User talk:Doniago: Difference between revisions
→Second 3RO: Reply |
Susan Davis (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 493: | Line 493: | ||
:A 3O request is inappropriate once more than two editors are involved in the discussion. It is literally for requesting a ''third'' opinion. If you feel additional input is needed at that point, you should pursue other forms of [[WP:DR|dispute resolution]]. Hope this helps! [[User:Doniago|DonIago]] ([[User talk:Doniago#top|talk]]) 03:39, 19 June 2022 (UTC) |
:A 3O request is inappropriate once more than two editors are involved in the discussion. It is literally for requesting a ''third'' opinion. If you feel additional input is needed at that point, you should pursue other forms of [[WP:DR|dispute resolution]]. Hope this helps! [[User:Doniago|DonIago]] ([[User talk:Doniago#top|talk]]) 03:39, 19 June 2022 (UTC) |
||
== Reverted Star Trek edit == |
|||
My edit pointed at another page ([[Star Trek (1971 video game)]] full of references. Cherry-picking a reference to also add to the page linking to it is redundant. [[User:Susan Davis|Susan Davis]] ([[User talk:Susan Davis|talk]]) 15:44, 20 June 2022 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:44, 20 June 2022
Welcome to my Talk page. Please note the following-
|
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
DRN Case Status
Case | Created | Last volunteer edit | Last modified | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Title | Status | User | Time | User | Time | User | Time |
15.ai | In Progress | Ltbdl (t) | 31 days, 2 hours | Robert McClenon (t) | 3 days, 13 hours | Robert McClenon (t) | 3 days, 13 hours |
Tuner (radio) | Closed | Andrevan (t) | 26 days, 22 hours | Robert McClenon (t) | 2 days, 23 hours | Robert McClenon (t) | 2 days, 23 hours |
Wolf | In Progress | Nagging Prawn (t) | 22 days, 8 hours | Robert McClenon (t) | 1 days, 16 hours | Robert McClenon (t) | 1 days, 16 hours |
Face masks during the COVID-19 pandemic | New | Randomstaplers (t) | 18 days, 13 hours | Conyo14 (t) | 2 days, 19 hours | Randomstaplers (t) | 11 hours |
Genocide | New | Bogazicili (t) | 6 days, 14 hours | Robert McClenon (t) | 5 days, 18 hours | Bogazicili (t) | 5 days, 1 hours |
Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf | Closed | Titan2456 (t) | 3 days, 22 hours | Kovcszaln6 (t) | 3 days, 6 hours | Kovcszaln6 (t) | 3 days, 6 hours |
Ikwerre people | Closed | ObiWali (t) | 3 days, 1 hours | Robert McClenon (t) | 2 days, 23 hours | Robert McClenon (t) | 2 days, 23 hours |
Khwarazmian Empire | Closed | 176.88.165.232 (t) | 2 days, 12 hours | Robert McClenon (t) | 1 days, 15 hours | Robert McClenon (t) | 1 days, 15 hours |
Egusi | Closed | OmoIyaLeke (t) | 2 days, 9 hours | Kovcszaln6 (t) | 2 days, 6 hours | Kovcszaln6 (t) | 2 days, 6 hours |
Double-slit experiment | New | Johnjbarton (t) | 1 days, 15 hours | Robert McClenon (t) | 1 days, 15 hours | Constant314 (t) | 1 days, 1 hours |
List of musicals filmed live on stage | New | Wolfdog (t) | 2 hours | None | n/a | Wolfdog (t) | 2 hours |
If you would like a regularly-updated copy of this status box on your user page or talk page, put {{DRN case status}} on your page. Click on that link for more options.
Last updated by FireflyBot (talk) at 16:46, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
Hello, this editor has edited offensive language to my user and talk page User:Cardei012597 and User talk:Cardei012597. I discovered you had this happen to you by the same editor. Can you help me in resolving this situation? Cardei012597 (talk) 16:44, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
The situation has been resolved. User talk:Rhyder Hawkman has been blocked indefinitely, due to his recent actions. Cardei012597 (talk) 19:58, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
- I'm not sure I'd had any interactions with them since January. Nevertheless, glad to hear that the situation has been resolved. DonIago (talk) 22:51, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
Could you weigh in?
Hey, I seen you participating in other character AFDs. Would you mind weighing in on the AFD for Coco Bandicoot? Thanks. MoonJet (talk) 16:57, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry, I just got to this and it looks like the matter's already been resolved. That said, I would have had concerns about weighing in in any case, as approaching me specifically for input on an AfD feels uncomfortably close to canvassing. I'm not saying or suggesting that was your intent, but I'm much more comfortable not being directly solicited for such things. DonIago (talk) 22:27, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:30, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Underworld Reference
Hello, my edit on Underworld (film series) was not unsourced. The following reference, which is used in the first line of the introduction in the article, describes Underworld as a dark fantasy series.[1] The Editor 155 (talk) 15:42, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, I self-reverted that edit. Though I think ideally any reference to "dark fantasy" on the individual film articles should also be sourced. As an example, AllMovie doesn't mention that genre at all, so editors might challenge it if it's used without a source being provided. DonIago (talk) 15:46, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
- Okay, thanks for clarifying.The Editor 155 (talk) 16:19, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
References
- ^ "Tv Series". Screen Rant. January 21, 2016.
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:26, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 06:30, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
I reviewed it
"Ethno-racial "color labels" may be given capitalized (Black and White) or lower-case (black and white).[h] The capitalized form will be more appropriate in the company of other upper-case terms of this sort (Asian–Pacific, Black, Hispanic, Native American, and White demographic categories)." Tytygh55 (talk) 17:45, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, and when I look at the article I'm not seeing much use of other upper-case terms of this sort. I specifically note that there's an instance of "Black" that isn't capitalized. I would appreciate it if you'd stop marking my edits as bad-faith, especially considering that you changed the stable form of the article and are reverting before we've even discussed the matter. DonIago (talk) 19:21, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
- I'm not the one who started the first reversion. The paragraph in which the word White is contained also contains the capitalized term "African-American." To bring consistency with the rest of the page I capitalized White. If you would like to captialize black you're welcome to do so; I won't revert that edit. ;) Tytygh55 (talk) 20:13, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Archiving notice
Hey! During your archiving of Talk:The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy (film), you seem to have used {{subst:FULLPAGENAME}}
, {{subst:BASEPAGENAME}}
, or something similar. Please keep in mind that these magic words have some encoding behaviours, and punctuation characters that can appear in titles, such as '
, "
, and &
, may become different. (E.g. '
into '
). This encoded version doesn't work with bots, so make sure to double check if the PAGENAME usage has worked correctly. Don't worry, I've fixed it for you - just keep this in mind for the future. Thanks! Aidan9382 (talk) 19:11, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for the assist! I have limited experience with setting up auto-archiving. Honestly, it would be great if that was functionality implemented in Twinkle or otherwise there was some configuration assistance available. Anyhow, thanks again! DonIago (talk) 19:14, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:36, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl
Hello,
Is there are reason why this edit was reverted outside of poorly written. I can understand not accepting the "Captain Barbossa"/"Hector Barbossa" trivia, but the rest is fair to add. Especially when the source is in the film itself. The order of cast members in particular should be accurate as that's how it was in the first two minutes of the end credits, to save confusion I'm not referring the cast list but the opening of the end credits. As far as the sourcing, I find it odd given the same sources are used in another article here on Wikipedia. Surely, some of the information I added could have been of good use? 69.245.96.48 (talk) 19:50, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- If the source is the film itself, then there's no reason to add this information in any case. Pertinent details can appear in the Plot section, and the Cast section should be focusing on real-world information anyway; it's not a place to drop fancruft. I won't revert you again at this time, but don't be surprised if another editor does. DonIago (talk) 20:35, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- Understandable. However, if a revert does happen, I'll still readd the information that isn't plot-related. Whereas the roles played by certain characters (i.e. saying a character talks about this before doing that) that I can see being taken out. 69.245.96.48 (talk) 22:46, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:31, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
Cast section format in Jurassic World Dominion
Doniago, I need you to take a look at the cast section format of Jurassic World Dominion and look at the cast section in diff here. Then go to the article's talk page here to express your opinion about it. BattleshipMan (talk) 01:33, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
- Asking me specifically to weigh in could be construed as canvassing, and I'm consequently uncomfortable doing so. DonIago (talk) 04:10, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
- Good point. Nevermind. Besides, I reverted to status quo. BattleshipMan (talk) 04:27, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Second 3RO
Hello @Doniago: I took upon previous 3RO provider [1] to take out second 3RO. But you reverted [2] the second request, can you undo this, or do you have objection to this? Thanks Dawit S Gondaria (talk) 03:38, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
- A 3O request is inappropriate once more than two editors are involved in the discussion. It is literally for requesting a third opinion. If you feel additional input is needed at that point, you should pursue other forms of dispute resolution. Hope this helps! DonIago (talk) 03:39, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
Reverted Star Trek edit
My edit pointed at another page (Star Trek (1971 video game) full of references. Cherry-picking a reference to also add to the page linking to it is redundant. Susan Davis (talk) 15:44, 20 June 2022 (UTC)