Ayn Rand: Difference between revisions
TallNapoleon (talk | contribs) Whoa, POV hagiography |
Revert to position protected - article is under ArbCom intervention, best no edits while that is resolved |
||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
Her political philosophy, reflected in both her fiction and her theoretical work, emphasizes [[individualism]], [[limited government]], and the constitutional protection of the [[right to life]], liberty, and property. She promoted the concept of the hero standing against the mob, amid derisive depictions of trade unions, socialism, and egalitarianism, arguing that [[Ethical egoism|rational self-interest]], properly understood, is the true standard of morality and that [[altruism]] is profoundly immoral.<ref name=Hicks>Hicks, Stephen R. C. [http://www.iep.utm.edu/r/rand.htm "Ayn Rand"], ''Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy'', 2006, accessed January 10, 2009.</ref> |
Her political philosophy, reflected in both her fiction and her theoretical work, emphasizes [[individualism]], [[limited government]], and the constitutional protection of the [[right to life]], liberty, and property. She promoted the concept of the hero standing against the mob, amid derisive depictions of trade unions, socialism, and egalitarianism, arguing that [[Ethical egoism|rational self-interest]], properly understood, is the true standard of morality and that [[altruism]] is profoundly immoral.<ref name=Hicks>Hicks, Stephen R. C. [http://www.iep.utm.edu/r/rand.htm "Ayn Rand"], ''Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy'', 2006, accessed January 10, 2009.</ref> |
||
She has attracted a following, mainly in America, where her views have influenced a number of public figures.<ref>A survey jointly conducted by the Library of Congress and the Book of the Month Club early in the 1990s asked readers to name the book that had most influenced their lives: ''Atlas Shrugged'' was second only to the Bible - ''Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy'', ''ibid''. She is not so well-known outside the U.S.: the [[Oxford Companion to English Literature]] (2000 edition), which mentions twentieth-century American writers such as [[William Burroughs]], [[Dorothy Parker]], [[H.L. Mencken]], [[Jack Kerouac]] and others, does not mention Rand. Nor does the ''[[Chambers Harrap|Chambers]] Biographical Dictionary''</ref> Within academia, her philosophical work has earned either no attention or has been criticized for its allegedly derivative nature,<ref>Walker, Jeff. ''The Ayn Rand Cult''. Open Court, 1998.<!--needs a page number--> Walker argues that everything Rand wrote was either derivative (from a combination of Jewish tradition, laissez-faire manifestos, and mystery novels), or devoid of literary value.</ref> a lack of rigor, and a limited understanding of the issues she wrote about,<ref>[[William Vallicella]], a Kant scholar, alleges that she misunderstood Kant, and outlines [http://maverickphilosopher.blogspot.com/2004/05/is-ayn-rand-good-philosopher.html here] what he sees as some elementary logical errors in her work.</ref> though an increasing interest in her writing saw the philosophy department of the University of Texas at Austin establish a fellowship in her name in 2001.<ref name=CohenGuardian>Cohen, David. [http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2001/dec/07/internationaleducationnews.highereducation "A growing concern"], ''The Guardian'', December 7, 2001. |
She has attracted a following, mainly in America, where her views have influenced a number of public figures.<ref>A survey jointly conducted by the Library of Congress and the Book of the Month Club early in the 1990s asked readers to name the book that had most influenced their lives: ''Atlas Shrugged'' was second only to the Bible - ''Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy'', ''ibid''. She is not so well-known outside the U.S.: the [[Oxford Companion to English Literature]] (2000 edition), which mentions twentieth-century American writers such as [[William Burroughs]], [[Dorothy Parker]], [[H.L. Mencken]], [[Jack Kerouac]] and others, does not mention Rand. Nor does the ''[[Chambers Harrap|Chambers]] Biographical Dictionary''</ref> Within academia, her philosophical work has earned either no attention or has been criticized for its allegedly derivative nature,<ref>Walker, Jeff. ''The Ayn Rand Cult''. Open Court, 1998.<!--needs a page number--> Walker argues that everything Rand wrote was either derivative (from a combination of Jewish tradition, laissez-faire manifestos, and mystery novels), or devoid of literary value.</ref> a lack of rigor, and a limited understanding of the issues she wrote about,<ref>[[William Vallicella]], a Kant scholar, alleges that she misunderstood Kant, and outlines [http://maverickphilosopher.blogspot.com/2004/05/is-ayn-rand-good-philosopher.html here] what he sees as some elementary logical errors in her work.</ref> though an increasing interest in her writing saw the philosophy department of the University of Texas at Austin establish a fellowship in her name in 2001.<ref name=CohenGuardian>Cohen, David. [http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2001/dec/07/internationaleducationnews.highereducation "A growing concern"], ''The Guardian'', December 7, 2001.</ref> |
||
==Life== |
==Life== |
||
Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
==Fiction== |
==Fiction== |
||
{{Main|The Night of January 16th|We the Living|Anthem (novella)}} |
{{Main|The Night of January 16th|We the Living|Anthem (novella)}} |
||
[[Plot]] was the essential structuring element in Ayn Rand's writing. She wrote, "...I write - and read - for the sake of the story." <ref>Mimi Reisel, ''The New Ayn Rand Companion'', p. 7, Greenwood Publishing Co., 1999 ISBN 978-0313303210</ref> |
|||
Rand's first literary success came with the sale of her screenplay ''Red Pawn'' in 1932 to [[Universal Studios]]. [[Josef Von Sternberg]] considered it for [[Marlene Dietrich]], but Russian themes were unpopular at the time, and the project came to nothing.<ref name="Turner">{{cite web|title="As Astonishing as Elvis"|last=Turner |first=Jenny |url=http://www.lrb.co.uk/v27/n23/turn03_.html|date=March 24, 2006}} Review of Jeff Briting's biography, ''Ayn Rand''.</ref> This was followed by the [[courtroom drama]] ''[[The Night of January 16th]]'' in 1934, on [[Broadway theater|Broadway]]. |
Rand's first literary success came with the sale of her screenplay ''Red Pawn'' in 1932 to [[Universal Studios]]. [[Josef Von Sternberg]] considered it for [[Marlene Dietrich]], but Russian themes were unpopular at the time, and the project came to nothing.<ref name="Turner">{{cite web|title="As Astonishing as Elvis"|last=Turner |first=Jenny |url=http://www.lrb.co.uk/v27/n23/turn03_.html|date=March 24, 2006}} Review of Jeff Briting's biography, ''Ayn Rand''.</ref> This was followed by the [[courtroom drama]] ''[[The Night of January 16th]]'' in 1934, on [[Broadway theater|Broadway]]. |
||
Line 154: | Line 151: | ||
Rand's views on [[gender role]] are controversial. While her books champion men and women as intellectual equals, she thought that physiological differences between the sexes led to fundamental psychological differences that were the source of legitimate gender roles, revolving around the man's initiatory role in the sex act. Rand denied endorsing any kind of power-difference between men and women, stating that man's "metaphysical dominance" in sexual relations refers to the man's role as the prime mover in sex and the necessity of male arousal for sex to occur.<ref name="Ayn Rand Answers">{{cite book |author=Rand, Ayn; Mayhew, Robert J. |title=Ayn Rand answers: the best of her Q & A |publisher=New American Library |location=New York |year=2005 |pages= |isbn=0-451-21665-2}}{{pn}}</ref> According to Rand, "For a woman ''qua'' woman, the essence of femininity is hero-worship—the desire to look up to man."<ref name = "iijwxo">{{cite journal |last=Rand |first=Ayn |title=An Answer to Readers (about a Woman President) |journal=The Objectivist |year=1968 |volume=7 |issue=12}}{{pn}}</ref> Rand believed that sex in its highest form is a physical response to intellectual and spiritual values, a means of giving concrete, physical expression to values that could otherwise only be experienced in the abstract. |
Rand's views on [[gender role]] are controversial. While her books champion men and women as intellectual equals, she thought that physiological differences between the sexes led to fundamental psychological differences that were the source of legitimate gender roles, revolving around the man's initiatory role in the sex act. Rand denied endorsing any kind of power-difference between men and women, stating that man's "metaphysical dominance" in sexual relations refers to the man's role as the prime mover in sex and the necessity of male arousal for sex to occur.<ref name="Ayn Rand Answers">{{cite book |author=Rand, Ayn; Mayhew, Robert J. |title=Ayn Rand answers: the best of her Q & A |publisher=New American Library |location=New York |year=2005 |pages= |isbn=0-451-21665-2}}{{pn}}</ref> According to Rand, "For a woman ''qua'' woman, the essence of femininity is hero-worship—the desire to look up to man."<ref name = "iijwxo">{{cite journal |last=Rand |first=Ayn |title=An Answer to Readers (about a Woman President) |journal=The Objectivist |year=1968 |volume=7 |issue=12}}{{pn}}</ref> Rand believed that sex in its highest form is a physical response to intellectual and spiritual values, a means of giving concrete, physical expression to values that could otherwise only be experienced in the abstract. |
||
In a [[McCall's]] magazine interview, Rand stated that while women are competent to be [[President of the United States]], as a matter of psychology, no rational woman would enjoy being in that position (as a woman in charge of men); she later explained that it would be psychologically damaging to the woman.<ref name = "iijwxo"/> She strongly opposed the modern [[feminist]] movement, despite supporting women needing careers and being the intellectual equals of men.<ref name="new left">{{cite book |author=Rand, Ayn |title=The New Left: The Anti-Industrial Revolution |publisher=Plume |location=New York |year=1993 |pages= |isbn=0-452-01125-6}}{{pn}}</ref> Feminist author [[Susan Brownmiller]] called Rand "a traitor to her own sex," while others, including [[Camille Paglia]] and the contributors to 1999's ''Feminist Interpretations of Ayn Rand,'' have noted Rand's "fiercely independent—and unapologetically sexual" heroines who are unbound by "tradition's chains ... [and] who had sex because they wanted to."<ref name="McLemee"> McLemee, Scott. {{cite web|title="The Heirs of Ayn Rand."|url=http://www.mclemee.com/id39.html|accessdate=2006-04-03}} originally in ''Lingua Franca'', September 1999. |
In a [[McCall's]] magazine interview, Rand stated that while women are competent to be [[President of the United States]], as a matter of psychology, no rational woman would enjoy being in that position (as a woman in charge of men); she later explained that it would be psychologically damaging to the woman.<ref name = "iijwxo"/> She strongly opposed the modern [[feminist]] movement, despite supporting women needing careers and being the intellectual equals of men.<ref name="new left">{{cite book |author=Rand, Ayn |title=The New Left: The Anti-Industrial Revolution |publisher=Plume |location=New York |year=1993 |pages= |isbn=0-452-01125-6}}{{pn}}</ref> Feminist author [[Susan Brownmiller]] called Rand "a traitor to her own sex," while others, including [[Camille Paglia]] and the contributors to 1999's ''Feminist Interpretations of Ayn Rand,'' have noted Rand's "fiercely independent—and unapologetically sexual" heroines who are unbound by "tradition's chains ... [and] who had sex because they wanted to."<ref name="McLemee"> McLemee, Scott. {{cite web|title="The Heirs of Ayn Rand."|url=http://www.mclemee.com/id39.html|accessdate=2006-04-03}} originally in ''Lingua Franca'', September 1999. </ref> |
||
Some of Rand's fiction features sex scenes with stylized erotic combat that some claim borders on [[rape]]. Rand said that if what ''The Fountainhead'' depicted was rape it was "rape by engraved invitation."<ref>{{cite book |author=Branden, Barbara |title=The passion of Ayn Rand |publisher=Doubleday |location=Garden City, N.Y |year=1986 |page=134 |isbn=0-385-19171-5}}</ref> In a review of a biography of Rand, writer Jenny Turner opined, <blockquote>"the sex in Rand’s novels is extraordinarily violent and fetishistic. In ''The Fountainhead,'' the first coupling of the heroes, heralded by whips and rock drills and horseback riding and cracks in marble, is ‘an act of scorn ... not as love, but as defilement’—in other words, a rape... In ''Atlas Shrugged,'' erotic tension is cleverly increased by having one heroine bound into a plot with lots of spectacularly cruel and handsome men.<ref name="Turner"/></blockquote> |
Some of Rand's fiction features sex scenes with stylized erotic combat that some claim borders on [[rape]]. Rand said that if what ''The Fountainhead'' depicted was rape it was "rape by engraved invitation."<ref>{{cite book |author=Branden, Barbara |title=The passion of Ayn Rand |publisher=Doubleday |location=Garden City, N.Y |year=1986 |page=134 |isbn=0-385-19171-5}}</ref> In a review of a biography of Rand, writer Jenny Turner opined, <blockquote>"the sex in Rand’s novels is extraordinarily violent and fetishistic. In ''The Fountainhead,'' the first coupling of the heroes, heralded by whips and rock drills and horseback riding and cracks in marble, is ‘an act of scorn ... not as love, but as defilement’—in other words, a rape... In ''Atlas Shrugged,'' erotic tension is cleverly increased by having one heroine bound into a plot with lots of spectacularly cruel and handsome men.<ref name="Turner"/></blockquote> |
Revision as of 23:02, 26 January 2009
Ayn Rand | |
---|---|
Half-length monochrome portrait photo of Ayn Rand, seated, holding a cigarette | |
Occupation | writer |
Notable works | The Fountainhead Atlas Shrugged |
Ayn Rand (/ˈaɪn ˈrænd/, February 2 [O.S. January 20] 1905 – March 6, 1982), was a Russian-American novelist, playwright, and screenwriter. She wrote the best-selling novels The Fountainhead and Atlas Shrugged and developed the philosophical system known as Objectivism. Born and educated in Russia, Rand emigrated to the United States in 1925. She based some of her writings on her personal experiences and was a fierce opponent of communism.
She worked as a screen-writer until 1932, when her first play was produced in Hollywood and Broadway. Her first successful novel was The Fountainhead, published in 1943, and her best-known work was the philosophical novel Atlas Shrugged, published in 1957.
Her political philosophy, reflected in both her fiction and her theoretical work, emphasizes individualism, limited government, and the constitutional protection of the right to life, liberty, and property. She promoted the concept of the hero standing against the mob, amid derisive depictions of trade unions, socialism, and egalitarianism, arguing that rational self-interest, properly understood, is the true standard of morality and that altruism is profoundly immoral.[1]
She has attracted a following, mainly in America, where her views have influenced a number of public figures.[2] Within academia, her philosophical work has earned either no attention or has been criticized for its allegedly derivative nature,[3] a lack of rigor, and a limited understanding of the issues she wrote about,[4] though an increasing interest in her writing saw the philosophy department of the University of Texas at Austin establish a fellowship in her name in 2001.[5]
Life
Childhood and education
Rand was born Alisa Zinov'yevna Rosenbaum (Russian: Алиса Зиновьевна Розенбаум) in 1905, into a middle-class family living in Saint Petersburg, Russia, the eldest of three daughters (Alisa, Natasha, and Nora),[6] to Zinovy Zacharovich Rosenbaum and Anna Borisovna Rosenbaum, agnostic and largely non-observant Jews. Her father was a chemist and a successful pharmaceutical entrepreneur who earned the privilege of living outside the Jewish Pale of Settlement.[7]
Rand was twelve at the time of the Russian revolution of 1917, and her family life was disrupted by the rise of the Bolshevik party. Her father's pharmacy was confiscated by the Soviets, and the family fled to the Crimea to recover financially. Rand then returned to Saint Petersburg to attend the University of Petrograd,[1] where she joined the department of social pedagogy, majoring in history with additional studies in philosophy, philology, and law.[8] She read Edmond Rostand, Friedrich Schiller, and Fyodor Dostoevsky, as well as the philosophical works of Friedrich Nietzsche, admiring his depiction of the hero in Thus Spake Zarathustra. She completed a three-year program and graduated in 1924,[8] after which she entered the State Institute for Cinema Arts to study screenwriting.
Immigration and marriage
In late 1925, she was granted a visa to visit American relatives. She arrived in the United States in February 1926, at the age of 21, entering by ship through New York City, which would ultimately become her home. After a brief stay with her relatives in Chicago, she resolved never to return to the Soviet Union, and set out for Hollywood to become a screenwriter. Already using Rand as a Cyrillic contraction of her surname, she adopted the name Ayn, which is of disputed origin.[9]
Initially, she struggled in Hollywood and took odd jobs to pay her basic living expenses. A chance meeting with famed director Cecil B. DeMille led to a job as an extra in his film, The King of Kings, and to subsequent work as a script reader.[10] She also worked as the head of the costume department at RKO Studios.[11] While working on The King of Kings, she intentionally bumped into an aspiring young actor, Frank O'Connor, who caught her eye. The two married on April 15, 1929, and remained married for fifty years, until O'Connor's death in 1979 at the age of 82. Rand became an American citizen in 1931.
Later years
Beginning in 1960, Rand was a visiting lecturer at several universities such as Yale University, Princeton University and Columbia University. In subsequent years, she went on to lecture at University of Wisconsin, Johns Hopkins University, Harvard University and MIT.[12] She received an honorary doctorate from Lewis & Clark College in 1963.[13]
For many years, she gave an annual lecture at the Ford Hall Forum, responding, afterwards, in her famously spirited form to questions from the audience.
Declining health and death
In 1973, she was briefly reunited with her youngest sister, Nora, who still lived in the Soviet Union.[14] Although Rand had written 1,200 letters to her family in the Soviet Union, and had attempted to bring them to the United States, she had ceased contacting them in 1937 after reading a notice in the post office that letters from Americans might imperil Russians at risk from Stalinist repression.[15] Rand received a letter from Nora in 1973 and invited her and her husband to America; but her sister's views had changed, and to Rand's disappointment Nora voluntarily returned to the USSR.[15]
Rand underwent surgery for lung cancer in 1974, and conflicts continued in the wake of the break with Branden and the subsequent collapse of the NBI. Several more of her closest "Collective" friends parted company with her, and during the late 1970s her activities within the Objectivist movement declined, especially after the death of her husband on November 9, 1979.[13] One of her final projects was work on a television adaptation of Atlas Shrugged. She had also planned to write another novel, To Lorne Dieterling, but did not get far in her notes.[16]
Rand died of heart failure on March 6, 1982 at her 34th Street home in New York City,[17] years after having successfully battled cancer, and was interred in the Kensico Cemetery, Valhalla, New York. Rand's funeral was attended by some of her prominent followers, including Alan Greenspan. David Kelley read her favorite poem Rudyard Kipling's "If—". A six-foot floral arrangement in the shape of a dollar sign was placed near her casket.[11]
Fiction
Rand's first literary success came with the sale of her screenplay Red Pawn in 1932 to Universal Studios. Josef Von Sternberg considered it for Marlene Dietrich, but Russian themes were unpopular at the time, and the project came to nothing.[18] This was followed by the courtroom drama The Night of January 16th in 1934, on Broadway.
Her first novel, the semi-autobiographical We the Living, appeared the same year. Set in communist Russia, it focused on the struggle between the individual and the state. The novella Anthem followed, a vision of a dystopian future world in which collectivism has triumphed to such an extent that even the word "I" has vanished from the language and from man's memory.
The Fountainhead
Rand's first major success came with The Fountainhead in 1943, a romantic drama and philosophical work that she wrote over a period of seven years. The novel centers around an uncompromising young architect named Howard Roark, and his struggle against what Rand described as "second-handers" — those who attempt to live through others, placing others above self. It was rejected by twelve publishers before finally being accepted by the Bobbs-Merrill Company on the insistence of editorial board member Archibald Ogden.[19] The novel became a film in 1949, produced by Warner Brothers, starring Gary Cooper and Patricia Neal, with the screenplay written by Rand herself. She had already written screenplays for two other Hollywood movies, Love Letters and You Came Along.
The Fountainhead eventually became a worldwide success, bringing Rand fame and financial security. In the sixty-six years since it was published, it has sold six million copies, and continues to sell about 100,000 copies per year.[19]
Atlas Shrugged
Rand's magnum opus, the 1,100-page Atlas Shrugged, was published in 1957. Because of the success of The Fountainhead, the initial print run was 100,000 copies, and the book went on to become an international bestseller, with many interviewees citing it as the book that most influenced them. It currently sells almost 200,000 copies annually. (See Popular interest and influence, below.)
The theme of Atlas Shrugged is the morality of rational self-interest. It advocates the core tenets of Rand's philosophy of Objectivism and expresses her idea of human greatness. The plot involves a dystopian United States in which industrialists and other creative individuals go on strike and retreat to a mountainous hideaway where they build an independent free economy. The hero, John Galt, describes the strike as "stopping the motor of the world" by withdrawing the people that Rand saw as contributing the most to the nation's productivity and creativity. With their strike, they aim to demonstrate that, without "the men of the mind," the economy would collapse and society would fall apart. The novel includes elements of mystery and science fiction, and contains Rand's most extensive statement of Objectivism in any of her works of fiction, including a lengthy monologue delivered by John Galt.
Objectivism
Rand saw her views as constituting a complete philosophical system, which she called "Objectivism." She embraced philosophical realism and advocated rational egoism, or rational self-interest, as a guiding moral principle. Her politics are generally described as minarchist and libertarian, though she did not use the first term and disavowed any connection to the second.[20] She wrote of Objectivism that it amounted to "the concept of man as a heroic being, with his own happiness as the moral purpose of his life, with productive achievement as his noblest activity, and reason as his only absolute."[21] The individual "must exist for his own sake," she wrote in 1962, "neither sacrificing himself to others nor sacrificing others to himself.[22]
She supported laissez-faire capitalism, holding that the sole function of government ought to be the protection of individual rights, including property rights. Rejecting faith as antithetical to reason, she opposed any form of mysticism or supernaturalism, including organized religion.
Rand saw the initiation of force or fraud as immoral, and held that government action should consist only in protecting citizens from criminal aggression (via the police), foreign aggression (via the military), and in maintaining a system of courts to decide guilt in criminal cases and to resolve civil disputes. In a 1976 Q&A session, she said that the most important parts of her philosophy were her "theory of concepts, my ethics, and my discovery in politics that evil—the violation of rights—consists of the initiation of force."[23]
She was greatly influenced by Aristotle and found early inspiration in Friedrich Nietzsche, although she later rejected his approach, holding it to be anti-reason. She was vociferously opposed to the views of Immanuel Kant, particularly those claiming the inability of reason to know reality "as it is in itself." Addressing the United States Military Academy at West Point on March 6, 1974, she said that, "[f]or some two hundred years, under the influence of Immanuel Kant, the dominant trend of philosophy has been directed to a single goal: the destruction of man's mind, of his confidence in the power of reason," and continued:
Today's mawkish concern with and compassion for the feeble, the flawed, the suffering, the guilty, is a cover for the profoundly Kantian hatred of the innocent, the strong, the able, the successful, the virtuous, the confident, the happy. A philosophy out to destroy man's mind is necessarily a philosophy of hatred for man, for man's life, and for every human value. Hatred of the good for being the good, is the hallmark of the twentieth century."[24]
She recognized an intellectual kinship with John Locke in political philosophy, agreeing with Locke's ideas that individuals have a right to the products of their own labor and have natural rights to life, liberty, and property. Unlike Locke, she found the basis for individual rights in man's nature as a being whose survival depends upon his independent exercise of reason. She agreed in a general way with the philosophies of the Age of Enlightenment and the Age of Reason and reported her approval of specific philosophical positions, including some of Baruch Spinoza and St. Thomas Aquinas.
Objectivist movement
In 1951 Rand moved from Los Angeles to 36 East 36th Street (across from the J.P. Morgan Library) in New York City, the city she most loved and admired. From 1965 to her death in 1982, she resided at 120 East 34th Street. In New York, she formed a group (jokingly designated "The Collective") which included future Federal Reserve chairman Alan Greenspan, a young psychology student named Nathan Blumenthal (later Nathaniel Branden) and his wife Barbara, and Leonard Peikoff, all of whom had been profoundly influenced by The Fountainhead. Rand launched the Objectivist movement with this group to promote her philosophy.
The group originally started out as an informal gathering of friends who met with Rand on weekends at her apartment to discuss philosophy; later the Collective would proceed to play a larger, more formal role, reading Atlas Shrugged as the manuscript pages were written and promoting Rand's philosophy through the Nathaniel Branden Institute (NBI), established by him for that purpose. Many Collective members gave lectures at the NBI and in cities across the United States, while others wrote articles for her publications, The Objectivist Newsletter and The Objectivist. Throughout the 1960s and 1970s, Rand developed and promoted her Objectivist philosophy through both her fiction and non-fiction works, and by giving talks at several prominent universities, including Yale, Columbia, and the University of Michigan. "The Objectivist Newsletter, later expanded and renamed simply The Objectivist, contained essays by Rand, Branden, and other associates ... that analyzed current political events and applied the principles of Objectivism to everyday life."[14] Rand later published some of these in book form.
After several years, Rand's close relationship with the much younger Branden turned into a romantic affair, with the consent of their spouses.[25] It lasted until Branden (having separated from Barbara) entered into an affair with the young actress Patrecia Scott, whom he later married. The Brandens hid the affair from Rand, lied about it (by their own admission). When Rand found out, she abruptly ended her relationship with both Brandens and with NBI, which closed. She published a letter in The Objectivist repudiating Branden for dishonesty and other "irrational behavior",[26] never disclosing their affair. Both Brandens remain personae non gratae with certain Objectivists, particularly the group that formed the Ayn Rand Institute.
Several prominent critics of the movement denoted it as a "cult"[27] claiming that it exhibited typical cult traits, including slavish adherence to unprovable doctrine and extreme adulation of the founder. Objectivists counter that even if some of Rand's followers have acted like cultists, this was not intended by Rand, and note that Rand explicitly condemned "blind followers."[28]
Epistemological views
Rand held that epistemology—the theory of knowledge—was fundamental to philosophy. She wrote that her advocacy of capitalism in politics and egoism in ethics was only a consequence of her advocacy of reason in epistemology. She defined "reason" as "the faculty that identifies and integrates the material provided by man's senses."
To defend and explain her position on reason, she developed a theory of sense-perception that distinguishes between the form and object of perception, holding that the form in which an organism perceives is determined by its physiological means of perception but that in whatever form it perceives, what it perceives—the object of its perception—is reality. She rejected the Kantian dichotomy between "things as we perceive them" and "things as they are in themselves." Perception, she held, is the unchallengeable given; perception, being physiologically determined, cannot make mistakes or err. Apparent errors, such as in "optical illusions," she regarded as errors in the conceptual identification of what is seen, not in the seeing itself. Perception is, she argued, automatic, infallible, and provides the base for the non-automatic, fallible processes of conceptual interpretation and inference that is the sphere of reason.
In her 1979 work, Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology, Rand presented her novel theory of concepts—in effect, her solution to the age-old "problem of universals." In essence, her theory holds that concepts (abstract ideas) are classifications of existents that possess commensurable characteristics. Things that are similar, she held, have "the same characteristic but in different measure or degree." Seeing many links between concepts and mathematics, her theory of concepts uses such mathematical terms as "unit," "measurement," and "common denominator." Her definition of "concept" is: "A concept is a mental integration of two or more units possessing the same distinguishing characteristic(s), with their particular measurements omitted."
In other areas of epistemology, she advanced a theory that concepts, and knowledge generally, is both contextual and hierarchical. She rejected the "analytic-synthetic" dichotomy, holding that the meaning of a concept includes all the characteristics of its referents, including those yet to be discovered. Her overall theory of the cognitive function of concepts was that they expand man's range of awareness by condensing the number of units one needs to hold in mind in one frame of awareness ("unit-economy").
A strong advocate of Aristotelian logic, she titled the three parts of Atlas Shrugged with the names of the three axioms of Aristotelian logic: "A is A," "Non-Contradiction," and "Either/Or." In regard to inductive logic, she held that her theory of concepts would provide the basis for a new approach to validating inductive generalization, and Leonard Peikoff has attempted this development.
For more discussion of her epistemology, see Objectivism: The Philosophy of Ayn Rand by Leonard Peikoff and On Ayn Rand by Allan Gotthelf.
Ethics
Rand's ethical egoism is her most well-known position. She advocated "rational selfishness." In The Virtue of Selfishness she gave an original validation of her moral code, claiming to have bridged the infamous gap between "Is" and "Ought"—or between facts and values. She begins by asking "What are values? Why does man need them?" She argues that the concept of "value" depends upon the concept of an "alternative" in the face of which one must act. "Where no alternatives exist, no goals and no values are possible."[29] The next point in her derivation is to argue that "there is only one fundamental alternative in the universe: existence or non-existence—and it pertains to a single class of entities: to living organisms. The existence of inanimate matter is unconditional, the existence of life is not: it depends on a specific course of action....It is only a living organism that faces a constant alternative: the issue of life or death....It is only the concept of 'Life' that makes the concept of 'Value' possible."[29]
All living organisms, she held, act to gain values—i.e., the items their survival requires. An organism's own life is its ultimate value. But man enters the sphere of moral values because man has free will: one does not automatically hold his own life as his ultimate value. Whether he acts to promote and fulfill his own life or not is up to him, not hard-wired into his physiology. "Man has the power to act as his own destroyer—and that is the way he has acted through most of his history."[30] The purpose of a moral code, Rand held, is to provide a standard of value and a code of virtues by reference to which man can achieve the values his survival requires and which enhance his life. Her standard of value is: "Man's life qua rational being," and rationality is the primary virtue of this code. The derivative virtues of her Objectivist morality are: independence, integrity, honesty, justice, productiveness, and pride—each of which she explains in some detail in "The Objectivist Ethics."
Integrating with this is her view that the primary locus of man's free will is in the choice: to think or not to think. "Thinking is not an automatic function. In any hour and issue of his life, man is free to think or to evade that effort. Thinking requires a state of full, focused awareness. The act of focusing one's consciousness is volitional. Man can focus his mind to a full, active, purposefully directed awareness of reality—or he can unfocus it and let himself drift in a semiconscious daze, merely reacting to any chance stimulus of the immediate moment, at the mercy of his undirected sensory-perceptual mechanism and of any random, associational connections it might happen to make."[31]
She concludes that "for you, who are a human being, the question 'to be or not to be' is the question 'to think or not to think.'"[32]
Political and social views
Rand held that the only moral social system is laissez-faire capitalism. Her political views were strongly individualist and hence anti-statist and anti-Communist. She exalted what she saw as the heroic American values of rational egoism and individualism. As a champion of rationality, Rand also had a strong opposition to mysticism and religion, which she believed helped foster a crippling culture acting against individual human happiness and success. Rand detested many prominent liberal and conservative politicians of her time, including prominent anti-Communists, such as Harry S. Truman, Ronald Reagan, Hubert Humphrey, and Joseph McCarthy.
Many consider Rand one of the three founding mothers (along with Rose Wilder Lane and Isabel Paterson) of modern American libertarianism, although she rejected libertarianism and the libertarian movement.[33]
War
While Rand often criticized conventional motivations for U.S. involvement in World War I, World War II,[34] and the Korean War, she approved American action when strictly justified in response to an attack, as in World War II.[35] She strongly denounced pacifism: "When a nation resorts to war, it has some purpose, rightly or wrongly, something to fight for—and the only justifiable purpose is self-defense."[36]
Rand opposed the Vietnam War,[36] but also believed that unilateral American withdrawal would be a mistake of appeasement that would embolden communists and the Soviet Union.[34] Her opposition to the Vietnam War was based on her view that no actual American self-interest was involved, that it was an exercise in self-sacrifice, not self-defense. She vehemently opposed the draft and her argument that a draft violates the right to life motivated some of those in the Nixon Administration who worked for the draft's repeal.
Rand supported Israel during the 1973 Arab-Israeli War, which she saw as an attack by a primitive society on a government that largely supported individual rights.[37] While Rand characterized Israel as "a mixed economy inclined toward socialism," this was secondary to the consideration that "when it comes to the power of the mind—the development of industry in that wasted desert continent—versus savages who don't want to use their minds, then if one cares about the future of civilization, don't wait for the government to do something. Give whatever you can".
Economics
Rand expressed qualified enthusiasm for the economic thought of Ludwig von Mises and Henry Hazlitt, and The Ludwig von Mises Institute notes that "it was largely as a result of Ayn's efforts that the work of von Mises began to reach its potential audience."[38] Later Objectivists, such as Richard Salsman, have claimed that Rand's economic theories are implicitly more supportive of the doctrines of Jean-Baptiste Say, though Rand herself was likely not acquainted with his work.[citation needed]
Charity
Rand did not see charity as a moral duty or a major virtue and held charity to be proper only when the recipient is worthy and when it does not involve sacrifice.[39] She opposed all forms of aid given by governments, just as she opposed any other government activity not directed at protecting individual rights.
Gender and sex
Rand's views on gender role are controversial. While her books champion men and women as intellectual equals, she thought that physiological differences between the sexes led to fundamental psychological differences that were the source of legitimate gender roles, revolving around the man's initiatory role in the sex act. Rand denied endorsing any kind of power-difference between men and women, stating that man's "metaphysical dominance" in sexual relations refers to the man's role as the prime mover in sex and the necessity of male arousal for sex to occur.[40] According to Rand, "For a woman qua woman, the essence of femininity is hero-worship—the desire to look up to man."[41] Rand believed that sex in its highest form is a physical response to intellectual and spiritual values, a means of giving concrete, physical expression to values that could otherwise only be experienced in the abstract.
In a McCall's magazine interview, Rand stated that while women are competent to be President of the United States, as a matter of psychology, no rational woman would enjoy being in that position (as a woman in charge of men); she later explained that it would be psychologically damaging to the woman.[41] She strongly opposed the modern feminist movement, despite supporting women needing careers and being the intellectual equals of men.[42] Feminist author Susan Brownmiller called Rand "a traitor to her own sex," while others, including Camille Paglia and the contributors to 1999's Feminist Interpretations of Ayn Rand, have noted Rand's "fiercely independent—and unapologetically sexual" heroines who are unbound by "tradition's chains ... [and] who had sex because they wanted to."[43]
Some of Rand's fiction features sex scenes with stylized erotic combat that some claim borders on rape. Rand said that if what The Fountainhead depicted was rape it was "rape by engraved invitation."[44] In a review of a biography of Rand, writer Jenny Turner opined,
"the sex in Rand’s novels is extraordinarily violent and fetishistic. In The Fountainhead, the first coupling of the heroes, heralded by whips and rock drills and horseback riding and cracks in marble, is ‘an act of scorn ... not as love, but as defilement’—in other words, a rape... In Atlas Shrugged, erotic tension is cleverly increased by having one heroine bound into a plot with lots of spectacularly cruel and handsome men.[18]
Rand's viewed homosexuality as "immoral" and "disgusting."[45] and said that "there is a psychological immorality at the root of homosexuality" because "it involves psychological flaws, corruptions, errors, or unfortunate premises."[46]. She did however say the government has no right to prohibit homosexual behavior [45]. Her position on this subject has been controversial within the objectivist movement. [47]
Race
Rand vehemently opposed ethnic and racial prejudice on moral grounds, in essays like "Racism" and "Global Balkanization," while still arguing for the right of individuals and businesses to act on such prejudice without government intervention. She wrote, "Racism is the lowest, most crudely primitive form of collectivism ... [the notion] that a man is to be judged, not by his own character and actions, but by the characters and actions of a collective of ancestors,"[48] but opposed governmental remedies for this problem: "Private racism is not a legal, but a moral issue—and can be fought only by private means, such as economic boycott or social ostracism."[49]
HUAC testimony
In 1947, during the Second Red Scare, Rand testified as a "friendly witness" before the United States House Un-American Activities Committee. Her testimony regarded the disparity between her personal experiences in the Soviet Union and the whitewashed portrayal of it in the 1944 film Song of Russia. Rand argued that the film grossly misrepresented the socioeconomic conditions in the Soviet Union and portrayed life in the USSR as being much better and happier than it actually was. Furthermore, she believed that even if a temporary alliance with the USSR was necessary to defeat the Nazis, the case for this should not have been made by portraying what she believed were falsely positive images of Soviet life:
If we had good reason, if that is what you believe, all right, then why not tell the truth? Say it is a dictatorship, but we want to be associated with it. Say it is worthwhile being associated with the devil, as Churchill said, in order to defeat another evil which is Hitler. There might be some good argument made for that. But why pretend that Russia was not what it was?"[50]
After the hearings, when Rand was asked about her feelings on the effectiveness of their investigations, she described the process as "futile".[50]
Legacy
After decades of dismissal or outright hostility from the profession, Rand's ideas have found some recognition within academic philosophy. Clemson University and The University of Texas at Austin have established chairs or centers which involve the study of Rand's views. In 2001 a $300,000 fellowship was sponsored by the Anthem Foundation for Objectivist Scholarship at the University of Texas.[5] Her books continue to be widely sold and read, with 25 million copies sold (as of 2007), and 800,000 more being sold each year.[51] Following Rand's death, continued conflict within the Objectivist movement led to establishment of independent organizations.
Institutes
A range of institutes have been established since Rand's death
Ayn Rand Institute
In 1985, Leonard Peikoff, a surviving member of "The Collective" and Ayn Rand's legal heir, established "The Ayn Rand Institute: The Center for the Advancement of Objectivism" (ARI). The Ayn Rand Institute "works to introduce young people to Ayn Rand's novels, to support scholarship and research based on her ideas, and to promote the principles of reason, rational self-interest, individual rights and laissez-faire capitalism to the widest possible audience."
Ayn Rand Center for Individual Rights
In 2008, The Ayn Rand Institute opened the Ayn Rand Center for Individual Rights ("ARC") in Washington, D.C. to specialize in issues of public policy. During the current economic crisis, the ARC has been a vocal proponent of the position that government intervention is responsible for the crisis, and that the solution lies not in further government regulation but in a return to full laissez-faire capitalism. On foreign policy, the ARC advocates American national self-interest, including ending the regimes that sponsor terrorism, rather than the Bush Administration's policies which they see as timid, halfway measures that only weaken America's position in the world.
The Anthem Foundation for Objectivist Scholarship
Organized in 2000 by historian John McCaskey, this Foundation provides grants for the pursuit of scholarly work on Objectivism in academia. Recent grants have gone to the University of Pittsburgh (Department of History and Philosophy of Science) and to philosophy departments at the University of Texas at Austin, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and Warwick University (England).
The Objectivist Center and The Atlas Society
Arose as a result of a schism in the movement in 1989 (the reasons for which remain disputed). David Kelley was denounced by Peikoff and expelled from the Ayn Rand Institute at which point Kelley founded The Institute for Objectivist Studies, now known as The Atlas Society, which has its own web site that is focused on attracting readers of Ayn Rand's fiction. The associated Objectivist Center division deals with more academic ventures. The Atlas Society/Objectivist Center also publishes The New Individualist (formerly Navigator).
Popular interest and influence
Although Rand's influence has been greatest in the United States, she has a growing international following.[5] Her books were international best sellers, and they continue to sell in large numbers.[52] For example, Atlas Shrugged is consistently in the top few hundred best sellers at Amazon.com;[53] 185,000 copies were sold in 2007, fifty years after it was first published.[54]
When asked in a 1991 survey by the Library of Congress and the Book-of-the-Month Club what the most influential book in the respondent's life was, Rand's Atlas Shrugged was the second most popular choice, after the Bible.[55] Readers polled in 1998 and 1999 by Modern Library placed four of her books on the 100 Best Novels list (Atlas Shrugged, The Fountainhead, Anthem, and We the Living were in first, second, seventh, and eighth place, respectively) and one on the 100 Best Nonfiction list (The Virtue of Selfishness, in first place), with books about Rand and her philosophy in third and sixth place.[56] However, the validity of such polls has been disputed.[57] Freestar Media/Zogby polls conducted in 2007 found that around 8 percent of American adults have read Atlas Shrugged.[58]
Rand has had an influence on a number of notable people in different fields. Examples include philosophers such as John Hospers, George H. Smith, Allan Gotthelf, Robert Mayhew and Tara Smith, economists such as George Reisman and Murray Rothbard, psychologists such as Nathaniel Branden, historians such as Eric Daniels, and political writers such as Charles Murray. Former Chairman of the Federal Reserve Alan Greenspan, U.S. Congressmen Ron Paul, and Bob Barr, and Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States Clarence Thomas have acknowledged her influence on their lives. The "Randex" website lists recent media references to Rand or her work. Although not Objectivists, the popular right-wing pundit Rush Limbaugh makes frequent positive reference to "Atlas" on his radio program,[citation needed] and former President Ronald Reagan described himself as an "admirer" of Rand in private correspondence in the 1960s.[59]
BioShock, an award-winning video game released in the summer of 2007, is built around a story influenced by Rand's philosophy and Atlas Shrugged.[60]
Rand appears on a 33 cent U.S. postage stamp,[61] which debuted April 22, 1999 in New York City.
Rand's work and academic philosophy
During Rand's lifetime her work was not given much attention by academic philosophers, and currently only a few universities consider Rand or Objectivism to be a philosophical specialty or research area. Many adherents and practitioners of continental philosophy criticize her celebration of self-interest, and as a result there has been little focus on her work in this intellectual discipline. However, since her death in 1982, there has been an increase in interest in Ayn Rand's work.[62] In a 1999 interview in the Chronicle of Higher Education, Rand scholar Chris Matthew Sciabarra said, "I know they laugh at Rand," while forecasting a growth of interest in her work in the academic community.[63]
Fellowships for the study of Ayn Rand's ideas have been established by the Anthem Foundation for Objectivist Scholarship at academic institutions such as the University of Texas at Austin.[64].
The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies (JARS), a self-described "nonpartisan" peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the study of Ayn Rand—principally her philosophic work—is published twice yearly.[65]
The Ayn Rand Society, founded in 1987 and affiliated with the American Philosophical Association, has been active in sponsoring seminars.[66] A 2006 conference at the University of Pittsburgh, "Concepts and Objectivity: Knowledge, Science, and Values," featured presentations by Objectivists Onkar Ghate, Allan Gotthelf, James Lennox, and Darryl Wright alongside non-Objectivist academics such as A.P. Martinich and Peter Railton.[67]
In 2006, Cambridge University Press published Ayn Rand's Normative Ethics: The Virtuous Egoist, a volume on Rand's ethical theory written by ARI-affiliated scholar Tara Smith, a philosophy professor at the University of Texas at Austin. A review of Smith's book by Helen Cullyer of the University of Pittsburgh, published in Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews, ends with the following:
It should be stressed in conclusion that whether one is a fan or a detractor of Ayn Rand, the issues raised by this book are manifold and provocative. This book should force a debate of renewed vigor about what we mean by egoism, whether and how the egoism/altruism dichotomy should be applied within eudaemonistic ethical theories, and what our ethical theories imply about our political outlook. Smith provides us with a version of egoism that will need to be argued against by those who find it distasteful or misguided, rather than simply dismissed.[68]
Criticism
Rand has remained controversial. On the left, linguist and cognitive philosopher[69] Noam Chomsky considers Rand: "one of the most evil figures of modern intellectual history."[70]
On the right, conservative commentator and founder of the National Review William F. Buckley declared in his obituary for the New York Times that: "Ayn Rand is dead. So, incidentally, is the philosophy she sought to launch dead; it was in fact stillborn."[71]
Philosophical criticism
Online U.S. News and World Report columnist Sara Dabney Tisdale says academic philosophers have generally dismissed Rand's ideas, and Atlas Shrugged in particular, as "sophomoric, preachy, and unoriginal."[72] In addition, Greg Nyquist has written that Rand's philosophy fundamentally misunderstands the very core of human nature.[73]
One significant exception to the general lack of attention paid to Rand in academic philosophy is the essay "On the Randian Argument" by Harvard University philosopher Robert Nozick, which appears in his collection, Socratic Puzzles.[74][75][76] Nozick is sympathetic to Rand's political conclusions, but does not think her arguments justify them. In particular, his essay criticizes her foundational argument in ethics—laid out most explicitly in her book The Virtue of Selfishness—which claims that one's own life is, for each individual, the ultimate value because it makes all other values possible. Nozick says that to make this argument sound one needs to explain why someone could not rationally prefer dying and thus having no values. Therefore, he argues, her attempt to defend the morality of selfishness is essentially an instance of begging the question. Nozick also argues that Rand's solution to David Hume's famous is-ought problem is unsatisfactory.[needs context] Tara Smith responds to this criticism in her book Viable Values.[page needed] Philosophers Douglas Rasmussen and Douglas Den Uyl have also responded to Nozick's article, arguing that there are basic misstatements of Rand's case on Nozick's part.[77]
Rand has also been accused of misinterpreting the works of many of the philosophers that she criticized in her writing. According to Fred Seddon, author of Ayn Rand, Objectivists, and the History of Philosophy (2003), Nathaniel Branden stated that Rand never read any of Kant's works.[78]
Finally, Murray Rothbard (who helped define modern libertarianism and anarcho-capitalism),[79] Jeff Walker,[80] and Michael Shermer(libertarian and founder of the The Skeptics Society),[81] have accused Objectivism of being a cult, claiming that it exhibited typical cult traits, including slavish adherence to unprovable doctrine and extreme adulation of the founder.
Literary criticism
Rand's novels, when they were first published, "received almost unanimously terrible reviews"[18] and were derided by some critics as long and melodramatic.[82] However, they became bestsellers due largely to word of mouth.[18] Scholars of English and American literature have largely ignored her work, although Rand has received occasional positive reviews from the literary establishment.[83][84][85]
The most famous review of Rand's novel Atlas Shrugged was written by the conservative author Whittaker Chambers and appeared in National Review in 1957. It was unrelentingly scathing. Chambers called the book "sophomoric"; and "remarkably silly," and said it "can be called a novel only by devaluing the term." He described the tone of the book as "shrillness without reprieve." Chambers accused Rand of supporting the same godless system as the Soviets, claiming "From almost any page of Atlas Shrugged, a voice can be heard, from painful necessity, commanding: 'To the gas chambers—go!'"[86] Five decades later, The Intellectual Activist published a reply, arguing that Chambers had not actually read the book, as he misspelled the names of two major characters and used no quotations from the novel in his critique.[87]
Another critic, Mimi Gladstein (author of The New Ayn Rand Companion), called Rand's characters flat and uninteresting, and her heroes implausibly wealthy, intelligent, physically attractive and free of doubt while arrayed against antagonists who are weak, pathetic, full of uncertainty, and lacking in imagination and talent.[88]
Rand stated in a 1963 essay, titled "The Goal of My Writing", that her fiction was intentionally different in that its goal was to project a vision of an ideal man: not man as he is, but man as he might be and ought to be. Rand, who described herself as a "romantic realist", presented her theory of aesthetics more fully in her 1969 book, The Romantic Manifesto: A Philosophy of Literature.
Bibliography
Fiction
- Night of January 16th (1934) ISBN 0-452-26486-3
- We the Living (1936) ISBN 0-451-18784-9
- Anthem (1938) ISBN 0-451-19113-7
- The Fountainhead (1943) ISBN 0-451-19115-3
- Atlas Shrugged (1957) ISBN 0-451-19114-5
Nonfiction
- For the New Intellectual (1961) ISBN 0-451-16308-7
- The Virtue of Selfishness (with Nathaniel Branden) (1964) ISBN 0-451-16393-1
- Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal (with Nathaniel Branden, Alan Greenspan, and Robert Hessen) (1966) ISBN 0-451-14795-2
- Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology (1967) ISBN 0-452-01030-6 (expanded second edition)
- The Romantic Manifesto (1969) ISBN 0-451-14916-5
- The New Left: The Anti-Industrial Revolution (1971) ISBN 0-452-01184-1
- Philosophy: Who Needs It posthumously edited by Leonard Peikoff (1982) ISBN 0-451-13893-7. The title essay was originally an address to the 1974 graduating class of the United States Military Academy.[3]
Posthumous works
- The Early Ayn Rand (edited and with commentary by Leonard Peikoff) (1984)
- The Voice of Reason: Essays in Objectivist Thought (edited by Leonard Peikoff; additional essays by Leonard Peikoff and Peter Schwartz) (1989)
- Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology second edition (edited by Harry Binswanger; additional material by Leonard Peikoff) (1990)
- Letters of Ayn Rand (edited by Michael S. Berliner) (1995)
- Journals of Ayn Rand (edited by David Harriman) (1997)
- Ayn Rand's Marginalia: Her Critical Comments on the Writings of over Twenty Authors (edited by Robert Mayhew) (1998)
- The Ayn Rand Column: Written for the Los Angeles Times (edited by Peter Schwartz) (1998)
- Russian Writings on Hollywood (edited by Michael S. Berliner) (1999)
- Return of the Primitive: The Anti-Industrial Revolution (expanded edition of The New Left; edited and with additional essays by Peter Schwartz) (1999)
- The Art of Fiction (edited by Tore Boeckmann) (2000)
- The Art of Nonfiction (edited by Robert Mayhew) (2001)
- The Objectivism Research CD-ROM (collection of most of Rand's works in CD-ROM format) (2001)
- Three Plays (2005)
- Ayn Rand Answers (edited by Robert Mayhew) (2005)
Film adaptations
Without Rand's knowledge or permission, We the Living was made into a pair of films, Noi vivi and Addio, Kira in 1942 by Scalara Films, Rome. They were nearly censored by the Italian government under Benito Mussolini, but they were permitted because the novel upon which they were based was anti-Soviet. The films were successful, and the public easily realized that they were as much against Fascism as Communism. These films were re-edited into a new version which was approved by Rand and re-released as We the Living in 1986.
The Fountainhead[89] was a Hollywood film (1949, Warner Bros.) starring Gary Cooper, for which Rand wrote the screen-play. Rand initially insisted that Frank Lloyd Wright design the architectural models used in the film, but relented when his fee was too high.[90]
A film adaptation of Atlas Shrugged is in pre-production as of early 2008, with production possibly starting in December if the script can be revised in time.[91] In September 2007, Lions Gate Films reported that it had hired Vadim Perelman to revise Randall Wallace's script and to direct the film, with screen star Angelina Jolie cast in the role of Dagny Taggart.[92] Jolie's 2008 pregnancy and Perelman's departure have cast the project into doubt.[93]
The Passion of Ayn Rand,[94] an independent film about her life, was made in 1999, starring Helen Mirren as Ayn Rand, Eric Stoltz, Julie Delpy and Peter Fonda. The film was based on the book by Barbara Branden, one of her former associates, and won several awards including an Emmy for Helen Mirren and a Golden Globe for Peter Fonda. This film's accuracy and fairness to Rand has been questioned by The Passion of Ayn Rand's Critics, by James Valliant, and even by associates of Barbara Branden, such as Robert Bidinotto.
A documentary film about Rand's life, Ayn Rand: A Sense of Life, was nominated for the Academy Award for Best Documentary of the Year.
Screenplays
In addition to the screenplay of The Fountainhead, Rand also collaborated on screenplays of You Came Along and the Oscar-nominated Love Letters, both filmed in 1945.
Notes
- ^ a b Hicks, Stephen R. C. "Ayn Rand", Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2006, accessed January 10, 2009.
- ^ A survey jointly conducted by the Library of Congress and the Book of the Month Club early in the 1990s asked readers to name the book that had most influenced their lives: Atlas Shrugged was second only to the Bible - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ibid. She is not so well-known outside the U.S.: the Oxford Companion to English Literature (2000 edition), which mentions twentieth-century American writers such as William Burroughs, Dorothy Parker, H.L. Mencken, Jack Kerouac and others, does not mention Rand. Nor does the Chambers Biographical Dictionary
- ^ Walker, Jeff. The Ayn Rand Cult. Open Court, 1998. Walker argues that everything Rand wrote was either derivative (from a combination of Jewish tradition, laissez-faire manifestos, and mystery novels), or devoid of literary value.
- ^ William Vallicella, a Kant scholar, alleges that she misunderstood Kant, and outlines here what he sees as some elementary logical errors in her work.
- ^ a b c Cohen, David. "A growing concern", The Guardian, December 7, 2001. Cite error: The named reference "CohenGuardian" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
- ^ "A Sense of Life". Retrieved 2006-03-22. website of the documentary film about Rand's life.
- ^ ""Ayn Rand: The Russian Radical—Published Reviews."". Retrieved 2006-03-23.
- ^ a b Sciabarra, Chris Matthew. Chris Matthew Sciabarra, "The Rand Transcript", The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies vol. 1, iss. 1 (1999): 1-26]
- ^ Possibly the contraction of the last three letters of her surname in handwritten Cyrillic which strongly resemble the three Roman letters a.y.n. ARI Biographical researcher Drs. Gotthelf and Berliner note that while still in Russia, Anna used the name "Rand", which is a Cyrillic contraction of Rosenbaum. They also note a hypothesis about a Finnish origin of Ayn. [1]
- ^ "A Brief Biography of Ayn Rand". Ayn Rand Institute. Retrieved 2008-12-29.
- ^ a b Leiendecker, Harold. ""Atlas Shrugged."". Retrieved 2006-03-30.
- ^ Ayn Rand's Bibliography ""Ayn Rand's Bibliography"". Retrieved 2006-10-22.
- ^ a b "Timeline of Ayn Rand's Life and Career". ARI. Retrieved 2008-12-29.
- ^ a b Daligga, Catherine. ""Ayn Rand" Biography at the Jewish Virtual Library". Retrieved 2006-03-24.
- ^ a b ""Ayn Rand's Sister: Eleanora Drobyshev 1910-1999"". Retrieved 2008-12-29.
- ^ Rand, Ayn. Journals of Ayn Rand. Dutton (1997). Edited by David Harriman. p.697.
- ^ Saxon, Wolfgang. ""Ayn Rand, 'Fountainhead' Author, Dies."". Retrieved 2008-02-02. The New York Times, March 7, 1982.
- ^ a b c d Turner, Jenny (March 24, 2006). ""As Astonishing as Elvis"". Review of Jeff Briting's biography, Ayn Rand.
- ^ a b ""The Fountainhead"". Cato Institute. Retrieved 2006-03-30.
- ^ ""Ayn Rand's Q&A on Libertarians."". Retrieved 2006-03-22. at the Ayn Rand Institute. Rand stated in 1980, "I've read nothing by a Libertarian ... that wasn't my ideas badly mishandled—i.e., had the teeth pulled out of them—with no credit given."
- ^ Rand, Ayn (1957). "Appendix". Atlas Shrugged. New York City: Random House. ISBN 0394415760.
- ^ Rand, Ayn. The Voice of Reason. Dutton Plume (1989). "Introducing Objectivism" p. 3. This article originally appeared in the Los Angeles Times on June 17, 1962.
- ^ Rand, Ayn (2005). Ayn Rand Answers, the Best of Her Q&A. New York: New American Library. p. 166. ISBN 0-451-21665-2.
{{cite book}}
: Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - ^ Rand, Ayn. "Philosophy: Who Needs It", delivered to the United States Military Academy, West Point, March 6, 1974, accessed January 9, 2009.
- ^ ""Ayn Rand Biographical FAQ: Did Rand have an affair with Nathaniel Branden?"". Retrieved 2008-04-28.
- ^ Rand, Ayn. To whom it may concern. The Objectivist, v. 7, no. 5, pp. 1-8, New York 1968.
- ^ *Murray Rothbard (who helped define modern libertarianism and anarcho-capitalism) in Rothbard, Murray. ""The sociology of the Ayn Rand cult."". Retrieved 2006-03-31. Michael Shermer (founder of The Skeptics Society),in Shermer, Michael. ""The Unlikeliest Cult in History"". Retrieved 2006-03-30. Originally published in Skeptic vol. 2, no. 2, 1993, pp. 74-81.
- ^ Rand, Ayn Letters, p. 592 Letter dated December 10, 1961, Plume (1997), ISBN 0-452-27404-4, as cited in ""Ayn Rand Biographical FAQ: Did Rand organize a cult?"". Retrieved 2006-06-25.
- ^ a b "The Objectivist Ethics," in The Virtue of Selfishness.
- ^ Atlas Shrugged, p. 931.
- ^ The Virtue of Selfishness, p. 21.
- ^ Atlas Shrugged, p. 939.
- ^ ""Three Women Who Inspired the Modern Libertarian Movement"". Retrieved 2008-01-17.
- ^ a b ""Ayn Rand on WWII"". Retrieved 2006-04-07. Excerpts from Rand's writing, cited at the ARI Watch website.[unreliable source?]
- ^ Rand, Ayn. Journals of Ayn Rand. Dutton (1997). Edited by David Harriman. p.315.
- ^ a b ""Honoring Virtue"". Retrieved 2006-04-06. at the ARI website.
- ^ Ayn Rand Ford Hall Forum lecture, 1974, text published on the website of The Ayn Rand Institute [2]
- ^ Long, Roderick T. ""Ayn Rand's Contributions to the Cause of Freedom."". Retrieved 2006-03-26.
- ^ The Ayn Rand Institute: FAQ
- ^ Rand, Ayn; Mayhew, Robert J. (2005). Ayn Rand answers: the best of her Q & A. New York: New American Library. ISBN 0-451-21665-2.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)[page needed] - ^ a b Rand, Ayn (1968). "An Answer to Readers (about a Woman President)". The Objectivist. 7 (12).[page needed]
- ^ Rand, Ayn (1993). The New Left: The Anti-Industrial Revolution. New York: Plume. ISBN 0-452-01125-6.[page needed]
- ^ McLemee, Scott. ""The Heirs of Ayn Rand."". Retrieved 2006-04-03. originally in Lingua Franca, September 1999.
- ^ Branden, Barbara (1986). The passion of Ayn Rand. Garden City, N.Y: Doubleday. p. 134. ISBN 0-385-19171-5.
- ^ a b Ford Hall forum remarks, cited in ""Ayn Rand Biographical FAQ: Ayn Rand and Homosexuality"". Retrieved 2006-03-24.
- ^ "Notes, The Ayn Rand Biographical FAQ". Retrieved 2006-03-24.
- ^ Varnell, Paul. ""Ayn Rand and Homosexuality"". Retrieved 2007-10-06. at the Indegay Forum, originally published in the Chicago Free Press December 3, 2003.
- ^ Rand, Ayn (1999). "Racism". Return of the primitive: the anti-industrial revolution. Australia: Meridian. p. 179. ISBN 0-452-01184-1.
- ^ Rand, Ayn (1999). "Racism". Return of the primitive: the anti-industrial revolution. Australia: Meridian. p. 182. ISBN 0-452-01184-1.
- ^ a b Rand's HUAC testimony, cited at "The Objectivism Reference Center". Retrieved 2006-04-07.
- ^ Ayn Rand Institute, ""Ayn Rand Institute: Sales of Ayn Rand Books Reach 25 million Copies"". Retrieved 2008-04-20.
- ^ Boaz, David (2005-02-02). "Ayn Rand at 100". CATO Institute. Retrieved 2008-12-29.
- ^ Amazon.com. "Atlas Shrugged (Paperback)". Retrieved 2008-02-01.
- ^ "Sales of Atlas Shrugged at All-Time Record". ARC. 2008-03-10. Retrieved 2008-12-29.
- ^ Fein, Esther B (1991-11-20). "Book Notes". The New York Times. The New York Times Company. Retrieved 2008-12-29.
- ^ "100 Best". The Modern Library. Random House. Retrieved 2008-12-29.
{{cite web}}
: External link in
(help)|work=
- ^ "Literature and Millennial Lists". enotes.com. Retrieved 2008-12-29.
{{cite web}}
: External link in
(help)|work=
- ^ "Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand read by 8.1%". Freestar Media / Zogby. 2007-10-17. Retrieved 2008-12-29.
- ^ Skinner, Anderson and Anderson, Reagan: a Life in Letters (2003) New York: Free Press, pp.281-282.
- ^ Gillen, Kieron (2008-08-23). "First-Person Shooter BioShock Owes More to Ayn Rand Than Doom". Wired. Retrieved 2008-01-18.
{{cite web}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|coauthors=
(help) - ^ Ayn Rand postage stamp[dead link] USPS.com. Retrieved on: January 18, 2008
- ^ Ayn Rand in libraries (WorldCat catalog)
- ^ Sharlet, Jeff.""Ayn Rand Has Finally Caught the Attention of Scholars"". Retrieved 2006-03-28.
- ^ "UT Texas Press Release". Retrieved 2006-04-14.
- ^ "Journal of Ayn Rand Studies". Retrieved 2006-03-28.
- ^ "Ayn Rand Society". Retrieved 2007-10-03.
- ^ "Concepts and Objectivity: Knowledge, Science, and Values" (PDF). Retrieved 2008-01-18.
- ^ Review of Tara Smith's Ayn Rand's Normative Ethics: the Virtuous Egoist
- ^ Simon Blackburn "Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy" pp 63 states " American linguist, philosopher and political activist"
- ^ "Question Period: Noam Chomsky on being censored, CHRC censorship, Ayn Rand, Robert Nozick and libertarianism". The Shotgun Blog. Western Standard. December 08, 2008. Retrieved 23 December 2008.
{{cite web}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help) - ^ Gekko, Gord (April 1997). "What Conservatives Owe Ayn Rand". Enter Stage Right. Retrieved 2008-12-29.
{{cite web}}
: External link in
(help)|publisher=
- ^ Tisdale, Sara Dabney (August 13), "A Celebration of Self", U.S. News & World Report, p. 72
{{citation}}
: Check date values in:|date=
and|year=
/|date=
mismatch (help) - ^ Nyquist, Greg S. (2001). Ayn Rand Contra Human Nature. Bloomington, IN: AuthorHouse. p. 407. ISBN 0595196330.[page needed]
- ^ Nozick, Robert (1997). "On the Randian Argument". Socratic Puzzles. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. ISBN 0-674-81654-4.[page needed]
- ^ Eaves-Johnson, James (January 31, 2002). "Celebrating the life of a friend of liberty". University Wire.
- ^ WDoherty, Brian (March 25, 2007). "What's not to like about Libertarianism?". Los Angeles Times.
- ^ "Den Uyl and Rasmussen, "Nozick on the Randian Argument," The Personalist, Spring, 1978, reprinted in Reading Nozick: Essays on Anarchy, State and Utopia, J. Paul, ed. (1981) Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 206-269.
- ^ Seddon, Frederick (2003). Ayn Rand, Objectivists, and the history of philosophy. Washington, D.C: University Press of America. ISBN 0-7618-2308-5.[page needed]
- ^ Rothbard, Murray. "The sociology of the Ayn Rand cult."
- ^ Walker, Jeff (1999). The Ayn Rand Cult. Chicago: Open Court.
- ^ Shermer, Michael. "The Unlikeliest Cult in History". Retrieved on 2006-03-30. Originally published in Skeptic vol. 2, no. 2, 1993, pp. 74-81.
- ^ Chapman, Steve"The evolution of Ayn Rand". Retrieved 2006-04-09. The Washington Times, February 2, 2005.
- ^ Berliner, Michael S., Letters of Ayn Rand (New York: Plume, 1995), pp. 74.
- ^ Lewis, John, "Literary Encyclopedia:Ayn Rand". Retrieved 2007-11-26., October 20, 2001.
- ^ Pruett, Lorine, The New York Times, May, 16, 1943.
- ^ Chambers, Whittaker (1957), "Big Sister is Watching You", National Review: 594–596
- ^ Tracinski, Robert (2005-01-06). "A Half-Century-Old Attack on Ayn Rand Reminds Us of the Dark Side of Conservatism". Capitalism Magazine. Retrieved 2008-12-29.
{{cite web}}
: External link in
(help)|publisher=
- ^ Gladstein, Mimi R. (1999). Feminist Interpretations of Ayn Rand. Pennsylvania State University Press. p. 140. ISBN 0-271-01831-3.
{{cite book}}
: Unknown parameter|coauthor=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - ^ "The Fountainhead (1949), at the IMDB". Retrieved 2008-01-17.
- ^ Branden, Barbara (1986). The passion of Ayn Rand. Garden City, N.Y: Doubleday. pp. 208–209. ISBN 0-385-19171-5.
- ^ "Atlas Shrugged Moves Forward". Retrieved 2008-04-13.
- ^ "Vadim Perelman to direct 'Atlas'". Retrieved 2007-10-02.
- ^ Jolie Fears She's Missed Out On Atlas Film With Pitt, Imdb.com
- ^ "The Passion of Ayn Rand (1999), at the IMDB". Retrieved 2008-01-17.
Further reading
- Baker, James T. (1987). Ayn Rand. Boston: Twayne. ISBN 0-8057-7497-1.
- Branden, Barbara (1986). The Passion of Ayn Rand. Garden City, New York: Doubleday & Company. ISBN 0-385-19171-5.
- Branden, Nathaniel (1998). My Years with Ayn Rand. San Francisco: Jossey Bass. ISBN 0-7879-4513-7.
- Branden, Nathaniel (1962). Who Is Ayn Rand?. New York: Random House.
{{cite book}}
: Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - Britting, Jeff (2005). Ayn Rand. New York: Overlook Duckworth. ISBN 1-58567-406-0.
- Gladstein, Mimi Reisel (1999). The New Ayn Rand Companion. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press. ISBN 0-313-30321-5.
- Gladstein, Mimi Reisel (1999). Feminist Interpretations of Ayn Rand. University Park, Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press. ISBN 0-534-57625-7.
{{cite book}}
: Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - Gotthelf, Allan (2000). On Ayn Rand. Belmont, California: Wadsworth Publishing Company. ISBN 0-271-01830-5.
- Hicks, Stephen (2003). "Ayn Rand and Contemporary Business Ethics". Journal of Accounting, Ethics, and Public Policy. 3 (1): 1–26.
- Mayhew, Robert (2004). Ayn Rand and Song of Russia. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 0-8108-5276-4.
- Mayhew, Robert (2005). Essays on Ayn Rand's Anthem. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 0-7391-1031-4.
- Mayhew, Robert (2004). Essays on Ayn Rand's We the Living. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 0-7391-0698-8.
- Paxton, Michael (1998). Ayn Rand: A Sense of Life (The Companion Book). Layton, Utah: Gibbs Smith. ISBN 0-87905-845-5.
- Peikoff, Leonard (1987). "My Thirty Years with Ayn Rand: An Intellectual Memoir". The Objectivist Forum. 8 (3): 1–16.
- Peikoff, Leonard (1991). Objectivism: The Philosophy of Ayn Rand. New York: Dutton. ISBN 0-452-01101-9.
- Rothbard, Murray N. (1987). The Sociology of the Ayn Rand Cult. Port Townsend, Washington: Liberty.
- Sciabarra, Chris Matthew (1995). Ayn Rand: The Russian Radical. University Park, Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press. ISBN 0-271-01440-7.
- Sciabarra, Chris Matthew (1999). "The Rand Transcript". The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies. 1 (1): 1–26.
- Shermer, Michael (1993). "The Unlikeliest Cult In History". Skeptic. 2 (2): 74–81.
- Sures, Mary Ann (2001). Facets of Ayn Rand. Los Angeles: Ayn Rand Institute Press. ISBN 0-9625336-5-3.
{{cite book}}
: Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - Thomas, William (editor) (2005). The Literary Art of Ayn Rand. Poughkeepsie, New York: The Objectivist Center. ISBN 1-57724-070-7.
{{cite book}}
:|author=
has generic name (help) - Valliant, James S. (2005). The Passion of Ayn Rand's Critics. Dallas: Durban House. ISBN 1930754671.
- Walker, Jeff (1999). The Ayn Rand Cult. Chicago: Open Court. ISBN 0-8126-9390-6.
External links
- Ayn Rand FAQ
- Frequently Asked Questions on Ayn Rand
- Ayn Rand Lexicon
- "Ayn Rand". Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
- Ayn Rand in libraries (WorldCat catalog)
- Works by Ayn Rand at Project Gutenberg
- Rand's papers at The Library of Congress
- Ayn Rand at IMDb
- Ayn Rand at Find a Grave
- Ayn Rand Phil Donahue Interview (Part 1 - 5)
- Articles with dead external links from December 2008
- 1905 births
- 1982 deaths
- 20th century philosophers
- Saint Petersburg State University alumni
- Russian-American writers
- American atheists
- American anti-communists
- American dramatists and playwrights
- American essayists
- American novelists
- American political philosophers
- American political theorists
- American political writers
- American philosophers
- American screenwriters
- Atheist thinkers and activists
- Atheist philosophers
- Deaths from cardiovascular disease
- Epistemologists
- Female philosophers
- Free speech activists
- Jewish atheists
- Moral philosophers
- Naturalized citizens of the United States
- Objectivists
- People from Saint Petersburg
- Philosophy writers
- Prometheus Award winning authors
- Russian philosophers
- Soviet dissidents
- Women screenwriters
- Jewish American writers