edit]

The Signpost: 29 January 2014[edit]

The Signpost: 29 January 2014[edit]

Why 2 is appearing in the external links section?[edit]

In the article 2012-13 Omani League why 2 is appearing in the external link section inspite of providing the complete url?

How can we change the name of the articles?[edit]

Please help me. How can we change the name of the articles?

Gee Langdon[edit]

Hello,

You mention that reviews of the above's books would be sufficient evidence of notability for acceptance. I have many newspaper cuttings of book reviews but, as they were from the pre-internet days, they are not available as online links.

What am I to do?

Best wishes,

John Dixon

GinAndWee (talk) 11:18, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 12 February 2014[edit]

Why unreliable source message is coming? Can I remove it?[edit]

In the article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juma_Saeed a message saying unreliable source is coming. I have provided a reliable source and there are many other articles who have only one source.

The Signpost: 19 February 2014[edit]

Please comment on changes to the AfC mailing list[edit]

Hello Zach Vega! There is a discussion that your input is requested on! I look forward to your comments, thoughts, opinions, criticisms, and questions!

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page.

This message was composed and sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} (t • e • c) 18:18, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Changing the title of the article.[edit]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al_Shabab_(Oman) Al-Shabab is actually a club and not just Al-Shabab and that title would me more appropriate but Wikipedia doesn't allow me to change the name saying that it was already moved before to this title.

WikiProject Articles for creation March 2014 Backlog Elimination Drive[edit]

Hello Zach Vega:

WikiProject AFC is holding a month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from March 1, 2014 to March 31, 2014.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 2500 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

A new version of our AfC helper script has been released! It includes many bug fixes, new improvements and features, code enhancements, and more. If you want to see a full list of changes, visit the changelog. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks.
Posted by Northamerica1000 (talk) on 02:12, 28 February 2014 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk), on behalf of WikiProject Articles for creation[reply]

The Signpost: 26 February 2014[edit]

(test) The Signpost: 05 March 2014[edit]

The Signpost: 12 March 2014[edit]

Why is there so much space between the table and heading - Stadia and Locations in the article 2013-14 Oman Professional League?[edit]

Why is there so much space between the table and heading - Stadia and Locations in the article 2013-14 Oman Professional League? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2013%E2%80%9314_Oman_Professional_League

The Signpost: 19 March 2014[edit]

The Signpost: 26 March 2014[edit]

The Signpost: 02 April 2014[edit]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Original Barnstar
hey can u make me a userbox? hit me up Blackfire121 (talk) 17:54, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

We need your help testing latest huggle[edit]

Hello,

I am sending you this message because you listed yourself on meta:Huggle/Members as a beta tester. We desperately need attention of testers, because since we resolved all release blockers, we are ready to release first official version of huggle 3! Before that happens, it would be nice if you could test it so that we can make sure there are no issues with it. You can download it packaged for your operating system (see Wikipedia:Huggle/Huggle3_Beta) or you can of course build it yourself, see https://github.com/huggle/huggle3-qt-lx for that. Don't forget to use always latest version, there is no auto-update message for beta versions!

Should you find any issue, please report it to wikimedia bugzilla, that is a central place for huggle bugs, where we look at them. That is i mportant, if you find a bug and won't report it, we can't fix it. Thank you for your work on this, if you have any questions, please send me a message on my talk page, I won't be looking for responses here. Thanks, Petrb (talk) 15:20, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Question about a comment you left for me - Page: CitiusTech[edit]

Hi Zach,

I hope you're having a good day. I had a quick question for you - You had edited a CitiusTech page for me back in October that was denied, saying: Provide a description of the offerings - with reliable sources, of course. Zach Vega (talk to me) 13:30, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

I was wondering if you could provide me with a little more information of what you're looking for. This is my first Wikipedia page, so I'm still trying to figure it out. Would you like descriptions of CitiusTech's offerings linking back to their website where they describe their offerings, or does it need to be a third-party source?

Thank you! Anna Aboyd519 (talk) 21:25, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(Aboyd519 (talk) 12:56, 14 April 2014 (UTC))[reply]

[edit]

Hi Zack, not sure exactly why you rejected the entry I did for the film 'Against Naature' directed by John Story and Antony Zaki and starring Adrian Dunbar http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0932918/

I did notice the film is listed on adrian Dunbar's wiki page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adrian_Dunbar#Select_Filmography

Would that be sufficient to qualify the article for publication. Also it might make sense to re name the page "Against Nature (2005 Film)" or something like that to distinguish it from the other 'Against Nature' entries.

I'm a not very experienced at wikipedia so appreciate your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bookchitchat (talk • contribs) 03:58, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 09 April 2014[edit]

The Signpost: 23 April 2014[edit]

The Signpost: 30 April 2014[edit]

The Signpost: 07 May 2014[edit]

Why image is called unfree file? Even though it was clicked by me.[edit]

This image was clicked by me by m own camera. Why is it unfree?

The Signpost: 14 May 2014[edit]

Notification of a June AfC BackLog Drive[edit]

Hello Zach Vega:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from June 1, 2014 to June 30, 2014.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 2500 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

The AfC helper script can assist you in tallying your edits automatically. To view a full list of changes, visit the changelog. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks. Sent on behalf of (t) Josve05a (c) by {{U|Technical 13}} (t • e • c) using the MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:46, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 21 May 2014[edit]

May 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of countries by GDP (nominal) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:04, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Zach_Vega/Archive_14&oldid=1168310024"