Bal Thackeray: Difference between revisions
not sure but i think this is more correct |
arbitrary decision about quotabillity of a source......reverted |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| caption = Bal Thackeray |
| caption = Bal Thackeray |
||
| birth_date = {{birth date and age|1924|01|23}} |
| birth_date = {{birth date and age|1924|01|23}} |
||
| birth_place = |
| birth_place = {{flagicon|India|British}} |
||
| residence = [[Mumbai]], [[India]] |
| residence = {{flagicon|IND}} [[Mumbai]], [[India]] |
||
| death_date = |
| death_date = |
||
| death_place = |
| death_place = |
||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
{{Hindu politics}} |
{{Hindu politics}} |
||
'''"Bal" Keshav Thackeray''' ([[Marathi language|Marathi]]: बाळ केशव ठाकरे ''bāḷ keśav ṭhākare'') (born [[January 23]], [[1924]]), popularly called 'Balasaheb', |
'''"Bal" Keshav Thackeray''' ([[Marathi language|Marathi]]: बाळ केशव ठाकरे ''bāḷ keśav ṭhākare'') (born [[January 23]], [[1924]]), popularly called 'Balasaheb', 'Sher', 'Tiger', or "Hindu Hridaysamrat," is the founder and president of the [[Shiv Sena]], a [[Hindu nationalist]] and [[populism|populist]] party active mainly in the [[West India|western]] [[India]]n state of [[Maharashtra]]. |
||
==Background== |
==Background== |
||
Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
Thackeray is very vocal in his opposition to people who migrate to Mumbai, to non-[[Hindu]]s (especially [[Muslim]]s), and to [[Pakistan]]is. In the late [[1970s]], as part of his "[[Maharashtra]] is for [[Maharashtrian]]s" campaign, Thackeray threatened migrants from [[South India]] with harm unless they left Mumbai. |
Thackeray is very vocal in his opposition to people who migrate to Mumbai, to non-[[Hindu]]s (especially [[Muslim]]s), and to [[Pakistan]]is. In the late [[1970s]], as part of his "[[Maharashtra]] is for [[Maharashtrian]]s" campaign, Thackeray threatened migrants from [[South India]] with harm unless they left Mumbai. |
||
In 2002, Thackeray issued a call to form |
In 2002, Thackeray issued a call to form suicide squads to counter alleged terrorism: |
||
<blockquote> If such suicide squads are formed only then can we take on perpetrators of mindless violence.<ref>{{cite news|url= http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/cms.dll/articleshow?artid=25248436|title=Thackeray for Hindu suicide squads|accessdate=2007-08-25|publisher=[[Times of India]]}}</ref></blockquote> |
<blockquote> If such suicide squads are formed only then can we take on perpetrators of mindless violence.<ref>{{cite news|url= http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/cms.dll/articleshow?artid=25248436|title=Thackeray for Hindu suicide squads|accessdate=2007-08-25|publisher=[[Times of India]]}}</ref></blockquote> |
||
In reaction to Thackeray’s call to form |
In reaction to Thackeray’s call to form suicide squads, Maharashtra government registered a case against him for inciting enmity between different groups. <ref>{{cite news|url= http://www.expressindia.com/fullstory.php?newsid=15895|title=Case filed against Thackeray for urging anti-terror suicide-squads|accessdate=2007-08-25|publisher=[[ExpressIndia.com ]]}}</ref> |
||
Asia Times further reported on Thackeray’s |
Asia Times further reported on Thackeray’s rhetoric: |
||
<blockquote> Thackeray called on Hindus to form suicide squads "to take the Muslims head on". "Trouble-making Muslims should be wiped out from the country ... kick out the four crore [40 million] Bangladeshi Muslims and then the country will be secure," the Shiv Sena leader said. Urging Hindus to start calling India "Hindu rashtra" (Hindu nation), he maintained that only "our religion [Hinduism] is to be honored here" and then "we will look after other religions".<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.atimes.com/atimes/South_Asia/DJ31Df02.html|title= India: The politics of passion|accessdate=2007-08-25|publisher=[[Asia Times]]}}</ref></blockquote> |
<blockquote> Thackeray called on Hindus to form suicide squads "to take the Muslims head on". "Trouble-making Muslims should be wiped out from the country ... kick out the four crore [40 million] Bangladeshi Muslims and then the country will be secure," the Shiv Sena leader said. Urging Hindus to start calling India "Hindu rashtra" (Hindu nation), he maintained that only "our religion [Hinduism] is to be honored here" and then "we will look after other religions".<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.atimes.com/atimes/South_Asia/DJ31Df02.html|title= India: The politics of passion|accessdate=2007-08-25|publisher=[[Asia Times]]}}</ref></blockquote> |
||
Line 66: | Line 66: | ||
What ELSE is required for Hindus to shake off the stupor and consider protecting our civilisation and culture? If telling it like it is makes one a Nazi, I say: Fine, better that than the spineless, deaf, dumb, numb and blind state exalted as Nehruvian Secularism. I wouldn't even spit on it.<ref>[http://www.rediff.com/news/1998/jan/29varsha.htm In rod we trust], Varsha Bhonsle</ref> |
What ELSE is required for Hindus to shake off the stupor and consider protecting our civilisation and culture? If telling it like it is makes one a Nazi, I say: Fine, better that than the spineless, deaf, dumb, numb and blind state exalted as Nehruvian Secularism. I wouldn't even spit on it.<ref>[http://www.rediff.com/news/1998/jan/29varsha.htm In rod we trust], Varsha Bhonsle</ref> |
||
</blockquote> |
</blockquote> |
||
Some Jewish scholars feel that, in spite of his remarks on Hitler, Thackeray and the Shiv Sena may share the ideological and political goals of [[Zionism]]. In an April 15, 1988, article in the ''Jerusalem Letter'', Nathan Katz and Ellen S. Goldberg of the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs write: <blockquote>[[History of the Jews in India|Jews in India]] are closely following the rise of Bal Thackeray, [[Shiv Sena]] and other [[Hindutva]] parties, since they see a possible supporter of [[Zionism]] in the [[Shiv Sena]]. The affinities between Hindus and Jews go beyond their shared perception of a Muslim adversary, and while secularism has been in the interest of Jews in most nations of exile, it may be that the Indian case is a notable exception.<ref>[http://www.jcpa.org/jl/jl101.htm THE LAST JEWS IN INDIA AND BURMA], Nathan Katz and Ellen S. Goldberg, Jerusalem Letter</ref>.</blockquote> |
|||
In an article appearing in Newindpress.com on August 20, 2007, Thackeray is quoted as wanting to be a dictator and the Hitler of whole India: |
In an article appearing in Newindpress.com on August 20, 2007, Thackeray is quoted as wanting to be a dictator and the Hitler of whole India: |
||
Line 81: | Line 83: | ||
The Justice Srikrishna Commission of Enquiry, which investigated the ensuing [[Bombay Riots|communal riots in Mumbai]], indicted Thackeray for sparking [[anti-Muslim]] violence, which led to more than 1,000 deaths in several ensuing riots, though the death toll during the actual act of the demolition was zero. The Srikrishna Commission found that Thackeray was personally responsible, not only for inciting the mobs through his incendiary speeches, but also directly coordinating the movement of the rioters{{Fact|date=February 2007}}. At the time, Thackeray made allegations that the Commission was "biased" and "[[anti-Hindu]]". His views were not supported outside of the [[Shiv Sena]] party<ref>[http://www.hinduonnet.com/fline/fl1517/15170200.htm The Shiv Sena indicted],''The Hindu''</ref>. |
The Justice Srikrishna Commission of Enquiry, which investigated the ensuing [[Bombay Riots|communal riots in Mumbai]], indicted Thackeray for sparking [[anti-Muslim]] violence, which led to more than 1,000 deaths in several ensuing riots, though the death toll during the actual act of the demolition was zero. The Srikrishna Commission found that Thackeray was personally responsible, not only for inciting the mobs through his incendiary speeches, but also directly coordinating the movement of the rioters{{Fact|date=February 2007}}. At the time, Thackeray made allegations that the Commission was "biased" and "[[anti-Hindu]]". His views were not supported outside of the [[Shiv Sena]] party<ref>[http://www.hinduonnet.com/fline/fl1517/15170200.htm The Shiv Sena indicted],''The Hindu''</ref>. |
||
In a deposition before the Srikrishna Commission a witness alleged Thackeray coordinated much of the January 1993 Mumbai |
In a deposition before the Srikrishna Commission a witness alleged Thackeray coordinated much of the January 1993 Mumbai riots. Yuvraj Mohite claimed, “Balasaheb was sitting and he was getting calls from various places. He would ask what was happening at that particular place (from where he got the call) and then he would say, 'Kill them. Send them to Allah'”. Mohite, additionally told the commission, that, “Thackeray ordered: |
||
* That not one Muslim be left alive to stand in the witness box. |
* That not one Muslim be left alive to stand in the witness box. |
||
* Asked his men to send the additional police commissioner, A A Khan, to his Allah. |
* Asked his men to send the additional police commissioner, A A Khan, to his Allah. |
||
* Ordered his men to retaliate to the Hindu killings in Jogeshwari.” |
* Ordered his men to retaliate to the Hindu killings in Jogeshwari.” |
||
Later, in February 1993 Thackeray said, "I am proud of what my boys have done. We had to retaliate and we did. If it was not for us, no one would have controlled the Muslims." <ref>{{cite news|url= http://www.ibnlive.com/news/balasaheb-commanded-rioters-witness/47404-3.html?xml&news=Balasaheb%20commanded%20rioters:%20witness&pubDate=Sat%2C+25+Aug+2007+03%3A21%3A51++0100&keyword=ibn_home|title=Balasaheb commanded rioters: witness|accessdate=2007-08-25|publisher=[[IBN Live]]}}</ref> |
Later, in February 1993 Thackeray said, "I am proud of what my boys have done. We had to retaliate and we did. If it was not for us, no one would have controlled the Muslims." <ref>{{cite news|url= http://www.ibnlive.com/news/balasaheb-commanded-rioters-witness/47404-3.html?xml&news=Balasaheb%20commanded%20rioters:%20witness&pubDate=Sat%2C+25+Aug+2007+03%3A21%3A51++0100&keyword=ibn_home|title=Balasaheb commanded rioters: witness|accessdate=2007-08-25|publisher=[[IBN Live]]}}</ref> |
||
[[Francois Gautier]], a French writer, has praised Thackeray for his hardline stance on Muslims and criticizes mainstream Hindu society for attacking him for his views. He writes: |
|||
<blockquote> |
|||
"What happens when there is ONE man in India -- whatever his faults, quirks, or excesses -- who dares to call a spade a spade, is not afraid of words and is ready to stand-up for his opinions? Not only, of course, is he attacked but he is also hounded by his own brothers and sisters, the "secular" Hindus. Are Hindus so intent to show the world that not only are they cowards but also idiots? This man, of course, is Bal Thackeray<ref name="Gautier">[http://www.rediff.com/news/2000/jul/27column.htm Are Hindus Cowards] by Francois Gautier,''Rediff.com''</ref>" |
|||
</blockquote> |
|||
However, in an interview in 1998, he claims to have tempered his stance on many issues that the Shiv Sena had with Muslims, particularly regarding the [[Babri Mosque]] or [[Ram Janmabhoomi]] issue <ref name="1998 interview">[http://www.rediff.com/news/1998/jan/21nandy.htm The Rediff Election Interview/Bal Thackeray],''Rediff.com''</ref>, saying: |
However, in an interview in 1998, he claims to have tempered his stance on many issues that the Shiv Sena had with Muslims, particularly regarding the [[Babri Mosque]] or [[Ram Janmabhoomi]] issue <ref name="1998 interview">[http://www.rediff.com/news/1998/jan/21nandy.htm The Rediff Election Interview/Bal Thackeray],''Rediff.com''</ref>, saying: |
||
Line 94: | Line 101: | ||
He has since made more inflammatory statements regarding Muslims, and reiterated his desire for Hindus to unite across linguistic barriers and to see "a Hindustan for Hindus" and to "bring Islam to this country down to its knees". <ref>http://www.expressindia.com/election/fullestory.php?type=ei&content_id=80435 |
He has since made more inflammatory statements regarding Muslims, and reiterated his desire for Hindus to unite across linguistic barriers and to see "a Hindustan for Hindus" and to "bring Islam to this country down to its knees". <ref>http://www.expressindia.com/election/fullestory.php?type=ei&content_id=80435 |
||
Hindustan of Hindus my dream: Thackeray, expressindia.com</ref> |
Hindustan of Hindus my dream: Thackeray, expressindia.com</ref> |
||
Line 99: | Line 107: | ||
===Views on President Kalam=== |
===Views on President Kalam=== |
||
Thackeray has been a vocal critic of the |
Thackeray has been a vocal critic of the then [[President of India]], [[Abdul Kalam|Dr. Abdul Kalam]]. Thackeray said Kalam was a leading scientist of the country but had "lost the dignity of the post" after he became President. He has criticized Kalam's indecisiveness regarding the conviction of the [[terrorist]] [[Mohammad Afzal]], who has been sentenced to death following his conviction for the [[2001 Indian Parliament attack]]. Thackeray criticizes the fact that a convicted terrorist's appeal for clemency is even being considered by Kalam.<ref name="ibnlive"/> |
||
<blockquote> |
<blockquote> |
||
"Afzal was sentenced to death by the highest court in this country in October and yet the file has been sitting on the President's table for the past four months. I have not said anything wrong about Kalam. We all have supported him to become President. Afzal's clemency letter is still lying with the President. Give me another example where the President has not taken decision on a clemency petition for four months." <ref name="ibnlive"/> |
"Afzal was sentenced to death by the highest court in this country in October and yet the file has been sitting on the President's table for the past four months. I have not said anything wrong about Kalam. We all have supported him to become President. Afzal's clemency letter is still lying with the President. Give me another example where the President has not taken decision on a clemency petition for four months." <ref name="ibnlive"/> |
||
Line 107: | Line 115: | ||
==Rift in Party== |
==Rift in Party== |
||
An increase in intra-party rivalry between Bal Thackeray's son [[Uddhav Thackeray]], and nephew [[Raj Thackeray]] has led to some divisions within the Shiv Sena. Senior Sena leaders, such as former Chief Minister [[Manohar Joshi]] have sided with Uddhav, while hard-line leaders such as [[Narayan Rane]] and [[Sanjay Nirupam]] have also left the party. Both these leaders were later expelled from Sena and joined the Indian National Congress. |
An increase in intra-party rivalry between Bal Thackeray's son [[Uddhav Thackeray]], and nephew [[Raj Thackeray]] has led to some divisions within the Shiv Sena. Senior Sena leaders, such as former Chief Minister [[Manohar Joshi]] have sided with Uddhav, while hard-line leaders such as [[Narayan Rane]] and [[Sanjay Nirupam]] have also left the party. Both these leaders were later expelled from Sena and joined the Indian National Congress. |
||
Line 112: | Line 121: | ||
==Valentine's Day protests== |
==Valentine's Day protests== |
||
Boycotting shops and restaurants that allow young people to celebrate the "western" holiday of [[Valentine's Day]], interpreted as bestial, indecent and un-Bharatiya (un-Indian) by Thackeray, is one of his recent actions. These boycotts have often culminated in violence and the destruction of said shops. |
Boycotting shops and restaurants that allow young people to celebrate the "western" holiday of [[Valentine's Day]], interpreted as bestial, indecent and un-Bharatiya (un-Indian) by Thackeray, is one of his recent actions. These boycotts have often culminated in violence and the destruction of said shops. |
||
On [[February 14]], [[2006]], Bal Thackeray condemned and apologized for the violent attacks of Shiv Sena members upon a private Valentine's Day celebration in Mumbai. "It is said that women were beaten up in the Nallasopara incident. If that really happened, then it is a symbol of cowardice," Thackeray said, "I have always instructed Shiv Sainiks that in any situation women should not be humiliated and harassed."[http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1419743.cms] Thackeray and the Shiv Sena remain opposed to Valentine's Day celebrations, although they may support an "Indian alternative".[http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1413273.cms] |
On [[February 14]], [[2006]], Bal Thackeray condemned and apologized for the violent attacks of Shiv Sena members upon a private Valentine's Day celebration in Mumbai. "It is said that women were beaten up in the Nallasopara incident. If that really happened, then it is a symbol of cowardice," Thackeray said, "I have always instructed Shiv Sainiks that in any situation women should not be humiliated and harassed."[http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1419743.cms] Thackeray and the Shiv Sena remain opposed to Valentine's Day celebrations, although they may support an "Indian alternative".[http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1413273.cms] |
||
==Cultural references== |
==Cultural references== |
||
Thackery is satirized in [[Salman Rushdie]]'s novel ''[[The Moor's Last Sigh]]'' as "Raman Fielding".{{Fact|date=June 2007}} [[Suketu Mehta]] interviews Thackeray in his critically acclaimed, [[Pulitzer Prize|Pulitzer-nominated]], non-fiction 2004 book ''[[Maximum City]]''. |
Thackery is satirized in [[Salman Rushdie]]'s novel ''[[The Moor's Last Sigh]]'' as "Raman Fielding".{{Fact|date=June 2007}} [[Suketu Mehta]] interviews Thackeray in his critically acclaimed, [[Pulitzer Prize|Pulitzer-nominated]], non-fiction 2004 book ''[[Maximum City]]''. |
||
Line 123: | Line 134: | ||
==External links== |
==External links== |
||
*[http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/841488.stm Profile] by [[BBC]] dated [[July 19]], [[2000]] referring to him as the "uncrowned [[monarch]] of [[Maharashtra]]" |
*[http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/841488.stm Profile] by [[BBC]] dated [[July 19]], [[2000]] referring to him as the "uncrowned [[monarch]] of [[Maharashtra]]" |
||
*[http://www.hindustantimes.com/news/181_994563,001301310002.htm "''Bal Thackeray: The Tiger who can't be tamed''"] - HindustanTimes.com article dated September 8, 2004 |
*[http://www.hindustantimes.com/news/181_994563,001301310002.htm "''Bal Thackeray: The Tiger who can't be tamed''"] - HindustanTimes.com article dated September 8, 2004 |
Revision as of 04:35, 30 August 2007
Bal Thackeray | |
---|---|
File:Bthackeray1.jpg | |
Personal details | |
Born | |
Political party | Shiv Sena |
Residence(s) | Mumbai, India |
As of July 4, 2006 |
Template:Hindu politics "Bal" Keshav Thackeray (Marathi: बाळ केशव ठाकरे bāḷ keśav ṭhākare) (born January 23, 1924), popularly called 'Balasaheb', 'Sher', 'Tiger', or "Hindu Hridaysamrat," is the founder and president of the Shiv Sena, a Hindu nationalist and populist party active mainly in the western Indian state of Maharashtra.
Background
Thackeray was born to Prabodhankar Thakaeray in a Chandraseniya Kayastha Prabhu family and is a Hindu fundamentalist, revivalist and Hindu nationalist. Several nationalists within the Shiv Sena (which he helped found) and other Hindu-centric political parties brand him as Hindu Hridaysamrat (literally, "Hindu Heart-Ruler").
Career
Thackeray started his career as a cartoonist in the Free Press Journal in Mumbai (formerly Bombay) in the 1950s, and was a contemporary of R. K. Laxman during his early years. His cartoons were also published in the Sunday edition of The New York Times. In 1960, he launched a cartoon weekly Marmik with his brother. He used it to campaign against the growing influence of non-Marathi people in Bombay. He has also fought trade union control battles with the Communists and the Indian National Congress.
He formed the Shiv Sena in 1966 with the intent of fighting for the rights of the natives of the state of Maharashtra (called Maharashtrians)[citation needed]. Politically, the Shiv Sena has allied itself with the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP).
Thackeray has claimed that the party has benefited the Marathi Manus (Marathi man) in Mumbai,[1] especially in the public sector.[2] Opposition leftist parties allege that the Shiv Sena has done little to solve the problem of unemployment facing a large proportion of Maharashtrian youth during its tenure, in contradiction to its ideological foundation of 'sons of the soil.'[3] In addition, Thackeray played a central role in the emancipation of 500,000 slum dwellers in the Dharavi area of Mumbai, the largest slum in Asia.[4] However, the state's policy of giving free houses to slum dwellers has been subject to controversy by the opposing leftist parties ever since it was introduced by the Shiv Sena-BJP government a decade ago. [3] [5]
Thackeray has also led the Shiv Sena to an active role in trying to improve infrastructure in Maharashtra, particularly in the state capital Mumbai, which also serves as the financial capital of the country.
In addition to improvements in transportation infrastructure, Thackeray has supported initiatives against proprietary technologies such as the "Conditional Access System" for television networks, which would have led to cable companies charging more for channels.[6] He has also questioned the government’s procedure of divesting equity in oil refining and marketing majors, effectively "selling" profitable oil companies out.[7]
Controversy
Thackeray is very vocal in his opposition to people who migrate to Mumbai, to non-Hindus (especially Muslims), and to Pakistanis. In the late 1970s, as part of his "Maharashtra is for Maharashtrians" campaign, Thackeray threatened migrants from South India with harm unless they left Mumbai.
In 2002, Thackeray issued a call to form suicide squads to counter alleged terrorism:
If such suicide squads are formed only then can we take on perpetrators of mindless violence.[8]
In reaction to Thackeray’s call to form suicide squads, Maharashtra government registered a case against him for inciting enmity between different groups. [9]
Asia Times further reported on Thackeray’s rhetoric:
Thackeray called on Hindus to form suicide squads "to take the Muslims head on". "Trouble-making Muslims should be wiped out from the country ... kick out the four crore [40 million] Bangladeshi Muslims and then the country will be secure," the Shiv Sena leader said. Urging Hindus to start calling India "Hindu rashtra" (Hindu nation), he maintained that only "our religion [Hinduism] is to be honored here" and then "we will look after other religions".[10]
Thackeray continues to publish inflammatory editorials in his party's newsletter, Samna (Confrontation).
Views on Hitler
Thackeray has attracted controversy for his praise of Adolf Hitler.
He was quoted by Asiaweek as saying:
I am a great admirer of Hitler, and I am not ashamed to say so! I do not say that I agree with all the methods he employed, but he was a wonderful organizer and orator, and I feel that he and I have several things in common...What India really needs is a dictator who will rule benevolently, but with an iron hand." [4]
In an interview with the Indian Express that was printed on January 29, 2007, Thackeray remarked,
Hitler did very cruel and ugly things. But he was an artist, I love him (for that). He had the power to carry the whole nation, the mob with him. You have to think what magic he had. He was a miracle...The killing of Jews was wrong. But the good part about Hitler was that he was an artist. He was a daredevil. He had good qualities and bad. I may also have good qualities and bad ones. [5]
His opponents have used these remarks against him and accused him of a fascist ideology. Thackeray's supporters, such as right-wing columnist Varsha Bhosle, have defended Thackeray's position as necessary in what they claim is an atmosphere of religious extremism against Hindus. Bhosle writes:
What ELSE is required for Hindus to shake off the stupor and consider protecting our civilisation and culture? If telling it like it is makes one a Nazi, I say: Fine, better that than the spineless, deaf, dumb, numb and blind state exalted as Nehruvian Secularism. I wouldn't even spit on it.[11]
Some Jewish scholars feel that, in spite of his remarks on Hitler, Thackeray and the Shiv Sena may share the ideological and political goals of Zionism. In an April 15, 1988, article in the Jerusalem Letter, Nathan Katz and Ellen S. Goldberg of the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs write:
Jews in India are closely following the rise of Bal Thackeray, Shiv Sena and other Hindutva parties, since they see a possible supporter of Zionism in the Shiv Sena. The affinities between Hindus and Jews go beyond their shared perception of a Muslim adversary, and while secularism has been in the interest of Jews in most nations of exile, it may be that the Indian case is a notable exception.[12].
In an article appearing in Newindpress.com on August 20, 2007, Thackeray is quoted as wanting to be a dictator and the Hitler of whole India:
He is on record as having told the Navakal: ‘‘Yes, I am a dictator. It is a Hitler that is needed in India today.’’ He was once asked in a television programme whether he wanted to be Hitler of Bombay? ‘‘Do not underestimate me,’’ he is reported to have retorted. ‘‘I am (the Hitler) of the whole of Maharashtra and want to be of whole of India.’’ The Hitler question was put to him twelve years ago in September 1996 by the Outlook magazine as well during an interview. ‘‘Once you’d expressed admiration for certain facets of Hitler.’’ ‘Comparison was inevitable,’ the interviewer prompted. Thackaray said: ‘‘I have not sent anybody to the gas chamber. If I’d been like that, you wouldn’t have dared to come and interview me.’’[13]
Views on Muslims
Thackeray's views on Muslims have typically been highly vacillatory, sometimes attacking them and sometimes sympathizing with them. His party stands accused of being anti-Muslim, though Shiv Sainiks generally deny this accusation. [6] When explaining his views on Hindutva, he has conflated Islam with terrorism and has called for Hindus to "fight terrorism and fight Islam".[14]
In the 1980's he had stated that:
"They [Muslims] were spreading like a cancer and should be operated on like a cancer. The...country should be saved from the Muslims and the police should support them [Hindu Maha Sangh] in their struggle just like the police in Punjab were sympathetic to the Khalistanis." [15]
Bal Thackeray criticized and challenged Indian Muslims through his party newspaper, Sāmna, around the time the 16th century Babri Masjid was demolished by members of the Shiv Sena and the BJP in the northern town of Ayodhya, on December 6 1992. The claim of many Hindus and some scholars is that the Babri Mosque was built on the demolished ruins of a Hindu temple in the 16th century, and is believed by many to be the Ram Janmabhoomi (birthplace of the Hindu God-King Rama, an avatar of Vishnu, one of the Trimurti of the Hindu Pantheon).
The Justice Srikrishna Commission of Enquiry, which investigated the ensuing communal riots in Mumbai, indicted Thackeray for sparking anti-Muslim violence, which led to more than 1,000 deaths in several ensuing riots, though the death toll during the actual act of the demolition was zero. The Srikrishna Commission found that Thackeray was personally responsible, not only for inciting the mobs through his incendiary speeches, but also directly coordinating the movement of the rioters[citation needed]. At the time, Thackeray made allegations that the Commission was "biased" and "anti-Hindu". His views were not supported outside of the Shiv Sena party[16].
In a deposition before the Srikrishna Commission a witness alleged Thackeray coordinated much of the January 1993 Mumbai riots. Yuvraj Mohite claimed, “Balasaheb was sitting and he was getting calls from various places. He would ask what was happening at that particular place (from where he got the call) and then he would say, 'Kill them. Send them to Allah'”. Mohite, additionally told the commission, that, “Thackeray ordered:
- That not one Muslim be left alive to stand in the witness box.
- Asked his men to send the additional police commissioner, A A Khan, to his Allah.
- Ordered his men to retaliate to the Hindu killings in Jogeshwari.”
Later, in February 1993 Thackeray said, "I am proud of what my boys have done. We had to retaliate and we did. If it was not for us, no one would have controlled the Muslims." [17]
Francois Gautier, a French writer, has praised Thackeray for his hardline stance on Muslims and criticizes mainstream Hindu society for attacking him for his views. He writes:
"What happens when there is ONE man in India -- whatever his faults, quirks, or excesses -- who dares to call a spade a spade, is not afraid of words and is ready to stand-up for his opinions? Not only, of course, is he attacked but he is also hounded by his own brothers and sisters, the "secular" Hindus. Are Hindus so intent to show the world that not only are they cowards but also idiots? This man, of course, is Bal Thackeray[18]"
However, in an interview in 1998, he claims to have tempered his stance on many issues that the Shiv Sena had with Muslims, particularly regarding the Babri Mosque or Ram Janmabhoomi issue [19], saying:
"We must look after the Muslims and treat them as part of us."[19]
He has since made more inflammatory statements regarding Muslims, and reiterated his desire for Hindus to unite across linguistic barriers and to see "a Hindustan for Hindus" and to "bring Islam to this country down to its knees". [20]
However, he has also expressed admiration for Muslims in Mumbai in the wake of the July 2006 Bombay train bombings perpetrated by Islamic fundamentalists. In response to threats made by the leader of the communist Samajwadi Party that accusations of terrorism directed at Indian Muslims would bring about violence from them, Thackeray said that the unity of Mumbaikars (residents of Mumbai) in the wake of the terrorist attacks was "a slap to fanatics of Samajwadi Party leader Abu Asim Azmi" and that Thackeray "salute(s) those Muslims who participated in the two minutes' silence on July 18 to mourn the blast victims".[21]
Views on President Kalam
Thackeray has been a vocal critic of the then President of India, Dr. Abdul Kalam. Thackeray said Kalam was a leading scientist of the country but had "lost the dignity of the post" after he became President. He has criticized Kalam's indecisiveness regarding the conviction of the terrorist Mohammad Afzal, who has been sentenced to death following his conviction for the 2001 Indian Parliament attack. Thackeray criticizes the fact that a convicted terrorist's appeal for clemency is even being considered by Kalam.[14]
"Afzal was sentenced to death by the highest court in this country in October and yet the file has been sitting on the President's table for the past four months. I have not said anything wrong about Kalam. We all have supported him to become President. Afzal's clemency letter is still lying with the President. Give me another example where the President has not taken decision on a clemency petition for four months." [14]
His views on Kalam have been heavily criticized by Parliamentary Affairs Minister Priya Ranjan Dasmunsi as inappropriate and "violative of decorum".[22]
Rift in Party
An increase in intra-party rivalry between Bal Thackeray's son Uddhav Thackeray, and nephew Raj Thackeray has led to some divisions within the Shiv Sena. Senior Sena leaders, such as former Chief Minister Manohar Joshi have sided with Uddhav, while hard-line leaders such as Narayan Rane and Sanjay Nirupam have also left the party. Both these leaders were later expelled from Sena and joined the Indian National Congress.
On December 18, 2005, Raj Thackeray announced his resignation as a primary member of the Shiv Sena. On March 19, 2006, Raj announced the formation of the Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS).
Valentine's Day protests
Boycotting shops and restaurants that allow young people to celebrate the "western" holiday of Valentine's Day, interpreted as bestial, indecent and un-Bharatiya (un-Indian) by Thackeray, is one of his recent actions. These boycotts have often culminated in violence and the destruction of said shops. On February 14, 2006, Bal Thackeray condemned and apologized for the violent attacks of Shiv Sena members upon a private Valentine's Day celebration in Mumbai. "It is said that women were beaten up in the Nallasopara incident. If that really happened, then it is a symbol of cowardice," Thackeray said, "I have always instructed Shiv Sainiks that in any situation women should not be humiliated and harassed."[7] Thackeray and the Shiv Sena remain opposed to Valentine's Day celebrations, although they may support an "Indian alternative".[8]
Cultural references
Thackery is satirized in Salman Rushdie's novel The Moor's Last Sigh as "Raman Fielding".[citation needed] Suketu Mehta interviews Thackeray in his critically acclaimed, Pulitzer-nominated, non-fiction 2004 book Maximum City.
References
- ^ ""On the wrong track"". The Hindu. Retrieved 2006-08-11.
- ^ ""Sena fate: From roar to meow"". The Times of India. Retrieved 2006-08-11.
- ^ ""Diversionary tactics"". The Hindu Frontline Magazine. Retrieved 2008-08-08.
- ^ Rediff News
- ^ Dharavi slum will be economic hub: Joshi
- ^ Address loopholes in CAS: Shiv Sena,The Hindu Business Line
- ^ Shiv Sena’s views,The Tribune
- ^ "Thackeray for Hindu suicide squads". Times of India. Retrieved 2007-08-25.
- ^ "Case filed against Thackeray for urging anti-terror suicide-squads". ExpressIndia.com . Retrieved 2007-08-25.
- ^ "India: The politics of passion". Asia Times. Retrieved 2007-08-25.
- ^ In rod we trust, Varsha Bhonsle
- ^ THE LAST JEWS IN INDIA AND BURMA, Nathan Katz and Ellen S. Goldberg, Jerusalem Letter
- ^ "Where Hitler meets Thackeray". Newindpress.com. Retrieved 2007-08-24.
- ^ a b c Thackeray lashes out at Prez again,ibnlive
- ^ Bal Thackeray in India Today, June 15, 1984.
- ^ The Shiv Sena indicted,The Hindu
- ^ "Balasaheb commanded rioters: witness". IBN Live. Retrieved 2007-08-25.
- ^ Are Hindus Cowards by Francois Gautier,Rediff.com
- ^ a b The Rediff Election Interview/Bal Thackeray,Rediff.com
- ^ http://www.expressindia.com/election/fullestory.php?type=ei&content_id=80435 Hindustan of Hindus my dream: Thackeray, expressindia.com
- ^ [1]
- ^ [2]
External links
- Profile by BBC dated July 19, 2000 referring to him as the "uncrowned monarch of Maharashtra"
- "Bal Thackeray: The Tiger who can't be tamed" - HindustanTimes.com article dated September 8, 2004
- "Are Hindus cowards?" - Rediff Article in praise of Thackeray
- Shiv Sena Informational piece circulated during the 2004 election year