Caipira dialect: Difference between revisions
tag {{Bare URL image}}, {{Bare URL PDF}} or {{Bare URL plain text}} per HTTP MIME type |
Expanded some portions of the phonology segment of this article |
||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
==Phonology== |
==Phonology== |
||
{{More citations needed section|date=September 2016}} |
{{More citations needed section|date=September 2016}} |
||
There may be some variation between speakers, the following is a description of various features of this dialect that is sometimes described as having a significant number of particularties: |
|||
=== Rhoticism === |
=== [[Rhotacism|Rhoticism]] === |
||
Phonetically, the most important differences in comparison with standard Brazilian Portuguese are the [[alveolar approximant|postalveolar]] or [[Retroflex approximant|retroflex]] approximants ({{IPA|[{{IPA link|ɹ̠}} ~ {{IPA link|ɻ}}]}}) for {{angle bracket|r}} as allophone of [[European Portuguese|European]] and ''[[São Paulo|paulistano]]'' {{IPA|[r ~ ɹ]}} <ref>{{cite web |last1=OUSHIRO |first1=Livia |title=A pronúncia de (–r) em coda silábica no português paulistano |access-date=7 September 2021 |url=https://revistas.gel.org.br/rg/article/view/39}}</ref> in the syllable coda ({{IPAslink|ʁ}} in the syllable coda for most Brazilian dialects), as in most areas there's [<nowiki/>[[Voiced labial–velar approximant|u̯]] ~ ʊ̯] realization of coda <l>, although not as in most area, it can also be pronounced as the coda <r> of it, {{IPA|[{{IPA link|ɹ̠}} ~ {{IPA link|ɻ}}]}}<ref name=":0" /> |
Phonetically, the most important differences in comparison with standard Brazilian Portuguese are the [[alveolar approximant|postalveolar]] or [[Retroflex approximant|retroflex]] approximants ({{IPA|[{{IPA link|ɹ̠}} ~ {{IPA link|ɻ}}]}}) for {{angle bracket|r}} as allophone of [[European Portuguese|European]] and ''[[São Paulo|paulistano]]'' {{IPA|[r ~ ɹ]}} <ref>{{cite web |last1=OUSHIRO |first1=Livia |title=A pronúncia de (–r) em coda silábica no português paulistano |access-date=7 September 2021 |url=https://revistas.gel.org.br/rg/article/view/39}}</ref> in the syllable coda ({{IPAslink|ʁ}} in the syllable coda for most Brazilian dialects), as in most areas there's [<nowiki/>[[Voiced labial–velar approximant|u̯]] ~ ʊ̯] realization of coda <l>, although not as in most area, it can also be pronounced as the coda <r> of it, {{IPA|[{{IPA link|ɹ̠}} ~ {{IPA link|ɻ}}]}}<ref name=":0" /> |
||
The most common coda ar allophones of ''caipira'' is not the same of those in urban areas of hinterland São Paulo and some speakers of the capital and the coast, [[alveolar approximant]] {{IPAblink|ɹ}} and [[r-colored vowel]]. Some ''caipira'' speakers may use those instead<sup>[[Original Research|[citation needed]]]</sup> |
The most common coda ar allophones of ''caipira'' is not the same of those in urban areas of hinterland São Paulo and some speakers of the capital and the coast, [[alveolar approximant]] {{IPAblink|ɹ}} and [[r-colored vowel]]. Some ''caipira'' speakers may use those instead<sup>[[Original Research|[citation needed]]]</sup> |
||
=== Iotization === |
=== {{IPA|/ʎ/}} Iotization === |
||
The merger of {{IPAslink|ʎ}} <lh> into the semivowel {{IPAblink|j}},as in the Northeast dialect ''Nordestino'' although unlike it this can't happen for its nasal equivallent and similar to, but not exactly like ''[[yeísmo]] ([{{IPAslink|ʎ}}] → [ʝ])'' is a feature of caipira, some may not merge {{IPA|/ʎ/}} into {{IPA|[j]}} <sup>[[Original Research|[original research?]]]</sup>or may vocalize the <l><sup>[[Original Research|[original research?]]]</sup>. Rarer pronunciations include using approximants for ''all'' instances in which European speakers of Portuguese have {{IPA|[ɾ]}} <sup>[[Original Research|[original research?]]]</sup>, including the intervocalic and post-consonantal ones (like in [[American English]]) or using a palatal approximant {{IPA|[j]}} instead of a rhotic approximant. That, while more common in the ''caipira'' area by its particular phonology, is more often associated with [[speech-language pathology]]. |
The merger of {{IPAslink|ʎ}} <lh> into the semivowel {{IPAblink|j}},as in the Northeast dialect ''Nordestino'' although unlike it this can't happen for its nasal equivallent and similar to, but not exactly like ''[[yeísmo]] ([{{IPAslink|ʎ}}] → [ʝ])'' is a feature of caipira, some may not merge {{IPA|/ʎ/}} into {{IPA|[j]}} <sup>[[Original Research|[original research?]]]</sup>or may vocalize the <l><sup>[[Original Research|[original research?]]]</sup>. Rarer pronunciations include using approximants for ''all'' instances in which European speakers of Portuguese have {{IPA|[ɾ]}} <sup>[[Original Research|[original research?]]]</sup>, including the intervocalic and post-consonantal ones (like in [[American English]]) or using a palatal approximant {{IPA|[j]}} instead of a rhotic approximant. That, while more common in the ''caipira'' area by its particular phonology, is more often associated with [[speech-language pathology]]. |
||
=== Lowering === |
=== Lowering === |
||
The lowering of \i\ to [e] happens in some context in ''caipira'' speech, so <país> "country" gets realized as [päes] in caipira speech, this can also happen with diphtongs and semi-vowels, |
The lowering of \i\ to [e] happens in some context in ''caipira'' speech, so <país> "country" gets realized as [päes] in caipira speech, this can also happen with diphtongs and semi-vowels, \i j\ become [e] and \w u\ become [o] |
||
<ref name=":0">http://www.gel.hospedagemdesites.ws/estudoslinguisticos/volumes/38/EL_V38N2_04.pdf {{Bare URL PDF|date=March 2022}}</ref> |
<ref name=":0">http://www.gel.hospedagemdesites.ws/estudoslinguisticos/volumes/38/EL_V38N2_04.pdf {{Bare URL PDF|date=March 2022}}</ref> |
||
Line 53: | Line 54: | ||
In this dialect it ocurrs in 'Vocalic Groups' (c<u>ãe</u>s, ar<u>ea</u>s, ... but not dipthongs like m<u>ai</u>s \aj\, l<u>ei</u>te \ej\) and in stressed vowels and the result of the heightening is [i] and [u], elision often happens in cases where it happens<ref name=":0" /> |
In this dialect it ocurrs in 'Vocalic Groups' (c<u>ãe</u>s, ar<u>ea</u>s, ... but not dipthongs like m<u>ai</u>s \aj\, l<u>ei</u>te \ej\) and in stressed vowels and the result of the heightening is [i] and [u], elision often happens in cases where it happens<ref name=":0" /> |
||
=== Diphthongization before specific consonants === |
|||
=== [j]-gliding === |
|||
Certain vowels start to glide to a [j] sound before coda <nowiki><s> as in other dialects (this merges </nowiki>''mas'' and ''mais'', that difference may be confusing for someone that's why there's a significant amount of material explaning the differences between the too<ref>https://www.normaculta.com.br/mas-ou-mais/</ref>)<ref>http://www.linguasagem.ufscar.br/index.php/linguasagem/article/download/1423/894</ref>, this may be analyzed as adding a [j], this pronounciation, there are identified cases where this sort of shift happens before <n> in ''Caipira'' as in some idiolets of ''Paulistano''<ref>https://www.bbc.com/portuguese/curiosidades-51275192</ref>, that is the dialect spoken casually in the urban regions of the southeast<ref name=":0" />, this sort of realization was historicly registered tipically only in other veneculars but that doesn't mean it doesn't occur in more educated speakers, those that know the standard but may do this in familiar, colloquial or informal registers of language<ref name=":0" /><ref>https://alib.ufba.br/sites/alib.ufba.br/files/r0395-1.pdf</ref> |
|||
Certain vowels start to glide to a [j] sound before coda <nowiki><s> as in other dialects (this merges </nowiki>''mas'' and ''mais''), but also before <n><ref name=":0" /> |
|||
=== Elision of consonants === |
=== Elision of consonants === |
||
It frequently happens with \r\ (Example: [pro] ''→'' [po]) in |
It frequently happens with \r\ (Example: [pro] ''→'' [po]) in specific situations, those aren't the same as what may happen in dialects like ''Paulistano'' where final rhotics in infinitives of verbs may get removed, elision sometimes described, more informally in portuguese as "comendo" (that usually passes the idea of consuming food) <ref>https://paulistanes.spturis.com.br/mania-de-paulistano/</ref> but also with vowels (Example: the first <e> in <cadáveres> and <inspetor> get deleted), there are reported cases of this happening in the 1840s and a vowel before <nh> may not get realized<ref name=":0" /> |
||
=== Ephetentesis === |
=== Ephetentesis === |
||
There's the usage of |
There's the usage of a vowel to break unfrequent consonant clusters<ref name=":0" /> as in some dialects <ref>{{Cite web |last=Sá Canfield |first=Samanta |date=6 November 2018 |title=BREVE DESCRIÇÃO DA EPÊNTESE CONSONANTAL EM PALAVRAS DERIVADAS POR SUFIXAÇÃO NO PORTUGUÊS BRASILEIRO |url=https://seer.ufrgs.br/cadernosdoil/article/download/83495/50776 |url-status=live}}</ref>, ''Caipira'' usually uses [e], but there are dialects that use a sound more like [i]<ref>www.letras.ufmg.br/padrao_cms/documentos/profs/thaiscristofaro/2000_ART_Sobre a quebra de encontros consonantais no português brasileiro.pdf</ref> (advogado ''→'' adevogado) but there are cases of rhotic ephetentesis (debuta ''→'' debruta), sometimes it also happens because of [[hypercorrection]], (inclusive ''→'' inclusivel), ephetensis also occurs more broadly in Brazillian Portuguese when borrowing a word in certain contexts<ref>https://pt.quora.com/Por-que-muitos-dos-brasileiros-adicionam-um-E-ou-I-a-falar-em-ingl%C3%AAs-com-palavras-come%C3%A7adas-por-S-e-depois-consoante-Exemplo-small-%C3%A9-pronunciado-como-izmou-smith-como-izmit-spend-como-izpend</ref> |
||
=== [[Metathesis (linguistics)|Metathesis]] === |
|||
=== Methatesis === |
|||
This process happens in |
This process happens in \p f\ + \r\ + \V\ sequences where the rhotic + vowel position invert, that also in other situations like with the postposition <nowiki><em> (that is realized as [ni])</nowiki><ref name=":0" /><ref name=":0" /><sup>''[Expand]''</sup> |
||
=== Shifts in the nasalized property === |
|||
=== Nasality === |
|||
Things sometimes gain or lose nasality (ordenou ''→'' ordeou & economizar ''→'' enconomizar), the addition of nasaling may happen with \i\ and \e\ in inital position on their own, sometimes word final nasality is found in word final position (contagem ''→'' contage) |
Things sometimes gain or lose nasality ([NASAL+]) (ordenou ''→'' ordeou & economizar ''→'' enconomizar), the addition of nasaling may happen with \i\ and \e\ in inital position on their own, sometimes word final nasality is found in word final position (contagem ''→'' contage), that merges "fala" (3rd person singular) with "falam" (3rd person plural), in some representations like ''[[Chuck Billy (Chuck Billy 'n' Folks)|Chico Bento]]'', it can be seen<ref name=":0" /><ref>https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Figura-7-Chico-Bento-em-entrevista_fig7_353947424</ref> |
||
=== Shifts in [[Voice (phonetics)|voice ''(sometimes voicedness)'']] === |
|||
=== Voice\Voicedness === |
|||
Things may gain voice when in between voiced sounds (fétido ''→'' fedito), even as early as the 1808 phenoma like devoicing ([bt] ''→'' [pt]) |
Things may gain voice when in between voiced sounds (fétido ''→'' fedito), even as early as the 1808 there were phenoma like devoicing ([bt] ''→'' [pt])<ref name=":0" /><sup>''[Expand]''</sup> |
||
=== Dipthongs shifting to monothongs === |
=== Dipthongs shifting to monothongs === |
||
Unstressd \ow\, \aj\, \ej\, \õw̃\ and \ẽj̃\ may lose their semi-vowel,<ref name=":0" /> but monothongization is in no way limited to ''Caipira'' portuguese and can be observed in other varieties (that includes portuguese varieties<ref>https://ciberduvidas.iscte-iul.pt/consultorio/perguntas/o-dialecto-estremenho/29135</ref>), the [ow] ''→'' [o] |
Unstressd \ow\, \aj\, \ej\, \õw̃\ and \ẽj̃\ may lose their semi-vowel,<ref name=":0" /> but monothongization is in no way limited to ''Caipira'' portuguese and can be observed in other varieties (that includes portuguese varieties<ref>https://ciberduvidas.iscte-iul.pt/consultorio/perguntas/o-dialecto-estremenho/29135</ref>), the [ow] ''→'' [o], which results in the short version of the temporal copula <estou> being \to\ (<tô> or <to>) and not \tow\, the broad range of how much of portugal is affected by this shift is from half to 2/3 of portugal<ref name=":0" /><ref>https://web.archive.org/web/20171011052325/http://www.abralin.org/site/data/uploads/revistas/2009-vol-8-n-1/mariasocorro.pdf</ref>, other shift like \ej\ and \aj\ also affect other regions too<ref>http://www.gelne.com.br/arquivos/anais/gelne-2014/anexos/410.pdf</ref>. |
||
=== Table of variants === |
=== Table of variants === |
Revision as of 02:03, 9 April 2022
Caipira Brazilian Portuguese dialect | |
---|---|
Pronunciation | Portuguese pronunciation: [kajˈpiɾɐ], locally [kajˈpiɽɐ] |
Native to | Rural areas of São Paulo Mato Grosso do Sul Goiás Minas Gerais Paraná |
Native speakers | Unknown. There are about 6 million rural inhabitants in the linguistic area.[1] |
Indo-European
| |
Language codes | |
ISO 639-3 | – |
Glottolog | None |
Linguasphere | 51-AAA-am |
Caipira (Portuguese pronunciation: [kajˈpiɾɐ] ; Old Tupi: ka'apir or kaa-pira, which means "bush cutter") is a Brazilian Portuguese dialect spoken in the rural areas of the State of São Paulo and adjacent parts of neighbouring Mato Grosso do Sul, Goiás, Minas Gerais, and Paraná.
History
The formation of the caipira dialect began with the arrival of the Portuguese in São Vicente in the sixteenth century. Ongoing research points to several influences, such as Galician-Portuguese, represented in some archaic aspects of the dialect, and the língua geral paulista, a Tupian Portuguese-like creole codified by the Jesuits.[2] The westward colonial expansion by the Bandeirantes expedition spread the dialect throughout a dialectal and cultural continuum called Paulistania[3] in the provinces of São Paulo, Mato Grosso (later, Mato Grosso do Sul and Rondônia), Goiás (with the Federal District), and Minas Gerais.
In the 1920s, the scholar Amadeu Amaral published a grammar and predicted the imminent death of the Caipira dialect, caused by urbanization and the coming wave of mass immigration resulting from the monoculture of coffee.[4] However, the dialect survived in rural subculture, with music, folk stories (causos), and a substratum in city-dwellers' speech, recorded by folklorists and linguists, although some Caipira variants where already heard by the 1790s to 1890s[5]
Sociolinguistics
Although the caipira accent originated in the state of São Paulo, the middle and upper class sociolect of the state capital is now a very different variety closer to standard Portuguese but with some Italian-influenced elements, and working-class paulistanos may sound somewhat like caipira to people of other parts of Brazil, such as Bahia and Rio de Janeiro. Caipira is spoken mostly in the countryside.[citation needed]
Phonology
This section needs additional citations for verification. (September 2016) |
There may be some variation between speakers, the following is a description of various features of this dialect that is sometimes described as having a significant number of particularties:
Phonetically, the most important differences in comparison with standard Brazilian Portuguese are the postalveolar or retroflex approximants ([ɹ̠ ~ ɻ]) for ⟨r⟩ as allophone of European and paulistano [r ~ ɹ] [6] in the syllable coda (/ʁ/ in the syllable coda for most Brazilian dialects), as in most areas there's [u̯ ~ ʊ̯] realization of coda <l>, although not as in most area, it can also be pronounced as the coda <r> of it, [ɹ̠ ~ ɻ][5]
The most common coda ar allophones of caipira is not the same of those in urban areas of hinterland São Paulo and some speakers of the capital and the coast, alveolar approximant [ɹ] and r-colored vowel. Some caipira speakers may use those instead[citation needed]
/ʎ/ Iotization
The merger of /ʎ/ <lh> into the semivowel [j],as in the Northeast dialect Nordestino although unlike it this can't happen for its nasal equivallent and similar to, but not exactly like yeísmo ([/ʎ/] → [ʝ]) is a feature of caipira, some may not merge /ʎ/ into [j] [original research?]or may vocalize the <l>[original research?]. Rarer pronunciations include using approximants for all instances in which European speakers of Portuguese have [ɾ] [original research?], including the intervocalic and post-consonantal ones (like in American English) or using a palatal approximant [j] instead of a rhotic approximant. That, while more common in the caipira area by its particular phonology, is more often associated with speech-language pathology.
Lowering
The lowering of \i\ to [e] happens in some context in caipira speech, so <país> "country" gets realized as [päes] in caipira speech, this can also happen with diphtongs and semi-vowels, \i j\ become [e] and \w u\ become [o]
Heightening
This phenoma happens in most dialects although not all (the dialect Curitibano\Sulista doesn't have this[7])
In this dialect it ocurrs in 'Vocalic Groups' (cães, areas, ... but not dipthongs like mais \aj\, leite \ej\) and in stressed vowels and the result of the heightening is [i] and [u], elision often happens in cases where it happens[5]
Diphthongization before specific consonants
Certain vowels start to glide to a [j] sound before coda <s> as in other dialects (this merges mas and mais, that difference may be confusing for someone that's why there's a significant amount of material explaning the differences between the too[8])[9], this may be analyzed as adding a [j], this pronounciation, there are identified cases where this sort of shift happens before <n> in Caipira as in some idiolets of Paulistano[10], that is the dialect spoken casually in the urban regions of the southeast[5], this sort of realization was historicly registered tipically only in other veneculars but that doesn't mean it doesn't occur in more educated speakers, those that know the standard but may do this in familiar, colloquial or informal registers of language[5][11]
Elision of consonants
It frequently happens with \r\ (Example: [pro] → [po]) in specific situations, those aren't the same as what may happen in dialects like Paulistano where final rhotics in infinitives of verbs may get removed, elision sometimes described, more informally in portuguese as "comendo" (that usually passes the idea of consuming food) [12] but also with vowels (Example: the first <e> in <cadáveres> and <inspetor> get deleted), there are reported cases of this happening in the 1840s and a vowel before <nh> may not get realized[5]
Ephetentesis
There's the usage of a vowel to break unfrequent consonant clusters[5] as in some dialects [13], Caipira usually uses [e], but there are dialects that use a sound more like [i][14] (advogado → adevogado) but there are cases of rhotic ephetentesis (debuta → debruta), sometimes it also happens because of hypercorrection, (inclusive → inclusivel), ephetensis also occurs more broadly in Brazillian Portuguese when borrowing a word in certain contexts[15]
This process happens in \p f\ + \r\ + \V\ sequences where the rhotic + vowel position invert, that also in other situations like with the postposition <em> (that is realized as [ni])[5][5][Expand]
Shifts in the nasalized property
Things sometimes gain or lose nasality ([NASAL+]) (ordenou → ordeou & economizar → enconomizar), the addition of nasaling may happen with \i\ and \e\ in inital position on their own, sometimes word final nasality is found in word final position (contagem → contage), that merges "fala" (3rd person singular) with "falam" (3rd person plural), in some representations like Chico Bento, it can be seen[5][16]
Shifts in voice (sometimes voicedness)
Things may gain voice when in between voiced sounds (fétido → fedito), even as early as the 1808 there were phenoma like devoicing ([bt] → [pt])[5][Expand]
Dipthongs shifting to monothongs
Unstressd \ow\, \aj\, \ej\, \õw̃\ and \ẽj̃\ may lose their semi-vowel,[5] but monothongization is in no way limited to Caipira portuguese and can be observed in other varieties (that includes portuguese varieties[17]), the [ow] → [o], which results in the short version of the temporal copula <estou> being \to\ (<tô> or <to>) and not \tow\, the broad range of how much of portugal is affected by this shift is from half to 2/3 of portugal[5][18], other shift like \ej\ and \aj\ also affect other regions too[19].
Table of variants
Rio de Janeiro and São Paulo | Caipira | English | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Spelling | Pronunciation (IPA) | Pronunciation spelling | Pronunciation (IPA) | |
flor | ['floh ~ 'flox ~ˈfloʁ ~ ˈflo(ɾ) ~ 'floɹ] | frô, flô | [ˈfɾo ~ ˈflo] | flower |
falso | [ˈfau̯su ~ ˈfaʊ̯sʊ] | farso | [ˈfaɻsʊ] | false |
melhor | [me̞ˈʎɔχ ~ mɪˈʎɔ(ɾ)] | mió, mior | [miˈjɔ ~ miˈɔɻ] | better |
voar | [vuˈaʁ ~ vʊˈa(ɾ)] | avuá | [ɐ̞vʊˈa] | to fly |
por quê? | [puʀˈke ~ poɾˈke] | pur quê? | [puɻˈke ~ pʊɻˈke] | why? |
ganhamos | [ɡɐ̃ˈ ȷ̃ɐ̃muʃ ~ ɡɐˈ ȷ̃ɐ̃mʊs] | ganhemo | [ɡɐ̃ˈ ȷ̃ẽ̞mʊ] | we won |
chegamos | [ʃⁱˈɡɐ̃muʃ ~ ʃeˈɡɐ̃mʊs] | cheguemo | [ʃɛˈɡẽ̞mʊ] | we came |
voltamos | [vo̞u̯ˈtɐ̃muʃ ~ voːˈtɐ̃mʊs] | vortemo | [vo̞ɻˈtẽ̞mʊ] | we came back |
bêbado | [ˈbeβɐdu ~ ˈbebadʊ] | beudo | [ˈbeʊ̯dʊ] | drunk |
Morphology and syntax
This section needs additional citations for verification. (September 2016) |
Pronouns
- The usage of "cê" (happens in some) or "ocê" as the informal 2rd person singular pronoun, which derived from "você", the pronoun used in most of brazil[20][5]
- "Tu" never gets used not even with "você"\"ele" conjugations (Tu anda, tu peida, ...) like in some places[21]
- "Vós" never gets used
Inflectional Morphology
Observed inflectional morphology development, some of those aren't restricted to the Caipira area
Gains:
- Com + a = coa[5]
- De + outra = D'outra[5]
- Para + dentro = padãtu[5]
- Para + art = Pa\Po[5]
- Negation word distingtion: Não [nɐ̃ʊ̯̃] in short replies, and num [nʊ̃] for negative phrases[22]
- Pra\Para constracts with Ocê (you)[5]
- P(r) + ose = p(r)ose
Loss:
- Because of nasalation shifts, pairs like 'falam' (3nd person plural) and 'fala' (2\3nd person singular) merge[5]
Usage-shift:
- As other venecular varieties, if something already makes clear that you're talking about something in the plural, a caipira-speaker may drop its inflection: standard: essas coisas bonitas [ˈɛsɐsˈ koi̯zɐz bʊˈn̠ʲitɐs] "those beautiful things" (those-PL beautiful-PL thing-PL) ↔ caipira and other venecular dialects: essas coisa bonita [ˈ(ɛ)sɐsˈ koi̯zɐ bʊˈn̠ʲitɐ] (those-PL beautiful-∅ thing-∅) \ um monte de livro (a lot of book), because the fact that there's a lot of book implies that there's more than one[23]
Caipira is the Brazilian dialect by far most influenced by the línguas gerais, which is said to be a recent decreolization of them into a more standard Brazilian Portuguese. Nevertheless, the decreolization was successful, and despite all the differences, a speaker of Vernacular Brazilian Portuguese of other regions has no difficulty in understanding caipira at all, but foreigners who learned to deal only with standard lusitanizing Brazilian Portuguese may have as much difficulty with caipira as they would have with other colloquial and vernacular registers of the language
Representation
This section needs additional citations for verification. (September 2016) |
There is no standard orthography, and Brazilians are taught only the standard variant when learning Portuguese in schools (among the reasons why the dialect was often thought of as endangered in the course of socio-economic development of the country). A nonstandard orthography intended to convey caipira pronunciation is featured prominently in the popular children's comic book Chico Bento, in which some characters speak in it.
See also
References
- ^ 2010 Census
- ^ Ataliba T. de Castilho (Org. 2007). História do Português Paulista. Série Estudos - Vol. I. São Paulo: Setor de Publicações do IEL / Unicamp
- ^ Ribeiro, Darcy. Os Brasileiros
- ^ Amaral, Amadeu . O Dialeto Caipira. São Paulo: Casa Editora "O livro", 1920.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u http://www.gel.hospedagemdesites.ws/estudoslinguisticos/volumes/38/EL_V38N2_04.pdf [bare URL PDF]
- ^ OUSHIRO, Livia. "A pronúncia de (–r) em coda silábica no português paulistano". Retrieved 7 September 2021.
- ^ This seems to be well-known among brazillians and it is mention by this article:https://www.gazetadopovo.com.br/conteudo-publicitario/vina/de-onde-vem-o-sotaque-curitibano/
- ^ https://www.normaculta.com.br/mas-ou-mais/
- ^ http://www.linguasagem.ufscar.br/index.php/linguasagem/article/download/1423/894
- ^ https://www.bbc.com/portuguese/curiosidades-51275192
- ^ https://alib.ufba.br/sites/alib.ufba.br/files/r0395-1.pdf
- ^ https://paulistanes.spturis.com.br/mania-de-paulistano/
- ^ Sá Canfield, Samanta (6 November 2018). "BREVE DESCRIÇÃO DA EPÊNTESE CONSONANTAL EM PALAVRAS DERIVADAS POR SUFIXAÇÃO NO PORTUGUÊS BRASILEIRO".
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ www.letras.ufmg.br/padrao_cms/documentos/profs/thaiscristofaro/2000_ART_Sobre a quebra de encontros consonantais no português brasileiro.pdf
- ^ https://pt.quora.com/Por-que-muitos-dos-brasileiros-adicionam-um-E-ou-I-a-falar-em-ingl%C3%AAs-com-palavras-come%C3%A7adas-por-S-e-depois-consoante-Exemplo-small-%C3%A9-pronunciado-como-izmou-smith-como-izmit-spend-como-izpend
- ^ https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Figura-7-Chico-Bento-em-entrevista_fig7_353947424
- ^ https://ciberduvidas.iscte-iul.pt/consultorio/perguntas/o-dialecto-estremenho/29135
- ^ https://web.archive.org/web/20171011052325/http://www.abralin.org/site/data/uploads/revistas/2009-vol-8-n-1/mariasocorro.pdf
- ^ http://www.gelne.com.br/arquivos/anais/gelne-2014/anexos/410.pdf
- ^ https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Figura-1-distribuicao-dos-pronomes-tu-e-voce-no-Brasil_fig1_337046757
- ^ http://i.imgur.com/Mj4Wz2H.png [bare URL image file]
- ^ https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/kanina/article/download/30230/30209/ [bare URL PDF]
- ^ https://pt.quora.com/Por-que-os-brasileiros-est%C3%A3o-tendendo-a-omitir-o-s-final-os-carro-as-casa-bonita-etc
Further reading
- Garcia, Rosicleide Rodrigues. Para o estudo da formação e expansão do dialeto caipira em Capivari. São Paulo: USP, 2009.
- Pires, Cornélio . Conversas ao pé do fogo - IMESP, edição fac-similar, 1984.
- Rodrigues, Ada Natal.O Dialeto Caipira na Região de Piracicaba , Editora Ática, 1974.