User talk:Mar4d

Beware! This user's talk page is patrolled by talk page stalkers.

Your recent reverts on Rajput clans

Dear, You made an edit on the said article and modified the sourced contents. Have you gone through the given sources before making an attempt to edit. Just do it and also refer the talk page of the said article where I have given a line from from the source. For your easy reference I have mentioned the related page no. too. Thanks.--MahenSingha (Talk)

Yo

Yo man could you please go over to the Al-khalid tank and talk page and clear up all the confusion there.

help required

sir reference to

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Fakhar_Abbas

i am contacting you to help to revive this article please note the person has done a lot in different fields but he is quite media shy and don't want to be named for his achievements regarding the complaints about references here are few articles within Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?search=%22fakhar-i-abbas%22&title=Special:Search&go=Go&searchToken=5wg4hahw6m7r2haav0bu1r6yi

https://ipfs.io/ipfs/QmXoypizjW3WknFiJnKLwHCnL72vedxjQkDDP1mXWo6uco/wiki/Fakhar_Abbas.html

and also here are https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yMGLg1Ja_Qw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IFIrA7TULxA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yLfhCosAPbw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=smS2r_WYQRU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9WuyUnJX0QU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=spklHufXs5Y

https://www.google.com.pk/search?q=fakhar+abbas+bioresource+research+centre&oq=fakhar+abbas+bioresource+research+centre&aqs=chrome..69i57.11151j0j8&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

i can provide more if required please help restoring this page or let me know what else they require

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Speedy deletion nomination of Pakistan Mazdoor Kissan Party

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Pakistan Mazdoor Kissan Party requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. » Shadowowl | talk 12:33, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Category:Pakistani wine has been nominated for discussion

Category:Pakistani wine, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 20:52, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Teefa in Trouble

Hi! Hope you will be fine. Since my last edit on the mentioned page, there have been many other edits. At a glance, I saw that someone inserted unsourced amount figures in the infobox. Also, the addition of plot have overlinks of film cast. The other things, a new reference with name Bilal Agha has been linked, and Meesha Shafi's paragraph has been added. Need some help, please guide what to do. Thanks! M. Billoo 14:29, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Update: Sorry, I just saw the edit history, and you must have been notified of this. But what does these mean:

• became the fifth Pakistani film to be released during a non-holiday period
• breaking the record of the previous highest-grossing film Jawani Phir Nahi Ani

Instead / though, I consider this as correct:

• surpassing the challenge of releasing during a non-holiday and non-peak season

Does plot section really need reference? Also, Yalghaar was the most expensive Pakistani film, maybe… I think Ali Zafar-Meesha Shafi case has enough content to be added on a new page instead of writing same thing on each related page, what do you think? Please help, Thanks! M. Billoo 15:02, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

How could it be a crime film on the basis of only one reference by Bilal Agha? M. Billoo 15:23, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Hi M.Billoo2000. I suggest you take these notes to the talk page. A few comments; I believe what the first quote says is that it was released during a non-holiday period, which could refer to a weekend or perhaps holidays could also refer to Eid. I don't see any reason to delete references from the plot or elsewhere, as that will make the content unsourced and difficult to verify. Also, no comment on the Ali Zafar-Meesha Shafi case (which is still in courts, and are allegations as of now), but I believe it deserves a sentence on the article given the initial controversy which surrounded the film's release. Thanks, Mar4d (talk) 22:59, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

You said, "I don't see any reason to delete references from the plot or elsewhere, as that will make the content unsourced and difficult to verify."

• Then, are budget or box office figures sourced? The budget is in $ per source, and gross is in PKR, so the conversions here in the page are unsourced.
• Similarly, the category of crime films is poorly sourced, based on only one reference.
• On first day at the local box office, the film managed to become the top Pakistani film, while all-time fifth film in non-holiday releases including international films.

The international films play a great part at Pakistani box office. Sultan (2016) is the biggest opener, and Sanju (2018) has now became the biggest film. You can check out BOD. For plot, I disagree on some sentences that you supported from Bilal Agha's reference. As I have seen the edit history, I now think you have made these edits. So, I consider to talk to you directly. Please try to understand and help, thanks! M. Billoo 00:24, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

M.Billoo2000: Unfortunately I don't have enough time at the moment, but if you think there is an issue with the category, feel free to remove it. If you have better sources for the plot or feel a source has been missed out, feel free to add it. As far as the box office is concerned, I think the sentence is very clear in referring to Pakistani films, not international films. You can suggest rewording on the talk page. Also, the gross figures should be easy to convert per Template:PKRConvert although that template may be outdated, so I would still recommend doing a sanity check and making sure that the figures are accurate per current exchange rates/source estimates. The box office figures should be easy to verify from official/reliable links. Thanks, Mar4d (talk) 08:32, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 16:17, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

You've done good job...

...of turning the previous shambles into an actual Wikipedia article. --Saqib (talk) 13:04, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

@Saqib: Glad to be of help. There is actually more coverage of this aspect of Khan's life than meets the eye, and it certainly seems to evoke more curiosity than any other Pakistani political figure. As far as I know, only Jinnah's pet dogs have evoked as much interest before. Mar4d (talk) 13:12, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Absolutely! --Saqib (talk) 13:18, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

August 2018

To enforce an arbitration decision and for your participation at this ANI thread. This editor is heavily involved in the topic area that you are banned from, and your participation there is clearly related to that topic area., you have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions.

If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 18:29, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

---

Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."

@BU Rob13: Seriously? I disagree with this block, and find it harsh. Will you please clarify where the said violation occurred. I am certain I have not breached the restrictions, or else I wouldn't have left my thoughts in the first place; that, I am sure of. My comments have pertained only to the way this case was being handled in the context of NadirAli. Please do let me know where I have crossed the topic ban territory, because I can convincingly assure you it is not intentional. I'm ready and more than happy to address your concerns. Mar4d (talk) 18:47, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

NadirAli is an editor who was found to be socking in the area you were topic banned from and has also been topic banned from that area. I don't think it was a random occurrence that four of the editors who were topic banned along with NadirAli chose to participate in that discussion. The participation was because of his involvement in that topic area. This is on both sides, to be clear, not just from you. I do not believe any administrator would look at your participation in that discussion and see it as disengaging in from your protracted and ongoing personal dispute in the India-Pakistan topic area. You are welcome to appeal my block at WP:AE or WP:AN, and I'm happy to copy an appeal to either location if you would like. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 18:51, 14 August 2018 (UTC)