User talk:Saintstephen000

February 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Camel (band) have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Camel (band) was changed by SkidMountTubularFrame (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.864005 on 2021-02-12T02:16:21+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:16, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

How to cite sources

Hi, I modified your edit to Sandra Bullock by changing the external URL that you added to a reference. You might find User:Nick Moyes/Easier Referencing for Beginners helpful. Cheers! Schazjmd (talk) 13:47, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Requesting some help

Greetings,

Is it ok to make a help request regarding women related articles if following topics interest you?

Requesting your visit to the article Women's shelter and a Peer review there of

I am also looking for first level copy edit support @ Draft:2021 Minar-e-Pakistan mass sexual assault

Thanks and warm regards

Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 10:14, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

thank you for your kind request, but i don't have the actual technical skills to help with that. however, I'm checking out out. good day SkidMountTubularFrame (talk) 06:03, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Hi,i know you undo my edit of One Last Time (Ariana Grande song) two times,but according to Billboard hot 100,it charted No.13,not No.1,I hope you can see the link of Billboard charts and change it the right way,thanks. Exemleer (talk) 09:11, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Iot ritual.jpeg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Iot ritual.jpeg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Vladlen Manilov ✉ / 06:10, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

W.A.S.P.

Hello, I have reverted your changes over at W.A.S.P. based on your claim that "Forever Free" and "Mean Man" were not "notable" because they didn't chart. They both charted (at least in Europe) according to W.A.S.P. discography, meaning they are "notable" enough to be mentioned among the band's "notable" songs and therefore I restored them in the article. Not only that, but "Forever Free" and "Mean Man" had some airplay on radio or MTV back in at least 1989, is that not "notable" enough? If you disagree, you might want to consider taking it over to Talk:W.A.S.P. (band) rather than engaging in an edit war, otherwise stop removing "Forever Free" and "Mean Man" from the list of W.A.S.P.'s "notable" songs. Thanks. Have a great day! MetalDiablo666 (talk) 17:50, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited GypsyCrusader, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Romani. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

Dylan Thomas (guitarist) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Dylan Thomas (guitarist), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ––FormalDude talk 09:55, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

thank you for the help! SkidMountTubularFrame (talk) 01:13, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Aikens

...is a licensed pilot, otherwise there would be no license for the FAA to revoke. MartinezMD (talk) 22:38, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

nope. not a licenced pilot. SkidMountTubularFrame (talk) 22:47, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Yes he was. Replied in the article's talk page. MartinezMD (talk) 23:56, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Iranian politics general sanctions notification

Please read this notification carefully: it contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

community discussion has authorised the use of general sanctions to curtail disruption in articles related to post-1978 Iranian politics, broadly construed. Before continuing to make edits that involve this topic, please read the full description of these sanctions here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

FYI about your revert at People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran, which is technically a violation [1]. Please discuss edits that have been reverted in the talk page and try to get some consensus before adding them back to the article. Thanks. Fad Ariff (talk) 12:00, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

thank you for the heads up. definitely taking note. SkidMountTubularFrame (talk)

discrete parts

as written, the word 'parts' used twice in a longer sentence seemed confusing on the first read, but now 'discrete parts' almost seems redundant. thank you for clearing that up SkidMountTubularFrame (talk) 22:35, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

"Sandboxing articles"

Hi there, you've indicated that you intend to "sandbox" articles and rewrite them. Please first spend some time considering the Wikipedia policies that encourage editors to thoroughly discuss article issues on the talk pages before they are "sandboxed". I haven't seen much discussion by you on the articles that I believe you intend to sandbox. But i'd be happy to discuss further on those talk pages once you initiate that. Thanks so much.

Farr4h2004 (talk) 22:11, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

thanks for your suggestions regarding my rewrite. it's surely welcome. as this is a collaborative project, and as i rewrite articles for style, npov, sources, etc, and as i am a disinterested editor, I'm sure you'll have lots of good ideas. I'm not an interested editor in the topic. totally non aligned.

thanks again.SkidMountTubularFrame (talk)

They are not just my concerns. Multiple editors have the concerns as it’s unusual to rewrite an entire article. Please refrain. And if you have any issues do as you should by discussing them on the talk pages. Thank you so much. Farr4h2004 (talk) 17:28, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

i rewrite entire articles for style, noov, sourcing, prose, ect.

your seem to be very strident as regards your various multiple edits, and i understand how that can be hard.

your request is denied.

SkidMountTubularFrame (talk) 17:42, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

Ok do as you like. I’ll have to report for wiki violations given your lack of discussion on the issues per wiki policies. Again, your use of “us” is also suspect. Farr4h2004 (talk) 18:06, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

For the record, you’ve been asked by other users to discuss your issues on the article talk pages and have not done so. Farr4h2004 (talk) 18:16, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

not sure why your are continuing to harass me into not editing a page, but please stop.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Ownership_of_content SkidMountTubularFrame (talk) 18:30, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

Hi, you keep coming on my talk page. Again, I have asked you to discuss your article issues on the ARTICLE talk page. Not my talk page. Please do so. Farr4h2004 (talk) 21:38, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

i don't know what you mean. you send me a message like this one, it shows up on a link at the top of the page, i click it and respond politely and firmly, as I'm doing now. i did not initiate or perpetuate the exchange you've engaged me in. i will simply block you, if that's ok. thanks again for your assistance. SkidMountTubularFrame (talk)

Propose Barney Miller "genre" Edit: 2022-06-03

Greetings --

The reason for the "interesting" edit summary was in response to MarnetteDI's rejection of the same edit, last week (please review the Barney Miller Talk Page entry, "Barney Miller 'genre' Discussion"), where he/she provided no rationale for why such a rudimentary, base-level edit requires a source. The new content regards nothing more than understanding and identification of literary devices; any given individual with associated fundamental knowledge could make such an assessment. It would seem a "source" per se, within this context, is actually nothing more than validating one's capacity for knowledge -- which is wholly unnecessary.

I kindly ask that you re-instate the requested edit, the content of which is accurate.

Regards, J. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.10.164.56 (talk) 16:23, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

interesting take, one with which the arbitration kids will find disagreement. let me again check the relevant, and work through the logic. SkidMountTubularFrame (talk) 16:36, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

I can't do it. I agree with your basic premise, but am unable to create an exception to unsourced categorizing. Barney Miller has element you describe, but to drop that into the category churn, it needs more than your obvious thoughtful knowledge and my agreement. an example, say an editor watched bacharach perform on a living room piano songs later presented as Lennon McCartney compositions. that is notable, would be attested to by a handful of people, and would be factual let's say. but it would be a claim requiring similarly strong sources. i suggest you identify all series thought of as dramatic comedy but with script and directorial elements you have identified, and just do it. SkidMountTubularFrame (talk) 20:33, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for taking the time to offer a detailed response — very much appreciated.

First, I would offer that my request is not a genre classification change; rather, my request is to simply qualify the classification, "sitcom", early in the narrative so the reader has a more accurate understanding regarding the show’s unique content. (Aside from All In The Family and M*A*S*H no other long-term "sitcom" at that time routinely provided consequential (and at times pivotal) relevant topics in an earnest, effected manner.) Second, it all seems rather silly that my objective opinions are deemed invalid; yet, seemingly given internet articles smitten with blatant inaccuracies and misleading generalizations (for instance, calling all the detectives "quirky" or "off the wall", and referring to Inspector Lugar as a "racist" [Arnold would clearly never cast such a character as a member of the 12th]) would seem more likely to receive the Wikipedia Good Housekeeping Seal of Approval as it were...

My muted tirade aside, I spent about 45 internet minutes and found a few articles to support my opinion and have provided the sources. (To sound haughty, I doubt any one of those writers has either watched or studied the show as much as I have; and still maintain that my unbiased opinion is as valid as the opinions of the cited writers.)

Thanks again! 172.10.164.56 (talk) 00:56, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Adder stone, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Adder.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

June 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Shed Seven. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Stesmo (talk) 04:05, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for the heads up on that, and your instruction. I was trying to find places where the content couldbe altered to fit extant citations, and delete content for which i could not find an actual citation especially in promotional non notable.

I'll look at the attempts for reference. SkidMountTubularFrame (talk)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Aspen Education Group, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Stesmo (talk) 04:40, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

i thought the responses from the respondent were in the pdf documents cited in the same paragraph from the filings from the l petitioner, but should have included the page and line from the document.

my concern was the older lawsuits without any information about the eventual settlement, and wanting to at least give the last filing from accused. it reads as a group of disgruntled parents and teens, verses a group of very scurrilous criminals, and am trying to source some of the thousands of clients who perhaps had other experiences. thank you for some new reading material. it's a climb. SkidMountTubularFrame (talk)

Template removal

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Manipulation (psychology), without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you.

Edits which remove templates should not be flagged as minor. The same applies for removing the disambiguation template. There is an ongoing discussion at DRN here. Darcyisverycute (talk) 01:56, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

we fixed it, therefore dispute settled. thank you for helping edit Wikipedia SkidMountTubularFrame (talk)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Melanie Zanona (July 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Numberguy6 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Melanie Zanona and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Numberguy6 (talk) 19:05, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Saintstephen000! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Numberguy6 (talk) 19:05, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Brock Pierce

added a link pointing to FEC

The Groundlings

added a link pointing to Variety

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Brock Pierce, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FEC.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Dylan Thomas (guitarist)

Hello, Saintstephen000. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dylan Thomas (guitarist), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:03, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Page move to FBI investigation of Donald Trump and classified materials

On what consensus did you base that move? --Valjean (talk) (PING me) 18:47, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

good morning, and thanks for helping me edit Wikipedia!

i have been reading and re-reading suggestions from other editors and watching data come across the desk here.

people inclined to snowball will debate the move, but i think it's non controversial and solid.

Saintstephen000 (talk)

Please answer the question and provide a diff to the discussion where the consensus for the move is found.

A thread has been opened about this at the article talk page, so you need to comment there immediately. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 19:32, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

i though your question was rhetorical, as an experienced editor like yourself would know i moved it boldly without discussing it. seemed non controversial, now the various persons more inclined to bureaucracy and debate can have at it. thanks for the suggestions, and enjoy helping me edit Wikipedia!

Saintstephen000 (talk)

Page moves are rarely a place to apply BOLD. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 19:59, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

noted Saintstephen000 (talk)

It depends on the page. Anything about hot American cable news is almost always "up for debate". But unilaterally rewriting Cypriot political history from 2004 is "almost too easy". InedibleHulk (talk) 22:20, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

it's been a learning experience and the feedback has been helpful. it's been instructive watching this article expand organically, the process, arguments, and prose. on good behavior, Saintstephen000 (talk)

Reply on the Speed of Light

A citation is absolutely needed because every textbook you claim says this is wrong. It specifically has occurred in history because of a misunderstanding of energy and information, as well as the difference between an idealized classical vacuum and the real life exotic quantum vacuum that has been proven to exist today. Specifically, special relativity only states that all observers, irrespective of their relative motions will all measure the speed of light as the same number in vacuum, and that is it! It says nothing more. A corollary to this is that a classical point mass will take infinite energy to reach the speed of light. This says nothing about energy in general or more abstractly, "information". MMmpds (talk) 23:55, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

David W. Dugan

Hello,

I see you deleted the picture for David W. Dugan I inserted for his profile. The reason you gave was fair usage claims. Could you explain what the issue is so I can try to correct it? Thank you

MIAJudges (talk) 04:42, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

Completely a mistake, and i apologize

Saintstephen000 (talk)

Adding comments to RfCs

You added a comment to an RfC at FBI search of Mar-a-Lago. This is the second time I noticed that you're not using the proper format, so I assume you're not aware of it. Please, start your line with an asterisk * and optionally Support or Oppose or just add whatever comment you want to make. After the last word of your comment, click the signature button in the bottom line of the editor to sign and date the comment. Examples:

• Support. Whatever. Text text text. Space4Time3Continuum2x (talk) 11:10, 28 August 2022 (UTC) or
• Wait. Blend into eventual featured article 'Trial and Incarceration of...' Space4Time3Continuum2x (talk) 11:10, 28 August 2022 (UTC) (I can only sign with my own name.:)

Thank you in the name of the eventual closer of the RfC. Space4Time3Continuum2x (talk) 11:10, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

• Thank you! Saintstephen000 (talk) 14:36, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

Unexplained reverts

You are making unexplained reverts very frequently.[2] I would ask you to stop it. 103.240.204.88 (talk) 05:41, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

We noticed you're making contributions on an article about which you seem both knowledgeable and passionate. Thanks for helping! A friendly suggestion: approach your addition to the encyclopedia as though it were an important school assignment worthy of your precious time. Gather your sources, scribble a draft, let someone suggest edits, write it all down, tidy it all up, make sure it's sourced (make dam'd sure it's sourced) and the changes you're attempting will likely find a way into the article, given both factual and appropriately sourced.

Thanks again for building a truly unique encyclopedia, Saintstephen000 (talk)

Urdu revert

Because you are using mobile view, you probably didn't see the purpose of my edit that you reverted.[3] With desktop view and a window width of 1280 or more, the "See also" section heading is to the right of the last photo; the list wraps around the photo to the left margin. "Clear" forces the "See also" section to begin below the image so it's all in one column on the left, like it should be.

With a window width of about 900 or less, the References section is all in one narrow column between the left margin and the Official Languages box on the right. "Clear" forces the References section to begin below the boxes so that the full window width is used.

Or maybe you saw a problem that I didn't see? 63.226.230.9 (talk) 14:46, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

no, you are entirely correct. thank you for helping me. Saintstephen000 (talk)

September 2022

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template index/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. Inspector Eevee (talk) 19:05, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

thank you for the heads up on that resource.

Saintstephen000 (talk)

Michael Gaughan (Irish republican)

Sorry, I think I edit-conflicted with you there. John (talk) 18:24, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

i thought i might have stumbled into a border clash👍😁 Saintstephen000 (talk) 18:26, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Questions,

What talk section are you talking about? Some of the sources that are cited have questionable information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:4EA0:D80:718D:55A2:184D:1322 (talk) 19:24, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

Revert

Why did you revert my edit to Mohammed Siraj ? 2402:3A80:198B:654D:678:5634:1232:5476 (talk) 15:32, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

unsourced name change needed source. i can't find one. Saintstephen000 (talk) 15:34, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

That's not my problem bitch. 2402:3A80:198B:654D:678:5634:1232:5476 (talk) 15:37, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

no need for vulgarity. please be nice. thank you, Saintstephen000 (talk)

October 2022

Hi, sorry, if you saw my previous message, it was in error, I clicked the wrong username. Equine-man (talk) 06:40, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

Totally thanks! Keep me on my toes.

Saintstephen000 (talk)

IDEA Scuba

I am the owner of idea scuba USA I have edited the page and somebody keeps deleting my edits I do not appreciate that. 69.73.94.36 (talk) 20:06, 15 October 2022 (UTC)