Jump to content

Talk:Ukraine: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 106: Line 106:
De jure -- few states will recognize the annexation
De jure -- few states will recognize the annexation


Question -- the US never really recognized the incorporation of the Baltic states into the USSR following WW2. Did Wikipedia show a map with the de factor reality (i.e. part of USSR) or the USA de jure reality (still independent but occupied)?
Question -- the US never really recognized the incorporation of the Baltic states into the USSR following WW2. Did Wikipedia show a map with the de facto reality (i.e. part of USSR) or the USA de jure reality (still independent but occupied)?


The answer should guide action here. Chesspride[[Special:Contributions/216.144.161.51|216.144.161.51]] ([[User talk:216.144.161.51|talk]]) 18:38, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
The answer should guide action here. Chesspride[[Special:Contributions/216.144.161.51|216.144.161.51]] ([[User talk:216.144.161.51|talk]]) 18:38, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:39, 30 March 2023

Template:Outline of knowledge coverage

Former good articleUkraine was one of the Geography and places good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 12, 2006Good article nomineeNot listed
December 21, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed
January 26, 2008Good article nomineeListed
July 12, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
August 8, 2008Featured article candidateNot promoted
July 30, 2013Good article reassessmentDelisted
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on August 24, 2004, August 24, 2005, August 24, 2006, August 24, 2007, August 24, 2008, August 24, 2009, August 24, 2010, August 24, 2011, August 24, 2012, August 24, 2014, August 24, 2015, and August 24, 2016.
Current status: Delisted good article

Map legend

The map legend reads "Russian-occupied territories of Ukraine prior to the 2022 Russian invasion" for the uncontrolled territories prior to the ongoing Russian invasion. However, the only territory directly occupied by Russia before the invasion was Crimea. The region of Donbass was occupied by pro-Russian separatists with unofficial support from Russia. To my knowledge, this is what all reliable sources claim, and it should not be controversial to consider this a good faith mistake. I suggest we change it back to what it was before, either "Occupied/annexed territories prior to the 2022 Russian invasion" or "Claimed but uncontrolled territory prior to the 2022 Russian invasion" or something in the lines of "Russia and pro-Russian separatists-occupied territory prior to the 2022 Russian Invasion" to present the Russian involvement in a more accurate manner. 187.71.138.117 (talk) 00:14, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

After the recognition of the republics on 21 February 2022, Russian troops were sent there. Mellk (talk) 00:20, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Geography of Ukraine

The area of Ukraine and it's demographics are clearly not up to date with the changes in recent years and recent months. It's still considered as it was before russian annexation of Crimea and Donbas. Perhaps this is a matter to be taken in consideration. 2A02:2F01:8E08:3B00:F1:6416:C98D:A1F (talk) 12:55, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The area of Ukraine and ITS (not IT'S) demographics. So what are you suggesting? That we rewrite Wikipedia to ratify the Putinist position that Crimea and Donbas are Russia, not Ukraine? Perhaps you'd like to try the Russian Wikipedia first. Uporządnicki (talk) 13:42, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ack! Someone removed OP's (or is it VP's?) gaslighting, doublespeak response--and created an edit conflict with my own brilliant retort. Uporządnicki (talk) 14:16, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


I guess it depends -- does Wikipedia recognize de facto reality or de jure reality?

De facto -- the Donbas are part of Russia (annexed) just as assuredly as the Golan Heights are part of Israel.

De jure -- few states will recognize the annexation

Question -- the US never really recognized the incorporation of the Baltic states into the USSR following WW2. Did Wikipedia show a map with the de facto reality (i.e. part of USSR) or the USA de jure reality (still independent but occupied)?

The answer should guide action here. Chesspride216.144.161.51 (talk) 18:38, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Strange

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.



Very strange that many African countries are downgraded in their HDI but Ukraine figure is still left for more than 2 years even with the war raging which means obv it's per capita income and HDI have gone drastically down but the majority of white editors ignore it and concentrate on downgrading African countries on purpose Nlivataye (talk) 10:02, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am reasonably confident the various HDI gnomes are not part of some random and pointless conspiracy. CMD (talk) 14:12, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:42, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

National anthem

Please replace the anthem audio with one of these authentic (performed by Ukrainian orchestras) renditions: Президентський_оркестр_Гімн.ogg or Anthem_of_Ukraine_instrumental.ogg. VSL (talk) 01:24, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A change like this one would need consensus. The audio file that is currently in the article is a performance by Veryovka Ukrainian Folk Choir, an authentic Ukrainian musical group. This group has even been recognized with a stamp in their honor. So they clearly qualify as sufficiently Ukrainian. EdJohnston (talk) 23:23, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@EdJohnston You are not right. Check the current audio. VSL (talk) 23:35, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oh I see; what we have here currently is the US Navy band. But, if you want to replace the present recording with a different one, how about choosing a choral version rather than instrumental? The US Navy version is instrumental. The one by the Veryovka choir in State Anthem of Ukraine gives you a sung version of the anthem plus English subtitles for the words. The two new .ogg files that you propose above are once again just instrumental. EdJohnston (talk) 01:48, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There is also a more complete 1916 vocal performing: Ukrainian_national_anthem_1916_(complete).ogg
So a poll may be taken here for which version (or two versions: instrumental and vocal) to include:
Президентський_оркестр_Гімн.ogg
File:Anthem of Ukraine instrumental.ogg Anthem_of_Ukraine_instrumental.ogg
File:Anthem-of-Ukraine Chorus Veryovka.ogg Anthem-of-Ukraine_Chorus_Veryovka.ogg
Ukrainian_national_anthem_1916_(complete).ogg
VSL (talk) 04:22, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Currently the last one (1916 complete) is tagged as public domain. For the other 3 I'm unsure which of the copyright exemptions these fall under. "works of folk art (folklore)"? CMD (talk) 04:54, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]