Jump to content

Talk:Victoria line: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
The Extension Of Victoria Line: please stop guessing about what might happen
Tag: Reverted
No edit summary
Line 43: Line 43:
: Ditto with [[Northern line]] too - similar looking edits from another IP. [[User:Turini2|Turini2]] ([[User talk:Turini2|talk]]) 14:20, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
: Ditto with [[Northern line]] too - similar looking edits from another IP. [[User:Turini2|Turini2]] ([[User talk:Turini2|talk]]) 14:20, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
:: The entries are inaccurate, de Menezes was not a tourist but working as an electrician. [[User:Murgatroyd49|Murgatroyd49]] ([[User talk:Murgatroyd49|talk]]) 09:47, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
:: The entries are inaccurate, de Menezes was not a tourist but working as an electrician. [[User:Murgatroyd49|Murgatroyd49]] ([[User talk:Murgatroyd49|talk]]) 09:47, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

== The Extension Of Victoria Line ==

The Extension Will Began The construction In 2027.
From Brixton-Nunhead
This Will Be Above Grounds
* Loughborough Junction (2036)
* Camberewell (2036)
* Pechkam Rye (2039)
* Nunhead (2039) <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/49.204.142.79|49.204.142.79]] ([[User talk:49.204.142.79#top|talk]]) 15:34, 27 November 2021 (UTC)</small>
:Please stop [[WP:CRYSTAL|guessing]] about what might happen. --[[User:Redrose64|<span style="color:#a80000; background:#ffeeee; text-decoration:inherit">Red</span>rose64]] &#x1f339; ([[User talk:Redrose64|talk]]) 15:39, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:41, 27 November 2021

Good articleVictoria line has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 6, 2010Good article nomineeNot listed
January 5, 2015Peer reviewReviewed
October 27, 2018Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on December 2, 2018.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the London Underground Victoria line (train pictured) was so named because it sounded "just right"?
Current status: Good article
WikiProject iconTrains: Rapid transit / in UK / in London GA‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.
GAThis article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Associated projects or task forces:
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Rapid transit.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as High-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject London Transport (assessed as High-importance).

Station spacing

The Service and rolling stock section says "because of its evenly spaced stations" - this is demonstrably untrue. Kings Cross is much closer to Euston (0.75 km) than to Highbury & Islington (2.43 km). --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 07:52, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And from H&I to Finsbury Park is one of the longest underground gaps in the network. Better get rid of that misinfo. —SerialNumber54129 paranoia /cheap sh*t room 08:09, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
By "because of its evenly spaced stations" means you don't have the situation such as Leicester Square and Covent Garden being right next door to each other. The HMSO source also adds, "Finally, by having fewer stations than the Piccadilly Line between King's Cross and Finsbury Park, the Victoria Line would be faster over that stretch". I think "fewer stops" describes it best. Specifically, I was thinking about the "hack" from Morden to Kings Cross by getting on the Victoria at Stockwell instead of staying on the Northern, which is reportedly faster (though I didn't have a stopwatch). Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 09:46, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that's what it means; but "evenly-spaced" means something else to the reader, and is not a reflection of the source. It seems to have been adjusted though, so all's well. —SerialNumber54129 paranoia /cheap sh*t room 09:50, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps "long-stretches between stations outside of Zone 1 / centre of London"; North of King's Cross there generally 2 kilometres / 1.5 miles between stops (Tottenhale Hale excepted). —Sladen (talk) 10:19, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong dates

There is a problem with the dates, some of the stations opened in 1870s.. So how the hell did the line open in 1960s, a good 90 years later.150.101.100.140 (talk) 03:38, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Because this line was built to connect already-existing stations on other lines, and consequently every station on this line (with the exception of Pimlico) already existed before the Victoria Line was built. ‑ Iridescent 09:04, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jean Charles de Menezes

There appears to be an edit war about whether the Shooting of Jean Charles de Menezes belongs in this article. The source given is "Man shot in terror hunt was innocent young Brazilian" from The Observer, but this does not mention the Victoria line anywhere and says de Menezes was shot in Stockwell tube station. The article on the shooting does not mention the Victoria line; it implies that de Menezes was travelling from Stockwell to Kilburn tube station which would normally involve the Victoria line to Green Park and changing to the Jubilee, but it could also involve the Northern Line Charing Cross Branch and changing at Waterloo. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:40, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I would argue that the Shooting of Jean Charles de Menezes best belongs in the Stockwell tube station article. It's not notable to the Victoria line itself. Similar edits have been made to District line regarding the Parsons Green train bombing by the same IP editor - again, notable in the Parsons Green tube station article, but not the District line. Turini2 (talk) 14:18, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ditto with Northern line too - similar looking edits from another IP. Turini2 (talk) 14:20, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The entries are inaccurate, de Menezes was not a tourist but working as an electrician. Murgatroyd49 (talk) 09:47, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]