Jump to content

Talk:Aaron Rodgers: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
2+2=5
Line 113: Line 113:
::Jeppiz, please don't editorialize. Wikipedia is not a owned by Big Pharma. It is neutral and does not take a side on the vaccine controversy. [[Special:Contributions/96.255.69.229|96.255.69.229]] ([[User talk:96.255.69.229|talk]]) 17:24, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
::Jeppiz, please don't editorialize. Wikipedia is not a owned by Big Pharma. It is neutral and does not take a side on the vaccine controversy. [[Special:Contributions/96.255.69.229|96.255.69.229]] ([[User talk:96.255.69.229|talk]]) 17:24, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
:::To the IP: First, nobody except you has mentioned that, ethe rest of us are discussing media coverage. Second, you're wrong Wikipedia - read [[WP:NPOV]]. Wikipedia is neutral in the sense that we report scientific consensus. WP is in no way ever "neutral" between science and conspiracy theories. [[User:Jeppiz|Jeppiz]] ([[User talk:Jeppiz|talk]]) 21:59, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
:::To the IP: First, nobody except you has mentioned that, ethe rest of us are discussing media coverage. Second, you're wrong Wikipedia - read [[WP:NPOV]]. Wikipedia is neutral in the sense that we report scientific consensus. WP is in no way ever "neutral" between science and conspiracy theories. [[User:Jeppiz|Jeppiz]] ([[User talk:Jeppiz|talk]]) 21:59, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

== Nba Champion (As manager) Should be added to the career highlights section. ==

Because technically as a owner of the Bucks he got a ring.

Revision as of 02:32, 8 November 2021

Former good article nomineeAaron Rodgers was a Sports and recreation good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 25, 2011Good article nomineeNot listed
June 6, 2012Peer reviewReviewed
July 11, 2012Good article nomineeNot listed
October 22, 2013Peer reviewReviewed
May 2, 2015Good article nomineeNot listed
August 15, 2016Peer reviewReviewed
Current status: Former good article nominee

NBA champion

I am not sure that belongs in the career highlights and awards section for Rodgers. He is a minority owner. He isn't the prime owner. It's mentioned in his bio. Billy Krystal for instance has a ring for the Arizona Diamondbacks winning the World Series in 2001 but he doesn't have a career highlights box saying he is a world series champion (he played 1 day for the yankees too)

2019 season

How about adding he was rated 16th by his fellow teammates in NFL Top 100 Players of 2020?

No. He's been #1 before and it isn't there.

Semi-protected edit request on 27 September 2021

In the NFL records section it lists the record "Most seasons with 40 touchdown passes" twice. Once with (3) and once with (5) . I do not know which one is correct but logically speaking they cannot both be true. 2601:407:C400:2FF0:F1DF:F889:EFBF:2F80 (talk) 01:54, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. Assuming you mean the infobox (sidebar on the right), you might want to read that again. One's "total touchdowns" and the other is "touchdown passes". There's a difference there.  Ganbaruby! (talk) 06:29, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 20 October 2021

Aaron Rogers' performance in the 2021-2022 NFL Season is limited to the first game in this article, and six have been played. The current article leaves his position as a starter into question, and he has not only been a starter but the Packers have won five straight games since. If his performance this season is to be left blank until it is finished, I have no objection, but as of now it is framed and stated in an entirely incomplete manner. His participation and performance in the current season should either be erased or completed, as of now it is neither, to the point of subjective animosity. TSElliot323 (talk) 05:12, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 10:44, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Pat McAfee interview

Rodgers appeared on McAfee today and explained very logically and coherently why he decided that it was best for his health not to get the jab, including that he is allergic to ingredients in two of the shots, and the third shot (J&J) was pulled from the market because of its dangerous side effects. He also mentioned that he has already cured himself of the strongest virus symptoms with Ivermectin and that he sees the that most of the impetus behind the virus push is politically-motivated. I suggest adding a few sentences on all that to the article. https://www.si.com/nfl/2021/11/05/aaron-rodgers-interview-pat-mcafee-vaccination-status-covid-19-immunized-ivermectin-joe-rogan — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.255.69.229 (talk) 22:57, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

His COVID situation has since been added.—Bagumba (talk) 04:21, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of balance

While Aaron Rodgers is of course American, Wikipedia is international and should avoid taking a national point of view. Internationally, Aaron Rodgers is only known for his conspiracy theories about Covid-19 and his lies about his own medical status. This should be mentioned in the lede, and probably have it's own section in the body of the article. Jeppiz (talk) 11:46, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Jeppiz: I agree it can be expanded in the body, quite possibly into its own section given his recent sitdown interview from today. The lede is a representation of the body though, and until it is expanded, it should not be included in the lede. On a side note, I'm not sure it's fair to say Aaron Rodgers is "only known for his conspiracy theories about COVID-19" internationally. Surely international sourcing has covered more than just the COVID-19 bit concerning Rodgers. ––FormalDude talk 11:55, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@FormalDude: I agree with all you say. Of course NFL fans around the world would know him bit (speaking as a European) NFL nevers hits the news here apart from Super Bowl, it's not among the 30 most covered sports. Having had a look at several different European media (in the UK, France, Germany and Sweden), the only articles about Rodgers are for conspiracy theories, lies about his status, and his Covid (anecdotally, I had never heard about him before, and I think it's safe to assume the same goes for most people outside the US). Jeppiz (talk) 12:10, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
A relevant guideline is MOS:LEADBIO: What is most recent is not necessarily what is most noteworthy: new information should be carefully balanced against old, with due weight accorded to each.Bagumba (talk) 14:19, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Jeppiz, please don't editorialize. Wikipedia is not a owned by Big Pharma. It is neutral and does not take a side on the vaccine controversy. 96.255.69.229 (talk) 17:24, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
To the IP: First, nobody except you has mentioned that, ethe rest of us are discussing media coverage. Second, you're wrong Wikipedia - read WP:NPOV. Wikipedia is neutral in the sense that we report scientific consensus. WP is in no way ever "neutral" between science and conspiracy theories. Jeppiz (talk) 21:59, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nba Champion (As manager) Should be added to the career highlights section.

Because technically as a owner of the Bucks he got a ring.