Talk:Harry Potter: Difference between revisions
No edit summary Tags: Reverted Visual edit: Switched |
No edit summary Tag: Reverted |
||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
}} |
}} |
||
{{tmbox|text = The correct title of the first book is ''Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone'' - the author, [[J. K. Rowling]], is British, and the book was first published in the United Kingdom. The alternative ''Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone'' is used only for the United States (USA) publication.}} |
{{tmbox|text = The correct title of the first book is ''Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone'' - the author, [[J. K. Rowling]], is British, and the book was first published in the United Kingdom. The alternative ''Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone'' is used only for the United States (USA) publication.}} |
||
{{Notaforum|''Harry Potter''}} |
{{Notaforum|''[[Harry Potter]]''}} |
||
{{Caution|This is not the correct location to discuss suggestions for ''Harry Potter''-related articles on Wikipedia. Please see [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Harry Potter|Wikipedia talk: WikiProject ''Harry Potter'']] to bring up an idea.}} |
{{Caution|This is not the correct location to discuss suggestions for ''Harry Potter''-related articles on Wikipedia. Please see [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Harry Potter|Wikipedia talk: WikiProject ''Harry Potter'']] to bring up an idea.}} |
||
{{WikiProject banner shell|1= |
{{WikiProject banner shell|1= |
Revision as of 06:42, 8 June 2022
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Harry Potter article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15Auto-archiving period: 90 days |
The correct title of the first book is Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone - the author, J. K. Rowling, is British, and the book was first published in the United Kingdom. The alternative Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone is used only for the United States (USA) publication. |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Harry Potter. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Harry Potter at the Reference desk. |
This is not the correct location to discuss suggestions for Harry Potter-related articles on Wikipedia. Please see Wikipedia talk: WikiProject Harry Potter to bring up an idea. |
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Template:Vital article
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Other talk page banners | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Trimming
The article has a readable prose size of 12,500 words, exceeding the recommended 10,000 words in WP:Length. I think many sections, in particular the plot, can be trimmed down. What do people think? Olivaw-Daneel (talk) 03:20, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- Trim away! Along with Plot, Reception is a big issue. It warrants its own article, summarized back to here with one paragraph. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:47, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- The "Cultural impact" section includes statements such as "those who read the books were significantly different from those who had not", based on just one paper: doi:10.1111/jasp.12279. Would this fall under WP:MEDRS (need for review articles)? Olivaw-Daneel (talk) 21:16, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Yep, the kinds of statement being made based on that "study" can't be made based on Facebook responses--that fails the duck test even without MEDRS! Unless some better source can be found (meaning, not a Facebook survey), that paragraph should probably go. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 21:45, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- I don't see anything about Facebook; the study surveyed school children in Italy and the UK. It's not a review, however. Olivaw-Daneel (talk) 22:46, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Yep, the kinds of statement being made based on that "study" can't be made based on Facebook responses--that fails the duck test even without MEDRS! Unless some better source can be found (meaning, not a Facebook survey), that paragraph should probably go. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 21:45, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- We're now below 9500 words! Next on my list is a rewrite of Literary criticism from book sources. Olivaw-Daneel (talk) 00:54, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- The "Cultural impact" section includes statements such as "those who read the books were significantly different from those who had not", based on just one paper: doi:10.1111/jasp.12279. Would this fall under WP:MEDRS (need for review articles)? Olivaw-Daneel (talk) 21:16, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
I agree that the article should be trimmed for the sake of clarity. I think there is room for trimming in the Literary Criticism part, as there are strong claims mentioned such as blaming the series for the result of the 2016 election that does not directly relate to the book series itself, but has more to do with the Harry Potter franchise or JK Rowling which are separate articles. I think this article can be more focused on the books themselves and their impact, instead of the impact of the entire franchise. Ekg34 (talk) 14:40, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Book Publisher
Harry Potter Books are published by Bloomsbury (India) in India, can I add this information on the wiki page. SadX (talk) 11:46, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
"Harry, Ron and Hermione" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Harry, Ron and Hermione and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 31#Harry, Ron and Hermione until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 18:40, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
"Harry potter subjects" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Harry potter subjects and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 31#Harry potter subjects until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 18:43, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
"Harry Potter Further Reading" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Harry Potter Further Reading and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 31#Harry Potter Further Reading until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 18:53, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
"Harry Potter trivia" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Harry Potter trivia and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 31#Harry Potter trivia until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 18:55, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
"Harry Potter mysteries" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Harry Potter mysteries and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 31#Harry Potter mysteries until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 19:12, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
"Magical Britain" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Magical Britain and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 31#Magical Britain until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 19:19, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 31 March 2022
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Under the "Early years" subheading of the "Plot" heading, change "...house of the Dursleys, his aunt, uncle and cousin." to "...house of the Dursleys, his aunt Petunia, uncle Vernon and cousin Dudley."
This edit request is a part of an Outreachy'22 microtask linked here Diyawaghmare (talk) 22:18, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
- Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the
{{edit semi-protected}}
template. The plot is already overlong, so naming minor characters is unnecessary. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:34, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
"Harry Potter censorship" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Harry Potter censorship and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 1#Harry Potter censorship until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 06:04, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
Suggested Edits to the controversies section
Should information be added about the certain controversy surrounding J.K. Rowling and the trans community? Loki friggason (talk) 19:40, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Loki friggason If you find information directly related to the series sure, but I think most of the controversy is already well covered in Political views of J. K. Rowling. Poirot09 (talk) 20:06, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- I missed that page in my search! Thank you for pointing it out. Loki friggason (talk) 20:34, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- Language and literature good articles
- GA-Class Featured topics articles
- Wikipedia featured topics Harry Potter novels good content
- Mid-importance Featured topics articles
- Old requests for peer review
- GA-Class novel articles
- Top-importance novel articles
- GA-Class Fantasy fiction articles
- High-importance Fantasy fiction articles
- GA-Class Harry Potter articles
- Top-importance Harry Potter articles
- Harry Potter task force articles
- WikiProject Novels articles
- GA-Class Women writers articles
- Top-importance Women writers articles
- WikiProject Women articles
- WikiProject Women writers articles
- GA-Class children and young adult literature articles
- Top-importance children and young adult literature articles
- GA-Class media franchise articles
- Top-importance media franchise articles
- WikiProject Media franchises articles
- GA-Class United Kingdom articles
- Mid-importance United Kingdom articles
- WikiProject United Kingdom articles
- Wikipedia articles that use British English
- Wikipedia pages referenced by the press
- Pages in the Wikipedia Top 25 Report