Meaning of life: Difference between revisions
←Replaced page with 'suck tits ur moms tits!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!' |
Someguy1221 (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{otheruses4|the concept of the meaning of life}} |
|||
suck tits ur moms tits!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
|||
The '''meaning of life''' is an elusive concept that has been the subject of much [[philosophy|philosophical]], [[science|scientific]] and [[theology|theological]] speculation. <ref name="Baggini">{{cite book |author=[[Julian Baggini]] |title=What's It All About? Philosophy and the Meaning of Life |publisher=Granta Books |date=September 2004 |location=USA |isbn=1862076618}}</ref><ref name="Reginster">{{cite book |author=Bernard Reginster |title=The Affirmation of Life: Nietzsche on Overcoming Nihilism |publisher=Harvard University Press |year=2006 |isbn=0674021991}}</ref><ref name="Young">{{cite book |author=Julian Young |title=The Death of God and the Meaning of Life |publisher=Routledge |year=2003 |isbn=0415307902}}</ref><ref name="Westphal">{{cite book |author=Jonathan Westphal |title=Philosophical Propositions: An Introduction to Philosophy |publisher=Routledge |year=1998 |isbn=0415170532}}</ref> </br> It is often expressed in various related [[question]]s:<ref name="Kelly">{{cite book |author=Matthew Kelly |title=The Rhythm of Life: Living Every Day with Passion and Purpose |publisher=Simon & Schuster |year=2005 |isbn=0743265106}}</ref> |
|||
* ''What is the [[meaning]] of [[life]]?''<ref name="Westphal" /><ref name="Nozick">{{cite book |author=[[Robert Nozick]] |title=[[Philosophical Explanations]] |publisher=Harvard University Press |year=1981 |isbn=0674664795}}</ref><ref name="Jewell">{{cite book |author=Albert Jewell |title=Ageing, Spirituality and Well-Being |publisher=Jessica Kingsley |
|||
Publishers |year=2003 |isbn=184310167X}}</ref><ref name="WITMOL">{{cite web |title=Question of the Month: What Is The Meaning Of Life? |work=[[Philosophy Now]] |publisher=Issue 59 |url=http://www.philosophynow.org/issue59/59question.htm |accessdate=2007-07-26}}</ref><ref name="Yeffeth">{{cite book |author=Glenn Yeffeth |title=The Anthology at the End of the Universe: Leading Science Fiction Authors on Douglas Adams' The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy |publisher=BenBella Books, Inc |year=2005 |isbn=1932100563}}</ref><ref name="Seaman" /> |
|||
* ''Why are we here?''<ref name="Baggini" /><ref name="Thiemann & Placher">{{cite book |author=[[Ronald F. Thiemann]]; William Carl Placher |title=Why Are We Here?: Everyday Questions and the Christian Life |publisher=Continuum International Publishing Group |year=1998 |isbn=1563382369}}</ref><ref name="Marcellino">{{cite book |author=Dennis Marcellino |title=Why Are We Here?: The Scientific Answer to this Age-old Question (that you don't need to be a scientist to understand) |publisher=Lighthouse Pub |year=1996 |isbn=0945272103}}</ref><ref name="Curtiss">{{cite book |author=F. Homer Curtiss |title=Why Are We Here |publisher=Kessinger Publishing |year=2003 |isbn=0766138992}}</ref><ref name="Badke">{{cite book |author= William B. Badke |title=The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Meaning of Everything |publisher=Kregel Publications |year=2005 |isbn=0825420695}}</ref> ''What are we here for?''<ref name="Hua">{{cite book |author=Hsuan Hua |title=Words of Wisdom: Beginning Buddhism |publisher=Dharma Realm Buddhist Association |year=2003 |isbn=0881393029}}</ref> |
|||
* ''What is the [[origin of life]]?''<ref name="Davies">{{cite book |author=[[Paul Davies]] |title=The Fifth Miracle: The Search for the Origin and Meaning of Life |publisher=Simon & Schuster |date=March 2000 |url=http://www.simonsays.com/content/book.cfm?tab=1&pid=410133 |accessdate=2007-07-26 |isbn=0-684-86309-X}}</ref> |
|||
* ''What is the [[nature]] of life (and of [[reality]] itself)?''<ref name="Davies" /><ref name="Christiansen & Baum & Bass-Haugen">{{cite book |author=Charles Christiansen; Carolyn Manville Baum; Julie Bass-Haugen |title=Occupational Therapy: Performance, Participation, and Well-Being |publisher=SLACK Incorporated |year=2005 |pages=680 |isbn=1556425309}}</ref> |
|||
* ''What is the [[purpose]] of, or in, (one's) life?''<ref name="Baggini" /><ref name="WITMOL" /><ref name="Christiansen & Baum & Bass-Haugen" /><ref name="warren">{{cite book |author=[[Rick Warren]] |title=[[The Purpose Driven Life|The Purpose Driven Life: What on Earth Am I Here For?]] |publisher=Zondervan |year=2002 |isbn=0310255252}}</ref><ref name="Krishnamurti">{{cite book |author=[[Jiddu Krishnamurti]] |title=What Are You Doing With Your Life? |publisher=Krishnamurti Foundation of America |year=2001 |isbn=188800424X}}</ref> |
|||
* ''What is the [[significance]] of life?''<ref name="Krishnamurti" /> |
|||
* ''What is meaningful or [[value theory|valuable]] in life?''<ref name="UIUC">{{cite web |last=Puolimatka |first=Tapio | coauthors=Airaksinen, Timo |title=Education and the Meaning of Life |work=Philosophy of Education |publisher=[[University of Helsinki]] |date=2002 |url=http://www.ed.uiuc.edu/EPS/PES-Yearbook/2001/tapio%2001.pdf |format=PDF | accessdate=2007-07-26}}</ref> |
|||
* ''What is the [[value of life]]?''<ref name="Van Hooft">{{cite book |author=Stan Van Hooft |title=Life, Death, and Subjectivity: Moral Sources in Bioethics |publisher=Rodopi |year=2004 |pages=247 |isbn=9042019123}}</ref> |
|||
* ''What is the [[reason]] to live?''<ref name="Shafer-Landau & Cuneo">{{cite book |author=Russ Shafer-Landau; Terence Cuneo |title=Foundations of Ethics: An Anthology |publisher=Blackwell Publishing |year=2007 |pages=520 |isbn=1405129514}}</ref> ''What are we living for?''<ref name="Hua" /> |
|||
Some philosophers have asked questions like "What does the question 'What is the meaning of life?' mean?"<ref>{{cite book |author=[[Richard Taylor (philosopher)|Richard Taylor]] |title=Good and Evil |pages="The Meaning of Life" (Chapter 5) |publisher=Macmillan Publishing Company |date=January 1970 |isbn=0026166909}}</ref> and also questioned whether it is a meaningful question.<ref>Wohlgennant, Rudolph. (1981). "Has the Question about the Meaning of Life any Meaning?" (Chapter 4). In E. Morscher, ed., ''Philosophie als Wissenschaft''.</ref> (''see [[#Logical positivist views of the meaning of life|Logical positivist views]]'') Others have considered the question "If there are no objective values, then is life meaningless?"<ref>{{cite book |last=McNaughton |first=David |date=August 1988 |title=Moral Vision: An Introduction to Ethics |pages="Moral Freedom and the Meaning of Life" (Section 1.5) |publisher=Oxford: Blackwell Publishing |isbn=0631159452}}</ref> (''see [[#Existentialist views of the meaning of life|Existentialist views]] and [[#Nihilist views of the meaning of life|Nihilist views]]'') and some have aimed to develop an understanding of life that explains, regardless of how we came to be here, what we should do now that we are here. (''see [[#Humanist views of the meaning of life|Humanist views]]'') |
|||
[[Religious]] answers to the question "What is the meaning of my life?" tend to include a certain moral demand<ref name="Tolstoy">{{cite book |author=[[Leo Tolstoy]] |title=On Life and Essays on Religion |publisher=READ BOOKS |year=2007 |pages=448 |isbn=1406742090}}</ref> and try to keep humanity gentle-hearted with facing death.<ref name="Mason" /> [[Mysticism]] focuses more on direct experience than religions generally do, and it has been associated with various movements. In general the view is that life is a happening, an unfolding, and the meaning of life is living a life in accordance with it.<ref name="Jones">{{cite book |author=Richard H. Jones |title=Mysticism and Morality: A New Look at Old Questions |publisher=Lexington Books |year=2004 |pages=432 |isbn=0739107844}}</ref> [[Spirituality]] sees life as an inner-awakening or a discovery and transforming of one's understanding and insight, <ref name="Jewell" /> and can be summarized as understanding the meaning of life, all of life and reality itself.<ref name="King">{{cite book |author=Theresa King |title=The Spiral Path: Explorations in Women's Spirituality |publisher=Yes International Publishers |year=1992 |isbn=0936663138}}</ref> |
|||
=== Western philosophy === |
|||
{{see|Western philosophy}} |
|||
==== Ancient philosophy ==== |
|||
{{see|Ancient philosophy}} |
|||
[[Image:Sanzio 01 Plato Aristotle.jpg|thumb|180 px|right|Plato and Aristotle, as represented in [[Raphael]]'s ''[[The School of Athens]]'' fresco.]] |
|||
===== Platonic view of the meaning of life ===== |
|||
{{main|Platonism}} |
|||
[[Plato]] was one of the earliest and most influential thinkers of Western philosophy, most famous for his [[Philosophical realism|realist]] stance regarding the existence of [[universals (metaphysics)|universals]]. In the [[Theory of Forms]] he asserts that universals do not exist in the way that ordinary physical objects exist, but rather with a sort of ghostly or heavenly mode of existence. He describes the [[Form of the Good]] in his [[dialogue]], ''[[Plato's Republic|The Republic]]'', speaking through the character of [[Socrates]]. The [[Platonic realism|Idea]] of the Good is the child or offspring ''(ekgonos)'' of the Good, the ideal or perfect nature of goodness, and so an absolute measure of [[justice]]. |
|||
For Plato the meaning of life is to attain the highest form of knowledge, which is the Idea (or Form) of the Good. It is from this which all things that are good and just gain their usefulness and value. Humans have a duty to pursue the good, but no one can hope to do this successfully without philosophical reasoning. |
|||
===== Aristotelian view of the meaning of life===== |
|||
{{main|Aristotelian ethics}} |
|||
[[Aristotle]], a student of [[Plato]], was another of the earliest and most influential philosophers. He believed that ethical knowledge is not ''certain'' knowledge (like [[metaphysics]] and [[epistemology]]) but is ''general knowledge''. Because it is not a [[theory|theoretical]] discipline, he thought a person had to study in order to become 'good'. Thus if a person were to become [[virtue|virtuous]], he could not simply study what virtue ''is'', he had to actually do virtuous activities. |
|||
In order to do this, Aristotle had to first establish what was virtuous. He began by determining that everything was done with some goal in mind and that goal is 'good': |
|||
:Every skill and every inquiry, and similarly, every action and choice of action, is thought to have some good as its object. This is why the good has rightly been defined as the object of all endeavor. ''([[Nicomachean Ethics|NE]] 1.1)'' |
|||
But, if action A is done with the goal B, the goal B would also have a goal, goal C. Goal C would also have a goal and this would continue until something stopped the [[infinite regress]]. This was the ''[[Summum bonum|Highest Good]]'', and he said that it must have three characteristics: |
|||
*desirable for its own sake |
|||
*not desirable for the sake of some other good |
|||
*all other ‘goods’ desirable for its sake |
|||
Thus for Aristotle, the meaning of life involves achieving [[eudaemonia]], which is usually translated as "happiness," but could also be "well-being" or "flourishing." |
|||
:What is the highest good in all matters of action? As to the name, there is almost complete agreement; for uneducated and educated alike call it happiness, and make happiness identical with the good life and successful living. They disagree, however, about the meaning of happiness. ''([[Nicomachean Ethics|NE]] 1.4)'' |
|||
===== Cynic views of the meaning of life ===== |
|||
[[Cynicism]] is one of the most striking of all the [[Hellenistic period|Hellenistic]] philosophies. It offered people the possibility of happiness and freedom from suffering in an age of uncertainty. Although there was never an official Cynic doctrine, the fundamental principles of Cynicism can be summarised as follows:<ref>Kidd, I., "''Cynicism''," in ''The Concise Encyclopedia of Western Philosophy.'' (ed. Urmson and Rée), Routledge. (2005)</ref><ref>Long, A. A., "''The Socratic Tradition: Diogenes, Crates, and Hellenistic Ethics,''" in ''The Cynics: The Cynic Movement in Antiquity and Its Legacy.'' (ed. Branham and Goulet-Cazé), University of California Press, (1996).</ref> |
|||
# The goal of life is [[happiness]] which is to live in agreement with [[Nature]]. |
|||
# Happiness depends on being self-sufficient, and a master of mental attitude. |
|||
# Self-sufficiency is achieved by living a life of [[Virtue]]. |
|||
# The road to Virtue is to free oneself from any influence such as wealth, fame, or power, which have no value in Nature. |
|||
# Suffering is caused by false judgments of value, which cause negative [[emotions]] and a vicious character. |
|||
===== Cyrenaic views of the meaning of life ===== |
|||
[[Cyrenaicism]] is a [[hedonism|hedonistic]] school founded by [[Aristippus of Cyrene]]. It was one of the earliest Socratic schools, and emphasized one side only of the Socratic teaching. Taking Socrates' assertion that happiness is one of the ends of moral action, Aristippus maintained that pleasure was the supreme good, creating an ultra-hedonistic view. He found bodily gratifications, which he considered more intense, preferable to mental pleasures. They also denied that we should defer immediate gratification for the sake of long-term gain. In these respects they differ from the Epicureans.<ref>"Cyrenaics." Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The University of Tennessee At Martin. 4 Nov. 2007 <http://www.iep.utm.edu/>.</ref><ref>"The Cyrenaics and the Origin of Hedonism." Hedonism.org. BLTC. 4 Nov. 2007 <http://www.hedonism.org>.</ref> |
|||
[[Image:Epicurus Louvre.jpg|left|thumb|132px|Bust of [[Epicurus]] leaning against his disciple [[Metrodorus of Lampsacus (the younger)|Metrodorus]] in the [[Louvre|Louvre Museum]].]] |
|||
===== Epicurean views of the meaning of life ===== |
|||
:::::::''Main article: [[Epicurianism]]'' |
|||
[[Epicurus]] believed that while the pursuit of pleasure formed the focal point of the philosophy, this was largely directed to the 'static pleasures' of minimizing pain, anxiety and suffering. |
|||
::::::<blockquote>When we say...that pleasure is the end and aim, we do not mean the pleasures of the prodigal or the pleasures of sensuality, as we are understood to do by some through ignorance, prejudice or wilful misrepresentation. By pleasure we mean the absence of pain in the body and of trouble in the soul. It is not by an unbroken succession of drinking bouts and of revelry, not by sexual lust, nor the enjoyment of fish and other delicacies of a luxurious table, which produce a pleasant life; it is sober reasoning, searching out the grounds of every choice and avoidance, and banishing those beliefs through which the greatest tumults take possession of the soul.<ref>[[Epicurus]], "Letter to Menoeceus", contained in Diogenes Laertius, <em>Lives of Eminent Philosophers</em>, Book X</ref></blockquote> |
|||
Epicureanism rejects immortality and mysticism; it believes in the soul, but suggests that the soul is as mortal as the body. Epicurus rejected any possibility of an afterlife, while still contending that one need not fear death: |
|||
<blockquote>Death is nothing to us; for that which is dissolved, is without sensation, and that which lacks sensation is nothing to us.<ref name="Russel">[[Bertrand Russell]] (1946). ''[[History of Western Philosophy (Russell)|A History of Western Philosophy]]'', New York: Simon and Schuster; London: George Allen and Unwin</ref></blockquote> |
|||
===== Stoic views of the meaning of life ===== |
|||
[[Stoicism]] teaches the development of self-control and fortitude as a means of overcoming destructive [[emotion]]s; the philosophy holds that becoming a clear and unbiased thinker allows one to understand the universal reason (''[[logos]]''). Stoicism's prime directives are [[virtue]], [[reason]], and [[natural law]]. The Stoics did not seek to extinguish emotions, only to avoid emotional troubles by developing clear judgment and inner calm through diligent practice of logic, reflection, and concentration. Stoics believe that to live according to reason and virtue is to live in harmony with the divine order of the universe, which entails the recognition of the common reason and essential value of all people. |
|||
The foundation of Stoic ethics is that good lies in the state of the soul itself, and it is exemplified by [[wisdom]] and self-control. The meaning of life is to be free of [[suffering]] through ''apatheia'' (απαθεια) (Greek) understood as being [[objectivity|objective]] or having "clear judgment", rather than simple indifference. Another essential aspect of Stoicism involves improving the individual’s spiritual well-being: "''Virtue'' consists in a ''will'' which is in agreement with Nature."<ref name="Russel" /> This principle also applies to the realm of interpersonal relationships; "to be free from anger, envy, and jealousy".<ref name="Russel" /> |
|||
==== 19th century philosophy ==== |
|||
{{see|19th century philosophy}} |
|||
===== Utilitarian views of the meaning of life ===== |
|||
[[Image:Bentham.jpg|right|thumb|102px|Jeremy Bentham]] |
|||
The origins of [[Utilitarianism]] are often traced back as far as the Greek philosopher [[Epicurus]], but as a specific school of thought, it is generally credited to [[Jeremy Bentham]].<ref>Rosen, Frederick (2003). ''Classical Utilitarianism from Hume to Mill''. Routledge, pg. 28. ISBN 0415220947 "It was Hume and Bentham who then reasserted most strongly the Epicurean doctrine concerning utility as the basis of justice."</ref> Bentham found pain and pleasure to be the only intrinsic values in the world: "nature has placed mankind under the governance of two sovereign masters, pain and pleasure." From this he derived the rule of utility, that the good is whatever brings the greatest happiness to the greatest number of people. Later, after realizing that the formulation recognized two different and potentially conflicting principles, he dropped the second part and talked simply about "the greatest happiness principle." |
|||
[[Jeremy Bentham]]'s foremost proponent was [[James Mill]], a significant philosopher in his day and the father of [[John Stuart Mill]]. The younger Mill was educated according to Bentham's principles, including transcribing and summarising much of his father's work whilst still in his teens."<ref name="Mill">Mill, John Stuart. 'On Liberty', ed. Himmelfarb. Penguin Classics, 1974, Ed.'s introduction, p.11.</ref> |
|||
In his famous short work, ''[[Utilitarianism (book)|Utilitarianism]]'', [[John Stuart Mill]] argued that cultural, intellectual, and spiritual pleasures are of greater value than mere physical pleasure, because the former would be valued more highly by competent judges than the latter. A competent judge, according to Mill, is anyone who has experienced both the lower pleasures and the higher.<ref>John Stuart Mill (1863). ''[[Utilitarianism (book)|Utilitarianism]]''.</ref> |
|||
===== Nihilist views of the meaning of life ===== |
|||
[[Nihilism]] rejects claims to knowledge and truth, and explores the meaning of an [[existence]] without knowable truth. Though nihilism tends toward [[defeatism]], one can find strength and reason for celebration in the varied and unique human relationships it explores. From a nihilist point of view, morals are valueless and only hold a place in society as false ideals created by various forces. The characteristic that distinguishes nihilism from other skeptical or relativist philosophies is that, rather than merely insisting that values are subjective or even warrantless, nihilism declares that nothing is of value, as the name implies. |
|||
[[Friedrich Nietzsche]] characterized [[nihilism]] as emptying the world and especially human existence of meaning, purpose, comprehensible truth, or essential value. He summed up the process of nihilism as "the devaluing of the highest values".<ref name="Bindé">{{cite book|author=Jérôme Bindé|title=The Future Of Values: 21st-Century Talks|publisher=Berghahn Books|year=2004|isbn=1571814426}}</ref> He also saw nihilism as a natural result of the idea that [[God is dead]], and insisted that it was something to be overcome, by calling the nihilist's life-negating values in question and return meaning to the Earth.<ref name="Reginster" /> |
|||
[[Martin Heidegger]] described nihilism as the movement whereby Being is forgotten and is wholly transformed into value, or in other words, the reduction of being to exchange value.<ref name="Bindé" /> |
|||
===== Pragmatist views of the meaning of life ===== |
|||
[[Pragmatism]] is a school of philosophy which originated in the [[United States]] in the late [[1800s]]. Pragmatism is characterized by the insistence on consequences, utility and practicality as vital components of truth. Pragmatism holds that it is only in the struggle of intelligent organisms with the surrounding environment that theories and data acquire significance. Pragmatism does not hold, however, that just anything that is useful or practical should be regarded as true, or anything that helps us to survive merely in the short-term; pragmatists argue that what should be taken as true is that which most contributes to the most human good over the longest course. In practice, this means that for pragmatists, theoretical claims should be tied to verification practices — i.e., that one should be able to make predictions and test them − and that ultimately the needs of humankind should guide the path of human inquiry. |
|||
Pragmatic philosophers suggest that rather than a truth about life, we should seek a useful understanding of life. [[William James]] argued that truth could be made but not sought.<ref name="James">{{cite book|author=[[William James]]|title=The Meaning of Truth|publisher=Prometheus Books|year=1909|isbn=1-57392-138-6}}</ref><ref name="Corti">{{cite book|author=Walter Robert Corti|title=The Philosophy of William James|publisher=Meiner Verlag|year=1976|isbn=3787303529}}</ref> Thus, the meaning of life is a belief about the purpose of life that does not contradict one's experience of a purposeful life. Roughly, this could be applied as: "The meaning of life is those purposes which cause you to value it." To a pragmatist, the meaning of life, your life, can be discovered only through experience. |
|||
==== 20th century philosophy ==== |
|||
{{see|20th century philosophy}} |
|||
===== Existentialist views of the meaning of life ===== |
|||
There has been a wide variety in [[Existentialism|Existentialist]] thought. [[Arthur Schopenhauer]] offered a bleak answer to "what is the meaning of life?" by determining one's life as a reflection of one's will and the will (and thus life) as being an aimless, irrational, and painful drive. He saw salvation, deliverance, or escape from suffering in aesthetic contemplation, sympathy for others, and [[asceticism]].<ref name="Jacquette">{{cite book|author=Dale Jacquette|title=Schopenhauer, Philosophy, and the Arts|publisher=Cambridge University Press|year=1996|isbn=0521473888}}</ref><ref name="Murray">{{cite book|author=Durno Murray|title=Nietzsche's Affirmative Morality|publisher=Walter de Gruyter|year=1999|isbn=3110166011}}</ref> |
|||
[[Søren Kierkegaard]] invented the term "[[leap of faith]]" and argued that life is full of [[Absurdism|absurdity]] and the individual must make his or her own values in an indifferent world. For Kierkegaard, an individual can have a meaningful life (or at least one free of despair) if the individual relates the self in an unconditional commitment to something finite, and devotes his or her life to the commitment despite the inherent vulnerability of doing so.<ref name="Hall">{{cite book|author=Amy Laura Hall|title=Kierkegaard and the Treachery of Love|publisher=Cambridge University Press|year=2002|isbn=0521893119}}</ref> |
|||
===== Humanist views of the meaning of life ===== |
|||
{{See|Humanism (life stance)}} |
|||
[[Image:Humanism.png|95px|left|thumb|The "[[Happy Human]]" symbol representing [[Humanism]].]] |
|||
According to [[Humanism]], the [[human race]] came to be by reproducing in a progression of unguided [[evolution]] as an integral part of [[nature]], which is self-existing.<ref name=humanifesto1>{{cite web |title=[[Humanist Manifesto I]]] [http://www.americanhumanist.org/about/manifesto1.html | url=http://www.americanhumanist.org/about/manifesto1.html |work=American Humanist Association |date=1933 |accessdate=2007-07-26}}</ref><ref name=humanifesto2>{{cite web |title=[[Humanist Manifesto II]]] [http://www.americanhumanist.org/about/manifesto2.html |work=American Humanist Association |date=1973 |url=http://www.americanhumanist.org/about/manifesto2.html |accessdate=2007-08-01}}</ref> Knowledge does not come from supernatural sources, rather it flows from human observation, experimentation, and rational analysis preferably utilizing the [[scientific method]]: the nature of the [[universe]] is what we discern it to be.<ref name=humanifesto1 /> As are "[[ethics|values]] and realities", which are determined "by means of intelligent inquiry"<ref name=humanifesto1 /> and "are derived from human need and interest as tested by experience", that is, by [[Critical thinking|critical intelligence]].<ref name=humanifesto3>{{cite web |title=[[Humanist Manifesto III]]] [http://www.americanhumanist.org/3/HumandItsAspirations.php |work=American Humanist Association |date=2003 |url=http://www.americanhumanist.org/3/HumandItsAspirations.php |accessdate=2007-08-01}}</ref><ref name=CDSH>{{cite web |title=[[A Secular Humanist Declaration]]] [http://www.secularhumanism.org/index.php?section=main&page=declaration |work=Council for Democratic and Secular Humanism (now the Council for Secular Humanism) |date=1980 |url=http://www.secularhumanism.org/index.php?section=main&page=declaration |accessdate=2007-08-01}}</ref> "As far as we know, the total personality is [a function] of the biological organism transacting in a social and cultural context."<ref name=humanifesto2 /> |
|||
Humanists believe that human purpose is determined by humans, completely without [[supernatural]] influence; it is human personality (in the broadest sense) that is the purpose of a human's life, and this humanism seeks to develop and fulfill:<ref name=humanifesto1 /> "Humanism affirms our ability and responsibility to lead ethical lives of personal fulfillment that aspire to the greater good of humanity."<ref name=humanifesto3 /> Humanists seek [[enlightened self-interest]] and the [[common good]] for all people. The [[happiness]] of the individual is inextricably linked to the well-being of humanity as a whole, in part because we are social animals which find meaning in [[interpersonal relationship|relationships]], and because cultural progress benefits everybody who lives in that [[culture]].<ref name=humanifesto2 /><ref name=humanifesto3 /> |
|||
[[Posthumanism]] and [[transhumanism]] (sometimes used as [[synonyms]]) are extensions of humanistic values. Like humanism, they propose that we should seek the advancement of [[human race|humanity]] and of [[Biocentrism|all life]] to the greatest degree feasible, with an emphasis on reconciling the views of [[Renaissance humanism]] to correspond more closely to the [[21st century]]'s concepts of [[technoscientific]] knowledge. These views insist that all living things be granted the basic option to inquire after their own personal or social "meaning(s) of life" (including meanings that human beings are currently incompetent to comprehend) as much as it is physically possible to do so, and no less.<ref>{{Cite web| author=[[Nick Bostrom]] |title=Transhumanist Values |work=[[Oxford University]] |date=2005 |url=http://www.nickbostrom.com/ethics/values.html |accessdate=2007-07-28}}</ref> They insist that the meaning of life is necessarily indefinite and ambiguous, and should be left to the philosophical inclinations of the individual; however there is a moral imperative common to all intelligent agents to improve their lives. |
|||
===== Logical positivist views of the meaning of life ===== |
|||
Of the meaning of life, [[Ludwig Wittgenstein]] and the [[logical positivism|logical positivists]] said: expressed in language, the question is meaningless. This is because "meaning of x" is a term ''in'' life usually conveying something regarding the consequences of x, or the significance of x, or that which should be noted regarding x, etc. So when "life" is used as "x" in the term "meaning of x", the statement becomes [[recursion|recursive]] and therefore nonsensical, or would simply refer to the obvious fact that the condition of life is essential for having meaning (in life). |
|||
In other words, things in a person's life can have meaning (importance), but a meaning of life itself, i.e., apart from those things, can't be discerned. In this context, a person's life is said to have meaning (significance to himself and others) in the form of the events throughout his life and the results of his life in terms of achievements, a legacy, family, etc. But to say that life itself has meaning is a misuse of language, since any note of significance or consequence is relevant only ''in'' life (to those living it), rendering the statement erroneous. [[Bertrand Russell]], for example, wrote that although he found it impossible to bring himself to seriously believe that his distaste for torture was similar in nature to his distaste for broccoli, he nonetheless could find no satisfactory empirical method of proving this:<ref name="Russel"/> |
|||
<blockquote>When we try to be definite as to what we mean when we say that this or that is "the Good," we find ourselves involved in very great difficulties. [[Jeremy Bentham|Bentham's]] creed that pleasure is the Good roused furious opposition, and was said to be a pig's philosophy. Neither he nor his opponents could advance any argument. In a scientific question, evidence can be adduced on both sides, and in the end, one side is seen to have the better case — or, if this does not happen, the question is left undecided. But in a question as to whether this or that is the ultimate Good, there is no evidence either way; each disputant can only appeal to his own emotions, and employ such rhetorical devices as shall rouse similar emotions in others...Questions as to "values" — that is to say, as to what is good or bad on its own account, independently of its effects — lie outside the domain of science, as the defenders of religion emphatically assert. I think that in this they are right, but I draw the further conclusion, which they do not draw, that questions as to "values" lie wholly outside the domain of knowledge. That is to say, when we assert that this or that has "value," we are giving expression to our own emotions, not to a fact which would still be true if our personal feelings were different.<ref>[[Bertrand Russell]] ([[1961]]). [http://www.solstice.us/russell/science-ethics.html ''Science and Ethics'']</ref></blockquote> |
|||
=== Abrahamic religions === |
|||
{{see|Abrahamic religion}} |
|||
[[Image:ReligionSymbolAbr.PNG|thumb|150px|right|Symbols of the three main Abrahamic religions – Christianity, Judaism and Islam]] |
|||
==== Jewish views of the meaning of life ==== |
|||
[[Judaism|Jews]] believe the purpose of life is to serve God<ref name="Cohn-Sherbok">{{cite book |author=Dan Cohn-Sherbok |title=Judaism: History, Belief, and Practice |publisher=Routledge |year=2003 |pages=512 |isbn=0415236614}}</ref> and to prepare for the world to come<ref name="Heschel">{{cite book |author=Abraham Joshua Heschel |title=Heavenly Torah: As Refracted Through the Generations |publisher=Continuum International Publishing Group |year=2005 |isbn=0826408028}}</ref> "[[Jewish eschatology#The afterlife and olam haba (the "world to come")|Olam Haba]]".<ref name="Shuchat">{{cite book |author=Wilfred Shuchat |title=The Garden of Eden & the Struggle to Be Human: According to the Midrash Rabbah |publisher=Devora Publishing |year=2006 |pages=584 |isbn=1932687319}}</ref> |
|||
Judaism regards life as a precious gift from God; precious not only because it is a gift from God, but because, for humans, there is a uniqueness attached to that gift. Of all the creatures on Earth, humans are created in the image of God. Our lives are sacred and precious because we carry within us the Divine Image, and with it, unlimited potential.<ref name="Braham">{{cite book |author=Randolph L. Braham |title=Contemporary Views on the Holocaust |publisher=Springer |year=1983 |isbn=089838141X}}</ref> |
|||
While Jewish thoughts are about elevating oneself in spirituality and connecting to God and trying to prepare for "Olam Haba", Jewish thought is to use this world, "Olam Hazeh," to help elevate ourself into the next. |
|||
[[Kabbalah]], Jewish mysticism, takes it one step further. The Zohar states that the reason for life is to better one's soul. The soul descends to this world and endures the trials of this life so that it can reach a higher spiritual state upon its return to the source. |
|||
==== Christian views of the meaning of life ==== |
|||
[[Christians]] draw many of their beliefs from the [[Bible|Holy Bible]], and believe that loving God is the meaning of life. In order to achieve this, one would ask for [[Atonement|forgiveness of sins]] and receive God into their heart. Christianity believes in an eternal afterlife, and declares that it is an unearned gift from God through the love of [[Jesus Christ]], which is to be received or forfeited by [[faith]]. ({{bibleverse||Ephesians|2:8-9}}; {{bibleverse||Romans|6:23}}; {{bibleverse||John|3:16-21}}; {{bibleverse||John|3:36}}). |
|||
Christians believe they are being tested and purified so that they may have a place of responsibility with Jesus in the eternal Kingdom to come. What the Christian does in this life will determine his place of responsibility with Jesus in the eternal Kingdom to come. Jesus encouraged Christians to be overcomers, so that they might share in the glorious reign with Him in the life to come: "To him who overcomes, I will give the right to sit with me on my throne, just as I overcame and sat down with my Father on his throne. He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches." ({{bibleverse||Rev|3:21-22}}) |
|||
The Bible states that it is God "in whom we live and move and have our being" ({{bibleverse||Acts|17:28}}), that to [[Fear]] God is the beginning of [[wisdom]], and to depart from [[evil]] is the beginning of understanding ({{bibleverse||Job|28:28}}) and that "In Christ Jesus are hidden all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge" ({{bibleverse||Colossians|2:3}}). The Bible also says, in {{bibleverse||Ecclesiastes|12:13}} "Let us hear the conclusion of the whole matter: Fear God, and keep his commandments: for this is the whole duty of man", and "Whether therefore ye eat, or drink, or whatsoever ye do, do all to the glory of God." {{bibleverse||Corinthians|10:31}} |
|||
In one of the Westminster Articles (1647), the Shorter Catechism, the first question is "What is the chief end of man?", or in other words, 'What is man's main purpose?'. The answer, according to the Catechism is "Man's chief end is to glorify God and enjoy him forever." It goes on to explain that God requires of us to obey the moral law revealed to us, summarily comprehended in the "Greatest Commandment", which proclaim that we must "love the Lord our God with all our heart, with all our soul, with all our strength, and with all our mind; and our neighbour as ourselves."<ref>{{cite web |title=The Westminster Shorter Catechism |url=http://www.creeds.net/reformed/Westminster/shorter_catechism.html |accessdate=2008-03-21}}</ref> |
|||
====Islamic views of the meaning of life==== |
|||
In [[Islam]] the ultimate objective of man is to seek the pleasure of [[Allah]] by living in accordance with the Divine guidelines as stated in the [[Qur'an]] and the Tradition of the Prophet. The Qur'an clearly states that the whole purpose behind the creation of man was for gloryfying and worshipping Allah:<ref name="Markham & Özdemir">{{cite book |author=Ian Markham; İbrahim Özdemir |title=Globalization, Ethics and Islam: The Case of Bediuzzaman Said Nursi |publisher=Ashgate Publishing, Ltd. |year=2005 |isbn=0754650154}}</ref> "I only created [[jinn]] and man to worship Me" (Qur'an 51:56). Worshiping in Islam means to testify to the [[oneness of God]] in his lordship, names and attributes. To Muslims, life was created as a test, and how well one performs on this test will determine whether one finds a final home in [[Jannah]] (Heaven) or [[Jahannam]] (Hell). |
|||
The [[esoteric]] [[Muslim]] view, generally held by [[Sufi]]s, the universe exists only for God's pleasure. Creation works as a grand game,<ref name="Yusuf Ali">{{cite book |author=[[Abdullah Yusuf Ali]] |title=[[Qur'an|The Holy Qur'an]] |publisher=Wordsworth Editions |year=2000 |isbn=1853267821}}</ref> with Allah as the greatest prize.<ref name="Yusuf Ali" /> |
|||
==== Bahá'í views of the meaning of life ==== |
|||
[[Image:Bahaistar.jpg|thumb|140px|Two [[Bahá'í symbols]] in one; a [[Bahá'í symbols#Nine Pointed Star|nine-pointed star]] with the [[calligraphy]] of the [[Bahá'í symbols#The Greatest Name|Greatest Name]] in the centre]] |
|||
The [[Bahá'í Faith]], founded by [[Bahá'u'lláh]], emphasizes the spiritual unity of all humankind.<ref>{{Citation | year = 2007 | title = "Bahaism." The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language | volume = Fourth Edition | publisher = Houghton Mifflin Company | url = http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/bahaism |}}</ref> According to [[Bahá'í teachings]], religious history has unfolded through a series of [[God]]'s messengers who brought teachings suited for the capacity of the people at their time, and whose fundamental purpose is the same. |
|||
The purpose of human life, say Bahá'ís, is spiritual growth. This is conceived almost as an organic process, like the development of a fetus, and continues after death. Neither a physical [[Heaven]] or [[Hell]] are present in the Bahá'í Faith. The Bahá'í teachings present "Heaven" and "Hell" to be states of spiritual nearness or remoteness to God, and that life continues in an afterlife through which the soul may progress infinitely through ever-more-exalted spiritual realms, eventually coming to stand before the Presence of God. The Bahá'í faith teaches that this process continues on in the spiritual afterlife, and not through a series of births and re-births as in [[reincarnation]]. |
|||
<br><ref>{{cite book |author=[[Bahá'u'lláh]] |year=1873 |title=[[Kitáb-i-Aqdas|The Kitáb-i-Aqdas: The Most Holy Book]] [http://reference.bahai.org/en/t/b/KA/] |publisher=Bahá'í Publishing Trust |location=Wilmette, Illinois, USA |isbn=0853989990}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |author=[[Bahá'u'lláh]] |year=1862 |title=[[Kitáb-i-Íqán|The Kitáb-i-Íqán: The Book of Certitude]] [http://reference.bahai.org/en/t/b/KI/] |publisher=Bahá'í Publishing Trust |location=Wilmette, Illinois, USA |isbn=1931847088}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |author=[[Bahá'u'lláh]] |origyear=1856-63 |year=1991 |title=[[Seven Valleys|The Seven Valleys]] and [[Four Valleys (Bahá'í)|the Four Valleys]] [http://reference.bahai.org/en/t/b/SVFV/] |publisher=Bahá'í Publishing Trust |location=Wilmette, Illinois, USA |isbn=0-87743-227-9}}</ref> |
|||
Bahá'ís believe that while God's essence can never be fully fathomed, he can be understood through his "names and attributes." These are sometimes referred to as gems, and include such qualities as compassion, justice, knowledge, and wisdom. Education (especially of a spiritual nature) reveals the divine gems which God has placed within our souls.<ref>{{cite book |author=[[Bahá'u'lláh]] |year=2002 |title=[[Gems of Divine Mysteries]] [http://reference.bahai.org/en/t/b/GDM/] |publisher=Bahá'í World Centre |location=Haifa, Israel |isbn=0-85398-975-3}}</ref> |
|||
=== Dharmic religions and philosophy === |
|||
{{see|Dharma|Indian religions|Indian philosophy}} |
|||
==== Hindu views of the meaning of life ==== |
|||
[[Hinduism]] is an extremely diverse religion. Although some tenets of the faith are accepted by most Hindus, scholars have found it difficult to identify any doctrines with universal acceptance among all denominations.<ref name=weightman>{{Harvard reference | author= Simon Weightman | year=1998 | title=The new Penguin handbook of living religions |editor = Hinnells, John (Ed.) | publisher= [[Penguin books]] |chapter= Hinduism | isbn=0-140-51480-5}}</ref> Most Hindus believe that the spirit or soul—the true "self" of every person, called the [[Atman (Hinduism)|ātman]]—is eternal.<ref name="monierwilliams">{{Harvard reference | author= [[Monier Monier-Williams]] | year=1974 | title=Brahmanism and Hinduism: Or, Religious Thought and Life in India, as Based on the Veda and Other Sacred Books of the Hindus | publisher= Adamant Media Corporation |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=U5IBXA4UpT0C&dq=isbn:1421265311 |accessdate=[[2007-07-08]] |series=Elibron Classics | isbn=1421265311}}</ref> The [[purusharthas]] are the canonical four ends or aims of human life.<ref>For dharma, artha, and kama as "brahmanic householder values" see: Flood (1996), p. 17.</ref><ref>For the ''Dharma Śāstras'' as discussing the "four main goals of life" (dharma, artha, {{IAST|kāma}}, and moksha) see: Hopkins, p. 78.</ref><ref>For definition of the term पुरुष-अर्थ ({{IAST|puruṣa-artha}}) as "any of the four principal objects of human life, i.e. {{lang|sa|धर्म}}, {{lang|sa|अर्थ}}, {{lang|sa|काम}}, and {{lang|sa|मोक्ष}}" see: Apte, p. 626, middle column, compound #1.</ref> These goals are, from lowest to highest importance: ''[[Kāma]]'' (sensual pleasure or love), ''[[Artha]]'' (wealth), ''[[Dharma]]'' (righteousness or morality) and ''[[Moksha]]'' (liberation from the cycle of [[reincarnation]]) |
|||
According to the [[Monism|monistic]]/[[Pantheism|pantheistic]] theologies of Hinduism (such as the [[Advaita Vedanta]] school), the ātman is ultimately indistinct from [[Brahman]], the supreme spirit. [[Brahman]] is described as "The One Without a Second;" hence these schools are called "[[Dualism#Consciousness/Matter dualism|non-dualist]]."<ref name=bhaskaranandaessential>{{Harvard reference | last=Bhaskarananda | first=Swami | year=1994 | title=The Essentials of Hinduism: a comprehensive overview of the world's oldest religion | place=Seattle, WA | publisher=Viveka Press | isbn=1-884852-02-5}}</ref> The goal of life according to the Advaita school is to realize that one's [[Atman (Hinduism)|atman]] (soul) is identical to [[Brahman]], the supreme soul.<ref>{{Harvard reference | last= Vivekananda | first=Swami | authorlink=Swami Vivekananda | year=1987 | title=Complete Works of Swami Vivekananda | place=Calcutta | publisher= Advaita Ashrama | isbn=81-85301-75-1}}</ref> The [[Upanishads]] state that whoever becomes fully aware of the ātman as the innermost core of one's own self, realises their identity with Brahman and thereby reaches [[Moksha]] (liberation or freedom)<ref name="monierwilliams"/><ref name="werner">{{Harvard reference | last= Werner | first=Karel | year=1994 | title=A Popular Dictionary of Hinduism | place=Richmond, Surrey | editor = Hinnells, John (Ed.) | publisher= Curzon Press | chapter= Hinduism | isbn=0-7007-0279-2}}</ref><ref>See also the Vedic statement "ayam ātmā brahma" (This Atman is Brahman).</ref> The notion of [[lila]] (literally, "play") refers to the idea of the universe as a cosmic game, and meaning as a "play of significance".<ref name=Schechner>{{cite book |author=Richard Schechner |year=2002 |title=Performance Studies: An Introduction |publisher=Routledge |pages=304 |isbn=0415146208}}</ref> This "play", manifested in the million-formed inexhaustible richness of beings and events, is what gives us the key to the meaning of life.<ref name=Merton>{{cite book |author=Thomas Merton |year=1995 |title=Thoughts on the East |publisher=New Directions Publishing |pages=84 |isbn=0811212939}}</ref> |
|||
Other Hindu schools, such as the [[Dualism#Consciousness/Matter dualism|dualist]] [[Dvaita|Dvaita Vedanta]] and other [[bhakti]] schools, understand [[Brahman]] as a Supreme Being who possesses personality. On these conceptions, the ātman is dependent on Brahman, and the meaning of life is to achieve Moksha through love towards God and on God's grace.<ref name="werner" /> |
|||
[[Image:Jain hand.svg|right|thumb|135px|The Jain [[dharmacakra]], which symbolizes the Jain Vow of [[Ahimsa in Jainism|Ahimsa]], meaning [[nonviolence|non-violence]], and halting the cycle of reincarnation through relentless pursuit of [[truth]].]] |
|||
==== Jain views of the meaning of life ==== |
|||
[[Jainism]] is a religion originating in [[Iron Age India|ancient India]], its ethical system promotes self-discipline above all else. Through following the [[asceticism|ascetic]] teachings of [[Tirthankara|jina]], a [[human]] achieves [[Moksa (Jainism)|enlightenment (perfect knowledge)]]. Jainism divides the universe into living and non-living beings. Only when the non-living become attached to the living does suffering result. Therefore, happiness is the result of self-conquest and freedom from external objects. The meaning of life may then be said to be to use of the physical body to achieve self-realization and bliss.<ref>Shah, Natubhai. ''Jainism: The World of Conquerors.'' Sussex Academic Press, 1998.</ref> |
|||
Jains believe that every human is responsible for his or her actions and all living beings have an eternal [[soul]], ''[[jiva|jīva]]''. Jains believe all souls are equal because they all possess the potential of being liberated and attaining [[Moksa (Jainism)|Moksha]]. The [[Karma in Jainism|Jain view of karma]] is that every action, every word, every thought produces, besides its visible, an invisible, transcendental effect on the soul. |
|||
Jainism includes strict adherence to [[Ahimsa in Jainism|ahimsa]] (or ''ahinsā''), a form of [[nonviolence]] that goes far beyond [[vegetarianism]]. Jains refuse food obtained with unnecessary cruelty. Many practice a lifestyle similar to [[Veganism]] due to the violence of modern dairy farms, and others exclude [[root vegetable]]s from their diets in order to preserve the lives of the plants from which they eat.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.retoday.org.uk/pdfs/dre/viren.pdf |title=Viren, Jain |accessdate=2007-06-14 |publisher=[http://www.retoday.org.uk/ RE Today] }}</ref> |
|||
==== Buddhist views of the meaning of life ==== |
|||
One of the central views in [[Buddhism]] is a [[nondual]] worldview, in which subject and object are the same, and the sense of doer-ship is illusionary. On this account, the meaning of life is to become enlightened as to the nature and oneness of the universe. According to the [[Buddhist texts|scriptures]], the [[Gautama Buddha|Buddha]] taught that in life there exists [[Dukkha]], which is in essence sorrow/suffering, that is caused by [[tanha|desire]] and it can be brought to cessation by following the [[Noble Eightfold Path]].[[Image:Dharma wheel.svg|thumb|144px|right|The eight-spoked [[Dharmacakra]]. The eight spokes represent the [[Noble Eightfold Path]] of Buddhism.]]This teaching is called the Catvāry Āryasatyāni (Pali: {{unicode|Cattāri Ariyasaccāni}}), or the "[[Four Noble Truths]]". |
|||
# There is suffering (duhkha) |
|||
# There is a cause of suffering — [[Tanha|craving]] (trishna) |
|||
# There is the cessation of suffering (nirvana) |
|||
# There is a way leading to the cessation of suffering — the [[Noble Eightfold Path]] |
|||
[[Theravada|Theravada Buddhism]] promotes the concept of [[Vibhajjavada]] ([[Pāli|Pali]]), literally "Teaching of Analysis." This doctrine says that insight must come from the aspirant's experience, critical investigation, and reasoning instead of by blind faith; however, the scriptures of the Theravadin tradition also emphasize heeding the advice of the wise, considering such advice and evaluation of one's own experiences to be the two tests by which practices should be judged. The Theravadin goal is liberation (or freedom) from suffering, according to the [[Four Noble Truths]]. This is attained in the achievement of [[Nibbana]], or Unbinding which also ends the [[reincarnation|repeated cycle]] of birth, old age, sickness and death. |
|||
[[Mahayana|Mahayana Buddhist]] schools de-emphasize the traditional Theravada ideal of the release from individual [[dukkha|Suffering]] ([[Dukkha]]) and attainment of [[nirvana|Awakening]] ([[Nirvana]]). In Mahayana, the Buddha is seen as an eternal, immutable, inconceivable, omnipresent being. The fundamental principles of Mahayana doctrine are based around the possibility of universal [[liberation]] from suffering for all beings, and the existence of the transcendent [[Buddha-nature]], which is the eternal Buddha essence present, but hidden and unrecognised, in all living beings. |
|||
==== Sikh views of the meaning of life ==== |
|||
The monastic [[Sikhism|Sikh]] religion founded by [[Guru Nanak Dev]], and the term "sikh" means student, which denotes that followers will lead their lives forever learning. This system of religious [[philosophy]] and expression has been traditionally known as the [[Gurmat]] (literally ''the counsel of the gurus'') or the Sikh Dharma. The followers of Sikhism are ordained to follow the teachings of the ten [[The Sikh Gurus|Sikh gurus]], or enlightened leaders, as well as the holy scripture entitled the ''[[Guru Granth Sahib|Gurū Granth Sāhib]]'', which includes selected works of many philosophers from diverse socio-economic and religious backgrounds. |
|||
The Sikh Gurus tell us that salvation can be obtained by following various spiritual paths. Therefore, Sikhs do not have a monopoly on salvation: "The Lord dwells in every heart, and every heart has its own way to reach Him."<ref name="Singh">{{cite book |author=Daljeet Singh |title=Guru Tegh Bahadur |publisher=Language Dept., Punjab |year=1971 |pages=195}}</ref> Sikhs do not consider they have an "exclusive" right to salvation. Sikhs believe that all people are equally important before [[Waheguru|God]].<ref name="Mayled">{{cite book |author=Jon Mayled |title=Modern World Religions: Sikhism |publisher=Harcourt Heinemann |year=2002 |pages=62 |isbn=0435336266}}</ref> Sikhs balance their moral and spiritual values with the quest for knowledge, and they aim to promote a life of peace and equality but also of positive action.<ref>[http://www.sikhcoalition.org The Sikh Coalition]</ref> |
|||
A key distinctive feature of Sikhism is a non-[[Anthropomorphism#In religions and mythologies|anthropomorphic]] concept of God, to the extent that one can interpret God as the [[Universe]] itself (''see [[Pantheism]]''). Sikhism thus sees life as an opportunity to understand this God as well as to discover the divinity which lies in each individual. While a full understanding of God is beyond human beings,<ref name="p252">{{cite book | last=Parrinder | first=Geoffrey | authorlink=Geoffrey Parrinder | year=1971 | title=World Religions: From Ancient History to the Present | publisher=Hamlyn Publishing Group Limited | location=United States | id = ISBN 0-87196-129-6 | pages=252}}</ref> [[Guru Nanak Dev|Nanak]] described God as not wholly unknowable. God is omnipresent (''[[sarav viāpak]]'') in all creation and visible everywhere to the spiritually awakened. Nanak stressed that God must be seen from "the inward eye", or the "heart", of a human being: devotees must [[meditate]] to progress towards enlightenment. Nanak emphasized the revelation through meditation, as its rigorous application permits the existence of communication between God and human beings.<ref name="p252"/> |
|||
According to Sikhism, every creature has a [[soul]]. In death, the soul passes from one body to another until final [[liberation]]. The journey of the soul is governed by the [[karma]] of the deeds and actions we perform during our lives, and depending on the goodness or wrongdoings committed by a person in their life they will either be rewarded or punished in their [[reincarnation|next life]]. As the spirit of God is found in all life and matter, a soul can be passed onto other life forms, such as plants and insects - not just human bodies. A person who has evolved to achieve spiritual perfection in his lifetimes attains salvation – union with God and liberation from rebirth in the material world. |
|||
[[Image:Yin yang.svg|right|thumb|120px|In Taoism, the ''[[Taijitu]]'' symbolizes the [[unity of opposites]] between ying and yang, described in the theory of the [[Taiji]].]] |
|||
=== East Asian religions and philosophy === |
|||
{{see|East Asian religions}} |
|||
==== Taoist views of the meaning of life ==== |
|||
The [[Taoists]] [[cosmogony]] emphasizes the need for all sentient beings and all man to return to the ''primordial'' or to rejoin with the ''Oneness'' of the Universe by way of self-correction and self realization. It is the objective for all adherents to understand and be in tune with the ultimate truth. |
|||
Within the theology of Taoism, all man were originally a being called yuanling from [[Taiji]] and [[Tao]], the meaning in life for the adherents is to realise the temporal nature of the existence, and all adherents are expected to practise, hone and conduct their mortal lives by way of [[Xiuzhen]] and [[Xiushen]], as a preparation for the spiritual transcendence thereafter. "Only introspection can then help us to find our innermost reasons for living...the simple answer is here within ourselves."<ref name="Ming-Dao">{{cite book |author=Ming-Dao Deng |title=Scholar Warrior: An Introduction to the Tao in Everyday Life |publisher=HarperCollins |year=1990}}</ref> |
|||
[[Image:Torii.svg|thumb|right|120px|A [[torii]] is a traditional Japanese gate commonly found at the entry to a Shinto shrine.]] |
|||
==== Shinto views of the meaning of life ==== |
|||
[[Shinto]] wants life to live, not to die. Shinto sees death as pollution and regards life as the realm where the divine spirit seeks to purify itself by rightful self-development. Shinto wants individual human life to be prolonged forever on earth as a victory of the divine spirit in preserving its objective personality in its highest forms. The presence of evil in the world, as conceived by Shinto, does not stultify the divine nature by imposing on divinity responsibility for being able to relieve human suffering while refusing to do so. The sufferings of life are the sufferings of the divine spirit in search of progress in the objective world.<ref name="Mason">{{cite book |author=J. W. T. Mason |title=The Meaning of Shinto |publisher= Trafford Publishing |year=2002 |pages=175 |isbn=1412245516}}</ref> |
|||
==== Confucian views of the meaning of life ==== |
|||
[[Confucianism]] recognizes human nature in accordance with the need for discipline and education. Because mankind is driven by both positive and negative influences, Confucianists see a goal in achieving the good nature through strong relationships and reasoning as well as minimizing the negative energy. This emphasis on normal living is seen in the Confucianist scholar Wei-Ming's quote, "we can realize the ultimate meaning of life in ordinary human existence."<ref>Tu, Wei-Ming. ''Confucian Thought: Selfhood as Creative Transformation.'' Albany: State University of New York Press, 1985.</ref> |
|||
=== Non-Abrahamic Iranian religions and philosophy === |
|||
{{see|Iranian religions|Iranian philosophy}} |
|||
==== Zoroastrian views of the meaning of life ==== |
|||
Founded by [[Zoroaster]], the [[Zoroastrianism]] message was that humans are responsible for the moral choices they make in a world of both good and evil options. For those who chose good actions, a blissful afterlife is promised, as well as a return to earth to continue life in a physical form. Those who chose evil actions would be doomed to a hellish afterlife.<ref>Muesse, Mark. Religions of the Axial Age: An Approach to the World's Religions. Lectures at Rhodes College. </ref> |
|||
== Scientific approaches to the meaning of life == |
|||
<!-- |
|||
Please do not include single-scientific-theory specific entries in this section. Thank you. |
|||
--> |
|||
The primary aim of the [[science|scientific]] approach to the meaning of life is to describe the [[empirical]] facts about human existence. Claims that empirical science can shed light on issues such as the meaning of life are highly disputed within the scientific and [[Philosophy of science|philosophy-of-science]] communities, and have been from the very beginning of science. In spite of this, science has provided many theories about the [[origin of life]], in the areas of [[abiogenesis]] (for the origins of biological life) and [[cosmogony]] (for the origins of the universe). Both of these areas are quite hypothetical; cosmogony because no existing physical model can accurately describe the very early universe (the instant of the [[Big Bang]]),<ref>{{cite book | author = [[Brian Greene]] | title = [[The Fabric of the Cosmos]] | publisher = Alfred A. Knopf | date=2004 | location = New York | pages = 272 | isbn = 0375727205}}</ref> and abiogenesis because the environment of the young earth is still not accurately known, and even though the conditions and chemical processes that may have been present then have been reproduced in a laboratory, to produce organic molecules, those very conditions are still under debate.<ref name="Lahav">{{cite book | author = Noam Lahav | title = Biogenesis: Theories of Life's Origin | publisher = Oxford University Press US | date=1998 | pages = 368 | isbn = 0195117557}}</ref><ref name="Brack">{{cite book | author = André Brack | title = The Molecular Origins of Life: Assembling Pieces of the Puzzle | publisher = Cambridge University Press | date=1998 | pages = 428 | isbn = 0521564751}}</ref><ref>Günter Wächtershäuser (25 Aug 2000). "[http://ajdubre.tripod.com/Sci-Read-0/y-OriginLife-82500/OriginLifeSci-82500.html Origin of Life: Life as We Don't Know It]", ''Science'', '''289''' (5483) pp. 1307-1308.<!-- G. Wächtershäuser remarks 'It remains to be established whether such conditions are geophysically possible.' --></ref> |
|||
The true nature and origin of [[consciousness]] and the [[mind]] itself are also widely debated in science, and more specifically in relation to the [[hard problem of consciousness]]. Various theories relating to consciousness have been postulated,<ref name="Churchland">{{cite book |author=Paul M. Churchland |title=A Neurocomputational Perspective: The Nature of Mind and the Structure of Science |publisher= MIT Press |year=1989 |pages=321 |isbn=0262531062}}</ref><ref name="Whitehouse">{{cite book |author=Harvey Whitehouse |title=The Debated Mind: Evolutionary Psychology Versus Ethnography |publisher=Berg Publishers |year=2001 |pages=224 |isbn=1859734278}}</ref> including [[hypotheses of consciousness and spacetime]],<ref name="Barrow & Davies & Harper">{{cite book |author=John D. Barrow; Paul C. W. Davies; Charles L. Harper |title=Science and Ultimate Reality: Quantum Theory, Cosmology, and Complexity |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=2004 |pages=742 |isbn=052183113X}}</ref><ref name="Ho">{{cite book |author=Mae-Wan Ho |title=The Rainbow and the Worm: The Physics of Organisms |publisher=World Scientific |year=1998 |pages=304 |isbn=9810234279}}</ref> [[electromagnetic theories of consciousness]],<ref>J. McFadden (2002) "[http://www.mindcontrolforums.com/news/electromagnetic-field-theory-of-consciousness.htm Synchronous Firing and Its Influence on the Brain's Electromagnetic Field: Evidence for an Electromagnetic Field Theory of Consciousness]". ''Journal of Consciousness Studies'' '''9''' (4) pp. 23-50.</ref><ref name="Ho" /><ref name="Buccheri & Di Gesù & Saniga">{{cite book |author=R. Buccheri; V. Di Gesù; Metod Saniga |title=Studies on the Structure of Time: From Physics to Psycho(patho)logy |publisher=Springer |year=2000 |pages=420 |isbn=030646439X}}</ref> the [[Multiple Drafts Model]],<ref name="Dennett">{{cite book |author=[[Daniel Dennett|Daniel Clement Dennett]] |title=[[Consciousness Explained]] |publisher=Little, Brown and Co. |year=1991 |pages=511 |isbn=0316180661}}</ref><ref name="Block">{{cite book |author=Ned Joel Block |title=Consciousness, Function, and Representation |publisher=MIT Press |year=2007 |pages=636 |isbn=0262026031}}</ref><ref name="Brook & Akins">{{cite book |author=Andrew Brook; Kathleen Akins |title=Cognition and the Brain: The Philosophy and Neuroscience Movement |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=2005 |pages=440 |isbn=0521836425}}</ref><ref name="Dehaene">{{cite book |author=Stanislas Dehaene |title=The Cognitive Neuroscience of Consciousness |publisher=MIT Press |year=2001 |pages=249 |isbn=0262541319}}</ref><ref name="Gray">{{cite book |author=[[Jeffrey Alan Gray]] |title=Consciousness: Creeping Up on the Hard Problem |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2004 |pages=360 |isbn=0198520905}}</ref> the [[holonomic brain theory]],<ref name="Kermanshahi">{{cite book |author=Mohsen Kermanshahi |title=Universal Theory: A Model for the Theory of Everything |publisher=Universal Publishers |date=May 2007 |pages=268 |isbn=1581129432}}</ref> [[Orch-OR]]<ref name="Bruce">{{cite book |author=Alexandra Bruce |title=Beyond the Bleep: The Definitive Unauthorized Guide to What the Bleep Do We Know!? |publisher=The Disinformation Company |year=2005 |pages=288 |isbn=1932857222}}</ref> and the [[many-minds interpretation]].<ref name="Bohm & Hiley">{{cite book |author=David Bohm; Basil J. Hiley |title=The Undivided Universe: An Ontological Interpretation of Quantum Theory |publisher=Routledge |year=1993 |pages=397 |isbn=0415065887}}</ref> |
|||
===Origin and nature of biological life=== |
|||
The exact mechanisms by which [[Origin of life|biological life could have originated]] from [[non-life|inanimate matter]] are unknown, but multiple theories have been posited, including the contemporary [[RNA world hypothesis]]. Some scientists claim life began on [[Earth]] as a [[primeval soup]], while others believe that a more "complete" form of life arrived on our planet through [[panspermia]]. The initial mechanisms by which primitive cells were formed notwithstanding, almost all scientific origin theories are contingent upon the [[evolution]] of traits through [[mutation]] and [[natural selection]].<ref>[[Charles Darwin]] (1859). ''[[On the Origin of Species]]''.</ref> Near the end of the 20th century, equipped with insights from the [[gene-centered view of evolution]], biologists such as [[George C. Williams]], [[Richard Dawkins]] and [[David Haig (biologist)|David Haig]], to name a few, have suggested that insofar as there may be a primary function to life, it may be the survival of [[genes]]; following this approach, success isn't measured in terms of the survival of species, but rather in terms of the successful replication of genes.<ref name="Dawkins selfish gene">{{cite book |author=[[Richard Dawkins]] |title=[[The Selfish Gene]] |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=1976 |pages=224 |isbn=019857519X}}</ref> |
|||
In addition to [[Metaphysical naturalism#Evolution|naturalistic]] arguments for the origin of life on Earth, some philosophers and theologians have postulated that a "watchmaker" or intelligent designer guided its development. This [[teleological argument]] has been [[Level of support for evolution|rejected by most scientists]], including [[Richard Dawkins]], who has often affirmed that [[teleology]] is an illusion and does not exist, like in his Discovery Science video 'The Big Question: Why are we here?'<ref>{{cite episode | title = [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1146359/ Why are we here?] | episodelink = | series = The Big Questions | serieslink = The Science Channel | airdate = 2007-11-25 | season = 1 | number = 10 }}</ref> and in books such as ''[[The Blind Watchmaker]]''<ref name="Dawkins blind watchmaker">{{cite book |author=[[Richard Dawkins]] |title=[[The Blind Watchmaker]] |publisher=Norton & Company |year=1986 |isbn=0-393-31570-3}}</ref> and ''[[The God Delusion]]''.<ref name="Dawkins God delusion">{{cite book |author=[[Richard Dawkins]] |title=[[The God Delusion]] |publisher=Bantam Books |year=2006 |isbn=0-618-68000-4}}</ref><ref name="McGrath Dawkins delusion">{{cite book |author=[[Alister McGrath|Alister E. McGrath]] |title=[[The Dawkins Delusion?]] |publisher=Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge |year=2007 |isbn=978-0-281-05927-0}}</ref><ref name="McGrath Dawkins' God">{{cite book |author=[[Alister McGrath|Alister E. McGrath]] |title=[[Dawkins' God: Genes, Memes, and the Meaning of Life]] |publisher=Blackwell Publishing |year=2005 |pages=202 |isbn=140512539X}}</ref> |
|||
===Significance and value of life=== |
|||
Science may or may not be able to tell us what is most valuable in life in a philosophical sense, but some studies bear on related questions: Researchers in "[[positive psychology]]" (and earlier and less rigorously in [[humanistic psychology]]) study factors that lead to [[Contentment|satisfaction]] in our lives. [[Social psychology (psychology)|Social psychology]] examines factors that lead to infants thriving or failing to thrive, and in other areas of [[psychology]] questions of motivation, preference, and what people value. [[Economics|Economists]] have learned a great deal about what is [[Value (economics)|valued]] in the marketplace; and [[sociology]] examines value at a social level using theoretical constructs such as [[Value theory#Sociology|value theory]], norms, anomie, etc. |
|||
== Popular views of the purpose of life == |
|||
<!--Please do not add 42 in this section. It is covered under the section titled "Humorous treatments". Thank you.--> |
|||
"What is the meaning of life?" is a question many people ask themselves at some point during their lives, most in the context "What is the purpose of life?"<ref name="WITMOL" /> Here are some of the life goals people choose, and some of their beliefs on what the purpose of life is: |
|||
=== ...to have life === |
|||
* ...to survive,<ref>{{cite web |last=Lopez |first=Mike |title=Episode III: Relativism? A Jedi craves not these things |work=The Michigan Daily |date=September 22, 1999 |url=http://www.pub.umich.edu/daily/1999/sep/09-22-99/edit/edit2.html |accessdate=2007-07-26}}</ref> that is, to live as long as possible,<ref>{{cite book |last=Lovatt |first=Stephen C. |title=New Skins for Old Wine |publisher=Universal Publishers |date=2007 |pages=The Meaning of Life |url=http://homepage.ntlworld.com/pharseas.world/Life.html |isbn=1581129602}}</ref> including pursuit of [[immortality]] (through scientific means).<ref name="Kurweil & Grossmann">{{cite book |author=[[Raymond Kurzweil]]; [[Terry Grossman]] |title=[[Fantastic Voyage: Live Long Enough to Live Forever]] [http://www.fantastic-voyage.net/] |publisher=Holtzbrinck Publishers |date=2004 |isbn=1-57954-954-3}}</ref><br>...to live forever<ref name="Kurweil & Grossmann" /> or die trying.<ref name="Appleyard">{{cite book |author=Bryan Appleyard |title=How to Live Forever Or Die Trying: On the New Immortality |publisher=Simon & Schuster |year=2007 |isbn=0743268687}}</ref> (''see also [[Life extension]] and [[Indefinite lifespan]]'') |
|||
* ...to evolve.<ref>{{cite book |last=Cameron |first=Donald |title=The Purpose of Life |publisher=Woodhill Publishing |date=2001 |url=http://www.woodhillpublishing.co.uk/ |isbn=0-9540291-0-0}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Wayne |first=Larry |coauthors=Johnson, Grace |title=Expanding The Oneness |work=SelfGrowth.com |url=http://www.selfgrowth.com/articles/Johnston7.html |accessdate=2007-07-26}}</ref> |
|||
* ...to replicate, to reproduce.<ref name="Seaman">{{cite book |author=David Seaman |title=The Real Meaning of Life |publisher=New World Library |year=2005 |isbn=1577315146}}</ref> "The 'dream' of every cell is to become two cells."<ref name="Lane">{{cite book |author=[[Nick Lane]] |title=Power, Sex, Suicide: Mitochondria and the Meaning of Life |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2005 |isbn=0192804812}}</ref><ref name="Weiss & Buchanan">{{cite book |author=Kenneth M. Weiss; Anne V. Buchanan |title=Genetics and the Logic of Evolution |publisher=Wiley-IEEE |year=2004 |isbn=0471238058}}</ref><ref name="Ackerman">{{cite book |author=Jennifer Ackerman |title=Chance in the House of Fate: A Natural History of Heredity |publisher=Houghton Mifflin Books |year=2001 |isbn=0618219099}}</ref><ref name="Rensberger">{{cite book |author=Boyce Rensberger |title=Life Itself: Exploring the Realm of the Living Cell |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=1996 |isbn=0195125002}}</ref><br>...to be fruitful and multiply.<ref name="Burke">{{cite book |author=Thomas Patrick Burke |title=The Major Religions: An Introduction with Texts |publisher=Blackwell Publishing |year=2004 |pages=400 |isbn=140511049X}}</ref> ({{bibleverse||Genesis|1:28}}) |
|||
=== ...to seek wisdom and knowledge === |
|||
<!-- |
|||
* ...to be without questions, or to keep asking questions{{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
* ...to [[explore]], to expand beyond our [[frontier]]s{{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
* ...to [[learning|learn]] from one's own and others' mistakes{{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
* ...to seek [[truth]], [[knowledge]], understanding, or [[wisdom]]{{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
* ...to understand and be mindful of creation or the cosmos{{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
* ...to lead the world towards a desired situation{{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
* ...to satisfy the natural curiosity felt by humans about life{{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
* ...to enjoy all the enjoyable things one really want and available in the world and filled with joy in inner through out the journey of life{{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
*...to give life meaning{{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
*...to participate in the chain of events which has led from the creation of the universe until its possible end (either freely chosen or determined, this is a subject widely debated amongst philosophers){{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
* ...to achieve self-actualisation{{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
* ...all possible meanings have some validity (see [[existentialism]]){{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
* ...to ''''''be'''''' that which we truly are, '''meaning''', to manifest in the flesh that which we are deep inside{{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
* However, a meaning of our presence on this earth has never been proven. Although all the rest of the items on this list may seem like great reasons for living, a truly objective purpose for living is not known, and possibly never will be. {{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
--> |
|||
* ...to expand one's perception of the world.<ref name="Ellerton">{{cite book |author=Roger Ellerton PhD, CMC |title=Live Your Dreams... Let Reality Catch Up: NLP and Common Sense for Coaches, Managers and You |publisher=Trafford Publishing |year=2006 |isbn=1412047099}}</ref> |
|||
* ...to learn as many things as possible in life.<ref name="Cooper & Hutchinson">{{cite book |author=John M. Cooper; D. S. Hutchinson |title=Plato: Complete Works |publisher=Hackett Publishing |year=1997 |pages=1808 |isbn=0-87220-349-2}}</ref><br>...to know as much as possible about as many things as possible.<ref name="Findling & Thackeray">{{cite book |author=John E. Findling, Frank W. Thackeray |title=Events That Changed the World Through the Sixteenth Century |publisher=Greenwood Press |year=2001 |pages=240 |isbn=0313290792}}</ref> |
|||
* ...to know and master the world.<ref name="Harrison">{{cite book |author=Peter Harrison |title=The Bible, Protestantism, and the Rise of Natural Science |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=2001 |pages=326 |isbn=0521000963}}</ref><ref name="Dillon">{{cite book |author=Steven Dillon |title=The Solaris Effect: Art and Artifice in Contemporary American Film |publisher=University of Texas Press |year=2006 |pages=265 |isbn=0292713452}}</ref><br>...to know and master nature.<ref name="Aron">{{cite book |author=Raymond Aron |title=The Century of Total War |publisher=Wisdom Publications |year=2000 |isbn=0861711734}}</ref> |
|||
* ...to seek [[wisdom]] and [[knowledge]] and to tame the [[mind]], as to avoid [[suffering]] caused by [[ignorance]] and find [[happiness]].<ref name="Dalai Lama">{{cite book |author=[[Tenzin Gyatso, 14th Dalai Lama]] |title=The Meaning of Life: Buddhist Perspectives on Cause and Effect |publisher=Doubleday |year=1954 |pages=379}}</ref> |
|||
* ...to face our [[fear]]s and accept the [[lesson]]s life offers us.<ref name="Cappannelli">{{cite book |author=George Cappannelli; Sedena Cappannelli |title=Authenticity: Simple Strategies for Greater Meaning and Purpose at Work and at Home |publisher=Emmis Books |year=2004 |pages=256 |isbn=1578601487}}</ref> |
|||
* ...to understand the mystery of God.<ref name="Cappannelli" /> |
|||
* ...to know God.<ref name="Girard">{{cite book |author=Michael Joachim Girard |title=Essential Believing for the Christian Soul |publisher=Xulon Press |year=2006 |pages=324 |isbn=1597815969}}</ref> |
|||
* ...to know oneself, know others, and know the will of heaven.<ref name="Mahadevan">{{cite book |author=T. M. P. Mahadevan |title=Philosophy: Theory and Practice (Proceedings of the International Seminar on World Philosophy) |publisher=Centre for Advanced Study in Philosophy, University of Madras |year=1974 |pages=652}}</ref> |
|||
* ...to find the meaning of life.<ref name="Simmons">{{cite book |author=Ernest Joseph Simmons |title=Tolstoy |publisher=Routledge |year=1973 |pages=260 |isbn=071007395X}}</ref><br>...to find the purpose of life.<ref name="Bowell">{{cite book |author=Richard A. Bowell |title=The Seven Steps Of Spiritual Intelligence: The Practical Pursuit of Purpose, Success and Happiness |publisher=Nicholas Brealey Publishing |year=2004 |pages=199 |isbn=1857883446}}</ref><br>...to find a reason to live.<ref name="Gibbs & Basinger & Fuller">{{cite book |author=John C. Gibbs; Karen S. Basinger; Dick Fuller |title=Moral Maturity: Measuring the Development of Sociomoral Reflection |publisher=Lawrence Erlbaum Associates |year=1992 |pages=232 |isbn=0805804250}}</ref> |
|||
* ...to resolve the imbalance of the mind by understanding the nature of reality.<ref name="Tang">{{cite book |author=Timothy Tang |title=Real Answers to The Meaning of Life and Finding Happiness |publisher=iUniverse |year=2007 |pages=70 |isbn=9780595459414}}</ref> |
|||
=== ...to do good, to do the right thing === |
|||
<!-- |
|||
* ...to express [[compassion]]{{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
* ...to follow the "[[Ethic of reciprocity|Golden Rule]]", treat others as you would like to be treated {{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
* ...to give and receive [[love]]{{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
* ...to work for [[justice]] and [[freedom (political)|freedom]]{{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
* ...to live in [[peace]] with yourself and each other, and in [[harmony]] with our [[natural environment]] (see [[utopia]]){{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
* ...to protect [[human race|humanity]], or more generally the environment{{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
* ...to serve others, or do good deeds{{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
* ...to live an honorable life and die an honorable death{{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
* ...to seek and acquire [[virtue]], to live a [[seven virtues|virtuous life]]{{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
--> |
|||
* ...to leave the world a better place than you found it.<ref name="Seaman" /><br>...to do your best to leave every situation better than you found it.<ref name="Seaman" /> |
|||
* ...to benefit others.<ref name="Hua" /> |
|||
* ...to give more than you take.<ref name="Seaman" /> |
|||
* ...to end suffering.<ref name="Roberts">{{cite book |author=Tyler T. Roberts |title=Contesting Spirit: Nietzsche, Affirmation, Religion |publisher=Princeton University Press |year=1998 |pages=256 |isbn=0691001278}}</ref><ref name="Costigan">{{cite book |author=Lucy Costigan |title=What Is the Meaning of Your Life: A Journey Towards Ultimate Meaning |publisher=iUniverse |year=2004 |pages=124 |isbn=0595338801}}</ref><ref name="Jeffers & Smith">{{cite book |author=Steven L. Jeffers; Harold Ivan Smith |title=Finding a Sacred Oasis in Grief: A Resource Manual for Pastoral Care |publisher=Radcliffe Publishing |year=2007 |pages=188 |isbn=1846191815}}</ref> |
|||
* ...to create equality.<ref name="Jeffrey">{{cite book |author=David L. Jeffrey |title=A Dictionary of Biblical Tradition in English Literature |publisher=Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing |year=1992 |isbn=0802836348}}</ref><ref name="Williams">{{cite book |author=Dana A. Williams |title="In the Light of Likeness-transformed": The Literary Art of Leon Forrest |publisher=Ohio State University Press |year=2005 |isbn=0814209947}}</ref><ref name="Muller">{{cite book |author=Jerry Z. Muller |title=Conservatism: An Anthology of Social and Political Thought from David Hume to the Present |publisher=Princeton University Press |year=1997 |pages=464 |isbn=0691037116}}</ref> |
|||
* ...to challenge oppression.<ref name="Nash & Stewart">{{cite book |author=Mary Nash; Bruce Stewart |title=Spirituality and Social Care: Contributing to Personal and Community Well-being |publisher=Jessica Kingsley Publishers |year=2002 |pages=256 |isbn=184310024X}}</ref> |
|||
* ...to distribute wealth.<ref name="Yao">{{cite book |author=Xinzhong Yao |title=An Introduction to Confucianism |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=2000 |pages=362 |isbn=0521644305}}</ref><ref name="Turner & Rojek">{{cite book |author=Bryan S. Turner; Chris Rojek |title=Society and Culture: Principles of Scarcity and Solidarity |publisher=SAGE |year=2001 |pages=272 |isbn=0761970495}}</ref> |
|||
* ...to be generous.<ref name="Goonewardene">{{cite book |author=Anil Goonewardene |title=Buddhist Scriptures |publisher=Harcourt Heinemann |year=1994 |pages=48 |isbn=0435303554}}</ref><ref name="Ferry">{{cite book |author=Luc Ferry |title=Man Made God: The Meaning of Life |publisher=University of Chicago Press |year=2002 |pages=172 |isbn=0226244849}}</ref> |
|||
* ...to contribute to the well-being and spirit of others.<ref name="Stephan & Pace">{{cite book |author=Eric G. Stephan; R. Wayne Pace |title=Powerful Leadership: How to Unleash the Potential in Others and Simplify Your Own Life |publisher=FT Press |year=2002 |pages=225 |isbn=0130668362}}</ref> |
|||
* ...to help others,<ref name="Baggini" /><ref name="Ferry" /> to help one another.<ref name="Steinberg">{{cite book |name=Dominique Moyse Steinberg|title=The Mutual-aid Approach to Working with Groups: Helping People Help One Another |publisher=Haworth Press |date=2004 |isbn=0789014629}}</ref><br>...to take every chance to help another while on your journey here.<ref name="Seaman" /> |
|||
* ...to be creative and innovative.<ref name="Stephan & Pace" /> |
|||
* ...to forgive.<ref name="Seaman" /><br>...to accept and forgive human flaws.<ref name="Caunt">{{cite book |author=John Caunt |title=Boost Your Self-Esteem |publisher=Kogan Page |year=2002 |isbn=0749438711}}</ref> |
|||
* ...to be emotionally sincere.<ref name="Cook">{{cite book |author=John Cook |title=The Book of Positive Quotations |publisher=Fairview Press |year=2007 |pages=755 |isbn=1577491696}}</ref> |
|||
* ...to be responsible.<ref name="Cook" /> |
|||
* ...to be honorable.<ref name="Cook" /> |
|||
* ...to seek peace.<ref name="Cook" /> |
|||
<!-- COMMENT OUT THE # LINE BEFORE YOU REINTRODUCE THIS |
|||
=== ...to find eternal peace or internal fulfillment === |
|||
#Please do not include single-religion specific entries in this section. Thank you. |
|||
* ...to worship the Lord{{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
*...to find perfect love and a complete expression of one's humanness in a relationship with God{{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
* ...to achieve a [[supernatural]] connection within the natural context{{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
* ...to achieve [[enlightenment (concept)|enlightenment]] and [[inner peace]]{{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
* ...to become like [[God]], or divine {{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
* ...[[Westminster Shorter Catechism|to glorify God, and enjoy Him forever]]{{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
* ...to experience personal justice (i.e. to be rewarded for goodness){{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
* ...to [[experience]] [[existence]] from an infinite number of perspectives in order to expand the [[consciousness]] of all there is (i.e. to seek objectivity){{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
* ...to be a filter of creation between [[heaven]] and [[hell]]{{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
* ...to produce useful structure in the universe over and above consumption (see [[net creativity]]){{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
* ...to reach [[Heaven]] in the [[afterlife]]{{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
* ...to turn fear into joy at a constant rate achieving on literal and metaphorical levels: immortality, enlightenment, and atonement {{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
* ...to understand and follow the "[[Religious text|Word of God]]"{{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
* ...to discover who you are{{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
* ...to resolve all problems that one faces, or to ignore them and attempt to fully continue life without them, or to detach oneself from all problems faced (see [[Buddhism]]){{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
* ...to prepare for the meeting with God{{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
* ...to be tested to see whether you deserve to go to [[Heaven]] or [[Hell]]{{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
* ...right and wrong do not exist, only the opinion of onself and the ideals held by oneself.{{Fact|date=February 2008}} |
|||
--> |
|||
=== ...to pursue a certain form of fulfillment, perfection or success === |
|||
<!-- |
|||
* ...to gain and exercise [[Power (sociology)|power]]{{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
* ...to live every day as if it is your last and to do your best at everything that comes before you |
|||
* ...to be always satisfied ([[hedonism]]) |
|||
* ...to produce offspring through [[sexual reproduction]] (alike to participating in evolution){{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
* ...to participate in natural [[human evolution]], or to contribute to the [[gene pool]] of the [[human race]]{{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
* ...to participate and contribute to a given society by going to school, working, paying taxes, being a good citizen, and contributing to raise the collective [[quality of life]].{{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
* ...to advance [[Transhumanism|technological evolution]], or to actively develop the [[Posthuman (Human evolution)|future of intelligent life]]{{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
* ...to [[Competition|compete]] or [[co-operation|co-operate]] with others{{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
* ...to destroy others who harm you, or to practice [[nonviolence]] and [[nonresistance]]{{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
* ...to [[cultural heritage|leave a legacy]], such as a work of art or a book.{{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
** ...to ensure that '''all''' others after you remember your name.{{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
* ...to eat{{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
* ...to sleep{{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
* ...to prepare for death{{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
* ...to spend life in the pursuit of happiness, maybe not to obtain it, but to pursue it relentlessly.{{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
* ...to protect and preserve one's kin, clan, or tribe (akin to participating in evolution){{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
* ...to seek [[Freedom (philosophy)|freedom]], either physically, mentally or financially{{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
* ...to observe the ultimate fate of humanity to the furthest possible extent{{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
* ...to attempt to have many sexual conquests (as in [[Arthur Schopenhauer]]'s will to procreate){{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
* ...to find and take over all free space in this "game" called life{{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
* ...to seek and find [[beauty]]{{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
* ...to find and follow an artistic passion{{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
--> |
|||
* ...to chase dreams.<ref name="Seaman" /><br>...to live one's dreams.<ref name="Ellerton" /> |
|||
* ...to seek [[beauty]] in all its forms.<ref name="Seaman" /> |
|||
* ...to seek happiness<ref>{{cite journal |last=Lee |first=Dong Yul |coauthors=Park, Sung Hee; Uhlemann, Max R.; Patsult, Philip |title =What Makes You Happy?: A Comparison of Self-reported Criteria of Happiness Between Two Cultures |journal=Social Indicators Research |volume=50 |issue=3 |pages=351-362 |date=June 2000 |url=http://www.springerlink.com/content/q5m68401859l2320/ |doi=10.1023/A:1004647517069 |issn=0303-8300 |accessdate=2007-07-26}}</ref><ref>[https://portal.acm.org/poplogin.cfm?dl=GUIDE&coll=GUIDE&comp_id=320261&want_href=delivery%2Ecfm%3Fid%3D320261%26type%3Dpdf%26CFID%3D28988131%26CFTOKEN%3D50367582&CFID=28988131&CFTOKEN=50367582&td=1184895603779 Social perspectives], [[Association for Computing Machinery#Digital_Library|ACM Digital Library]]</ref> and flourish.<ref name="Baggini" /><!-- to enjoy life, experience pleasure or [[celebration (party)|celebrate]] to be super-ultra-mega cool to the max. yea{{Fact|date=July 2007}}--> |
|||
* ...to expand one's potential in life.<ref name="Ellerton" /> |
|||
* ...to be a true authentic human being.<ref name="Kultgen">{{cite book |author=John Kultgen |title=Autonomy and Intervention: Parentalism in the Caring Life |publisher=Oxford University Press US |year=1995 |pages=280 |isbn=0195085310}}</ref> |
|||
* ...to become the person you've always wanted to be.<ref name="Chandler">{{cite book |author=Steve Chandler |title=Reinventing Yourself: How to Become the Person You've Always Wanted to Be |publisher=Career Press |year=2005 |pages=224 |isbn=1564148173}}</ref> |
|||
* ...to become the best version of yourself.<ref name="Kelly" /> |
|||
* ...to rule the world.<ref name="West">{{cite book |author=John G. West |title=Celebrating Middle-Earth: The Lord of the Rings as a Defense of Western Civilization |publisher=Inkling Books |year=2002 |pages=108 |isbn=1587420120}}</ref> |
|||
* ...to fill the Earth and subdue it.<ref name="Burke" /> ({{bibleverse||Genesis|1:28}}) |
|||
* ...to spend it for something that will outlast it.<ref name="Cook" /> |
|||
* ...to matter: to count, to stand for something, to have made some difference that you lived at all.<ref name="Cook" /> |
|||
* ...to keep one's soul pure.<ref name="Cook" /> |
|||
* ...to be able to put the whole of oneself into one's feelings, one's work, one's beliefs.<ref name="Cook" /> |
|||
* ...to follow our destiny.<ref name="Cappannelli" /><br>...to submit to our destiny.<ref name="West" /> |
|||
* ...to create your own destiny.<ref name="Madorsky">{{cite book |author=Rachel Madorsky |title=Create Your Own Destiny!: Spiritual Path to Success |publisher=Avanty House |year=2003 |pages=296 |isbn=0970534949}}</ref> |
|||
=== ...to love, to feel, to feel joy in living === |
|||
* ...to love more.<ref name="Seaman" /> |
|||
* ...to love those who mean the most. Every life you touch will touch you back.<ref name="Seaman" /> |
|||
* ...to treasure every enjoyable sensation one has.<ref name="Seaman" /> |
|||
* ...to have fun.<ref name="Stephan & Pace" /><br>...to enjoy life.<ref name="Cappannelli" /><br>...to seek pleasure.<ref name="Cook" /> |
|||
* ...to be compassionate.<ref name="Cook" /> |
|||
* ...to be moved by the tears and pain of others, and try to help them out of love and compassion.<ref name="Seaman" /> |
|||
* ...to love others as best we possibly can.<ref name="Seaman" /> |
|||
* ...to love something bigger, greater, and beyond ourselves, something we did not create or have the power to create, something intangible and made holy by our very belief in it.<ref name="Seaman" /> |
|||
* ...to love God.<ref name="Girard" /> |
|||
=== One should not search for the meaning of life === |
|||
* The answer to the meaning of life is too profound to be known and understood.<ref name="Tang" /> |
|||
* You will never live if you are looking for the meaning of life.<ref name="Seaman" /> |
|||
* The meaning of life is to forget about the search for the meaning of life.<ref name="Seaman" /> |
|||
=== Life has no meaning === |
|||
<!-- the purpose seems to be... |
|||
* ...no point. Since having a point is a condition of living human consciousness. Animals do not need a point to live or exist. It is more of an affliction of consciousness that there are such things as points, a negative side to evolutionary development for lack of better words.{{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
* ...to create meaning{{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
* ...to end (die){{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
* ...to simply live until one dies (there is no universal or [[celestial]] objective purpose){{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
* ...nature taking its course (the wheel of time keeps on turning){{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
* ...whatever you see you see, as in "[[Psychological projection|projection]] makes [[perception]]"{{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
* ...there is no purpose or meaning whatsoever (see [[nihilism]]){{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
* ...life may actually not exist, or may be illusory (see [[solipsism]] or nihilism){{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
* ...to contemplate "the meaning of the end of life"{{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
* ...to figure it out{{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
* ...to understand oneself{{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
* ...to question life itself{{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
* ...to contribute to collective meaning ("we" or "us") without having individual meaning ("I" or "me"){{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
* ...to find a [[purpose]], a "reason" for living that hopefully raises the quality of one's experience of life, or even life in general{{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
* ...to participate in the inevitable increase in entropy of the universe{{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
* ...to make conformists' lives miserable (see [[nonconformism]]){{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
* ...to make life as difficult as possible for others (i.e. to compete){{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
* ...to accomplish something that has never been done before{{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
* ...to do absolutely whatever you want because in the end you die. When everything is gone what does it matter anyway?{{Fact|date=July 2007}} |
|||
* We are all being pushed as cattle with fate as our cow prodder, and no matter what you do, you can't create your own path. |
|||
--> |
|||
* Life or human existence has no real meaning or purpose because human existence occurred out of a random chance in nature, and anything that exists by chance has no intended purpose.<ref name="Tang" /> |
|||
* Life has no meaning, but as humans we try to associate a meaning or purpose so we can justify our existence.<ref name="Seaman" /> |
|||
* There is no point in life, and that is exactly what makes it so special.<ref name="Seaman" /> |
|||
* Life is a bitch and then you die.<ref name="Chandler" /> |
|||
==Humorous, aesthetic and entertainment media treatments== |
|||
The mystery of life and its meaning is an often recurring subject in [[popular culture]], featured in [[mass media|entertainment media]] and [[the arts|various forms]] of [[art]], and more specifically in [[music]], [[literature]] and [[visual arts]], for example: |
|||
*in songs like [[The Offspring]]'s "[[The Meaning of Life (Offspring song)|The Meaning of Life]]", [[Nas]]' "[[Life's a Bitch (song)|Life's a Bitch]]", [[Kiss (band)|Kiss]]' "[[Reason to Live]]", [[George Harrison]]'s "[[All Things Must Pass (song)|All Things Must Pass]]" and "[[What Is Life]]", [[Frank Sinatra]]'s "[[That's Life (song)|That's Life]]", [[Eric Idle]]'s "[[Always Look on the Bright Side of Life]]", [[Evanescence]]'s "[[Bring Me To Life]]" and "[[Sweet Sacrifice]]", [[Nelly Furtado]]'s "[[All Good Things (Come To An End)]]" and "[[In God's Hands (song)|In God's Hands]]", [[30 Seconds to Mars]]' "[[A Beautiful Lie (song)|A Beautiful Lie]]", [[Good Charlotte]]'s "[[I Just Wanna Live]]" and "[[The Chronicles of Life and Death]]" and [[Linkin Park]]'s "[[In the End]]" and "[[Breaking the Habit]]"; |
|||
*in books like [[A. C. Grayling|Anthony C. Grayling]]'s ''[[The Meaning of Things]]'', [[Viktor Frankl]]'s ''[[Man's Search for Meaning]]'', [[Robert Nozick]]'s ''[[Philosophical Explanations]]'' and ''[[The Examined Life]]'', [[Ken Wilber]]'s ''[[Sex, Ecology, Spirituality]]'', [[Julian Baggini]]'s ''What's it All About? Philosophy and the Meaning of Life'', [[Rick Warren]]'s ''[[The Purpose Driven Life]]'', [[Oswald Spengler]]'s ''[[The Decline of the West]]'', [[Richard Dawkins]]'s ''[[Unweaving the Rainbow]]'' and ''[[River out of Eden]]'' and [[Alister McGrath]]'s ''[[Dawkins' God: Genes, Memes, and the Meaning of Life]]''. |
|||
*and in paintings like [[Paul Gauguin]]'s ''[[Where Do We Come From? What Are We? Where Are We Going?]]'', [[Edvard Munch]]'s ''[[The Scream]]'', [[John Martin (painter)|John Martin]]'s ''[[The End of the World (painting)|The End of the World]]'', [[Caspar David Friedrich]]'s ''[[Wanderer above the Sea of Fog]]'', [[Hieronymus Bosch]]'s ''[[The Garden of Earthly Delights]]'' triptych, [[Pieter Bruegel the Elder]]'s ''[[The Triumph of Death]]'', [[Thomas Cole]]'s ''[[The Voyage of Life]]'' series and [[Hans Memling]]'s ''[[The Last Judgment (Memling)|The Last Judgment]]'' triptych. |
|||
<center><gallery perrow=5> |
|||
Image:Where.jpg|''[[Where Do We Come From? What Are We? Where Are We Going?]]'' |
|||
Image:The Scream.jpg|''[[The Scream]]'' |
|||
Image:MARTIN John Great Day of His Wrath.jpg|''[[The End of the World (painting)|The End of the World]]'' |
|||
Image:Caspar David Friedrich 032.jpg|''[[Wanderer above the Sea of Fog]]'' |
|||
Image:GardenED.jpg|''[[The Garden of Earthly Delights]]'' |
|||
Image:Thetriumphofdeath.jpg|''[[The Triumph of Death]]'' |
|||
Image:Cole Thomas The Voyage of Life Childhood 1842.jpg|''[[The Voyage of Life]]<br>Childhood'' |
|||
Image:Cole Thomas The Voyage of Life Youth 1842.jpg|''[[The Voyage of Life]]<br>Youth'' |
|||
Image:Cole Thomas The Voyage of Life Manhood 1840.jpg|''[[The Voyage of Life]]<br>Manhood'' |
|||
Image:Cole Thomas The Voyage of Life Old Age 1842.jpg|''[[The Voyage of Life]]<br>Old Age'' |
|||
Image:MemlingJudgementOpen.jpg|''[[The Last Judgment (Memling)|The Last Judgment]]'' |
|||
</gallery></center> |
|||
===Several more specific references to the meaning of life in popular culture=== |
|||
[[Image:Answer to Life.png|thumb|right|The Ultimate Answer to Life, The Universe and Everything in ''The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy'' and illustration of the bizarre and humorous nature of the universe described in Douglas Adams' series]] |
|||
* In [[Douglas Adams]]' popular comedy book series ''[[The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy]]'', the [[Answer to Life, the Universe, and Everything|Answer to the Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe and Everything]] has the numeric solution of [[42 (number)|42]], which was derived over a period of seven and a half million years by a giant [[supercomputer]] called [[Minor characters from The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy#Deep Thought|Deep Thought]], which was built by an incredibly intelligent pan-dimensional race. After much confusion from the descendants of his creators, Deep Thought explains that the problem is that they do not know the [[Ultimate Question]]<ref name="Baggini" />, and they would have to build an even more powerful computer to determine what that is. This computer is revealed to be [[Earth]], which, after 10 million years of calculating, is destroyed to make way for a [[galaxy|galactic]] [[bypass]] moments before it finishes making its calculations.<ref name="Adams H2G2 book1">{{cite book|title=[[The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy (book)|The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy]]|author=[[Douglas Adams]]|published=1979|isbn=0-330-25864-8}}</ref><ref name="Yeffeth" /><ref name="Badke" /> |
|||
:In ''[[Life, the Universe and Everything]]'', it is confirmed that 42 is indeed the Ultimate Answer, and that it is impossible for both the Ultimate Answer and the Ultimate Question to be known about in the same universe, as they will cancel each other out and take the universe with them, to be replaced by something even more bizarre, and that this may have already happened.<ref name="Adams H2G2 book3">{{cite book|isbn=0-330-26738-8|title=[[Life, the Universe and Everything]]|author=[[Douglas Adams]]|published=1982}}</ref> |
|||
:Later, in the hopes that his [[subconscious]] holds the question, [[Arthur Dent]] attempts to guess at the question, and comes up with "What do you get when you multiply six by nine?" This was in fact not the Ultimate Question, because there had been computing errors which had been caused by the unexpected arrival of the [[Minor characters from The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy#Golgafrinchans|Golgafrinchans]] on prehistoric Earth.<ref name="Adams H2G2 book2">{{cite book|title=[[The Restaurant at the End of the Universe]]|author=[[Douglas Adams]]|date=1 January 1980|isbn=0-345-39181-0}}</ref> However, Dent, [[Minor characters from The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy#Fenchurch|Fenchurch]], and a dying [[Marvin the Paranoid Android|Marvin]] did see 'God's Final Message to His Creation' ("We apologise for the inconvenience").<ref name="Adams H2G2 book4">{{cite book|isbn=0-330-28700-1|title=[[So Long, and Thanks for All the Fish]]|author=[[Douglas Adams]]|published=1984}}</ref> |
|||
*In ''[[Monty Python's The Meaning of Life]]'', there are several allusions to the meaning of life. In "Part VI B: The Meaning of Life" a cleaning lady explains "Life's a game, you sometimes win or lose" and later a waiter describes his personal philosophy "The world is a beautiful place. You must go into it, and love everyone, not hate people. You must try and make everyone happy, and bring peace and contentment everywhere you go."<ref name="useless website">[http://www.intriguing.com/mp/_scripts/meanlife.asp Monty Python's Completely Useless Web Site: Monty Python's The Meaning Of Life: Complete Script]</ref> At the end of the film, we can see [[Michael Palin]] being handed an envelope, he opens it, and provides the viewers with 'the meaning of life': "Well, it's nothing very special. Uh, try to be nice to people, avoid eating fat, read a good book every now and then, get some walking in, and try to live together in peace and harmony with people of all creeds and nations."<ref name="useless website" /><ref name="Burnham">{{cite book |author=Terry Burnham |title=Mean Markets and Lizard Brains: How to Profit from the New Science of Irrationality |publisher=John Wiley and Sons |year=2005 |isbn=0471716952}}</ref><ref name="Fernandez">{{cite book |author=Yolanda Fernandez |title=In Their Shoes: Examining the Issue of Empathy and Its Place in the Treatment of Offenders |publisher=Wood 'N' Barnes Publishing |year=2002 |isbn=1885473486}}</ref> |
|||
*In ''[[The Simpsons]]'' episode "[[Homer the Heretic]]", a representation of God tells Homer what the meaning of life is, but as usual the one who really wanted to know (the viewer) is left disappointed. The dialogue goes as follows: |
|||
:'''Homer:''' God, what's the meaning of life? |
|||
:'''God:''' Homer, I can't tell you that. |
|||
:'''Homer:''' Why not? |
|||
:'''God:''' You'll find out when you die. |
|||
:'''Homer:''' Oh, I can't wait that long. |
|||
:'''God:''' You can't wait 6 months? |
|||
:'''Homer:''' No, tell me now... |
|||
:'''God:''' Oh, OK... The meaning of life is... |
|||
:At this point, the credits music starts and the show ends. The writer's original idea was that a commercial would come after this scene and before the credits, thus having the commercial interrupt God's explanation to humorous effect. |
|||
* At the end of ''[[The Matrix Revolutions]]'', [[Agent Smith]] concludes that "the purpose of life is to end." He is determined to move that purpose along for [[Neo]].<ref name="Lawrence">{{cite book|author=Matt Lawrence|title=Like a Splinter in Your Mind: The Philosophy Behind the Matrix Trilogy|publisher=Blackwell Publishing|year=2004|isbn=1405125241}}</ref> |
|||
* The crew of the [[Red Dwarf]] is captured in [[The Inquisitor (Red Dwarf episode)|episode 2 of season 5]] by a powerful being called [[Red Dwarf characters#Simulants|The Inquisitor]], a self-repairing simulant who survived until the end of time and, coming to the conclusion that there is no God and no afterlife, decided that the only point of life was to make something of yourself. The Inquisitor then proceeds to put each of the Red Dwarf misfits on trial and forces them to justify their existence. Failure to do so will result in a sentence of being erased from history. |
|||
*In ''[[Peanuts]]'', Charlie Brown explains he thinks the purpose of life is to make others happy, to which Lucy responds that she doesn't think she is making anyone happy, and—more importantly—no one is making her happy, so someone isn't doing their job, eventually she asks him "You say we're put on this earth to make others happy? ... What are the others put here for?"<ref name="Pregnant">[http://mypregnantpauses.blogspot.com/2007/08/charlie-lucy.html Pregnant Pauses: Charlie & Lucy]</ref> On several other occasions, Charlie has asserted several other things in relation to life and its meaning: "In the book of life, the answers aren't in the back."<ref name="Pregnant" /><ref>[http://www.allgreatquotes.com/charlie_brown_quotes.shtml AllGreatQuotes: Charlie Brown Quotes]</ref>, "That's the secret to life... replace one worry with another."<ref name="Pregnant" /><ref>[http://www.quotationspage.com/quote/14129.html Quote Details: Charles M. Schulz: That's the secret to life... replace one worry with another....]</ref>, "Happiness is anyone and anything at all that's loved by you."<ref>[http://www.hamienet.com/lyrics90055.html HamieNET.com [You're a Good Man, Charlie Brown<nowiki>]</nowiki> Happiness Lyrics]</ref> and "Life is like an ice cream cone...you have to lick it one day at a time."<ref>[http://www.quotationspage.com/quote/14129.html Quote Details: Charles M. Schulz: Life is like an ice cream cone...you have to lick it one day at a time.]</ref> Lucy has also declared "Life is too short to waste it listening to some person who doesn't know when to shut up! Time is too valuable!"<ref name="Pregnant" /> and "All you really need is love, but a little chocolate now and then doesn't hurt."<ref name="Pregnant" /><ref>[http://www.allgreatquotes.com/lucy_van_pelt_quotes.shtml AllGreatQuotes: Lucy Van Pelt Quotes]</ref> |
|||
*In ''[[Bill and Ted's Bogus Journey]]'', Bill and Ted end up meeting God. Before being admitted into his presence, [[St. Peter]] (billed as The Gatekeeper on [[Internet Movie Database|IMDb]]) asks them what the meaning of life is, and they reply with the lyrics to the song "[[Every Rose Has Its Thorn]]" by [[Poison (band)|Poison]]. |
|||
*''[[The Alchemist (novel)|The Alchemist]]'' and the movie ''[[City Slickers]]'' both present the meaning of life as an individual journey to find one's own "path". In this context, the "path", similar to what is defined in Buddhism as the [[Four Noble Truths|4th Noble Truth]]: the [[Eightfold Path]], is best explained simply as ''the overall way one chooses to lead their life''. |
|||
*In ''[[A Man Without a Country]]'', author [[Kurt Vonnegut]] sums up life with the words: "We're all here to fart around. Don't let anyone tell you any different!". In Vonnegut's novel ''[[Breakfast of Champions]]'', "To be the eyes and ears and conscience of the Creator of the Universe, you fool." is [[Kilgore Trout]]'s unwritten reply to the question "What is the purpose of life?" |
|||
*A quotation by [[Anton Chekhov]] states "You ask "What is life?" That is the same as asking "What is a carrot?" A carrot is a carrot and we know nothing more."<ref>[http://www.enotes.com/famous-quotes/you-ask-what-is-life-that-is-the-same-as-asking Chekhov Quote:You ask "What is life?" That is the same as asking "What is a carrot?" A carrot is a carrot and we know nothing more.]</ref> |
|||
*In [[William Shakespeare]]'s ''[[Hamlet]]'', [[Prince Hamlet]] states: "[[To be, or not to be|To be or not to be]], that is the question." |
|||
*In ''[[Dune (novel)|Dune]]'', a seminal science fiction novel by [[Frank Herbert]], the meaning of life is defined as "not a question to be answered, but a reality to be experienced". |
|||
== See also == |
|||
<!-- Please insert links in alphabetical order and avoid repeating from the text above any but the most on-topic links. Thank you. --> |
|||
{{wiktionary|meaning of life}} |
|||
{{portalpar|Personal life}} |
|||
{{portalpar|Philosophy}} |
|||
{{col-begin|width=auto}} |
|||
{{col-break|width=400}} |
|||
=== Origin and nature of life and reality === |
|||
* [[Entropy]] |
|||
** [[Entropy and life]] |
|||
** [[Self-organization]] |
|||
* [[Evolution]] |
|||
** [[Evolutionary psychology]] |
|||
** [[Gene-centered view of evolution]] |
|||
* [[Life]] |
|||
** [[Abiogenesis]] – the origins of biological life |
|||
* [[Logos]] |
|||
* [[Nature]] |
|||
** [[Metaphysical naturalism]] |
|||
** [[Teleology]] |
|||
* [[Reality]] |
|||
** [[Cosmos]] |
|||
*** [[Cosmogony]] |
|||
** [[Multiverse]] |
|||
** [[Omniverse]] |
|||
** [[Simulated reality]] |
|||
** [[Universe]] |
|||
*** [[Big bang]] |
|||
{{col-break|width=300}} |
|||
=== Significance of life === |
|||
* [[History]] |
|||
* [[Semiotics]] |
|||
=== Value in and of life === |
|||
* [[Culture of life]] |
|||
* [[Bioethics]] |
|||
* [[Pro-life]] versus [[Pro-choice]] |
|||
* [[Quality of life]] |
|||
* [[Right to life]] versus [[Right to die]] |
|||
* [[Value of life]] |
|||
=== Purpose of life === |
|||
* [[Destiny]] |
|||
* [[Intentional living]] |
|||
* [[Life extension]] |
|||
* [[Simple living]] |
|||
* [[Sustainable living]] |
|||
=== Miscellaneous === |
|||
* [[Ideology]] |
|||
* [[Perennial philosophy]] – the universal recurrence of philosophical principles |
|||
* [[World view]] |
|||
{{col-end}} |
|||
== References == |
|||
{{reflist|2}} |
|||
== External links == |
|||
=== General === |
|||
* [http://www.meaningsoflife.com/ Meaningsoflife.com] |
|||
* [http://www.inTERRAgation.com/ inTERRAgation.com] – A documentary project and forum for discussion about life and its meaning. |
|||
* [http://meaningoflife.tv/ Meaningsoflife.tv] – Video discussions on the ultimate meaning of life with various religious and philosophical leaders. |
|||
* [http://yudkowsky.net/tmol-faq/meaningoflife.html Frequently Asked Questions about the Meaning of Life] |
|||
* [http://onemancan.ca/2007/11/25/gods-will-meaning-life-love/ God's Will and The Meaning of Life: Creation is Love] – A highly-trafficked blog-post which suggests simplifying and synthesizing the possibility of science and spiritual teachings being accurate... and then some. |
|||
<!-- * [http://sysopmind.com/tmol-faq/tmol-faq.html The FAQ of life] – by [[Eliezer S. Yudkowsky]], [[Transhumanism|transhumanist]] – dead link, temporarily dead? Needs further checking. --> |
|||
* [http://www.rapidtables.com/tmol/index.htm The Meaning of Life and other questions] |
|||
* [http://users.aristotle.net/~diogenes/meaning1.htm The Meaning of Life (or, What's it all about?)] Lets step back a moment... Why do you want to know the meaning of life? |
|||
* [http://www.scienceofsoulmates.com/meaning.htm Soulmates as The Meaning of Life] |
|||
* [http://www.theonequestion.com/ The One Question] – Free articles, exercises and tests on discovering purpose in life. |
|||
=== Scientific === |
|||
<!-- VIDEO NO LONGER AVAILABLE * [http://richarddawkins.net/article,325,The-Big-Question-Why-are-we-here,Discovery-Science The Big Question: why are we here?] – [[Richard Dawkins]]. --> |
|||
<!-- Very questionable, little-known book: CERTAINLY does not belong in science section. * [http://www.2x21.com ''42 - The Answer to Life, The Universe, and Everything''], Mol Smith, 2007. ISBN 978-0-9557137-0-5. Information Site for a Book published in 2007 challenging Science and Religion by offering a definitive answer. --> |
|||
* [http://rationalphilosophy.net/meaning-of-life/ Life's meaning from space/time principles] |
|||
=== Philosophical === |
|||
* [http://www.rationalists.org/rc/1998_summer/einstein.htm Einstein's credo] |
|||
* [http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/life-meaning/ Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy's entry on the ''meaning of life''] |
|||
* [http://rationalphilosophy.net/meaning-of-life/ An Objective Philosophy: Why We Exist?] – by Martin G. Walker. |
|||
*[http://eneida.over-blog.net/ Hedonism & Meaning of life] |
|||
*[http://journal.ilovephilosophy.com/Article/The-Logic-of-Existential-Meaning/217 The Logic of Existential Meaning] |
|||
* [http://myweb.dal.ca/kernohan/godless A Guide for the Godless: The Secular Path to Meaning] |
|||
=== Spiritual === |
|||
* [http://www.motherearthnews.com/Alternative-Energy/1978-07-01/A-Guide-for-Perplexed.aspx A Guide for the Perplexed (excerpt included)] – by [[E.F. Schumacher]] |
|||
<!-- Categories --> |
|||
[[Category:Life]] |
|||
[[Category:Spirituality]] |
|||
[[Category:Core issues in ethics]] |
|||
[[Category:Religion and science]] |
|||
[[Category:Philosophy articles needing attention]] |
|||
[[Category:Metaphysics]] |
|||
[[Category:Ethics]] |
|||
[[cs:Smysl života]] |
|||
[[da:Meningen med livet]] |
|||
[[de:Sinn des Lebens]] |
|||
[[fr:Sens de la vie]] |
|||
[[ko:인생의 의미]] |
|||
[[he:משמעות החיים]] |
|||
[[ms:Makna hidup]] |
|||
[[nl:Zin van het leven]] |
|||
[[ja:人生の意義]] |
|||
[[no:Hva er meningen med livet]] |
|||
[[pl:Sens życia]] |
|||
[[pt:Sentido da vida]] |
|||
[[ru:Смысл жизни]] |
|||
[[sq:Kuptimi i jetës]] |
|||
[[simple:Meaning of life]] |
|||
[[sk:Zmysel života]] |
|||
[[fi:Elämän tarkoitus]] |
|||
[[sv:Meningen med livet]] |
|||
[[tr:Hayatın anlamı]] |
|||
[[zh:生命的意義]] |
Revision as of 23:34, 26 March 2008
The meaning of life is an elusive concept that has been the subject of much philosophical, scientific and theological speculation. [1][2][3][4]
It is often expressed in various related questions:[5]
- What is the meaning of life?[4][6][7][8][9][10]
- Why are we here?[1][11][12][13][14] What are we here for?[15]
- What is the origin of life?[16]
- What is the nature of life (and of reality itself)?[16][17]
- What is the purpose of, or in, (one's) life?[1][8][17][18][19]
- What is the significance of life?[19]
- What is meaningful or valuable in life?[20]
- What is the value of life?[21]
- What is the reason to live?[22] What are we living for?[15]
Some philosophers have asked questions like "What does the question 'What is the meaning of life?' mean?"[23] and also questioned whether it is a meaningful question.[24] (see Logical positivist views) Others have considered the question "If there are no objective values, then is life meaningless?"[25] (see Existentialist views and Nihilist views) and some have aimed to develop an understanding of life that explains, regardless of how we came to be here, what we should do now that we are here. (see Humanist views)
Religious answers to the question "What is the meaning of my life?" tend to include a certain moral demand[26] and try to keep humanity gentle-hearted with facing death.[27] Mysticism focuses more on direct experience than religions generally do, and it has been associated with various movements. In general the view is that life is a happening, an unfolding, and the meaning of life is living a life in accordance with it.[28] Spirituality sees life as an inner-awakening or a discovery and transforming of one's understanding and insight, [7] and can be summarized as understanding the meaning of life, all of life and reality itself.[29]
Western philosophy
Ancient philosophy
Platonic view of the meaning of life
Plato was one of the earliest and most influential thinkers of Western philosophy, most famous for his realist stance regarding the existence of universals. In the Theory of Forms he asserts that universals do not exist in the way that ordinary physical objects exist, but rather with a sort of ghostly or heavenly mode of existence. He describes the Form of the Good in his dialogue, The Republic, speaking through the character of Socrates. The Idea of the Good is the child or offspring (ekgonos) of the Good, the ideal or perfect nature of goodness, and so an absolute measure of justice.
For Plato the meaning of life is to attain the highest form of knowledge, which is the Idea (or Form) of the Good. It is from this which all things that are good and just gain their usefulness and value. Humans have a duty to pursue the good, but no one can hope to do this successfully without philosophical reasoning.
Aristotelian view of the meaning of life
Aristotle, a student of Plato, was another of the earliest and most influential philosophers. He believed that ethical knowledge is not certain knowledge (like metaphysics and epistemology) but is general knowledge. Because it is not a theoretical discipline, he thought a person had to study in order to become 'good'. Thus if a person were to become virtuous, he could not simply study what virtue is, he had to actually do virtuous activities.
In order to do this, Aristotle had to first establish what was virtuous. He began by determining that everything was done with some goal in mind and that goal is 'good':
- Every skill and every inquiry, and similarly, every action and choice of action, is thought to have some good as its object. This is why the good has rightly been defined as the object of all endeavor. (NE 1.1)
But, if action A is done with the goal B, the goal B would also have a goal, goal C. Goal C would also have a goal and this would continue until something stopped the infinite regress. This was the Highest Good, and he said that it must have three characteristics:
- desirable for its own sake
- not desirable for the sake of some other good
- all other ‘goods’ desirable for its sake
Thus for Aristotle, the meaning of life involves achieving eudaemonia, which is usually translated as "happiness," but could also be "well-being" or "flourishing."
- What is the highest good in all matters of action? As to the name, there is almost complete agreement; for uneducated and educated alike call it happiness, and make happiness identical with the good life and successful living. They disagree, however, about the meaning of happiness. (NE 1.4)
Cynic views of the meaning of life
Cynicism is one of the most striking of all the Hellenistic philosophies. It offered people the possibility of happiness and freedom from suffering in an age of uncertainty. Although there was never an official Cynic doctrine, the fundamental principles of Cynicism can be summarised as follows:[30][31]
- The goal of life is happiness which is to live in agreement with Nature.
- Happiness depends on being self-sufficient, and a master of mental attitude.
- Self-sufficiency is achieved by living a life of Virtue.
- The road to Virtue is to free oneself from any influence such as wealth, fame, or power, which have no value in Nature.
- Suffering is caused by false judgments of value, which cause negative emotions and a vicious character.
Cyrenaic views of the meaning of life
Cyrenaicism is a hedonistic school founded by Aristippus of Cyrene. It was one of the earliest Socratic schools, and emphasized one side only of the Socratic teaching. Taking Socrates' assertion that happiness is one of the ends of moral action, Aristippus maintained that pleasure was the supreme good, creating an ultra-hedonistic view. He found bodily gratifications, which he considered more intense, preferable to mental pleasures. They also denied that we should defer immediate gratification for the sake of long-term gain. In these respects they differ from the Epicureans.[32][33]
Epicurean views of the meaning of life
- Main article: Epicurianism
Epicurus believed that while the pursuit of pleasure formed the focal point of the philosophy, this was largely directed to the 'static pleasures' of minimizing pain, anxiety and suffering.
When we say...that pleasure is the end and aim, we do not mean the pleasures of the prodigal or the pleasures of sensuality, as we are understood to do by some through ignorance, prejudice or wilful misrepresentation. By pleasure we mean the absence of pain in the body and of trouble in the soul. It is not by an unbroken succession of drinking bouts and of revelry, not by sexual lust, nor the enjoyment of fish and other delicacies of a luxurious table, which produce a pleasant life; it is sober reasoning, searching out the grounds of every choice and avoidance, and banishing those beliefs through which the greatest tumults take possession of the soul.[34]
Epicureanism rejects immortality and mysticism; it believes in the soul, but suggests that the soul is as mortal as the body. Epicurus rejected any possibility of an afterlife, while still contending that one need not fear death:
Death is nothing to us; for that which is dissolved, is without sensation, and that which lacks sensation is nothing to us.[35]
Stoic views of the meaning of life
Stoicism teaches the development of self-control and fortitude as a means of overcoming destructive emotions; the philosophy holds that becoming a clear and unbiased thinker allows one to understand the universal reason (logos). Stoicism's prime directives are virtue, reason, and natural law. The Stoics did not seek to extinguish emotions, only to avoid emotional troubles by developing clear judgment and inner calm through diligent practice of logic, reflection, and concentration. Stoics believe that to live according to reason and virtue is to live in harmony with the divine order of the universe, which entails the recognition of the common reason and essential value of all people.
The foundation of Stoic ethics is that good lies in the state of the soul itself, and it is exemplified by wisdom and self-control. The meaning of life is to be free of suffering through apatheia (απαθεια) (Greek) understood as being objective or having "clear judgment", rather than simple indifference. Another essential aspect of Stoicism involves improving the individual’s spiritual well-being: "Virtue consists in a will which is in agreement with Nature."[35] This principle also applies to the realm of interpersonal relationships; "to be free from anger, envy, and jealousy".[35]
19th century philosophy
Utilitarian views of the meaning of life
The origins of Utilitarianism are often traced back as far as the Greek philosopher Epicurus, but as a specific school of thought, it is generally credited to Jeremy Bentham.[36] Bentham found pain and pleasure to be the only intrinsic values in the world: "nature has placed mankind under the governance of two sovereign masters, pain and pleasure." From this he derived the rule of utility, that the good is whatever brings the greatest happiness to the greatest number of people. Later, after realizing that the formulation recognized two different and potentially conflicting principles, he dropped the second part and talked simply about "the greatest happiness principle."
Jeremy Bentham's foremost proponent was James Mill, a significant philosopher in his day and the father of John Stuart Mill. The younger Mill was educated according to Bentham's principles, including transcribing and summarising much of his father's work whilst still in his teens."[37]
In his famous short work, Utilitarianism, John Stuart Mill argued that cultural, intellectual, and spiritual pleasures are of greater value than mere physical pleasure, because the former would be valued more highly by competent judges than the latter. A competent judge, according to Mill, is anyone who has experienced both the lower pleasures and the higher.[38]
Nihilist views of the meaning of life
Nihilism rejects claims to knowledge and truth, and explores the meaning of an existence without knowable truth. Though nihilism tends toward defeatism, one can find strength and reason for celebration in the varied and unique human relationships it explores. From a nihilist point of view, morals are valueless and only hold a place in society as false ideals created by various forces. The characteristic that distinguishes nihilism from other skeptical or relativist philosophies is that, rather than merely insisting that values are subjective or even warrantless, nihilism declares that nothing is of value, as the name implies.
Friedrich Nietzsche characterized nihilism as emptying the world and especially human existence of meaning, purpose, comprehensible truth, or essential value. He summed up the process of nihilism as "the devaluing of the highest values".[39] He also saw nihilism as a natural result of the idea that God is dead, and insisted that it was something to be overcome, by calling the nihilist's life-negating values in question and return meaning to the Earth.[2]
Martin Heidegger described nihilism as the movement whereby Being is forgotten and is wholly transformed into value, or in other words, the reduction of being to exchange value.[39]
Pragmatist views of the meaning of life
Pragmatism is a school of philosophy which originated in the United States in the late 1800s. Pragmatism is characterized by the insistence on consequences, utility and practicality as vital components of truth. Pragmatism holds that it is only in the struggle of intelligent organisms with the surrounding environment that theories and data acquire significance. Pragmatism does not hold, however, that just anything that is useful or practical should be regarded as true, or anything that helps us to survive merely in the short-term; pragmatists argue that what should be taken as true is that which most contributes to the most human good over the longest course. In practice, this means that for pragmatists, theoretical claims should be tied to verification practices — i.e., that one should be able to make predictions and test them − and that ultimately the needs of humankind should guide the path of human inquiry.
Pragmatic philosophers suggest that rather than a truth about life, we should seek a useful understanding of life. William James argued that truth could be made but not sought.[40][41] Thus, the meaning of life is a belief about the purpose of life that does not contradict one's experience of a purposeful life. Roughly, this could be applied as: "The meaning of life is those purposes which cause you to value it." To a pragmatist, the meaning of life, your life, can be discovered only through experience.
20th century philosophy
Existentialist views of the meaning of life
There has been a wide variety in Existentialist thought. Arthur Schopenhauer offered a bleak answer to "what is the meaning of life?" by determining one's life as a reflection of one's will and the will (and thus life) as being an aimless, irrational, and painful drive. He saw salvation, deliverance, or escape from suffering in aesthetic contemplation, sympathy for others, and asceticism.[42][43] Søren Kierkegaard invented the term "leap of faith" and argued that life is full of absurdity and the individual must make his or her own values in an indifferent world. For Kierkegaard, an individual can have a meaningful life (or at least one free of despair) if the individual relates the self in an unconditional commitment to something finite, and devotes his or her life to the commitment despite the inherent vulnerability of doing so.[44]
Humanist views of the meaning of life
According to Humanism, the human race came to be by reproducing in a progression of unguided evolution as an integral part of nature, which is self-existing.[45][46] Knowledge does not come from supernatural sources, rather it flows from human observation, experimentation, and rational analysis preferably utilizing the scientific method: the nature of the universe is what we discern it to be.[45] As are "values and realities", which are determined "by means of intelligent inquiry"[45] and "are derived from human need and interest as tested by experience", that is, by critical intelligence.[47][48] "As far as we know, the total personality is [a function] of the biological organism transacting in a social and cultural context."[46]
Humanists believe that human purpose is determined by humans, completely without supernatural influence; it is human personality (in the broadest sense) that is the purpose of a human's life, and this humanism seeks to develop and fulfill:[45] "Humanism affirms our ability and responsibility to lead ethical lives of personal fulfillment that aspire to the greater good of humanity."[47] Humanists seek enlightened self-interest and the common good for all people. The happiness of the individual is inextricably linked to the well-being of humanity as a whole, in part because we are social animals which find meaning in relationships, and because cultural progress benefits everybody who lives in that culture.[46][47]
Posthumanism and transhumanism (sometimes used as synonyms) are extensions of humanistic values. Like humanism, they propose that we should seek the advancement of humanity and of all life to the greatest degree feasible, with an emphasis on reconciling the views of Renaissance humanism to correspond more closely to the 21st century's concepts of technoscientific knowledge. These views insist that all living things be granted the basic option to inquire after their own personal or social "meaning(s) of life" (including meanings that human beings are currently incompetent to comprehend) as much as it is physically possible to do so, and no less.[49] They insist that the meaning of life is necessarily indefinite and ambiguous, and should be left to the philosophical inclinations of the individual; however there is a moral imperative common to all intelligent agents to improve their lives.
Logical positivist views of the meaning of life
Of the meaning of life, Ludwig Wittgenstein and the logical positivists said: expressed in language, the question is meaningless. This is because "meaning of x" is a term in life usually conveying something regarding the consequences of x, or the significance of x, or that which should be noted regarding x, etc. So when "life" is used as "x" in the term "meaning of x", the statement becomes recursive and therefore nonsensical, or would simply refer to the obvious fact that the condition of life is essential for having meaning (in life).
In other words, things in a person's life can have meaning (importance), but a meaning of life itself, i.e., apart from those things, can't be discerned. In this context, a person's life is said to have meaning (significance to himself and others) in the form of the events throughout his life and the results of his life in terms of achievements, a legacy, family, etc. But to say that life itself has meaning is a misuse of language, since any note of significance or consequence is relevant only in life (to those living it), rendering the statement erroneous. Bertrand Russell, for example, wrote that although he found it impossible to bring himself to seriously believe that his distaste for torture was similar in nature to his distaste for broccoli, he nonetheless could find no satisfactory empirical method of proving this:[35]
When we try to be definite as to what we mean when we say that this or that is "the Good," we find ourselves involved in very great difficulties. Bentham's creed that pleasure is the Good roused furious opposition, and was said to be a pig's philosophy. Neither he nor his opponents could advance any argument. In a scientific question, evidence can be adduced on both sides, and in the end, one side is seen to have the better case — or, if this does not happen, the question is left undecided. But in a question as to whether this or that is the ultimate Good, there is no evidence either way; each disputant can only appeal to his own emotions, and employ such rhetorical devices as shall rouse similar emotions in others...Questions as to "values" — that is to say, as to what is good or bad on its own account, independently of its effects — lie outside the domain of science, as the defenders of religion emphatically assert. I think that in this they are right, but I draw the further conclusion, which they do not draw, that questions as to "values" lie wholly outside the domain of knowledge. That is to say, when we assert that this or that has "value," we are giving expression to our own emotions, not to a fact which would still be true if our personal feelings were different.[50]
Abrahamic religions
Jewish views of the meaning of life
Jews believe the purpose of life is to serve God[51] and to prepare for the world to come[52] "Olam Haba".[53]
Judaism regards life as a precious gift from God; precious not only because it is a gift from God, but because, for humans, there is a uniqueness attached to that gift. Of all the creatures on Earth, humans are created in the image of God. Our lives are sacred and precious because we carry within us the Divine Image, and with it, unlimited potential.[54]
While Jewish thoughts are about elevating oneself in spirituality and connecting to God and trying to prepare for "Olam Haba", Jewish thought is to use this world, "Olam Hazeh," to help elevate ourself into the next.
Kabbalah, Jewish mysticism, takes it one step further. The Zohar states that the reason for life is to better one's soul. The soul descends to this world and endures the trials of this life so that it can reach a higher spiritual state upon its return to the source.
Christian views of the meaning of life
Christians draw many of their beliefs from the Holy Bible, and believe that loving God is the meaning of life. In order to achieve this, one would ask for forgiveness of sins and receive God into their heart. Christianity believes in an eternal afterlife, and declares that it is an unearned gift from God through the love of Jesus Christ, which is to be received or forfeited by faith. (Ephesians 2:8–9; Romans 6:23; John 3:16–21; John 3:36).
Christians believe they are being tested and purified so that they may have a place of responsibility with Jesus in the eternal Kingdom to come. What the Christian does in this life will determine his place of responsibility with Jesus in the eternal Kingdom to come. Jesus encouraged Christians to be overcomers, so that they might share in the glorious reign with Him in the life to come: "To him who overcomes, I will give the right to sit with me on my throne, just as I overcame and sat down with my Father on his throne. He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches." (Rev 3:21–22)
The Bible states that it is God "in whom we live and move and have our being" (Acts 17:28), that to Fear God is the beginning of wisdom, and to depart from evil is the beginning of understanding (Job 28:28) and that "In Christ Jesus are hidden all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge" (Colossians 2:3). The Bible also says, in Ecclesiastes 12:13 "Let us hear the conclusion of the whole matter: Fear God, and keep his commandments: for this is the whole duty of man", and "Whether therefore ye eat, or drink, or whatsoever ye do, do all to the glory of God." Corinthians 10:31Template:Bibleverse with invalid book
In one of the Westminster Articles (1647), the Shorter Catechism, the first question is "What is the chief end of man?", or in other words, 'What is man's main purpose?'. The answer, according to the Catechism is "Man's chief end is to glorify God and enjoy him forever." It goes on to explain that God requires of us to obey the moral law revealed to us, summarily comprehended in the "Greatest Commandment", which proclaim that we must "love the Lord our God with all our heart, with all our soul, with all our strength, and with all our mind; and our neighbour as ourselves."[55]
Islamic views of the meaning of life
In Islam the ultimate objective of man is to seek the pleasure of Allah by living in accordance with the Divine guidelines as stated in the Qur'an and the Tradition of the Prophet. The Qur'an clearly states that the whole purpose behind the creation of man was for gloryfying and worshipping Allah:[56] "I only created jinn and man to worship Me" (Qur'an 51:56). Worshiping in Islam means to testify to the oneness of God in his lordship, names and attributes. To Muslims, life was created as a test, and how well one performs on this test will determine whether one finds a final home in Jannah (Heaven) or Jahannam (Hell).
The esoteric Muslim view, generally held by Sufis, the universe exists only for God's pleasure. Creation works as a grand game,[57] with Allah as the greatest prize.[57]
Bahá'í views of the meaning of life
The Bahá'í Faith, founded by Bahá'u'lláh, emphasizes the spiritual unity of all humankind.[58] According to Bahá'í teachings, religious history has unfolded through a series of God's messengers who brought teachings suited for the capacity of the people at their time, and whose fundamental purpose is the same.
The purpose of human life, say Bahá'ís, is spiritual growth. This is conceived almost as an organic process, like the development of a fetus, and continues after death. Neither a physical Heaven or Hell are present in the Bahá'í Faith. The Bahá'í teachings present "Heaven" and "Hell" to be states of spiritual nearness or remoteness to God, and that life continues in an afterlife through which the soul may progress infinitely through ever-more-exalted spiritual realms, eventually coming to stand before the Presence of God. The Bahá'í faith teaches that this process continues on in the spiritual afterlife, and not through a series of births and re-births as in reincarnation.
[59][60][61]
Bahá'ís believe that while God's essence can never be fully fathomed, he can be understood through his "names and attributes." These are sometimes referred to as gems, and include such qualities as compassion, justice, knowledge, and wisdom. Education (especially of a spiritual nature) reveals the divine gems which God has placed within our souls.[62]
Dharmic religions and philosophy
Hindu views of the meaning of life
Hinduism is an extremely diverse religion. Although some tenets of the faith are accepted by most Hindus, scholars have found it difficult to identify any doctrines with universal acceptance among all denominations.[63] Most Hindus believe that the spirit or soul—the true "self" of every person, called the ātman—is eternal.[64] The purusharthas are the canonical four ends or aims of human life.[65][66][67] These goals are, from lowest to highest importance: Kāma (sensual pleasure or love), Artha (wealth), Dharma (righteousness or morality) and Moksha (liberation from the cycle of reincarnation)
According to the monistic/pantheistic theologies of Hinduism (such as the Advaita Vedanta school), the ātman is ultimately indistinct from Brahman, the supreme spirit. Brahman is described as "The One Without a Second;" hence these schools are called "non-dualist."[68] The goal of life according to the Advaita school is to realize that one's atman (soul) is identical to Brahman, the supreme soul.[69] The Upanishads state that whoever becomes fully aware of the ātman as the innermost core of one's own self, realises their identity with Brahman and thereby reaches Moksha (liberation or freedom)[64][70][71] The notion of lila (literally, "play") refers to the idea of the universe as a cosmic game, and meaning as a "play of significance".[72] This "play", manifested in the million-formed inexhaustible richness of beings and events, is what gives us the key to the meaning of life.[73]
Other Hindu schools, such as the dualist Dvaita Vedanta and other bhakti schools, understand Brahman as a Supreme Being who possesses personality. On these conceptions, the ātman is dependent on Brahman, and the meaning of life is to achieve Moksha through love towards God and on God's grace.[70]
Jain views of the meaning of life
Jainism is a religion originating in ancient India, its ethical system promotes self-discipline above all else. Through following the ascetic teachings of jina, a human achieves enlightenment (perfect knowledge). Jainism divides the universe into living and non-living beings. Only when the non-living become attached to the living does suffering result. Therefore, happiness is the result of self-conquest and freedom from external objects. The meaning of life may then be said to be to use of the physical body to achieve self-realization and bliss.[74]
Jains believe that every human is responsible for his or her actions and all living beings have an eternal soul, jīva. Jains believe all souls are equal because they all possess the potential of being liberated and attaining Moksha. The Jain view of karma is that every action, every word, every thought produces, besides its visible, an invisible, transcendental effect on the soul.
Jainism includes strict adherence to ahimsa (or ahinsā), a form of nonviolence that goes far beyond vegetarianism. Jains refuse food obtained with unnecessary cruelty. Many practice a lifestyle similar to Veganism due to the violence of modern dairy farms, and others exclude root vegetables from their diets in order to preserve the lives of the plants from which they eat.[75]
Buddhist views of the meaning of life
One of the central views in Buddhism is a nondual worldview, in which subject and object are the same, and the sense of doer-ship is illusionary. On this account, the meaning of life is to become enlightened as to the nature and oneness of the universe. According to the scriptures, the Buddha taught that in life there exists Dukkha, which is in essence sorrow/suffering, that is caused by desire and it can be brought to cessation by following the Noble Eightfold Path.
This teaching is called the Catvāry Āryasatyāni (Pali: Cattāri Ariyasaccāni), or the "Four Noble Truths".
- There is suffering (duhkha)
- There is a cause of suffering — craving (trishna)
- There is the cessation of suffering (nirvana)
- There is a way leading to the cessation of suffering — the Noble Eightfold Path
Theravada Buddhism promotes the concept of Vibhajjavada (Pali), literally "Teaching of Analysis." This doctrine says that insight must come from the aspirant's experience, critical investigation, and reasoning instead of by blind faith; however, the scriptures of the Theravadin tradition also emphasize heeding the advice of the wise, considering such advice and evaluation of one's own experiences to be the two tests by which practices should be judged. The Theravadin goal is liberation (or freedom) from suffering, according to the Four Noble Truths. This is attained in the achievement of Nibbana, or Unbinding which also ends the repeated cycle of birth, old age, sickness and death.
Mahayana Buddhist schools de-emphasize the traditional Theravada ideal of the release from individual Suffering (Dukkha) and attainment of Awakening (Nirvana). In Mahayana, the Buddha is seen as an eternal, immutable, inconceivable, omnipresent being. The fundamental principles of Mahayana doctrine are based around the possibility of universal liberation from suffering for all beings, and the existence of the transcendent Buddha-nature, which is the eternal Buddha essence present, but hidden and unrecognised, in all living beings.
Sikh views of the meaning of life
The monastic Sikh religion founded by Guru Nanak Dev, and the term "sikh" means student, which denotes that followers will lead their lives forever learning. This system of religious philosophy and expression has been traditionally known as the Gurmat (literally the counsel of the gurus) or the Sikh Dharma. The followers of Sikhism are ordained to follow the teachings of the ten Sikh gurus, or enlightened leaders, as well as the holy scripture entitled the Gurū Granth Sāhib, which includes selected works of many philosophers from diverse socio-economic and religious backgrounds.
The Sikh Gurus tell us that salvation can be obtained by following various spiritual paths. Therefore, Sikhs do not have a monopoly on salvation: "The Lord dwells in every heart, and every heart has its own way to reach Him."[76] Sikhs do not consider they have an "exclusive" right to salvation. Sikhs believe that all people are equally important before God.[77] Sikhs balance their moral and spiritual values with the quest for knowledge, and they aim to promote a life of peace and equality but also of positive action.[78]
A key distinctive feature of Sikhism is a non-anthropomorphic concept of God, to the extent that one can interpret God as the Universe itself (see Pantheism). Sikhism thus sees life as an opportunity to understand this God as well as to discover the divinity which lies in each individual. While a full understanding of God is beyond human beings,[79] Nanak described God as not wholly unknowable. God is omnipresent (sarav viāpak) in all creation and visible everywhere to the spiritually awakened. Nanak stressed that God must be seen from "the inward eye", or the "heart", of a human being: devotees must meditate to progress towards enlightenment. Nanak emphasized the revelation through meditation, as its rigorous application permits the existence of communication between God and human beings.[79]
According to Sikhism, every creature has a soul. In death, the soul passes from one body to another until final liberation. The journey of the soul is governed by the karma of the deeds and actions we perform during our lives, and depending on the goodness or wrongdoings committed by a person in their life they will either be rewarded or punished in their next life. As the spirit of God is found in all life and matter, a soul can be passed onto other life forms, such as plants and insects - not just human bodies. A person who has evolved to achieve spiritual perfection in his lifetimes attains salvation – union with God and liberation from rebirth in the material world.
East Asian religions and philosophy
Taoist views of the meaning of life
The Taoists cosmogony emphasizes the need for all sentient beings and all man to return to the primordial or to rejoin with the Oneness of the Universe by way of self-correction and self realization. It is the objective for all adherents to understand and be in tune with the ultimate truth.
Within the theology of Taoism, all man were originally a being called yuanling from Taiji and Tao, the meaning in life for the adherents is to realise the temporal nature of the existence, and all adherents are expected to practise, hone and conduct their mortal lives by way of Xiuzhen and Xiushen, as a preparation for the spiritual transcendence thereafter. "Only introspection can then help us to find our innermost reasons for living...the simple answer is here within ourselves."[80]
Shinto views of the meaning of life
Shinto wants life to live, not to die. Shinto sees death as pollution and regards life as the realm where the divine spirit seeks to purify itself by rightful self-development. Shinto wants individual human life to be prolonged forever on earth as a victory of the divine spirit in preserving its objective personality in its highest forms. The presence of evil in the world, as conceived by Shinto, does not stultify the divine nature by imposing on divinity responsibility for being able to relieve human suffering while refusing to do so. The sufferings of life are the sufferings of the divine spirit in search of progress in the objective world.[27]
Confucian views of the meaning of life
Confucianism recognizes human nature in accordance with the need for discipline and education. Because mankind is driven by both positive and negative influences, Confucianists see a goal in achieving the good nature through strong relationships and reasoning as well as minimizing the negative energy. This emphasis on normal living is seen in the Confucianist scholar Wei-Ming's quote, "we can realize the ultimate meaning of life in ordinary human existence."[81]
Non-Abrahamic Iranian religions and philosophy
Zoroastrian views of the meaning of life
Founded by Zoroaster, the Zoroastrianism message was that humans are responsible for the moral choices they make in a world of both good and evil options. For those who chose good actions, a blissful afterlife is promised, as well as a return to earth to continue life in a physical form. Those who chose evil actions would be doomed to a hellish afterlife.[82]
Scientific approaches to the meaning of life
The primary aim of the scientific approach to the meaning of life is to describe the empirical facts about human existence. Claims that empirical science can shed light on issues such as the meaning of life are highly disputed within the scientific and philosophy-of-science communities, and have been from the very beginning of science. In spite of this, science has provided many theories about the origin of life, in the areas of abiogenesis (for the origins of biological life) and cosmogony (for the origins of the universe). Both of these areas are quite hypothetical; cosmogony because no existing physical model can accurately describe the very early universe (the instant of the Big Bang),[83] and abiogenesis because the environment of the young earth is still not accurately known, and even though the conditions and chemical processes that may have been present then have been reproduced in a laboratory, to produce organic molecules, those very conditions are still under debate.[84][85][86]
The true nature and origin of consciousness and the mind itself are also widely debated in science, and more specifically in relation to the hard problem of consciousness. Various theories relating to consciousness have been postulated,[87][88] including hypotheses of consciousness and spacetime,[89][90] electromagnetic theories of consciousness,[91][90][92] the Multiple Drafts Model,[93][94][95][96][97] the holonomic brain theory,[98] Orch-OR[99] and the many-minds interpretation.[100]
Origin and nature of biological life
The exact mechanisms by which biological life could have originated from inanimate matter are unknown, but multiple theories have been posited, including the contemporary RNA world hypothesis. Some scientists claim life began on Earth as a primeval soup, while others believe that a more "complete" form of life arrived on our planet through panspermia. The initial mechanisms by which primitive cells were formed notwithstanding, almost all scientific origin theories are contingent upon the evolution of traits through mutation and natural selection.[101] Near the end of the 20th century, equipped with insights from the gene-centered view of evolution, biologists such as George C. Williams, Richard Dawkins and David Haig, to name a few, have suggested that insofar as there may be a primary function to life, it may be the survival of genes; following this approach, success isn't measured in terms of the survival of species, but rather in terms of the successful replication of genes.[102]
In addition to naturalistic arguments for the origin of life on Earth, some philosophers and theologians have postulated that a "watchmaker" or intelligent designer guided its development. This teleological argument has been rejected by most scientists, including Richard Dawkins, who has often affirmed that teleology is an illusion and does not exist, like in his Discovery Science video 'The Big Question: Why are we here?'[103] and in books such as The Blind Watchmaker[104] and The God Delusion.[105][106][107]
Significance and value of life
Science may or may not be able to tell us what is most valuable in life in a philosophical sense, but some studies bear on related questions: Researchers in "positive psychology" (and earlier and less rigorously in humanistic psychology) study factors that lead to satisfaction in our lives. Social psychology examines factors that lead to infants thriving or failing to thrive, and in other areas of psychology questions of motivation, preference, and what people value. Economists have learned a great deal about what is valued in the marketplace; and sociology examines value at a social level using theoretical constructs such as value theory, norms, anomie, etc.
Popular views of the purpose of life
"What is the meaning of life?" is a question many people ask themselves at some point during their lives, most in the context "What is the purpose of life?"[8] Here are some of the life goals people choose, and some of their beliefs on what the purpose of life is:
...to have life
- ...to survive,[108] that is, to live as long as possible,[109] including pursuit of immortality (through scientific means).[110]
...to live forever[110] or die trying.[111] (see also Life extension and Indefinite lifespan) - ...to evolve.[112][113]
- ...to replicate, to reproduce.[10] "The 'dream' of every cell is to become two cells."[114][115][116][117]
...to be fruitful and multiply.[118] (Genesis 1:28)
...to seek wisdom and knowledge
- ...to expand one's perception of the world.[119]
- ...to learn as many things as possible in life.[120]
...to know as much as possible about as many things as possible.[121] - ...to know and master the world.[122][123]
...to know and master nature.[124] - ...to seek wisdom and knowledge and to tame the mind, as to avoid suffering caused by ignorance and find happiness.[125]
- ...to face our fears and accept the lessons life offers us.[126]
- ...to understand the mystery of God.[126]
- ...to know God.[127]
- ...to know oneself, know others, and know the will of heaven.[128]
- ...to find the meaning of life.[129]
...to find the purpose of life.[130]
...to find a reason to live.[131] - ...to resolve the imbalance of the mind by understanding the nature of reality.[132]
...to do good, to do the right thing
- ...to leave the world a better place than you found it.[10]
...to do your best to leave every situation better than you found it.[10] - ...to benefit others.[15]
- ...to give more than you take.[10]
- ...to end suffering.[133][134][135]
- ...to create equality.[136][137][138]
- ...to challenge oppression.[139]
- ...to distribute wealth.[140][141]
- ...to be generous.[142][143]
- ...to contribute to the well-being and spirit of others.[144]
- ...to help others,[1][143] to help one another.[145]
...to take every chance to help another while on your journey here.[10] - ...to be creative and innovative.[144]
- ...to forgive.[10]
...to accept and forgive human flaws.[146] - ...to be emotionally sincere.[147]
- ...to be responsible.[147]
- ...to be honorable.[147]
- ...to seek peace.[147]
...to pursue a certain form of fulfillment, perfection or success
- ...to chase dreams.[10]
...to live one's dreams.[119] - ...to seek beauty in all its forms.[10]
- ...to seek happiness[148][149] and flourish.[1]
- ...to expand one's potential in life.[119]
- ...to be a true authentic human being.[150]
- ...to become the person you've always wanted to be.[151]
- ...to become the best version of yourself.[5]
- ...to rule the world.[152]
- ...to fill the Earth and subdue it.[118] (Genesis 1:28)
- ...to spend it for something that will outlast it.[147]
- ...to matter: to count, to stand for something, to have made some difference that you lived at all.[147]
- ...to keep one's soul pure.[147]
- ...to be able to put the whole of oneself into one's feelings, one's work, one's beliefs.[147]
- ...to follow our destiny.[126]
...to submit to our destiny.[152] - ...to create your own destiny.[153]
...to love, to feel, to feel joy in living
- ...to love more.[10]
- ...to love those who mean the most. Every life you touch will touch you back.[10]
- ...to treasure every enjoyable sensation one has.[10]
- ...to have fun.[144]
...to enjoy life.[126]
...to seek pleasure.[147] - ...to be compassionate.[147]
- ...to be moved by the tears and pain of others, and try to help them out of love and compassion.[10]
- ...to love others as best we possibly can.[10]
- ...to love something bigger, greater, and beyond ourselves, something we did not create or have the power to create, something intangible and made holy by our very belief in it.[10]
- ...to love God.[127]
One should not search for the meaning of life
- The answer to the meaning of life is too profound to be known and understood.[132]
- You will never live if you are looking for the meaning of life.[10]
- The meaning of life is to forget about the search for the meaning of life.[10]
Life has no meaning
- Life or human existence has no real meaning or purpose because human existence occurred out of a random chance in nature, and anything that exists by chance has no intended purpose.[132]
- Life has no meaning, but as humans we try to associate a meaning or purpose so we can justify our existence.[10]
- There is no point in life, and that is exactly what makes it so special.[10]
- Life is a bitch and then you die.[151]
Humorous, aesthetic and entertainment media treatments
The mystery of life and its meaning is an often recurring subject in popular culture, featured in entertainment media and various forms of art, and more specifically in music, literature and visual arts, for example:
- in songs like The Offspring's "The Meaning of Life", Nas' "Life's a Bitch", Kiss' "Reason to Live", George Harrison's "All Things Must Pass" and "What Is Life", Frank Sinatra's "That's Life", Eric Idle's "Always Look on the Bright Side of Life", Evanescence's "Bring Me To Life" and "Sweet Sacrifice", Nelly Furtado's "All Good Things (Come To An End)" and "In God's Hands", 30 Seconds to Mars' "A Beautiful Lie", Good Charlotte's "I Just Wanna Live" and "The Chronicles of Life and Death" and Linkin Park's "In the End" and "Breaking the Habit";
- in books like Anthony C. Grayling's The Meaning of Things, Viktor Frankl's Man's Search for Meaning, Robert Nozick's Philosophical Explanations and The Examined Life, Ken Wilber's Sex, Ecology, Spirituality, Julian Baggini's What's it All About? Philosophy and the Meaning of Life, Rick Warren's The Purpose Driven Life, Oswald Spengler's The Decline of the West, Richard Dawkins's Unweaving the Rainbow and River out of Eden and Alister McGrath's Dawkins' God: Genes, Memes, and the Meaning of Life.
- and in paintings like Paul Gauguin's Where Do We Come From? What Are We? Where Are We Going?, Edvard Munch's The Scream, John Martin's The End of the World, Caspar David Friedrich's Wanderer above the Sea of Fog, Hieronymus Bosch's The Garden of Earthly Delights triptych, Pieter Bruegel the Elder's The Triumph of Death, Thomas Cole's The Voyage of Life series and Hans Memling's The Last Judgment triptych.
-
The Voyage of Life
Childhood -
The Voyage of Life
Youth -
The Voyage of Life
Manhood -
The Voyage of Life
Old Age
Several more specific references to the meaning of life in popular culture
- In Douglas Adams' popular comedy book series The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, the Answer to the Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe and Everything has the numeric solution of 42, which was derived over a period of seven and a half million years by a giant supercomputer called Deep Thought, which was built by an incredibly intelligent pan-dimensional race. After much confusion from the descendants of his creators, Deep Thought explains that the problem is that they do not know the Ultimate Question[1], and they would have to build an even more powerful computer to determine what that is. This computer is revealed to be Earth, which, after 10 million years of calculating, is destroyed to make way for a galactic bypass moments before it finishes making its calculations.[154][9][14]
- In Life, the Universe and Everything, it is confirmed that 42 is indeed the Ultimate Answer, and that it is impossible for both the Ultimate Answer and the Ultimate Question to be known about in the same universe, as they will cancel each other out and take the universe with them, to be replaced by something even more bizarre, and that this may have already happened.[155]
- Later, in the hopes that his subconscious holds the question, Arthur Dent attempts to guess at the question, and comes up with "What do you get when you multiply six by nine?" This was in fact not the Ultimate Question, because there had been computing errors which had been caused by the unexpected arrival of the Golgafrinchans on prehistoric Earth.[156] However, Dent, Fenchurch, and a dying Marvin did see 'God's Final Message to His Creation' ("We apologise for the inconvenience").[157]
- In Monty Python's The Meaning of Life, there are several allusions to the meaning of life. In "Part VI B: The Meaning of Life" a cleaning lady explains "Life's a game, you sometimes win or lose" and later a waiter describes his personal philosophy "The world is a beautiful place. You must go into it, and love everyone, not hate people. You must try and make everyone happy, and bring peace and contentment everywhere you go."[158] At the end of the film, we can see Michael Palin being handed an envelope, he opens it, and provides the viewers with 'the meaning of life': "Well, it's nothing very special. Uh, try to be nice to people, avoid eating fat, read a good book every now and then, get some walking in, and try to live together in peace and harmony with people of all creeds and nations."[158][159][160]
- In The Simpsons episode "Homer the Heretic", a representation of God tells Homer what the meaning of life is, but as usual the one who really wanted to know (the viewer) is left disappointed. The dialogue goes as follows:
- Homer: God, what's the meaning of life?
- God: Homer, I can't tell you that.
- Homer: Why not?
- God: You'll find out when you die.
- Homer: Oh, I can't wait that long.
- God: You can't wait 6 months?
- Homer: No, tell me now...
- God: Oh, OK... The meaning of life is...
- At this point, the credits music starts and the show ends. The writer's original idea was that a commercial would come after this scene and before the credits, thus having the commercial interrupt God's explanation to humorous effect.
- At the end of The Matrix Revolutions, Agent Smith concludes that "the purpose of life is to end." He is determined to move that purpose along for Neo.[161]
- The crew of the Red Dwarf is captured in episode 2 of season 5 by a powerful being called The Inquisitor, a self-repairing simulant who survived until the end of time and, coming to the conclusion that there is no God and no afterlife, decided that the only point of life was to make something of yourself. The Inquisitor then proceeds to put each of the Red Dwarf misfits on trial and forces them to justify their existence. Failure to do so will result in a sentence of being erased from history.
- In Peanuts, Charlie Brown explains he thinks the purpose of life is to make others happy, to which Lucy responds that she doesn't think she is making anyone happy, and—more importantly—no one is making her happy, so someone isn't doing their job, eventually she asks him "You say we're put on this earth to make others happy? ... What are the others put here for?"[162] On several other occasions, Charlie has asserted several other things in relation to life and its meaning: "In the book of life, the answers aren't in the back."[162][163], "That's the secret to life... replace one worry with another."[162][164], "Happiness is anyone and anything at all that's loved by you."[165] and "Life is like an ice cream cone...you have to lick it one day at a time."[166] Lucy has also declared "Life is too short to waste it listening to some person who doesn't know when to shut up! Time is too valuable!"[162] and "All you really need is love, but a little chocolate now and then doesn't hurt."[162][167]
- In Bill and Ted's Bogus Journey, Bill and Ted end up meeting God. Before being admitted into his presence, St. Peter (billed as The Gatekeeper on IMDb) asks them what the meaning of life is, and they reply with the lyrics to the song "Every Rose Has Its Thorn" by Poison.
- The Alchemist and the movie City Slickers both present the meaning of life as an individual journey to find one's own "path". In this context, the "path", similar to what is defined in Buddhism as the 4th Noble Truth: the Eightfold Path, is best explained simply as the overall way one chooses to lead their life.
- In A Man Without a Country, author Kurt Vonnegut sums up life with the words: "We're all here to fart around. Don't let anyone tell you any different!". In Vonnegut's novel Breakfast of Champions, "To be the eyes and ears and conscience of the Creator of the Universe, you fool." is Kilgore Trout's unwritten reply to the question "What is the purpose of life?"
- A quotation by Anton Chekhov states "You ask "What is life?" That is the same as asking "What is a carrot?" A carrot is a carrot and we know nothing more."[168]
- In William Shakespeare's Hamlet, Prince Hamlet states: "To be or not to be, that is the question."
- In Dune, a seminal science fiction novel by Frank Herbert, the meaning of life is defined as "not a question to be answered, but a reality to be experienced".
See also
Origin and nature of life and reality
|
Significance of lifeValue in and of life
Purpose of lifeMiscellaneous
|
References
- ^ a b c d e f Julian Baggini (September 2004). What's It All About? Philosophy and the Meaning of Life. USA: Granta Books. ISBN 1862076618.
- ^ a b Bernard Reginster (2006). The Affirmation of Life: Nietzsche on Overcoming Nihilism. Harvard University Press. ISBN 0674021991.
- ^ Julian Young (2003). The Death of God and the Meaning of Life. Routledge. ISBN 0415307902.
- ^ a b Jonathan Westphal (1998). Philosophical Propositions: An Introduction to Philosophy. Routledge. ISBN 0415170532.
- ^ a b Matthew Kelly (2005). The Rhythm of Life: Living Every Day with Passion and Purpose. Simon & Schuster. ISBN 0743265106.
- ^ Robert Nozick (1981). Philosophical Explanations. Harvard University Press. ISBN 0674664795.
- ^ a b Albert Jewell (2003). Ageing, Spirituality and Well-Being. Jessica Kingsley
Publishers. ISBN 184310167X.
{{cite book}}
: line feed character in|publisher=
at position 17 (help) - ^ a b c "Question of the Month: What Is The Meaning Of Life?". Philosophy Now. Issue 59. Retrieved 2007-07-26.
- ^ a b Glenn Yeffeth (2005). The Anthology at the End of the Universe: Leading Science Fiction Authors on Douglas Adams' The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy. BenBella Books, Inc. ISBN 1932100563.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s David Seaman (2005). The Real Meaning of Life. New World Library. ISBN 1577315146.
- ^ Ronald F. Thiemann; William Carl Placher (1998). Why Are We Here?: Everyday Questions and the Christian Life. Continuum International Publishing Group. ISBN 1563382369.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Dennis Marcellino (1996). Why Are We Here?: The Scientific Answer to this Age-old Question (that you don't need to be a scientist to understand). Lighthouse Pub. ISBN 0945272103.
- ^ F. Homer Curtiss (2003). Why Are We Here. Kessinger Publishing. ISBN 0766138992.
- ^ a b William B. Badke (2005). The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Meaning of Everything. Kregel Publications. ISBN 0825420695.
- ^ a b c Hsuan Hua (2003). Words of Wisdom: Beginning Buddhism. Dharma Realm Buddhist Association. ISBN 0881393029.
- ^ a b Paul Davies (March 2000). The Fifth Miracle: The Search for the Origin and Meaning of Life. Simon & Schuster. ISBN 0-684-86309-X. Retrieved 2007-07-26.
- ^ a b Charles Christiansen; Carolyn Manville Baum; Julie Bass-Haugen (2005). Occupational Therapy: Performance, Participation, and Well-Being. SLACK Incorporated. p. 680. ISBN 1556425309.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Rick Warren (2002). The Purpose Driven Life: What on Earth Am I Here For?. Zondervan. ISBN 0310255252.
- ^ a b Jiddu Krishnamurti (2001). What Are You Doing With Your Life?. Krishnamurti Foundation of America. ISBN 188800424X.
- ^ Puolimatka, Tapio (2002). "Education and the Meaning of Life" (PDF). Philosophy of Education. University of Helsinki. Retrieved 2007-07-26.
{{cite web}}
: Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - ^ Stan Van Hooft (2004). Life, Death, and Subjectivity: Moral Sources in Bioethics. Rodopi. p. 247. ISBN 9042019123.
- ^ Russ Shafer-Landau; Terence Cuneo (2007). Foundations of Ethics: An Anthology. Blackwell Publishing. p. 520. ISBN 1405129514.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Richard Taylor (January 1970). Good and Evil. Macmillan Publishing Company. pp. "The Meaning of Life" (Chapter 5). ISBN 0026166909.
- ^ Wohlgennant, Rudolph. (1981). "Has the Question about the Meaning of Life any Meaning?" (Chapter 4). In E. Morscher, ed., Philosophie als Wissenschaft.
- ^ McNaughton, David (August 1988). Moral Vision: An Introduction to Ethics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. pp. "Moral Freedom and the Meaning of Life" (Section 1.5). ISBN 0631159452.
- ^ Leo Tolstoy (2007). On Life and Essays on Religion. READ BOOKS. p. 448. ISBN 1406742090.
- ^ a b J. W. T. Mason (2002). The Meaning of Shinto. Trafford Publishing. p. 175. ISBN 1412245516.
- ^ Richard H. Jones (2004). Mysticism and Morality: A New Look at Old Questions. Lexington Books. p. 432. ISBN 0739107844.
- ^ Theresa King (1992). The Spiral Path: Explorations in Women's Spirituality. Yes International Publishers. ISBN 0936663138.
- ^ Kidd, I., "Cynicism," in The Concise Encyclopedia of Western Philosophy. (ed. Urmson and Rée), Routledge. (2005)
- ^ Long, A. A., "The Socratic Tradition: Diogenes, Crates, and Hellenistic Ethics," in The Cynics: The Cynic Movement in Antiquity and Its Legacy. (ed. Branham and Goulet-Cazé), University of California Press, (1996).
- ^ "Cyrenaics." Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The University of Tennessee At Martin. 4 Nov. 2007 <http://www.iep.utm.edu/>.
- ^ "The Cyrenaics and the Origin of Hedonism." Hedonism.org. BLTC. 4 Nov. 2007 <http://www.hedonism.org>.
- ^ Epicurus, "Letter to Menoeceus", contained in Diogenes Laertius, Lives of Eminent Philosophers, Book X
- ^ a b c d Bertrand Russell (1946). A History of Western Philosophy, New York: Simon and Schuster; London: George Allen and Unwin
- ^ Rosen, Frederick (2003). Classical Utilitarianism from Hume to Mill. Routledge, pg. 28. ISBN 0415220947 "It was Hume and Bentham who then reasserted most strongly the Epicurean doctrine concerning utility as the basis of justice."
- ^ Mill, John Stuart. 'On Liberty', ed. Himmelfarb. Penguin Classics, 1974, Ed.'s introduction, p.11.
- ^ John Stuart Mill (1863). Utilitarianism.
- ^ a b Jérôme Bindé (2004). The Future Of Values: 21st-Century Talks. Berghahn Books. ISBN 1571814426.
- ^ William James (1909). The Meaning of Truth. Prometheus Books. ISBN 1-57392-138-6.
- ^ Walter Robert Corti (1976). The Philosophy of William James. Meiner Verlag. ISBN 3787303529.
- ^ Dale Jacquette (1996). Schopenhauer, Philosophy, and the Arts. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0521473888.
- ^ Durno Murray (1999). Nietzsche's Affirmative Morality. Walter de Gruyter. ISBN 3110166011.
- ^ Amy Laura Hall (2002). Kierkegaard and the Treachery of Love. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0521893119.
- ^ a b c d "[[Humanist Manifesto I]]] [http://www.americanhumanist.org/about/manifesto1.html". American Humanist Association. 1933. Retrieved 2007-07-26.
{{cite web}}
: External link in
(help); URL–wikilink conflict (help)|title=
- ^ a b c "[[Humanist Manifesto II]]] [http://www.americanhumanist.org/about/manifesto2.html". American Humanist Association. 1973. Retrieved 2007-08-01.
{{cite web}}
: External link in
(help); URL–wikilink conflict (help)|title=
- ^ a b c "[[Humanist Manifesto III]]] [http://www.americanhumanist.org/3/HumandItsAspirations.php". American Humanist Association. 2003. Retrieved 2007-08-01.
{{cite web}}
: External link in
(help); URL–wikilink conflict (help)|title=
- ^ "[[A Secular Humanist Declaration]]] [http://www.secularhumanism.org/index.php?section=main&page=declaration". Council for Democratic and Secular Humanism (now the Council for Secular Humanism). 1980. Retrieved 2007-08-01.
{{cite web}}
: External link in
(help); URL–wikilink conflict (help)|title=
- ^ Nick Bostrom (2005). "Transhumanist Values". Oxford University. Retrieved 2007-07-28.
- ^ Bertrand Russell (1961). Science and Ethics
- ^ Dan Cohn-Sherbok (2003). Judaism: History, Belief, and Practice. Routledge. p. 512. ISBN 0415236614.
- ^ Abraham Joshua Heschel (2005). Heavenly Torah: As Refracted Through the Generations. Continuum International Publishing Group. ISBN 0826408028.
- ^ Wilfred Shuchat (2006). The Garden of Eden & the Struggle to Be Human: According to the Midrash Rabbah. Devora Publishing. p. 584. ISBN 1932687319.
- ^ Randolph L. Braham (1983). Contemporary Views on the Holocaust. Springer. ISBN 089838141X.
- ^ "The Westminster Shorter Catechism". Retrieved 2008-03-21.
- ^ Ian Markham; İbrahim Özdemir (2005). Globalization, Ethics and Islam: The Case of Bediuzzaman Said Nursi. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd. ISBN 0754650154.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ a b Abdullah Yusuf Ali (2000). The Holy Qur'an. Wordsworth Editions. ISBN 1853267821.
- ^ "Bahaism." The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, vol. Fourth Edition, Houghton Mifflin Company, 2007
{{citation}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|1=
(help) - ^ Bahá'u'lláh (1873). The Kitáb-i-Aqdas: The Most Holy Book [1]. Wilmette, Illinois, USA: Bahá'í Publishing Trust. ISBN 0853989990.
{{cite book}}
: External link in
(help)|title=
- ^ Bahá'u'lláh (1862). The Kitáb-i-Íqán: The Book of Certitude [2]. Wilmette, Illinois, USA: Bahá'í Publishing Trust. ISBN 1931847088.
{{cite book}}
: External link in
(help)|title=
- ^ Bahá'u'lláh (1991) [1856-63]. The Seven Valleys and the Four Valleys [3]. Wilmette, Illinois, USA: Bahá'í Publishing Trust. ISBN 0-87743-227-9.
{{cite book}}
: External link in
(help)|title=
- ^ Bahá'u'lláh (2002). Gems of Divine Mysteries [4]. Haifa, Israel: Bahá'í World Centre. ISBN 0-85398-975-3.
{{cite book}}
: External link in
(help)|title=
- ^ Template:Harvard reference
- ^ a b Template:Harvard reference
- ^ For dharma, artha, and kama as "brahmanic householder values" see: Flood (1996), p. 17.
- ^ For the Dharma Śāstras as discussing the "four main goals of life" (dharma, artha, kāma, and moksha) see: Hopkins, p. 78.
- ^ For definition of the term पुरुष-अर्थ (puruṣa-artha) as "any of the four principal objects of human life, i.e. धर्म, अर्थ, काम, and मोक्ष" see: Apte, p. 626, middle column, compound #1.
- ^ Template:Harvard reference
- ^ Template:Harvard reference
- ^ a b Template:Harvard reference
- ^ See also the Vedic statement "ayam ātmā brahma" (This Atman is Brahman).
- ^ Richard Schechner (2002). Performance Studies: An Introduction. Routledge. p. 304. ISBN 0415146208.
- ^ Thomas Merton (1995). Thoughts on the East. New Directions Publishing. p. 84. ISBN 0811212939.
- ^ Shah, Natubhai. Jainism: The World of Conquerors. Sussex Academic Press, 1998.
- ^ "Viren, Jain" (PDF). RE Today. Retrieved 2007-06-14.
{{cite web}}
: External link in
(help)|publisher=
- ^ Daljeet Singh (1971). Guru Tegh Bahadur. Language Dept., Punjab. p. 195.
- ^ Jon Mayled (2002). Modern World Religions: Sikhism. Harcourt Heinemann. p. 62. ISBN 0435336266.
- ^ The Sikh Coalition
- ^ a b Parrinder, Geoffrey (1971). World Religions: From Ancient History to the Present. United States: Hamlyn Publishing Group Limited. p. 252. ISBN 0-87196-129-6.
- ^ Ming-Dao Deng (1990). Scholar Warrior: An Introduction to the Tao in Everyday Life. HarperCollins.
- ^ Tu, Wei-Ming. Confucian Thought: Selfhood as Creative Transformation. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1985.
- ^ Muesse, Mark. Religions of the Axial Age: An Approach to the World's Religions. Lectures at Rhodes College.
- ^ Brian Greene (2004). The Fabric of the Cosmos. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. p. 272. ISBN 0375727205.
- ^ Noam Lahav (1998). Biogenesis: Theories of Life's Origin. Oxford University Press US. p. 368. ISBN 0195117557.
- ^ André Brack (1998). The Molecular Origins of Life: Assembling Pieces of the Puzzle. Cambridge University Press. p. 428. ISBN 0521564751.
- ^ Günter Wächtershäuser (25 Aug 2000). "Origin of Life: Life as We Don't Know It", Science, 289 (5483) pp. 1307-1308.
- ^ Paul M. Churchland (1989). A Neurocomputational Perspective: The Nature of Mind and the Structure of Science. MIT Press. p. 321. ISBN 0262531062.
- ^ Harvey Whitehouse (2001). The Debated Mind: Evolutionary Psychology Versus Ethnography. Berg Publishers. p. 224. ISBN 1859734278.
- ^ John D. Barrow; Paul C. W. Davies; Charles L. Harper (2004). Science and Ultimate Reality: Quantum Theory, Cosmology, and Complexity. Cambridge University Press. p. 742. ISBN 052183113X.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ a b Mae-Wan Ho (1998). The Rainbow and the Worm: The Physics of Organisms. World Scientific. p. 304. ISBN 9810234279.
- ^ J. McFadden (2002) "Synchronous Firing and Its Influence on the Brain's Electromagnetic Field: Evidence for an Electromagnetic Field Theory of Consciousness". Journal of Consciousness Studies 9 (4) pp. 23-50.
- ^ R. Buccheri; V. Di Gesù; Metod Saniga (2000). Studies on the Structure of Time: From Physics to Psycho(patho)logy. Springer. p. 420. ISBN 030646439X.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Daniel Clement Dennett (1991). Consciousness Explained. Little, Brown and Co. p. 511. ISBN 0316180661.
- ^ Ned Joel Block (2007). Consciousness, Function, and Representation. MIT Press. p. 636. ISBN 0262026031.
- ^ Andrew Brook; Kathleen Akins (2005). Cognition and the Brain: The Philosophy and Neuroscience Movement. Cambridge University Press. p. 440. ISBN 0521836425.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Stanislas Dehaene (2001). The Cognitive Neuroscience of Consciousness. MIT Press. p. 249. ISBN 0262541319.
- ^ Jeffrey Alan Gray (2004). Consciousness: Creeping Up on the Hard Problem. Oxford University Press. p. 360. ISBN 0198520905.
- ^ Mohsen Kermanshahi (May 2007). Universal Theory: A Model for the Theory of Everything. Universal Publishers. p. 268. ISBN 1581129432.
- ^ Alexandra Bruce (2005). Beyond the Bleep: The Definitive Unauthorized Guide to What the Bleep Do We Know!?. The Disinformation Company. p. 288. ISBN 1932857222.
- ^ David Bohm; Basil J. Hiley (1993). The Undivided Universe: An Ontological Interpretation of Quantum Theory. Routledge. p. 397. ISBN 0415065887.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Charles Darwin (1859). On the Origin of Species.
- ^ Richard Dawkins (1976). The Selfish Gene. Oxford University Press. p. 224. ISBN 019857519X.
- ^ "Why are we here?". The Big Questions. Season 1. Episode 10. 2007-11-25.
{{cite episode}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|episodelink=
(help); External link in
(help); Unknown parameter|title=
|serieslink=
ignored (|series-link=
suggested) (help) - ^ Richard Dawkins (1986). The Blind Watchmaker. Norton & Company. ISBN 0-393-31570-3.
- ^ Richard Dawkins (2006). The God Delusion. Bantam Books. ISBN 0-618-68000-4.
- ^ Alister E. McGrath (2007). The Dawkins Delusion?. Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge. ISBN 978-0-281-05927-0.
- ^ Alister E. McGrath (2005). Dawkins' God: Genes, Memes, and the Meaning of Life. Blackwell Publishing. p. 202. ISBN 140512539X.
- ^ Lopez, Mike (September 22, 1999). "Episode III: Relativism? A Jedi craves not these things". The Michigan Daily. Retrieved 2007-07-26.
- ^ Lovatt, Stephen C. (2007). New Skins for Old Wine. Universal Publishers. pp. The Meaning of Life. ISBN 1581129602.
- ^ a b Raymond Kurzweil; Terry Grossman (2004). Fantastic Voyage: Live Long Enough to Live Forever [5]. Holtzbrinck Publishers. ISBN 1-57954-954-3.
{{cite book}}
: External link in
(help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)|title=
- ^ Bryan Appleyard (2007). How to Live Forever Or Die Trying: On the New Immortality. Simon & Schuster. ISBN 0743268687.
- ^ Cameron, Donald (2001). The Purpose of Life. Woodhill Publishing. ISBN 0-9540291-0-0.
- ^ Wayne, Larry. "Expanding The Oneness". SelfGrowth.com. Retrieved 2007-07-26.
{{cite web}}
: Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - ^ Nick Lane (2005). Power, Sex, Suicide: Mitochondria and the Meaning of Life. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0192804812.
- ^ Kenneth M. Weiss; Anne V. Buchanan (2004). Genetics and the Logic of Evolution. Wiley-IEEE. ISBN 0471238058.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Jennifer Ackerman (2001). Chance in the House of Fate: A Natural History of Heredity. Houghton Mifflin Books. ISBN 0618219099.
- ^ Boyce Rensberger (1996). Life Itself: Exploring the Realm of the Living Cell. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0195125002.
- ^ a b Thomas Patrick Burke (2004). The Major Religions: An Introduction with Texts. Blackwell Publishing. p. 400. ISBN 140511049X.
- ^ a b c Roger Ellerton PhD, CMC (2006). Live Your Dreams... Let Reality Catch Up: NLP and Common Sense for Coaches, Managers and You. Trafford Publishing. ISBN 1412047099.
- ^ John M. Cooper; D. S. Hutchinson (1997). Plato: Complete Works. Hackett Publishing. p. 1808. ISBN 0-87220-349-2.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ John E. Findling, Frank W. Thackeray (2001). Events That Changed the World Through the Sixteenth Century. Greenwood Press. p. 240. ISBN 0313290792.
- ^ Peter Harrison (2001). The Bible, Protestantism, and the Rise of Natural Science. Cambridge University Press. p. 326. ISBN 0521000963.
- ^ Steven Dillon (2006). The Solaris Effect: Art and Artifice in Contemporary American Film. University of Texas Press. p. 265. ISBN 0292713452.
- ^ Raymond Aron (2000). The Century of Total War. Wisdom Publications. ISBN 0861711734.
- ^ Tenzin Gyatso, 14th Dalai Lama (1954). The Meaning of Life: Buddhist Perspectives on Cause and Effect. Doubleday. p. 379.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link) - ^ a b c d George Cappannelli; Sedena Cappannelli (2004). Authenticity: Simple Strategies for Greater Meaning and Purpose at Work and at Home. Emmis Books. p. 256. ISBN 1578601487.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ a b Michael Joachim Girard (2006). Essential Believing for the Christian Soul. Xulon Press. p. 324. ISBN 1597815969.
- ^ T. M. P. Mahadevan (1974). Philosophy: Theory and Practice (Proceedings of the International Seminar on World Philosophy). Centre for Advanced Study in Philosophy, University of Madras. p. 652.
- ^ Ernest Joseph Simmons (1973). Tolstoy. Routledge. p. 260. ISBN 071007395X.
- ^ Richard A. Bowell (2004). The Seven Steps Of Spiritual Intelligence: The Practical Pursuit of Purpose, Success and Happiness. Nicholas Brealey Publishing. p. 199. ISBN 1857883446.
- ^ John C. Gibbs; Karen S. Basinger; Dick Fuller (1992). Moral Maturity: Measuring the Development of Sociomoral Reflection. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. p. 232. ISBN 0805804250.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ a b c Timothy Tang (2007). Real Answers to The Meaning of Life and Finding Happiness. iUniverse. p. 70. ISBN 9780595459414.
- ^ Tyler T. Roberts (1998). Contesting Spirit: Nietzsche, Affirmation, Religion. Princeton University Press. p. 256. ISBN 0691001278.
- ^ Lucy Costigan (2004). What Is the Meaning of Your Life: A Journey Towards Ultimate Meaning. iUniverse. p. 124. ISBN 0595338801.
- ^ Steven L. Jeffers; Harold Ivan Smith (2007). Finding a Sacred Oasis in Grief: A Resource Manual for Pastoral Care. Radcliffe Publishing. p. 188. ISBN 1846191815.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ David L. Jeffrey (1992). A Dictionary of Biblical Tradition in English Literature. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing. ISBN 0802836348.
- ^ Dana A. Williams (2005). "In the Light of Likeness-transformed": The Literary Art of Leon Forrest. Ohio State University Press. ISBN 0814209947.
- ^ Jerry Z. Muller (1997). Conservatism: An Anthology of Social and Political Thought from David Hume to the Present. Princeton University Press. p. 464. ISBN 0691037116.
- ^ Mary Nash; Bruce Stewart (2002). Spirituality and Social Care: Contributing to Personal and Community Well-being. Jessica Kingsley Publishers. p. 256. ISBN 184310024X.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Xinzhong Yao (2000). An Introduction to Confucianism. Cambridge University Press. p. 362. ISBN 0521644305.
- ^ Bryan S. Turner; Chris Rojek (2001). Society and Culture: Principles of Scarcity and Solidarity. SAGE. p. 272. ISBN 0761970495.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Anil Goonewardene (1994). Buddhist Scriptures. Harcourt Heinemann. p. 48. ISBN 0435303554.
- ^ a b Luc Ferry (2002). Man Made God: The Meaning of Life. University of Chicago Press. p. 172. ISBN 0226244849.
- ^ a b c Eric G. Stephan; R. Wayne Pace (2002). Powerful Leadership: How to Unleash the Potential in Others and Simplify Your Own Life. FT Press. p. 225. ISBN 0130668362.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ The Mutual-aid Approach to Working with Groups: Helping People Help One Another. Haworth Press. 2004. ISBN 0789014629.
{{cite book}}
: Unknown parameter|name=
ignored (help) - ^ John Caunt (2002). Boost Your Self-Esteem. Kogan Page. ISBN 0749438711.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j John Cook (2007). The Book of Positive Quotations. Fairview Press. p. 755. ISBN 1577491696.
- ^ Lee, Dong Yul (June 2000). "What Makes You Happy?: A Comparison of Self-reported Criteria of Happiness Between Two Cultures". Social Indicators Research. 50 (3): 351–362. doi:10.1023/A:1004647517069. ISSN 0303-8300. Retrieved 2007-07-26.
{{cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - ^ Social perspectives, ACM Digital Library
- ^ John Kultgen (1995). Autonomy and Intervention: Parentalism in the Caring Life. Oxford University Press US. p. 280. ISBN 0195085310.
- ^ a b Steve Chandler (2005). Reinventing Yourself: How to Become the Person You've Always Wanted to Be. Career Press. p. 224. ISBN 1564148173.
- ^ a b John G. West (2002). Celebrating Middle-Earth: The Lord of the Rings as a Defense of Western Civilization. Inkling Books. p. 108. ISBN 1587420120.
- ^ Rachel Madorsky (2003). Create Your Own Destiny!: Spiritual Path to Success. Avanty House. p. 296. ISBN 0970534949.
- ^ Douglas Adams. The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy. ISBN 0-330-25864-8.
{{cite book}}
: Unknown parameter|published=
ignored (help) - ^ Douglas Adams. Life, the Universe and Everything. ISBN 0-330-26738-8.
{{cite book}}
: Unknown parameter|published=
ignored (help) - ^ Douglas Adams (1 January 1980). The Restaurant at the End of the Universe. ISBN 0-345-39181-0.
- ^ Douglas Adams. So Long, and Thanks for All the Fish. ISBN 0-330-28700-1.
{{cite book}}
: Unknown parameter|published=
ignored (help) - ^ a b Monty Python's Completely Useless Web Site: Monty Python's The Meaning Of Life: Complete Script
- ^ Terry Burnham (2005). Mean Markets and Lizard Brains: How to Profit from the New Science of Irrationality. John Wiley and Sons. ISBN 0471716952.
- ^ Yolanda Fernandez (2002). In Their Shoes: Examining the Issue of Empathy and Its Place in the Treatment of Offenders. Wood 'N' Barnes Publishing. ISBN 1885473486.
- ^ Matt Lawrence (2004). Like a Splinter in Your Mind: The Philosophy Behind the Matrix Trilogy. Blackwell Publishing. ISBN 1405125241.
- ^ a b c d e Pregnant Pauses: Charlie & Lucy
- ^ AllGreatQuotes: Charlie Brown Quotes
- ^ Quote Details: Charles M. Schulz: That's the secret to life... replace one worry with another....
- ^ HamieNET.com [You're a Good Man, Charlie Brown] Happiness Lyrics
- ^ Quote Details: Charles M. Schulz: Life is like an ice cream cone...you have to lick it one day at a time.
- ^ AllGreatQuotes: Lucy Van Pelt Quotes
- ^ Chekhov Quote:You ask "What is life?" That is the same as asking "What is a carrot?" A carrot is a carrot and we know nothing more.
External links
General
- Meaningsoflife.com
- inTERRAgation.com – A documentary project and forum for discussion about life and its meaning.
- Meaningsoflife.tv – Video discussions on the ultimate meaning of life with various religious and philosophical leaders.
- Frequently Asked Questions about the Meaning of Life
- God's Will and The Meaning of Life: Creation is Love – A highly-trafficked blog-post which suggests simplifying and synthesizing the possibility of science and spiritual teachings being accurate... and then some.
- The Meaning of Life and other questions
- The Meaning of Life (or, What's it all about?) Lets step back a moment... Why do you want to know the meaning of life?
- Soulmates as The Meaning of Life
- The One Question – Free articles, exercises and tests on discovering purpose in life.
Scientific
Philosophical
- Einstein's credo
- Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy's entry on the meaning of life
- An Objective Philosophy: Why We Exist? – by Martin G. Walker.
- Hedonism & Meaning of life
- The Logic of Existential Meaning
- A Guide for the Godless: The Secular Path to Meaning