2001 Omsk An-70 crash: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Undid revision 639589756 by 67.142.235.252 (talk) |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
|stopover1 = |
|stopover1 = |
||
|stopover2 = |
|stopover2 = |
||
|stopover3 = |
|stopover3 = |
||
|last_stopover = |
|last_stopover = |
||
| Line 62: | Line 61: | ||
Previously in early May An-70 developers announced that the aircraft will be presented at the 2001 Paris Air Show but after the VVTV-2001 show in Omsk, France excluded the An-70 from the air show citing the aircraft's alleged poor safety record. |
Previously in early May An-70 developers announced that the aircraft will be presented at the 2001 Paris Air Show but after the VVTV-2001 show in Omsk, France excluded the An-70 from the air show citing the aircraft's alleged poor safety record. |
||
The engine/propeller problems were compounded on the pages of Russian newspapers by the existing problems in relations between Russia and Ukraine. Much of this negative publicity was instigated by competitors of Antonov, ZMKB "Progress" and OAO Motor-Sich in Russia and in the West. In reality, however, Ukrainian engine designers and manufacturers had little to do with the cause of the accident. The faulty propeller hub pitch mechanism was manufactured in Russia. |
The engine/propeller problems were compounded on the pages of Russian newspapers by the existing problems in relations between Russia and Ukraine. Much of this negative publicity was instigated by competitors of Antonov, ZMKB "Progress" and OAO Motor-Sich in Russia and in the West. In reality, however, Ukrainian engine designers and manufacturers had little to do with the cause of the accident. The faulty propeller hub pitch mechanism was manufactured in Russia. |
||
<ref>{{cite news |url= http://aviationweek.com/awin/only-remaining-prototype-antonov-70-four-engine-transport-made-its-first-flight |title= The only remaining prototype of the Antonov An-70 four-engine transport made its first flight |newspaper= Aviation Week & Space Technology |date= 2001-06-11}}</ref> |
<ref>{{cite news |url= http://aviationweek.com/awin/only-remaining-prototype-antonov-70-four-engine-transport-made-its-first-flight |title= The only remaining prototype of the Antonov An-70 four-engine transport made its first flight |newspaper= Aviation Week & Space Technology |date= 2001-06-11}}</ref> |
||
<!--==Summary==--><!--short summary including flight details, investigation, causes etc.-- |
<!--==Summary==--><!--short summary including flight details, investigation, causes etc.--> |
||
Revision as of 15:41, 25 December 2014
 | This article includes a list of references, related reading, or external links, but its sources remain unclear because it lacks inline citations. (November 2014) |
 | It has been suggested that this article be merged into Antonov An-70. (Discuss) Proposed since November 2014. |
 UR-NTK at the crash site | |
| Accident | |
|---|---|
| Date | 2001 January 27 |
| Summary | Multiple Engine Failure |
| Site | 660 meters from departure runway 54°58′0″N 73°18′30″E / 54.96667°N 73.30833°E[citation needed] |
| Aircraft | |
| Aircraft type | Short takeoff and landing tactical military medium transport |
| Aircraft name | Antonov 70 |
| Operator | Antonov Design Bureau |
| Registration | UR-NTK |
| Flight origin | Omsk Airport (OMS/UNOO), Russia |
| Destination | Yakutsk Airport (YKS/UEEE), Russia |
| Passengers | 22 |
| Crew | 11 |
| Fatalities | 0 |
| Injuries | 4 |
| Survivors | 33 |
The 2001 Antonov An-70 Crash occurred during testing of a Medium Military Transport STOL Aircraft near Omsk airport on January 27 2001 at 5:36 local time. The crash involved the only surviving Antonov An-70 prototype and put the future of the aircraft in doubt.[1]
Accident
The aircraft arrived at Omsk at 0:30 and was refueled with 38 tons of jet fuel. 5 hours after landing the four engine propfan lifted off the runway on its way to Yakutsk for cold weather testing. Within seconds of becoming airborne first one and then a second Progress D-27 engine with Contra-rotating propellers failed. At this point the flight crew increased power to the remaining three engines but a problem with the RPM sensors on one of them led to automatic engine shut-off. Thus the An-70 ended up flying at low speed with only two properly functioning engines, with the third engine generating over 11,000 pounds of negative thrust and disrupting airflow across the wing.
The crew successfully made a 180 degree turn to head back towards departure airport but crash landed hard in the snow and ice within several hundred yards of the runway. Of the 33 people aboard (11 crew and 22 specialists from Antonov), 4 were injured, 1 seriously. The accident investigators found that the pilots acted with remarkable skill to turn the aircraft around and crash-land it on the field without lowering the landing gear.
Aircraft
This is one of only two An-70 transport planes made. Prototype 1 was destroyed in a mid-air collision in 1995. The fuselage of prototype 2 was completely fractured between the midsection and the tail by the heavy landing during this incident. The plane was insured but only for $1 million - a fraction of its actual cost. The aircraft was disassembled on site and relocated to the local "Polyot" aircraft repair factory in Omsk and restored to flying condition. The damaged airframe required months of repair. As of 2012 the only AN-70 in existence is still performing important flight testing.
Investigation
Three possibilities for the accident were investigated. Engine/Prop malfunction, fuel or oil defects in sub-zero temperatures leading to fuel starvation due to water in the fuel system freezing, and finally acts of sabotage or terrorism. Sabotage & terrorism were investigated by Russia's FSB which found no corroborating evidence. The fuel crystallization theory was discounted very early by the team of experts investigating the accident, leaving an engine or a propeller malfunction the only remaining possibility.
Causes
The cause of the crash landing of the An-70 near Omsk remained the subject of much debate for a long time and the reason for heated exchange of accusations between the Antonov Design Bureau and the OAO Motor-Sich - the manufacturer of the D-27 engine. The manufacturer of the SV-27 propeller - Aerosila - also received some of the blame.
A report released by the investigation team in mid-March, by Ukrainian "Aviation and Time" magazine, provided preliminary details into the cause. According to the report, immediately after take-off one of the engines was automatically shut off by its electronic safeguards after it exceeded the safe RPM limit. The front set of blades of the contra rotating propeller assembly stopped but the aft part of the propeller assembly continued turning due to the damaged oil line that powered the blade actuators. This caused the negative air flow estimated at 5,000 kg/11,023 lbs. of thrust.
At the end of March 2001 Antonov's first deputy designer-general Dmitri Kiva provided further details about the cause announcing that the accident was caused by disintegration of the oil line leading to the propeller hub pitch mechanism that attaches to the engine. Kiva said that the pilots attempted to compensate for the loss of power by increasing the settings of the remaining three engines. At some point another D-27 automatically shut off after the safe RPM limit has been exceeded.
Consequences
The crash involved the only surviving Antonov An-70 prototype and put the future of the aircraft in doubt.[1] The aircraft was repaired for approximately $3 million and made its first flight after the catastrophe on June 5 of the same year. On June 7, 2001, the repaired An-70 made a successful appearance at the VVTV-2001 armaments expo in Omsk.
Previously in early May An-70 developers announced that the aircraft will be presented at the 2001 Paris Air Show but after the VVTV-2001 show in Omsk, France excluded the An-70 from the air show citing the aircraft's alleged poor safety record.
The engine/propeller problems were compounded on the pages of Russian newspapers by the existing problems in relations between Russia and Ukraine. Much of this negative publicity was instigated by competitors of Antonov, ZMKB "Progress" and OAO Motor-Sich in Russia and in the West. In reality, however, Ukrainian engine designers and manufacturers had little to do with the cause of the accident. The faulty propeller hub pitch mechanism was manufactured in Russia.
See also
- List of accidents and incidents involving military aircraft (2000–09)
- Aeroflot Flight 3352
- Accidents and incidents in aviation
- Military transport aircraft
- Air safety
Notes
- ^ a b "AN-70 Crash Disrupts..." Aviation Week & Space Technology. 2001-02-05.
- ^ "The only remaining prototype of the Antonov An-70 four-engine transport made its first flight". Aviation Week & Space Technology. 2001-06-11.
References
- http://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=20010127-1
- http://www.cthomas.de/an_70_news.htm
- http://www.luchtzak.be/picturegallery/displayimage.php?pid=7946 [dead link]
- http://www.avsimrus.com/f/accidents-88/an-70-crash-in-2001-26667.html
- http://m.newsru.com/russia/29jan2001/an70.html
- http://www.1tv.ru/news/polit/140291
- http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/ukraine/an-70.htm
- http://englishrussia.com/2013/07/07/antonov-an-70/
- http://www.militaryfactory.com/aircraft/detail.asp?aircraft_id=1037
- http://www.baaa-acro.com/2001/archives/crash-of-an-antonov-an-70-in-omsk/
- http://www.aer.ita.br/~bmattos/mundo/country/russia/an-70.html