Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
No edit summary
Line 394: Line 394:


[[Special:Contributions/95.149.88.216|95.149.88.216]] ([[User talk:95.149.88.216|talk]]) 14:27, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
[[Special:Contributions/95.149.88.216|95.149.88.216]] ([[User talk:95.149.88.216|talk]]) 14:27, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

== 14:29:53, 26 April 2022 review of submission by 69leiden69 ==
{{Lafc|username=69leiden69|ts=14:29:53, 26 April 2022|page=
User:69leiden69/sandbox
}}
I have worked on translating/updating the Dutch language page on architect/artist William Brand, who specializes on light art. Could you kindly check what in this case is missing? It was rejected.
[[User:69leiden69|69leiden69]] ([[User talk:69leiden69|talk]]) 14:29, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:29, 26 April 2022

Main pageTalk pageSubmissions
Category, List, Sorting, Feed		ShowcaseParticipants
Apply, By subject		Reviewing instructions
Help deskBacklog
drives
Shortcuts
Welcome to the Articles for Creation help desk

  • This page is only for questions about article submissions—are you in the right place?
  • Do not provide your email address or other contact details. Answers will be provided on this page.
  • Watch out for scammers! If someone contacts you saying that they can get your draft published for payment, they are trying to scam you. Report such attempts here.
Ask a new question
Please check back often for answers.
Skip to today's questions · Skip to the bottom · Archived discussions


April 20

02:39:21, 20 April 2022 review of submission by Zuoyeshu

Hello fellows, this article took too long for Review waiting, could someone help to improve it and review on it, really appreciated of you, thanks

There is no indication that they pass WP:NMUSICIAN, so I have declined it. Theroadislong (talk) 06:49, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
hello, it was traslated from Chinese wikipedia, accroding to WP:NMUSICIAN he won the best Lyricist Award for Singing 2021 Chinese Music (reference on 3 and 4) ,so now how can i fix this problem? may need your help, thanks Zuoyeshu (talk) 06:54, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Unless the " Lyricist Award" is notable that won't help. Theroadislong (talk) 06:58, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
hi, Lyricist Award has been written in the article and put reference,so this article can be accepted? thanks again Zuoyeshu (talk) 07:09, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No WP:NMUSICIAN requires "Has won or been nominated for a major music award, such as a Grammy, Juno, Mercury, Choice or Grammis award." The "Lyricist Award" is not notable so doesn't help. Theroadislong (talk) 07:16, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Regarding "this article took too long for review waiting"; do you have a particular need for a speedy review? That cannot be guaranteed, we are all volunteers here. 331dot (talk) 07:19, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • please another reviewer can review this article, please review this draft again, because differnet languages site of wikipedia has accepted this musician, such as ,ES,KO,JA,MS,FR. thanks very much.WP:NMUSICIAN requires "Has won or been nominated for a major music award, such as a Grammy, Juno, Mercury, Choice or Grammis award and etc." etc. means it contains another award except for Grammy, Juno, Mercury, Choice or Grammis award.

03:07:43, 20 April 2022 review of submission by CK121119

  I tried to enter a youtube link with a video that contains proof/citations and this isn't mainly a wiki issue but it linked the bing page that had my search for the video instead of the video. Does anyone know how I can get it to link the direct video and not the bing page? You can see this issue in my citation referring to Clark's siblings.

CK121119 (talk) 03:07, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Additional question; How can I add a photo to the page without copyright issues? CK121119 (talk) 03:14, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
CK121119,Considering none of your sources appear to establish notability and the tone of the article is all wrong, I wouldn't worry about the subject's siblings yet. The article is written from either a fan's POV or someone with a relationship to subject. If you have a connection, see WP:COI / WP:PAID. Every statement in a biography of a living person must be backed with an in-line source. For the subject to be notable, the sources need to be reliable sources which are independent and discuss the subject in-depth. Passing mentions are not useful. Also, photos won't help with draft approval and fair use does not apply to drafts, so another issue not to worry about right now.Slywriter (talk) 03:25, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

04:50:11, 20 April 2022 review of submission by Starling2022

Please can you review the new draft submitted.(Starling2022 (talk) 04:50, 20 April 2022 (UTC)) Starling2022 (talk) 04:50, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Starling2022 You would need to resubmit it for another review, but if you were to, I think that it would be rejected again. The sources seem to largely be announcements or press release type articles that say little about the person themselves. You claim that this person was "instrumental" in something but don't say how. Wikipedia is not for merely telling about a person and what they do- any article about a person must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about a person, showing how they meet the special Wikipedia definition of a notable person. "Significant coverage" goes beyond merely telling what the person does, it must go into detail and analysis about why it is important(which the article must then summarize). Please read Your First Article. 331dot (talk) 07:17, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

07:54:58, 20 April 2022 review of submission by Bastiankenn

Hey, I am trying to move my article from my user sandbox to Wikipedia (for review). I can't change the title of the article in the sandbox (it says something like bastiankenn/user sandbox), but when I try to submit and add the actual title it tells me "no draft with such a name exists" and I can't submit the article. Thank you for your help. Bastiankenn (talk) 07:54, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bastiankenn I would suggest that you use Articles for Creation to create drafts. I would say that your sandbox draft appears to be an essay of original research and not an encyclopedia article that summarizes what independent reliable sources say. I'm also wondering if you have considered editing what seems to be the existing articles on these topics, like platform economy that you link to. 331dot (talk) 08:03, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Courtesy link: Draft:Regulation of platform work in the European Union Not yet submitted for review. TechnoTalk (talk) 17:30, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

13:33:46, 20 April 2022 review of draft by Anandhkr

{{SAFESUBST:Void|

Draft was declined for Notability guidelines. It is unclear how a subject who won a prestigious State award in their field is not worthy of an article.

Anandhkr (talk) 13:33, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Because WP:NACTOR says Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions; or Has made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment. Theroadislong (talk) 17:34, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) @Anandhkr: You need more media coverage of the actress to demonstrate notability. See WP:GNG. The sources you have are mostly primary sources, with a listing of the awards without any context. If you can find more media coverage with biographical info, you can add the info and resubmit. TechnoTalk (talk) 17:36, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

16:43:45, 20 April 2022 review of submission by Shatbhisha6

Have made changes and added many reliable sources for establishing notability of the subject. The account that declined the page is now suspended for sockpuppetry.

Shatbhisha6 (talk) 16:43, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Shatbhisha6: There are many sources with a few titles I recognize that on the surface look interesting, but I'll have to dig in and do some translation to see if there's enough. The sock history of the reviewer is problematic, but is not automatically grounds for overturning a decline. TechnoTalk (talk) 17:40, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much, my apologies, didnt mention sock history to overturn. Its just that I found it a bit odd for him to decline it twice. And now that he isnt available, I was wondering who would review it after changes made. Thanks again for taking interest in my article. Shatbhisha6 (talk) 08:46, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Shatbhisha6: I did some cleanup and went through the sources. There are some sources that mention Giri, but most are about people visiting him, people calling him or events that he appeared at. Only #24 appears to be in any way biographical. Since WP:NPRIEST doesn't automatically make gurus notable, you'll need to show more media coverage of him to meet WP:GNG. I noticed that you have many sources about Modi calling him and telling him to close the Kumbh Mela because of Covid, but that's only deserving of one source. I also marked a few things that you added that are unsourced. If you can source everything that is there, that will help. If it can't be sourced, take it out. The article appears to have been resubmitted despite not (in my mind) being ready yet. You have some time to clean it up. Lastly, I linked a few confusing terms to make his role easier to understand. Most people reviewing articles here are not going to know what an Acharya Mahamandaleshwar of Juna Akhada sadhu is, so you'll want to try to explain things in English and link wherever you can. Good luck! TechnoTalk (talk) 21:45, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much for your contributions towards betterment of the article and investing your precious time. Also thank you for explaining in detail on how can make it better. I have made changes as suggested. Since the subject is a monk and follows the traditional way, there are not many public activities that may find mention or coverage in media. I have tried to put as many sources from mainstream independent media with respect to WP:GNG. Request you to suggest what more I can do if it still lacks required sources. Shatbhisha6 (talk) 21:54, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Shatbhisha6: I took a fresh look, and still found some issues. I cleaned up a few, but you still have statements that are not substantiated with sources. If they can't be sourced, you must remove them. Also, if there are not enough sources about him, then he unfortunately doesn't meet Wikipedia's definition of notability. I don't know enough about Indian religious leaders to determine if there's enough now. TechnoTalk (talk) 00:19, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@TechnoTalk: thanks again for your precious efforts, the article now has links of media coverage from almost all the top mainstream media of India. Most of them have the subject in special mention or in the headline itself. I checked with WP:GNG, in my understanding, it now meets notability criteria. If it still lacks anything, i'll be immensely grateful if you could tell what and exactly how much more sources are needed. Shatbhisha6 (talk) 09:11, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Shatbhisha6: I think we're close, but it would be great if there were more in-depth profiles of him. Almost everything is about a meeting he attended, or a speech he gave, with minimal biographical info about him. The Jerusalem Post piece mentions that he heads up thousands of ashrams, which should be a measure of his significance in Indian society. The fact that most of the religious terms are unfamiliar to the average reviewer hurts your chances. The fact that the sources are in Hindi, making this harder to review. Hopefully someone better versed with India religious organizations and personnel, and who doesn't mind using Google translate, can help give this a proper review. In the meantime, there's stray reference at the beginning of the early life section that you'll want to move. Lastly, you should only have the best sources at the end of a sentence, not 4-5 that all say the same thing. That kind of reference stuffing is called WP:OVERCITE, and it's not only a form of trying to influence the approval, but it makes the article harder to read. TechnoTalk (talk) 21:10, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Shatbhisha6: Also be careful about using YouTube links as sources. They don't impart any notability on the subject, and usually just show that someone spoke or attended a certain event. It won't help the article get approved, and can actually clutter the sourcing up and make it harder for reviewers to find the reliable sources that do demonstrate notability. TechnoTalk (talk) 21:18, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@TechnoTalkHi, thank you so much for your guidance and efforts, it has helped me understand wikipedia editing a lot I have removed extra sources. Actually initially i hadnt put so many sources, but one editor dismissed almost all the sources as biased, so I didnt know which source is considered reliable and which isnt. The sources quoted here indicate the subjects notability by way of his mention in the headline or mention in the articles, about him attending/participating various meeting or religious events of national level or importance as an eminent personality. The Youtube links added are of credible and independent mainstream media. What more can be done. Thanks again. Shatbhisha6 (talk) 15:21, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

18:11:56, 20 April 2022 review of draft by DMLilli2020


Hi. I tried to write a simple little article about a NJ attorney (he is a major figure here in NJ) who just had his first novel published. He asked me to do this so I did it - but it was not approved. I tried 4 times over a few days. Can you send me an example of a perfect or strong article - he is not famous but well known due to his profession and now his book! Thank you! Diane Lilli


DMLilli2020 (talk) 18:11, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DMLilli2020 The best articles to use as a model are those classified as good articles(click the link). A Wikipedia article is not for merely telling about someone and what they do. An article about a person must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the person, showing how they meet the special Wikipedia definition of a notable person. "Significant coverage" goes beyond merely telling what the person does, it goes in depth about the person describing how they are significant. Note that "famous" and "notability" are not the same thing. A person can be famous and not merit a Wikipedia article, and a person can merit an article without being famous. Please read Your First Article.
As you say Mr. Sangillo asked you to edit about him, you have a conflict of interest that you should declare on your user talk page. If you work for Mr. Sangillo or he is otherwise compensating you for your work, the Wikipedia Terms of Use require you to make a formal paid editing declaration(click for instructions). 331dot (talk) 18:36, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 23:43:24, 20 April 2022 for assistance on AfC submission by EagEwee


Hello, my recent submission for Process Technology, a company manufacturing heaters and power supplies, has been declined. Would the removal of the awards cited assist with an approval? Would I also need to remove the references to the awards from the body of the post? Any suggestions are appreciated. Thank you. EagEwee (talk) 23:43, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

EagEwee Yes the awards should be removed; awards generally only merit inclusion if the award itself merits an article (like Academy Award or Grammy Award). The main problem is that you do not have enough sources. A Wikipedia article about a company must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the company, showing how it meets Wikipedia's special definition of a notable company. The vast majority of your draft is unsourced. We don't just want documentation of awards or company activities.
I see that you declared a COI. If you work for this company, you must make the stricter paid editing disclosure. 331dot (talk) 00:06, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
On a side note, the company name makes it difficult to search for sources so reviewers will likely not spend much time looking outside of what you provide. Keep in mind that those you add to the draft will need to meet WP:ORGCRIT. Simply adding sources will not be enough. Wikipedia requires quality, not quantity. --CNMall41 (talk) 16:17, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 21

01:58:44, 21 April 2022 review of draft by Alihaiderkhan137


Alihaiderkhan137 (talk) 01:58, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Alihaiderkhan137: This is not an article. It's just two links. Please see WP:YOURFIRSTARTICLE. TechnoTalk (talk) 17:33, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

08:09:38, 21 April 2022 review of submission by Vrushabhj

We have requested to create a page for the CEO of our organization - CEEW. The initial draft was rejected due to some issues. We reworked the article, trimmed the content, and added relevant, independent & reliable news websites for references as per the content policy & guidelines, but it has been rejected again. Please help us in identifying the content section that is not meeting the guidelines & guide us in fixing the issue.

Vrushabhj (talk) 08:09, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vrushabhj I've answered you at the Teahouse, please only use one method of seeking assistance at a time to avoid duplication of effort. Since you are editing for your CEO, the Wikipedia Terms of Use require you to declare as a paid editor, see WP:PAID. 331dot (talk) 08:55, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

14:16:56, 21 April 2022 review of submission by Dakkemik


This article was written by the organization itself, as a direct translation of the Swedish language Wikipedia page of the same name. Even though it was declared that the text was written by the organization itself where it could not be cited, it was declined. Since the article is about a student union (an official legal status in Sweden), it's only natural that some parts cannot be verified by independent sources so I am asking for assistance on how to get this article to be approved

damikova (talk) 14:16, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia articles are based on what independent sources say about a topic, if there are none then we don't have an article, we are not a directory. Theroadislong (talk) 14:20, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

14:54:29, 21 April 2022 review of submission by AK Wiki Manger


AK Wiki Manger (talk) 14:54, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia articles are based on what independent sources say about a topic, you have none whatsoever, it was rejected, it will not be considered further. Theroadislong (talk) 15:05, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

20:24:33, 21 April 2022 review of draft by Deelopcus


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Laura_Jane_Clark#TV_Presenting - Hi, I submitted this originally and got feedback almost instantly, its now been 2 months and I have tried to follow the instructions and think the re-submission has gotten lost because I have done it wrong? Or is it just a case of waiting longer this time due to a bigger queue?

Thanks for what you do!

Deelopcus (talk) 20:24, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deelopcus That your first review happened quickly was pure happenstance. As noted on your draft, there are thousands of drafts awaiting review by volunteers, who conduct reviews in no particular order(it is not a queue). 331dot (talk) 00:00, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 20:49:47, 21 April 2022 for assistance on AfC submission by Ishraq Imran Nasif


Ishraq Imran Nasif (talk) 20:49, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ishraq Imran Nasif: You might try looking at Google Scholar to see if his words are cited. That helps with notability. See Wikipedia:Notability (academics). Also look for reviews of his books. And don't include anything that's not cited. TechnoTalk (talk) 22:17, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

22:45:45, 21 April 2022 review of submission by 2620:CC:8000:1C83:291B:B6D0:17B6:44F1


2620:CC:8000:1C83:291B:B6D0:17B6:44F1 (talk) 22:45, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The sources you included do not demonstrate notability. In most cases, you shouldn't use Twitter or other social media, since it its unverified. Please read WP:GNG and WP:YOURFIRSTARTICLE. TechnoTalk (talk) 22:09, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

23:35:40, 21 April 2022 review of draft by Lee Miao Si


Hi Wikipedia team, I am trying to edit my Wikipedia draft which got declined. It is possible to check how do I go about if I wish to add two school to infobox that my subject has attended? Because the details got removed from my infobox. Thank you!

Lee Miao Si (talk) 23:35, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Lee Miao Si: WP:NACTOR requires the subject to have been in lead roles in multiple significant productions. I only see one film that he was in with more than a minor role, Ah Girls Go Army, and the sources say he was the lead in Live Your Dreams. I don't think he's quite there yet. I think it's WP:TOOSOON. He just started getting recognition last year. Perhaps when the AGGA sequel comes out he'll get more press. Also, check that you don't have any duplicate sources. See Wikipedia:Citing sources#Duplicate citations for instructions how to combine the duplicates. Lastly, don't add anything that can't be sourced. Otherwise, it might be removed. TechnoTalk (talk) 22:06, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 22

01:28:31, 22 April 2022 review of submission by Integrityrules17

I believe my article about Sameer Wankhede has all the necessary sources and references still reviewers are not approving my article. The references I have given are reputed world over, the reason that reviewers are citing that "nothing has changed" after review- my reason is that I have changed reference section with all the independent world class secondary sources. The article has most of the basic details and it doesn't require any more change as of now I believe. Since, Wikipedia is not for promotion, I am not adding about his achievements to sound as if I am promoting him. I am very much neuatral in my approach.

And, when it comes to the question of , does this article needs a Wikipedia page or not - it's needed . Sameer Wankhede is a popular figure. You can find so many government officers Wikipedia page and those are not even necessary because they were not even popular for taking actions. I don't know why you guys are repeatedly rejecting the article. I thing a neutral decision is not taken whne reviewing my article. Please ensure you take a neutral decision.Integrityrules17 (talk) 01:28, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are a single purpose account, you have edited here for two days, and now you question the neutrality of experienced reviewers. Your draft has been rejected, it will not be considered further. Theroadislong (talk) 07:05, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

07:41:08, 22 April 2022 review of draft by Pathologix


I can't seem to get my categories to appear properly in a Categories box . What am I doing wrong? Help! (Thank you! 😄) Pathologix (talk) 07:41, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:PropertyGuru has now been rejected for advertising, and I don't understand why 😢. I've asked the reviewer to clarify, and the Treehouse for help, and would love any other help and feedback to get the article over the bar.

Thank you!! Pathologix (talk) 10:28, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pathologix (talk) 07:41, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • On Categories: Drafts should not appear in categories, so the categories have been disabled by adding ":" to each one. When the article moves to mainspace, remove the colons and all will be well.
On the general issue: I don't think it reads like an advert, but like a thoroughly-researched and well-sourced article. But I'm not an AfC regular. PamD 11:57, 22 April 2022 (UTC) (@Pathologix: - forgot to "ping". PamD 11:58, 22 April 2022 (UTC))[reply]
@PamD Thank you for the advice on categories and logos, and the extremely nice note about the article! I think I probably need to entice some experienced editors to help finish the draft, as I think I'm in over my head in terms of AfC approval... Pathologix (talk) 17:34, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

07:42:25, 22 April 2022 review of submission by Shadysbook


The website is having notable presence and prominence on onlines, magazines and PR. Check the links below: •https://www.outlookindia.com/newsscroll/oasis-fertility-sets-its-goal-be-the-numero-uno-in-theindian-fertility-industry/2159684 •https://www.theweek.in/wire-updates/business/2021/09/14/pwr22-oasis-fertility.html •https://www.dailyflashnews.com/oasis-fertility-sets-its-goal-be-the-numero-uno-in-the-indian-fertility-industry/ •https://www.theweek.in/wire-updates/business/2021/09/14/pwr22-oasis-fertility.html •https://www.freepressjournal.in/business/oasis-fertility-forays-into-karnataka-with-its-ivf-clinics-in-bengaluru •https://www.biospectrumindia.com/news/77/19856/oasis-fertility-opens-centre-in-bengaluru.html •https://www.expresshealthcare.in/news/oasis-fertility-forays-into-karnataka-with-its-ivf-clinics-in-bengaluru/431858/ •https://www.indianpharmapost.com/hospitals/oasis-fertility-forays-into-karnataka-plans-10-more-centres-10538 •https://thisweekindia.news/oasis-fertility-forays-into-karnataka-with-its-state-of-the-art-ivf-clinics-in-bengaluru/ •https://theindianpractitioner.com/2021/10/28/oasis-fertility-forays-into-karnataka-with-its-state-of-the-art-ivf-clinics-in-bengaluru/ •https://www.deccanherald.com/city/top-bengaluru-stories/fertility-rate-falls-in-bengaluru-urban-areas-1045212.html •https://kannada.news18.com/news/state/bengaluru-urban-fertility-rates-in-bangalore-urban-comes-down-stg-sesr-653615.html •https://www.timesnownews.com/videos/mirror-now/society/oasis-fertility-sets-up-its-largest-chain-of-fertility-clinic-in-bengaluru/113450 •https://indiaeducationdiary.in/oasis-fertility-conferred-the-best-employer-brand-award-by-asia-pacific-hrm-congress/ •https://www.prittleprattlenews.com/health/oasis-fertility-conferred-the-best-employer-brand-award-by-asia-pacific-hrm-congress/ •https://lifecarenews.in/oasis-fertility-conferred-the-best-employer-brand-award-by-asia-pacific-hrm-congress/ •https://www.apnnews.com/oasis-fertility-conferred-the-best-employer-brand-award-by-asia-pacific-hrm-congress/ •http://businessnewsthisweek.com/health/oasis-fertility-conferred-the-best-employer-brand-award-by-asia-pacific-hrm-congress/ •http://mediabulletins.com/health/oasis-fertility-conferred-the-best-employer-brand-award-by-asia-pacific-hrm-congress/ •https://digitalmedia9.com/health/oasis-fertility-conferred-the-best-employer-brand-award-by-asia-pacific-hrm-congress/ •https://www.nyoooz.com/features/health/tips-from-the-nutritionist-from-oasis-fertility-for-national-nutrition-week-2021.html/6406/ •https://health-reporter.news/national-nutrition-week-top-6-herbs-and-fruits-to-enhance-your-daily-diet-the-weather-channel-articles-from-the-weather-channel/ •https://www.firstshowz.com/2021/09/national-nutrition-week-2021-tips-for-right-nutrition%20-for-pregnant-women.html •https://www.newindianexpress.com/lifestyle/health/2021/sep/08/all-you-need-to-know-about-fertility-diet-2355659.html •https://lifeandmore.in/guest-post/diet-boost-fertility-levels/ •https://hotnewsexpress.com/2021/09/03/tips-from-the-nutritionist-from-oasis-fertility-for-national-nutrition-week-2021/ •https://www.apnnews.com/tips-from-the-nutritionist-oasis-fertility-for-national-nutrition-week-2021/ •tips-from-the-nutritionist-from-oasis-fertility-for-national-nutrition-week-2021/ •http://businessnewsthisweek.com/health/national-nutrition-week-2021-tips-from-the-nutritionist-from-oasis-fertility-for-national-nutrition-week-2021/

Shadysbook (talk) 07:42, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Shadysbook The draft was rejected, and will not be considered further. None of this massive list of sources is appropriate for establishing that the hospital meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable organization. Fewer high quality sources are much better than a large number of poor quality sources. The awards or survey rankings are unremarkable and subjective, unless the award merits an article itself(such as Academy Award). 331dot (talk) 09:01, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

12:57:03, 22 April 2022 review of draft by Tushar3011


Hello Admins, Can you tell me the draft article ready for submit. Can I submit this and get approved. Tushar (talk) 12:57, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tushar3011 Just noting that anyone can comment on and review a draft, not just admins. 331dot (talk) 13:06, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Tushar3011: Unsourced biographical claims need to either get sourced or get tossed, per WP:Biographies of living persons. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 19:10, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 23

03:38:44, 23 April 2022 review of submission by 97.80.80.103

please rereview 97.80.80.103 (talk) 03:38, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The draft was rejected, and will not be considered further. The person does not meet the special Wikipedia definition of a notable musician, as shown with significant coverage in independent reliable sources. 331dot (talk) 09:54, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

05:26:25, 23 April 2022 review of submission by Kowser CS

how and what to write on draft title

Kowser CS (talk) 05:26, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your sandbox page was deleted for being pure promotion, as was explained to you at the Teahouse. So this is question is moot. Nick Moyes (talk) 10:13, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

16:34:02, 23 April 2022 review of submission by Benjamin at TeComprendo


I think this article is noticeable enough to be included since the game was reviewed by a company with an editorial team (CBN) an was aired on TV, complying with the General Notability Guideline.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=SQGhS83ycnA

Benjamin at TeComprendo (talk) 16:34, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft was rejected meaning it will not be considered further. Theroadislong (talk) 16:55, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Benjamin at TeComprendo: On an unrelated note, all the screenshots and the listing image need to be removed; we don't allow fair-use images in drafts (and images don't help a draft at all in the first place). —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 18:42, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

19:19:05, 23 April 2022 review of submission by 202.160.33.84


Reason : Because this is an TV Show information for malaysian drama.. this is real! if you don't believe just check the malay wikipedia! i do this to translate the wikipedia page!

202.160.33.84 (talk) 19:19, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It may well be real, but it is NOT notable and totally unsourced. Theroadislong (talk)

19:22:22, 23 April 2022 review of submission by 202.160.33.84


DON'T BE STUPID. I DO THIS TO TRANSLATE THE MALAY PAGE!

202.160.33.84 (talk) 19:22, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just because there is an article on the Malay Wikipedia doesn't mean we have one here, the topic is not notable and is unsourced. and please don't call us stupid either that won't help your case. Theroadislong (talk) 19:31, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

19:35:02, 23 April 2022 review of submission by Bawah Nama Cinta


Bawah Nama Cinta (talk) 19:35, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Reason : I do this because this is english translation for our drama televisyen in malaysia! please.. veriffied it!

BUT Bawah Nama Cinta it has no sources, so it has been rejected. The English Wikipedia requires articles to be based on independent reliable sources. Theroadislong (talk) 19:37, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I request it because i want to translate it for malay page. I was pay for creating an article. But i still don't understand, why when i create the article the bot...........


Bawah Nama Cinta (talk) 19:48, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Because there are no sources, and we have much more rigourous standards than Malay Wikipedia - or, really, most other editions of Wikipedia - does. I will start reverting off any further requests for this as disruptive if there's been no effort to address the draft's sourcing issues. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 20:36, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 24

10:03:56, 24 April 2022 review of draft by Polysaccharides


Hi, I created a new draft and as requested done so in my sandbox. I now finished working on it and I would like it to be reviwed. Can someone please tell me if I did this correctly as it is now: User:Polysaccharides/sandbox ? Thank you, Polysaccharides (talk) 10:03, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please ignore, I moved it into a draft as can be seen here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Daniel_Edelson

Polysaccharides (talk) 10:03, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

City — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.44.239.132 (talk) 17:23, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

20:13:48, 24 April 2022 review of draft by Patrick21london


To Wikipedia Articles For Creation Helpdesk. I am a novice drafter of my article of a science fiction film called Dune Drifter. I have questions: 1) How do I amend my page title? I am wondering if I should add the year to the title, or if it looks OK as it is? 2) What is the best way to download an image acceptable to the system? I scanned a copy of the DVD cover, then Snipped the image to cut out what I wanted, then saved it onto my computer as a JPEG image. But the system was not sure if it was a valid image even though I made the image. Or it was not sure that I had given the image a valid title. From Patrick Lee, United Kingdom. 24 April 2022.

Patrick21london (talk) 20:13, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Patrick21london: In order:
  1. Draft names are, at best, provisional. When and if a draft is accepted the reviewer will move it to a disambiguated title if need be.
  2. Forget the image. Images don't help drafts at all, and in fact we cannot use fair-use images - such as the DVD cover (a scan of it would fall under the exact same copyright as the original) - in drafts.
Does this help? —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 22:45, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

20:25:36, 24 April 2022 review of draft by Makbw


Why was this article declined. I have cited all the sources in the reference below. Which part of this article can you not verify? Please show me and I will find the information from another source.

Regards

Makbw (talk) 20:25, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Makbw: Please see Help:Referencing for beginners and properly format your references. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 22:43, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 22:23:45, 24 April 2022 for assistance on AfC submission by 2600:1017:B41E:49B1:4C07:C28E:B9DA:503C


Dear Wikipedia,

I keep adding all the correct references to my article for creation, however, it keeps getting rejected. Any assistance would be greatly appreciated.

Thank you so much.

Kindest regards,

Bandar


2600:1017:B41E:49B1:4C07:C28E:B9DA:503C (talk) 22:23, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All of your citations are broken, as you don't start them with double-curlies (i.e. {{ ); instead you're using [{ (one square and one curly). —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 22:42, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 25

03:23:20, 25 April 2022 review of submission by 2409:4042:220A:6834:C9C4:D589:4890:73F0


No sources, no article, no debate. The article as writ is also almost entirely sentence fragments that turn the whole text into a series of non sequiturs that makes zero sense what-so-ever. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 06:11, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

06:32:22, 25 April 2022 review of draft by FilthyDon


Query resolved - please ignore. Thank you. FilthyDon (talk) 06:32, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FilthyDon (talk) 06:32, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

08:35:44, 25 April 2022 review of submission by Pranjalsharma2023


Pranjalsharma2023 (talk) 08:35, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pranjalsharma2023 If this is about Draft:Ashraw, you don't ask a question, but it is a long way from being a Wikipedia article. Please read Your First Article. 331dot (talk) 08:52, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 09:02:14, 25 April 2022 for assistance on AfC submission by ScienceBecky


Hello,

I've got a problem with my draft about Superelectophilic Anions.

I got the following message from a reviewer: „The article reads like a paper rather than an encyclopedia article, and it is likely far too technical for the average reader to understand. Please see WP:TECHNICAL for more information.“

I've read the technical guidelines and would appreciate some more concrete advice on what seems to be too technical in my article. For example, if you compare my article with the one on Metal carbonyl, the target audience is pretty similar. I would be interested to know where my article is too special compared to that. Thank you for a reply.

ScienceBecky (talk) 09:02, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@ScienceBecky I differ from the view of the prior reviewer. That is fine. Opinions differ. I believe this stands a better than 50% chance of surviving an immediate deletion process. I have accepted it to allow the community to decide 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 16:17, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

10:48:34, 25 April 2022 review of submission by Isaiasavoca

I am unsure why what is wrong with it, and if someone can help me make it look more like a usual Wikipedia page(box of content, box with logo and other small facts on right side) that would be very much apreciated. Isaiasavoca (talk) 10:48, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please confirm that you have read the very clear message in the big, pink, decline box. Then ask any further questions in this thread. Please do not start another thread unless this one has been archived 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 12:26, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

11:32:57, 25 April 2022 review of submission by Nicsav


Hi, I need advice on how to improve this article. I have added information as well as the citations for it. Please let me know the best way to overcome the errors. Nicsav (talk) 11:32, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Nicsav Your draft has been declined. The topic is inappropriate, and consists of WP:OR. Instead of improving it, which is relatively pointless now, improve Wikipedia by editing something else. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 12:25, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Small correction @Nicsav the draft has been rejected not declined, which means it will not be considered further. Theroadislong (talk) 16:41, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Theroadislong thanks. I must have had brain failure. I said 'rejected' in my head and my fingers typed 'declined' 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 21:36, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

14:51:13, 25 April 2022 review of submission by Artipreneurs India


Artipreneurs India (talk) 14:51, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requestor is blocked, and any possible drafts they'd've been asking after are deleted. Moot. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 19:41, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

16:32:05, 25 April 2022 review of draft by Muzsky17


Muzsky17 (talk) 16:32, 25 April 2022 (UTC) Please help me to clean the page I created for Michael Mulligan. My intention was to create his profile on Wikipedia similar to other European football players have. I appreciate any help. Lenka Mulligan[reply]

The draft as written is blatantly promotional and is completely bereft of sources, including any sources that could support an WP:NFOOTY claim. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 19:35, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

16:40:23, 25 April 2022 review of draft by Marinaxaykosy


Marinaxaykosy (talk) 16:40, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


I need help with this particular submission. I am an employee of this company and would like to make a guitar company/brand page for Lyman Guitar but since we are fairly new, there are no other news sources for the brand besides what I can actually receive from the owners and founders of the company. Wikipedia keeps denying my submission but I really cannot provide any more sources besides the information I receive straight from the owners. Please assist as soon as possible, we would like to try and get this Wikipedia page up as soon as we can before June.

In order to demonstrate notability, you need to provide multiple references to in-depth articles written about the company in unrelated, independent journals, magazines, books or online. If there are no sources then we simply can’t have an article about them, not every company is notable. Theroadislong (talk) 16:43, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 26

12:50:48, 26 April 2022 review of submission by 日本語男１２３

My draft was recently declined. They said it was because another article of it already exists. The article they are referring to is talking about both of the games, Pokemon Diamond and Pokemon Pearl. I am just talking and focusing on Pearl. Please accept my article. 日本語男１２３ (talk) 12:50, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ping 日本語男１２３, your draft offers no expansion or reliable sourcing so there is no need for it to be approved or even looked at. Feel free to add any missing information to the main article with proper sourcing McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 13:02, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

13:20:44, 26 April 2022 review of draft by John1295


John1295 (talk) 13:20, 26 April 2022 (UTC) Dear staff, Thank you for all you do. I am trying to publish this document what additional information/ evidence do you need to approve this article for johnson Mbabazi and how can you help for this to be published.? Johnson Mbabazi is a lecturer at Teesside University and also British citizen. what secondary reference is needed to for proof to be accepted. Thank you Kind regards, JOHN1295[reply]

14:27:27, 26 April 2022 review of submission by 95.149.88.216

Hello, what needs to be added in order for it to be more notable. The company’s NFT profile on two notable platforms being OpenSea and Rarible. I thought it would be sufficient, but very happy to hear why not Many thanks

95.149.88.216 (talk) 14:27, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

14:29:53, 26 April 2022 review of submission by 69leiden69

I have worked on translating/updating the Dutch language page on architect/artist William Brand, who specializes on light art. Could you kindly check what in this case is missing? It was rejected. 69leiden69 (talk) 14:29, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&oldid=1084775355"