Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Philosophy/Language: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
recat
update category link
 
(41 intermediate revisions by 14 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Linguistics/Header}}
Welcome to '''WikiProject Philosophy of Language''' (WPPL), a subproject of [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Philosophy|WikiProject Philosophy]].
{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Philosophy/Language/Nav}}

Welcome to the '''Philosophy of Language Task Force''', a subproject of [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Philosophy|WikiProject Philosophy]] and [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Linguistics|WikiProject Linguistics]].

== Getting started ==
There are a few things you can do right now to get started helping the task force and the project.

*Add yourself to the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Philosophy/participants/Philosophy of language task force|Participants Roster]].

*[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Version_1.0_Editorial_Team/Philosophy_of_language_articles_by_quality_log&action=watch Watchlist] and monitor the [[Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Philosophy_of_language_articles by quality_log|Philosophy of language log]].

*[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Philosophy&action=watch Watchlist] and monitor the [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Philosophy|General Discussion]].

*Add '''<nowiki>{{User WP Philosophy of language}}</nowiki>''' to your user page. It will automatically add you to [[:Category:Philosophy of language task force participants]]. You may also choose to place the Philosophy of language navigation banner on your user page as well by adding '''<nowiki>{{Philosophy of language/Nav}}</nowiki>'''.


==Scope and Goals==
==Scope and Goals==
The focus of WPPL will be to work as diligently as is humanly possible to create professional-quality, thoroughly documented, and encyclopedic articles on the [[philosophy of language]] and to integrate them as much as possible with work from all branches of [[linguistics]]: [[psycholinguistics]], [[sociolinguistics]], [[computational linguistics]], etc..
The focus of the task force will be to work as diligently as is humanly possible to create professional-quality, thoroughly documented, and encyclopedic articles on the [[philosophy of language]] and to integrate them as much as possible with work from all branches of [[linguistics]]: [[psycholinguistics]], [[sociolinguistics]], [[computational linguistics]], etc..


Philosophy of language is a particularly challenging, field because much of its most important and groundbreaking work lies at the subtle confine between philosophy and mathematical logic, between the humanities and rigorous scientific research. It attempts to bridge the gap between the so-called '''two cultures''' by creating a synthesizing third culture that includes and enhances the first two.
Philosophy of language is a particularly challenging field. Much of its most important and groundbreaking work lies at the subtle confine between philosophy and mathematical logic, and between the humanities and rigorous scientific research.


It attempts to bridge the gap between the so-called '''two cultures''' by creating a synthesizing third culture that includes and enhances the first two.
The current main article of [[philosophy of language]] contains hardly any information on important theoretical concepts and what it does contain is extremely ill-organized and confused. Philosophy of language is a large and complex field. Indeed, the [[analytic philosophy|analytic]] tradition of philosophy has traditionally, and continues to, place a tremendous amount of importance on the analysis of language as the vehicle of thought. According to most analytic philosophers that which we want to explain is the nature of thoughts. What are they? What is their structure and constitution? What are there relations with one another in the processes of reasoning and of deliberation which ultimately result in the performance of actions. Unlike the psychologist, we are not interested here, however, in the specific ''processes'' or ''activities'' of individual thought in and of themselves. That which should concern the philosopher of language are the ''contents'' of thoughts: their comprehensibility, communicability and objectivity (or perhaps intersubjectivity). As [[Michael Dummett]] has put it: ''that which distinguishes analytic philosophy, in all of it diverse manifestations, from other schools is the conviction that, in the first place, a philosophical explanation of thought can be acheived through a philosophical explanation of language, and secondly, that a comprehensive explanation is achievable ''only'' in this way.''

== Categories ==

<table cellpadding=4 align=float class="toccolours" style="text-align: left; border-collapse: collapse;">
<tr><td>
<categorytree>Philosophy of language</categorytree>
</td></tr></table>

==The task==
The current main article of [[philosophy of language]] contains hardly any information on important theoretical concepts and what it does contain is extremely ill-organized and confused.

Philosophy of language is a large and complex field. Indeed, the [[analytic philosophy|analytic]] tradition of philosophy has traditionally, and continues to, place a tremendous amount of importance on the analysis of language as the vehicle of thought.

According to most analytic philosophers that which we want to explain is the nature of thoughts. What are they? What is their structure and constitution? What are their relations with one another in the processes of reasoning and of deliberation which ultimately result in the performance of actions.

Unlike the psychologist, we are not interested here, however, in the specific ''processes'' or ''activities'' of individual thought in and of themselves.

That which should concern the philosopher of language are the ''contents'' of thoughts: their comprehensibility, communicability and objectivity (or perhaps intersubjectivity).

As [[Michael Dummett]] has put it: ''that which distinguishes analytic philosophy, in all of it diverse manifestations, from other schools is the conviction that, in the first place, a philosophical explanation of thought can be achieved through a philosophical explanation of language, and secondly, that a comprehensive explanation is achievable ''only'' in this way.''


The vast amount of information is too much for one or two people to handle. The coordinative effort of all those willing to assist is needed.
The vast amount of information is too much for one or two people to handle. The coordinative effort of all those willing to assist is needed.
Line 12: Line 46:
Since we are a derivative of WikiProject Philosophy, our goals are very similar and are as follows:
Since we are a derivative of WikiProject Philosophy, our goals are very similar and are as follows:


# To serve as a '''nexus and discussion area''' for contributors with knowledge of philosophy of language;
# To '''identify''' those areas of philosophy of language which lack sufficient coverage on Wikipedia;
# To '''identify''' those areas of philosophy of langauge which lack sufficient coverage on Wikipedia;
# To '''improve''' those articles that need help;
# To '''improve''' those articles that need help;
# To '''create a general map''' of the philosophy of language articles and subjects on Wikipedia and link the articles together accordingly.
# To '''create a general map''' of the philosophy of language articles and subjects on Wikipedia and link the articles together accordingly.

{{philosophy task force assessment|Philosophy of language}}
{{clear}}


==Current goals==
==Current goals==
{{PhilosophyOfLanguageTasksBox}}
* Identify and create missing [[philosophy of language]] content (see [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Philosophy_of_Language#Writing_and_Editing|Writing and Editing]])

* Identify and create missing [[philosophy of language]] content
* Improve the categorization and organization of [[philosophy of language]] material
* Improve the categorization and organization of [[philosophy of language]] material
* Gather interest and participation in a [[philosophy of language]] community within Wikipedia, including a Philosophy of Language Collaboration project
* Gather interest and participation in a [[philosophy of language]] community within Wikipedia, including a Philosophy of Language Collaboration project
*Please try to think of all possible renderings of terms before deciding that they don't exist. If they don't exist under ''any'' rendering then create a stub (or article if you see fit) and then create the pages for the different possible renderings and add the command: #REDIRECT [[Name of article you created]], in order to redirect all the renderings to one page. Example: [[type physicalism]] has [[identity theory of mind]], [[type-type theory]], [[type materialism]], etc. all redirected to it. This can often be done with many names of concepts listed on the main Philosophy Wikiproject's "list of philosophical concepts."
*Please try to think of all possible renderings of terms before deciding that they don't exist. If they don't exist under ''any'' rendering then create a stub (or article if you see fit) and then create the pages for the different possible renderings and add the command: #REDIRECT [[Name of article you created]], in order to redirect all the renderings to one page. Example: [[type physicalism]] has [[identity theory of mind]], [[type-type theory]], [[type materialism]], etc. all redirected to it. This can often be done with many names of concepts listed on the main Philosophy Wikiproject's "list of philosophical concepts."

==Writing and Editing==
===Articles in need of attention===
* [[Anaphora (linguistics)]] - Definitely needs more philosophy (e.g., the Geach Hob-Nob sentence.)
* [[Paul Boghossian]]
* [[Implicature]]
* [[principle of charity]] (expansion)

===Requested articles===
* "[[The Meaning of "Meaning"]]" - different book, separate article. (Putnam)
* "[[A Plea For Excuses]]" (Austin)
* [[Attributive use of descriptions]] and [[Referential use of descriptions]] (probably one article should suffice)
* [[Frege's puzzle]]
* [[Guise theory]]
* "[[How To Do Things With Words]]" (Austin)
* [[Linguistic community]]
* "[[Logic and Conversation]]" (Grice)
* "[[Naming and Necessity]]" (Kripke)
* [[Hector-Neri Castañeda]]
* [[Saturated and unsaturated expressions]] (Frege)
* [[Jason Stanley]]
* "[[Truth and Meaning]]" (Davidson)


==New or improved articles==
==New or improved articles==
Line 50: Line 66:


==Participants==
==Participants==
{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Philosophy/participants/Philosophy of language task force}}
*{{user|Lacatosias|Lacatosias}}

*{{user|KSchutte|KSchutte}}
== Templates ==
{{philosophy of language|state=expanded}}

* For main project templates, see the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Philosophy/Templates|Philosophy Templates]] and [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Linguistics/Templates|Linguistics Templates]]

===Project page tag===
Articles in the scope of the Philosophy of language task force should be tagged with the project templates for both WikiProject Philosophy and WikiProject Linguistics. Add the following at the top of the '''talk''' pages of all philosophy of language articles:

<pre>{{WikiProject Philosophy|class=|importance=|language=yes}}
{{WikiProject Linguistics|class=|importance=|philosophy=yes}}</pre>

It is especially important to tag:
*articles that members of the WikiProject are actively trying to improve.
*articles that need special attention.

===Userbox===

The template '''{{tl|User WP Phil of language}}''' will add the following userbox to your user page, and add you to the [[:Category:Philosophy of language task force participants]] and [[:Category:WikiProject Philosophy participants]] {{User WP Phil of language}}




[[Category:WikiProject Linguistics|Philosophy of language]]
[[Category:WikiProject Linguistics|Philosophy of language]]
[[Category:WikiProject Philosophy|Language, philosophy of]]
[[Category:WikiProject Philosophy|Language, philosophy of]]
[[Category:WikiProject Philosophy task forces]]

Latest revision as of 21:36, 21 October 2023

WikiProject Linguistics
collaboration on linguistics
in Wikipedia
Main pageDiscussionAssessmentArticle alertsRecognized contentPortal

Welcome to the Philosophy of Language Task Force, a subproject of WikiProject Philosophy and WikiProject Linguistics.

Getting started

There are a few things you can do right now to get started helping the task force and the project.

  • Add {{User WP Philosophy of language}} to your user page. It will automatically add you to Category:Philosophy of language task force participants. You may also choose to place the Philosophy of language navigation banner on your user page as well by adding {{Philosophy of language/Nav}}.

Scope and Goals

The focus of the task force will be to work as diligently as is humanly possible to create professional-quality, thoroughly documented, and encyclopedic articles on the philosophy of language and to integrate them as much as possible with work from all branches of linguistics: psycholinguistics, sociolinguistics, computational linguistics, etc..

Philosophy of language is a particularly challenging field. Much of its most important and groundbreaking work lies at the subtle confine between philosophy and mathematical logic, and between the humanities and rigorous scientific research.

It attempts to bridge the gap between the so-called two cultures by creating a synthesizing third culture that includes and enhances the first two.

Categories

The task

The current main article of philosophy of language contains hardly any information on important theoretical concepts and what it does contain is extremely ill-organized and confused.

Philosophy of language is a large and complex field. Indeed, the analytic tradition of philosophy has traditionally, and continues to, place a tremendous amount of importance on the analysis of language as the vehicle of thought.

According to most analytic philosophers that which we want to explain is the nature of thoughts. What are they? What is their structure and constitution? What are their relations with one another in the processes of reasoning and of deliberation which ultimately result in the performance of actions.

Unlike the psychologist, we are not interested here, however, in the specific processes or activities of individual thought in and of themselves.

That which should concern the philosopher of language are the contents of thoughts: their comprehensibility, communicability and objectivity (or perhaps intersubjectivity).

As Michael Dummett has put it: that which distinguishes analytic philosophy, in all of it diverse manifestations, from other schools is the conviction that, in the first place, a philosophical explanation of thought can be achieved through a philosophical explanation of language, and secondly, that a comprehensive explanation is achievable only in this way.

The vast amount of information is too much for one or two people to handle. The coordinative effort of all those willing to assist is needed.

Since we are a derivative of WikiProject Philosophy, our goals are very similar and are as follows:

  1. To identify those areas of philosophy of language which lack sufficient coverage on Wikipedia;
  2. To improve those articles that need help;
  3. To create a general map of the philosophy of language articles and subjects on Wikipedia and link the articles together accordingly.
Philosophy of language task force assessment statistics

statisticslogcategory

Current goals


  • Identify and create missing philosophy of language content
  • Improve the categorization and organization of philosophy of language material
  • Gather interest and participation in a philosophy of language community within Wikipedia, including a Philosophy of Language Collaboration project
  • Please try to think of all possible renderings of terms before deciding that they don't exist. If they don't exist under any rendering then create a stub (or article if you see fit) and then create the pages for the different possible renderings and add the command: #REDIRECT Name of article you created, in order to redirect all the renderings to one page. Example: type physicalism has identity theory of mind, type-type theory, type materialism, etc. all redirected to it. This can often be done with many names of concepts listed on the main Philosophy Wikiproject's "list of philosophical concepts."

New or improved articles

Participants


Templates

Project page tag

Articles in the scope of the Philosophy of language task force should be tagged with the project templates for both WikiProject Philosophy and WikiProject Linguistics. Add the following at the top of the talk pages of all philosophy of language articles:

{{WikiProject Philosophy|class=|importance=|language=yes}}
{{WikiProject Linguistics|class=|importance=|philosophy=yes}}

It is especially important to tag:

  • articles that members of the WikiProject are actively trying to improve.
  • articles that need special attention.

Userbox

The template {{User WP Phil of language}} will add the following userbox to your user page, and add you to the Category:Philosophy of language task force participants and Category:WikiProject Philosophy participants