Jump to content

Talk:Aurora (singer): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Assessment (B/Low): banner shell, Biography, Women, Norway, Women in Music (Rater)
??: new section
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 63: Line 63:


:It's the first half of a whole album on EP format. Here's a reference to it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a5zX1TpCTP4. However, it can technically be both, but the release fomat also implies it's an EP; only digital with some limited physical versions (released a year later), the promotion was rather small compared to Step 2, and -in consequence- so was the investment. So, for me, it's correct to call it an EP. --[[User:JBOOK17|JBOOK17]] ([[User talk:JBOOK17|talk]]) 03:11, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
:It's the first half of a whole album on EP format. Here's a reference to it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a5zX1TpCTP4. However, it can technically be both, but the release fomat also implies it's an EP; only digital with some limited physical versions (released a year later), the promotion was rather small compared to Step 2, and -in consequence- so was the investment. So, for me, it's correct to call it an EP. --[[User:JBOOK17|JBOOK17]] ([[User talk:JBOOK17|talk]]) 03:11, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

== ?? ==

i added that aurora had autism with the link to the video/documentary, i don’t understand why that fact was removed [[User:Crimsonnosmirc|Crimsonnosmirc]] ([[User talk:Crimsonnosmirc|talk]]) 22:37, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:37, 19 February 2021

COI

Noting that this very large edit, while not "bad" or revertable IMO, has ben made anonymously from an IP address belonging to Universal Music Group, owner of the labels which this artist is signed to. This conflict of interest appears undeclared.  · Salvidrim! ·  13:26, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

RfC: Page title capitalised or not

The following discussion is an archived record of a request for comment. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
There is consensus that the whole name should not be capitalised. The majority opinion points to the Wikipedia:Manual of Style that says that it should not be all caps. AlbinoFerret 02:10, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Should the title of this singer's page be capitalised? Btljs (talk) 10:26, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not sure Names are often written in all caps on releases. It's not necessarily to imply that the name is intended to be all caps, it's just part of the writing style. That being said, I'm not sure what is in use here. I went straight to MOS:CAPS for clues, and found MOS:ALLCAPS; the closest thing on that list that this title resembles is "acronyms & initialisms", which does not appear to be the case here. I'm inclined to only capitalize it as a proper noun. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 00:53, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes - If the page name was Aurora Aksnes then I would not agree with capitalizing the letters however, she identifies as AURORA so I say keep it that way. Meatsgains (talk) 00:24, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Considering it is her personal official site, I'm assuming this is how she would like it to be stylized. Meatsgains (talk) 18:28, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Assumptions count for very little. As Zeke said, most of that website is written in capitals, including the name of her latest album. nagualdesign 03:35, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Aurora (singer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:32, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Aurora (singer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:43, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Translation request

There's a lot of material that can be translated to this article from the Spanish Wikipedia. I worked on it so I can say all the content is verified. The issue with this version of the article is the redaction itself and that it is highly outdated, and also there's a lot of information about Aurora's personal life and early years that is not included and should be. Please, if someone has the time it would be a great contribution. You can check out the article in Spanish: https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aurora_Aksnes --JBOOK17 (talk) 23:31, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Infections of a Different Kind (Step 1), EP or album?

It has come to my attention that Infections of a Different Kind (Step 1) has been re-classified as an EP. It is not. It is intended to be the first half of her second album; alternatively, it is her second album, (if you consider A Different Kind of Human (Step 2) her third). Furthermore, at a running time of 33 minutes and a track listing of 8, it explicitely contradicts the definition given in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extended_play . The sources that are given are not authorities on the matter: it is listed as an album on both iTunes and Spotify, and one can find a plethora of sources wherein it is referred to as an album (her reddit AMA comes to mind – https://www.reddit.com/r/popheads/comments/9ln1y2/hello_popheads_ask_me_anything/). It was inteded as an album, it is long enough to be considered one, and it is too long to be considered an EP. I therefore request that we elevate it to the status of album once more. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:4643:BB7A:0:95CB:9660:E980:5063 (talk) 19:11, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's the first half of a whole album on EP format. Here's a reference to it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a5zX1TpCTP4. However, it can technically be both, but the release fomat also implies it's an EP; only digital with some limited physical versions (released a year later), the promotion was rather small compared to Step 2, and -in consequence- so was the investment. So, for me, it's correct to call it an EP. --JBOOK17 (talk) 03:11, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

??

i added that aurora had autism with the link to the video/documentary, i don’t understand why that fact was removed Crimsonnosmirc (talk) 22:37, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]