Talk:White-eyed river martin: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 08:45, 31 July 2021

White-eyed river martin is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.

White-eyed river martin is part of the River martin series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on July 31, 2021.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 4, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed
December 13, 2009	Good topic candidate	Promoted
November 7, 2012	Featured article candidate	Promoted
November 22, 2012	Featured topic candidate	Promoted
Current status: Featured article

Birds FA‑class Low‑importance

White-eyed river martin is part of WikiProject Birds, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative and easy-to-use ornithological resource. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Please do not substitute this template.BirdsWikipedia:WikiProject BirdsTemplate:WikiProject Birdsbird articles

FA

This article has been rated as FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Birds To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Endemic birds of Papua New Guinea (more)
Cleanup : Bullfinch • Vesper sparrow • Bird flight • Bird bath (more)
Copyedit : Plushcap • Magpie duck • Saker falcon (more)
Expand : Phalarope • Nidicolous • Gouldian finch • Cathartes • Cnemophilidae • Avian malaria (more)
NPOV : Debeaking • Driven grouse shooting • Abu Dhabi Falcon Hospital (more)
Stubs : Cathartiformes • Semiplumbeous hawk • Rainbow-bearded Thornbill • Sunda scops owl (more)
Update : Coal tit • Scottish crossbill • New Caledonian lorikeet • Operation Migration (more)
Verify : Argus (bird) • Blyth's frogmouth • Nik Borrow • Pytilia • Fregata • Chestnut-headed tesia • Darter • Pallid scops owl • Starling (more)
Wikify : Ninox boobook ocellata • The Institute for Bird Populations (more)
Other : Add photos to bird articles needing photos (search Flickr for free images). Add taxonomic authorities to genus articles.

More outstanding tasks at the project's cleanup listing, Category:Birds articles needing attention, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Birds/Todo.

Thailand FA‑class Mid‑importance

	Thailand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Thailand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Thailand-related articles on Wikipedia. The WikiProject is also a part of the Counteracting systematic bias group aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Thailand-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.ThailandWikipedia:WikiProject ThailandTemplate:WikiProject ThailandThailand articles
FA	This article has been rated as FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Successful good article nomination

I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of January 4, 2008, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: Check

2. Factually accurate?: Check

3. Broad in coverage?: Check

4. Neutral point of view?: Check

5. Article stability? Check

6. Images?: Check

Well written. Nothing to say, quite excellent in my opinion. :) If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations. Rt . 15:35, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Legal status

The article already mentions that the species is protected under the CITES Appendix 1. This is locally applied through its designation as a reserved wild animal species.[1] under the Wild Animal Reservation and Protection Act, BE 2535.[2] This could be mentioned in the article. --Paul_012 (talk) 06:14, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Photo

I've uploaded a photo I took of one of the specimens at Chulalongkorn University. I'll leave it to the article's regular contributors to decide how best it should be used. --Paul_012 (talk) 11:40, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that, Paul, I didn't expect ever to get an image of the actual bird Jimfbleak - talk to me? 11:46, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on White-eyed river martin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.orientalbirdclub.org/publications/forktail/2pdfs/Dickinson-White-eyedRiver-Martin.pdf
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.orientalbirdclub.org/publications/forktail/3pdfs/Parkes-White-eyedRiverMartin.pdf
Corrected formatting/usage for http://orientalbirdclub.org/publications/bullfeats/eyedmart.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.orientalbirdclub.org/publications/bullfeats/eyedmar2.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.cbd.int/programmes/areas/water/toolkit/html/1.9.6a_threatened_southeast.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.worldbirdnames.org/n-warblers.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:00, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summary

Shyamal, no, just my stupidity. Not picked up at FAC either... Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:43, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, knowing your careful editing, I was worried that I might have been in error. Shyamal (talk) 05:46, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Main drawing

This stylised drawing of the bird is very inappropriate as the main illustration of this bird. Is there no scientific drawing/accurate drawing, or clear photo that can be used? The stylised drawing is more like a logo. 81.147.167.25 (talk) 08:45, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 73: / Line 73: @@
 {{u|Shyamal}}, no, just my stupidity. Not picked up at FAC either... [[User:Jimfbleak|<b style="font-family:Lucida;color:red">Jimfbleak</b>]] - [[User talk:Jimfbleak|<span style="font-family:arial;color:green"><i>talk to me?</i></span>]] 05:43, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
 :Ok, knowing your careful editing, I was worried that I might have been in error. [[User:Shyamal|Shyamal]] ([[User talk:Shyamal|talk]]) 05:46, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
+== Main drawing ==
+This stylised drawing of the bird is very inappropriate as the main illustration of this bird. Is there no scientific drawing/accurate drawing, or clear photo that can be used? The stylised drawing is more like a logo. [[Special:Contributions/81.147.167.25|81.147.167.25]] ([[User talk:81.147.167.25|talk]]) 08:45, 31 July 2021 (UTC)