User talk:Amitchell125: Difference between revisions
Amitchell125 (talk | contribs) →Osbert Parsley: reply |
Gerda Arendt (talk | contribs) →osbert parsley: MP |
||
Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
Thank you today for the article "about the English composer, organist and 'singing man' Osbert Parsley, whose 50-year-long musical career at Norwich Cathedral spanned the reigns of four Tudor monarchs—Henry VIII, Edward VI, Mary, and Elizabeth." I am pleased to see a "singing man" exposed prominently! - I began [[User:Gerda Arendt/Songs|songs]], to grow. -- "singing woman" [[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 08:38, 10 January 2023 (UTC) |
Thank you today for the article "about the English composer, organist and 'singing man' Osbert Parsley, whose 50-year-long musical career at Norwich Cathedral spanned the reigns of four Tudor monarchs—Henry VIII, Edward VI, Mary, and Elizabeth." I am pleased to see a "singing man" exposed prominently! - I began [[User:Gerda Arendt/Songs|songs]], to grow. -- "singing woman" [[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 08:38, 10 January 2023 (UTC) |
||
:{{ping|Gerda Arendt}} Thanks, I thought you would spot this article! His music is rather good... [[User:Amitchell125|Amitchell125]] ([[User talk:Amitchell125#top|talk]]) 08:43, 10 January 2023 (UTC) |
:{{ping|Gerda Arendt}} Thanks, I thought you would spot this article! His music is rather good... [[User:Amitchell125|Amitchell125]] ([[User talk:Amitchell125#top|talk]]) 08:43, 10 January 2023 (UTC) |
||
:: Sure, I was looking forward after I reviewed in the FAC ;) - I mentioned "him" in the Debussy discussion. - I just added my first choir's plans to the "happy new year": quite promising! We - Chor St. Martin - celebrate 50 years in 2023, and 26 of them were with me, [[St. Martin, Idstein#Choral concerts|beginning with the St Matthew Passion]]. --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 09:31, 10 January 2023 (UTC) |
|||
== [[Artemy Vedel]] scheduled for TFA == |
== [[Artemy Vedel]] scheduled for TFA == |
Revision as of 09:32, 10 January 2023
This is Amitchell125's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives 2010–2022: | |
2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014-2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023 |
|
osbert parsley
Amitchell125, i had a few questions regarding this blurb for this article.
- was this reversion done in error? i admittedly cannot figure out what was wrong with the edit, as i try to only make what i believe are uncontroversial edits to tfa blurbs, preferring to address fac nominators directly regarding issues that may be less clear (such as the two points below). many similar changes are routinely made to tfa blurbs to conform each to the current standard. aside from the routine changes, i had also reworded one sentence because i believe it was missing a main verb, which seems like a particularly obvious error. (the fragment had been part of a longer sentence in the article lead.) if your reversion was, in fact, deliberate, please let me know your reasoning, so that i may be more aware of similar issues in the future.
- is "Spes Nostra" being used as a title, or only as an incipit? if the latter, then i believe the 'N' should not be capitalized, as per mos:incipit, to conform with the capitalization used in "Conserva me, domine", as seen earlier in the blurb. the article appears to be inconsistent regarding how it should be capitalized. the description in the cited british library source does not seem to mention the motet, though the diamm entry cited elsewhere in the article does mention it, and does not capitalize the 'n'.
- is the "domine" in "Conserva me, domine" being used as either a proper name referencing a deity, or a title doing the same? if so, then i believe the 'd' should be capitalized, as per mos:god, even though sentence case is being used. the aforementioned diamm entry capitalizes the 'D', though the cited odnb entry does not. (incidentally, the article also mentions "a hymn Salvator mundi domine" with a minuscule 'd', citing the same diamm entry, though both the diamm and the odnb omit "domine" from the reference to the hymn.)
dying (talk) 05:28, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
![]() | |
happy new year |
---|
Thank you today for the article "about the English composer, organist and 'singing man' Osbert Parsley, whose 50-year-long musical career at Norwich Cathedral spanned the reigns of four Tudor monarchs—Henry VIII, Edward VI, Mary, and Elizabeth." I am pleased to see a "singing man" exposed prominently! - I began songs, to grow. -- "singing woman" Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:38, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Gerda Arendt: Thanks, I thought you would spot this article! His music is rather good... Amitchell125 (talk) 08:43, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
- Sure, I was looking forward after I reviewed in the FAC ;) - I mentioned "him" in the Debussy discussion. - I just added my first choir's plans to the "happy new year": quite promising! We - Chor St. Martin - celebrate 50 years in 2023, and 26 of them were with me, beginning with the St Matthew Passion. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:31, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
Artemy Vedel scheduled for TFA
This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 6 February 2023. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/February 6, 2023, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/February 2023. I suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work. Gog the Mild (talk) 22:33, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Supermarine S.4
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Supermarine S.4 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 09:21, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Happy New Year, Amitchell125!
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/93/Fuochi_d%27artificio.gif/212px-Fuochi_d%27artificio.gif)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/85/Happy_new_year_01.svg/177px-Happy_new_year_01.svg.png)
Amitchell125,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. See this for background context.
— Moops ⋠T⋡ 16:14, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
— Moops ⋠T⋡ 16:14, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
DYK for Isaac Sailmaker
On 5 January 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Isaac Sailmaker, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that artist Isaac Sailmaker (painting shown) was referred to in contemporary journals and books as "the father of British sea painting"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Isaac Sailmaker. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Isaac Sailmaker), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
-- RoySmith (talk) 12:02, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Supermarine S.4
The article Supermarine S.4 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Supermarine S.4 for comments about the article, and Talk:Supermarine S.4/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 06:43, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
AfD of interest
Hello, I thought (per WP:APPNOTE) that you might be interested in an AfD that concerns an article that you participated in previous discussions about: namely, Skathi (moon), for which you did a GA review. You can find the deletion discussion here. - Astrophobe (talk) 16:37, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:List of bibliographical materials on Ukrainian music
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/1d/Information_icon4.svg/48px-Information_icon4.svg.png)
Hello, Amitchell125. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of bibliographical materials on Ukrainian music".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 08:01, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Supermarine Sparrow
The article Supermarine Sparrow you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Supermarine Sparrow and Talk:Supermarine Sparrow/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 00:42, 10 January 2023 (UTC)