User talk:TwinTurbo

6ix Rising moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 6ix Rising, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 09:06, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:6IX RISING.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:6IX RISING.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:43, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Da Degrees

Hello, TwinTurbo, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username North8000, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Da Degrees, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Da Degrees.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 18:16, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

Request for unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

TwinTurbo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I was blocked back in April 2020 for committed sockpuppetry. I have since learnt that such things go against Wikipedia guidelines and I won't engage in activities like this again (Refer back to previous unblock request). I wish to continue making positive contributions in line with what is expected of Wikipedia and understand the outcomes of sockpuppetry. I hope you guys reconsider my unblock request under WP:SO. Thank you . TwinTurbo (talk) 21:40, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Accept reason:

Unblocked with one account restriction. TonyBallioni (talk) 21:53, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

As a checkuser, I see no evidence of recent block evasion from this user. However, note that TonyBallioni is the blocking admin in this case and has substantially more experience with the checkuser tools than I do. Please consult with the blocking admin before considering lifting this block. --Yamla (talk) 21:44, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

• Yeah, I don’t see anything either. I’m fine unblocking with a one account restriction. TwinTurbo: do you agree to only use this account and not to use any other account, even if it would otherwise be within policy? That is to say, the use of any account other than this one will be considered socking in the future? TonyBallioni (talk) 21:46, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

• • @TonyBallioni: I agree completely. I'll only be using this account and not any other account from here onwards and I understand the consequences if I was to use another account. . TwinTurbo (talk) 21:51, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: NorthSideBenji (December 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:NorthSideBenji and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:NorthSideBenji, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 17:19, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Hello, TwinTurbo! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 17:19, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chris Yonge, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Album of the Year.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: NorthSideBenji has been accepted

NorthSideBenji, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 16:18, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of NorthSideBenji

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on NorthSideBenji requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NorthSideBenji. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Magnolia677 (talk) 17:40, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

@Magnolia677 (talk · contribs) Why do you always do stuff like this? As you can see the article has now gone through the correct channels and significant improvements have been made according to Wikipedia guidelines, please look into an article thoroughly before trying to delete it. . TwinTurbo (talk) 11:50, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Chris Yonge for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chris Yonge is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Yonge until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Magnolia677 (talk) 23:40, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Robin Banks (rapper)

Hello, TwinTurbo,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username John B123 and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Robin Banks (rapper), for deletion, because a consensus decision previously decided that it wasn't suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. If you wish to restore a page deleted via a deletion discussion, please use the deletion review process instead, rather than reposting the content of the page.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|John B123}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 20:02, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

@John B123:. HI John, I have recreated the page with more info as he now meets WP:MUSICBIO. He has a single which was certified gold by Music Canada as I have included in the article. Thanks. TwinTurbo (talk) 20:53, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi TwinTurbo, I didn't notice the gold when I looked through the article, so yes the article now meets WP:MUSICBIO. On a side note, you shouldn't remove speedy delete tags from articles you have created. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 21:10, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

No problem, will keep that in mind in the future. . TwinTurbo (talk) 00:29, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Why submission rejected draft of Draft:Kavita_Joshi

Hello, TwinTurbo, I edit a draft since and the topic have sufficiently notability for inclusion in Wikipedia. but some other editor having problem with that... kindly look into this profile.

User:Eyebeller sir kindly advice how can i prove it... She had 28 films which can be seen on youtube and views are very heigh and actress work in Ayodhya ki Ramleela which was very popular among Indian audience. please check views on her film over internet. if these is not sufficient to prove person notability so what can prove it. let's me know. if this is not sufficient so please tell me what is next to do provide notability.

Recent article in media : https://www.jagran.com/uttarakhand/nainital-the-language-thresholds-of-poetry-become-the-pride-of-haryana-film-industry-national-girls-day2021-21301331.html

Hi @Ibablubaghel:, it seems that the bulk of notability for the coverage of the subject seems to be in Hindi. Although, in my opinion, this still shows notability, I would recommend making the article on the hindi wikipedia first to gain approval as I believe somebody over there would be able to confirm notability first. I would then suggest you create the article on the English Wikipedia as a translated article (per WP:RFT) after the article has been reviewed by an administrator on the Hindi Wikipedia. Hope this helps. . TwinTurbo (talk) 18:00, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for review but Hindi wikipedia already exist so kindly let's me know where i get recommendation for the subject.

Hindi Wikipedia here : https://hi.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E0%A4%95%E0%A4%B5%E0%A4%BF%E0%A4%A4%E0%A4%BE_%E0%A4%9C%E0%A5%8B%E0%A4%B6%E0%A5%80

@Ibablubaghel: I have added the correct template to the top of the draft, I would recommend adding a couple more sources into the draft (in English preferably) before resubmitting, and letting the reviewers know that the article has been imported from the Hindi Wikipedia and that it meets notability guidelines there. Let them know the page is a translation of the Hindi article and a lot of the sources included are in hindi. TwinTurbo (talk) 12:06, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Houdini (rapper) (January 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Houdini (rapper) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Houdini (rapper), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 01:04, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Cooli Carlito

A tag has been placed on Category:Cooli Carlito requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:53, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Cooli Carlito

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Cooli Carlito, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Dennis Bratland (talk) 19:24, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

"Cooli Carlito" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Cooli Carlito. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 3#Cooli Carlito until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Dennis Bratland (talk) 19:45, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

February 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  MER-C 12:38, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Fast Wave Communications and Draft:Craig Davis (entrepreneur) are both supported by fake news black hat SEO references. You have deliberately tried to circumvent the spam blacklist which blocks some of these fake news websites. There are other things about Fast Wave Communications that make me suspect that you are editing Wikipedia for undisclosed payments. MER-C 12:43, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TwinTurbo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hi, I admit that I did try to include some references into the article which were banned by Wikipedia, but the notification said something along the lines of "give a reason why you think it's okay to add these references" in which I would have. As with Fast Wave Communications, I did mention in my edit that I got a notification of a depreciated source, however, was unaware that this was "fake news black hat SEO references" because I thought it had considerable information on the subject and I wrote the article in a neutral point of view to minimise bias (I believe only one reference that is considered "fake news black hate SEO reference" was used on this page). I would like to point out that I usually create articles of people I am a follower of (generally in music but also social media, etc.). Craig Davis has an ample following on social media hence my reason to create an article for submission. I created a page on him in the draft space because I wanted it to be checked against the notability guidelines (the same way I have done for Draft:Houdini (rapper)) as I was slightly unsure and wanted it reviewed by a page reviewer. I would also like to point out that I have not been paid for the creation of the article(s), and haven't been paid for editing any article in the past. I did attempt to bypass certain sources in the article and did not think of it of great importance as I haven't been enlightened on the consequences of such actions. TwinTurbo (talk) 14:11, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I think, for now, this block is serving to protect our project.

You admit that you were intentionally violating our policies -, now that you were caught. You intentionally circumvented the technical mechanisms in place to keep you from doing this.

Why should we trust you now that you're saying you aren't engaging in paid editing? SQL^{Query me!} 16:41, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

I have been a Wikipedian for over 9 years and made contributions to pages that I am a follower of and believe to be of notable standard. I do admit that I tried to include references by archiving them, but I have only ever done it this once as I was unaware of the consequences of this and assumed it would benefit the article. A simple message or a warning informing me of the severity would have been enough to ensure I would not have done it again. I will respect this block and abide by it and appeal again in the future. I stand by my statement that I have not been paid to write any articles since the creation of my Wikipedia account. TwinTurbo (talk) 14:38, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The multiple fake news black hat sources I am referring to are not the ones you got a deprecated source warning for. MER-C 15:19, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

It's the archived sources, right? (Draft:Craig Davis (entrepreneur): 1,2 3, 4,). It was flagged with a Redbox I did not pay much attention to this but assumed they would be okay as they seemed informative. I wasn't aware that they were fake news black hat sources (I don't know much about these). Is there a Wiki essay on these as I would like to educate myself on this, there's no mention of "black hat" or fake news" on WP:V. TwinTurbo (talk) 15:33, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

The archived sources are indeed black hat SEO, but so are some other sources you cited. MER-C 16:24, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Which other ones? Every source I found in the article were found from a Google search on the subject. Also, I'm not entirely sure of the meaning of the term "black hat" is there a Wikipedia Essay in which I can learn about this. TwinTurbo (talk) 14:38, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Educating myself on unreliable sources

• WP:RS
• WP:SPB
• WP:DEPS
• WP:RSP
• WP:V
• WP:REPUTABLE