User talk:Zwap2019

Your submission at Articles for creation: YNW Bortlen (May 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:YNW Bortlen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:YNW Bortlen, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

asilvering (talk) 03:35, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Zwap2019! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! asilvering (talk) 03:35, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

May 2022

Hello, I'm Magnolia677. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Kevin Gates discography, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:02, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for the notice, I'm pretty new so I'm getting used to things! I'll be sure to include a citation next time. Zwap2019 (talk) 21:26, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

You did it again at YNW Melly. Please take a moment to read Help:Referencing for beginners. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 08:42, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:File.Khaza.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:File.Khaza.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kanye West production discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lost Souls. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: YNW Bortlen (July 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Missvain was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:YNW Bortlen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:YNW Bortlen, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Missvain (talk) 05:12, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:YoungBoy Never Broke Again - Vette Motors.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:YoungBoy Never Broke Again - Vette Motors.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 04:26, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

Ways to improve Lost Souls (Vory album)

Hello, Zwap2019,

Thank you for creating Lost Souls (Vory album).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

The page's subject may not meet the notability guideline for music. Please help demonstrate notability by adding reliable secondary sources with significant coverage.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|FormalDude}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

––FormalDude talk 05:47, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

August 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Kodak Black discography, you may be blocked from editing. Magnolia677 (talk) 15:35, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

September 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at A Boogie wit da Hoodie discography, you may be blocked from editing. Muhandes (talk) 08:24, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Mr. Crawford (album). scope_creep^Talk 21:46, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Quando Rondo

Template:Quando Rondo has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Muhandes (talk) 08:44, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Youngboy Never Broke Again - Realer2.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Youngboy Never Broke Again - Realer2.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Muhandes (talk) 15:15, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Blocked

You have had countless warnings for adding unsourced content, and yet you've continued to do so, as recently as today. As such, your account is blocked for 3 days. When you return, please take our sourcing policy seriously and source any and all content you add. Sergecross73 msg me 23:56, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

@Sergecross73: Perhaps not worth another block quite yet, but it's been a month and this user's inventing content now...this chart position isn't even correct. Ss112 22:39, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Care to chime in on what's going on, Zwap? Sergecross73 msg me 23:34, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Don't take chart positions from Hits Daily Double

Hello. Please realise that Hits Daily Double is not Billboard and they never have access to Billboard's official chart positions or their data, including official sales figures. Hits Daily Double is only a prediction. Until Billboard has announced something themselves, it's not official, so please do not add chart positions or sales figures from Hits Daily Double in future. Thank you. Ss112 22:41, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for letting me know. I'll keep this in mind for next time. Zwap2019 (talk) 16:33, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

Ma’ I Got A Family moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ma’ I Got A Family, is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:14, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited NoCap, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jagged Edge.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ma’ I Got A Family (October 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devonian Wombat was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ma’ I Got A Family and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Devonian Wombat (talk) 12:53, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:NoCap.jpeg

A tag has been placed on File:NoCap.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 15:24, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:YoungBoy Never Broke Again - Ma’ I Got A Family.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:YoungBoy Never Broke Again - Ma’ I Got A Family.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:57, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ma’ I Got A Family (October 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ingenuity was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ma’ I Got A Family and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 20:01, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ma’ I Got A Family (October 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ma’ I Got A Family and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 21:28, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

November 2022

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Template:Quando Rondo, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. The article was deleted after discussion. Please don't recreate it against consensus. Muhandes (talk) 08:23, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Relation to Never Broke Again

Hi there. All your edits seem to revolve around Never Broke Again artists. Are you in anyway related? --Muhandes (talk) 08:26, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Hi! No, I am not related, however, I contribute a lot on rap music and Never Broke Again artists release a lot more music then other artists in the rap industry. Zwap2019 (talk) 12:07, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Thanks, was just wondering. --Muhandes (talk) 17:09, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Quando Rondo

Template:Quando Rondo has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Muhandes (talk) 17:06, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ma’ I Got A Family has been accepted

Ma’ I Got A Family, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 22:59, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Clavish in 2022.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Clavish in 2022.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 16:34, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

Please explain your edits with an edit summary

Hello. When you make edits like this, where you move singles on a discography, you should really be leaving an edit summary explaining why. Please do so in future or you can find your edits reverted without explanation as you didn't provide one. Thank you. Ss112 00:35, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Motown, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Offset.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Do not create articles at deliberately incorrect titles

It's fine to want credit for creating an article in the edit history. It's not fine to circumvent this by creating an article at a deliberately incorrect title like Black (YoungBoy Never Broke song when you know the closing parenthesis is missing. Please just create an article as a draft or in your userspace and ask for it to be moved at WP:RM/TR when it's ready in future. Your article has been moved to Black (YoungBoy Never Broke Again song). Ss112 01:04, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

February 2023

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Shy Glizzy, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:53, 3 February 2023 (UTC)

Do not use The Needle Drop

Hello. You recently added a Needle Drop review to Afterlyfe. Per WP:ALBUMAVOID (which was determined through consensus), we should not use Anthony Fantano's self-published reviews on Wikipedia. Thanks. Ss112 08:53, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nicki Minaj discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Don't Try This at Home.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Please see WP:NCMDAB

Zwap, nearly every article you've created recently has been moved to a simpler article title. Please locate the simplest article name for what you're creating and create the article there, or request it be moved there from wherever you're creating it (userspace, draft, etc). There was nothing else at Big Truck (song), nor What You Say, and the articles you made have had to be moved by page movers or administrators. Also, please stop capitalising the first letters of prepositions in titles. You've repeatedly capitalised the "a" in "at" in Don't Try This at Home, but per MOS:CT it should not be capitalised. Finally, please see WP:LQ. We don't include commas in song titles or fragments of sentences from sources we're quoting. Thank you. Ss112 22:30, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Pagwghd33 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Pagwghd33. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Girth Summit _(blether) 17:57, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zwap2019 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I don't know why I've been blocked. I'm not aware of this account, "Pagwghd33," furthermore, I heavily contribute to Wikipedia, I add the appropriate sources and have created numerous pages.

Decline reason:

You are blocked for the reasons discussed in the SPI(Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Pagwghd33). 331dot (talk) 19:44, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zwap2019 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

It's said I've been blocked for creating several accounts after being banned on others, however, I have no knowledge of this. It's said that just because I share similar editing interests with the other accounts and am in the same radius, I am the other accounts, however, I edit extremely popular artists who are known worldwide, therefore, it's very likely others close to me in the area also edit their profiles. Also, there isn't actually any hard proof that the other accounts were me, as noted by the team who decided to block me, it's just speculation.

Decline reason:

As a lot of our sockpuppetry blocks usually are. Where your request really fails is this "I edit extremely popular artists who are known worldwide" thing. I admit my awareness of popular music at my age is not what it once was, but I didn't recognize any of the names you and these other accounts edited ... in fact I think some of these pages were deleted, which suggests to me that the artists they were about are not presently notable. I would think that "extremely popular artists who are known worldwide" would mean someone at the Taylor Swift or BTS level, someone who has long had an article on Wikipedias in many languages. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:19, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zwap2019 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

In response to Daniel Case's argument, artists like Taylor Swift or BTS are actually considered global superstars and are often played heavily on the radio, hence why you would recognize them more than artists I mainly edit such as YoungBoy Never Broke Again, YNW Melly, and Toosii. I admit some artists I edit aren't as notable, but to use that excuse that the artists aren't of the level isn't fair since YoungBoy Never Broke Again is the youngest artist to chart 100 songs on the Billboard Hot 100 and is one of the youngest artists to have received 100 gold and platinum plaques from the RIAA. Since it's written that "I edit extremely popular artists who are known worldwide" is where my response "fails", I hope this can assist you to see why I believe I should be unbanned, and not even have been banned in the first place. Thanks.

Decline reason:

I'm afraid that I find the evidence of sockpuppetry convincing, and your denial to not be. You should review the standard offer. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 02:48, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.