User talk:Ironman1104

A barnstar for you!

	The Copyeditor's Barnstar
	Some good copyedits there. I enjoyed your trims of Corbyn and Smith. Keep up the good work. John (talk) 21:58, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Very kind. Some people don't write well! Ironman1104 (talk) 08:42, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Lord Polak

The FT article (ref 1) has a lot more juicy info that could be added to the article. Afraid I don't have time right now to DIY. SmartSE (talk) 11:55, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

(I think it is paywalled, but registering lets you access a few articles for free). SmartSE (talk) 11:56, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Right Honourable

Please stop your incorrect removal of Right Honourable. See The Right Honourable#United Kingdom for referenced details. DuncanHill (talk) 17:30, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Please stop rv-ing it. Check the title of the relevant individual in the House of Lords. PCs are Rt Hon. others are not. Ironman1104 17:17, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Multiple editors have raised this issue with you. You need to stop. DuncanHill (talk) 17:20, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Er. no they haven't. Who are these multiples?

While writing, what is your explanation for the formal titles of the relevant individuals being given on HL website without Rt Hon prefix. It may be that archaic usage once attached the title to some peers, but it is not modern usage. If you can improve on the HL as a source, feel free. Similarly, if you can provide a source for any of your candidates for this prefix, go ahead. But you cannot. Ironman1104 17:23, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Who? Two editors in the thread right above this one for a start! DuncanHill (talk) 17:28, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at John Taylor, Baron Taylor of Warwick. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.
One might note that given every article has 'Rt Hon.' and it is the accepted style for life peers, that you might be in the wrong instead of literally everyone else. Please desist: you are also breaking 3RR now. · | (talk - contributions) 10:49, 4 October 2019 (UTC)}

Your signature

Hi, just letting you know that per WP:SIGLINK, your signature must include at least one direct internal link to your user page, user talk page, or contributions page. If you've already corrected this, thanks! If not, the signature guideline pages discusses how to correct any custom signature so it complies. Nil Einne (talk) 18:53, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Standard ArbCom discretionary sanctions notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Newimpartial (talk) 11:51, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

== Introduction to contentious topics ==

You have recently been editing gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, which has been designated a contentious topic. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;

comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;

follow editorial and behavioural best practice;

comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and

refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Please have a look also at the information at this page, which appears every time you edit J. K. Rowling. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 00:26, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

April 2023

Hello, I'm Pokelova. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Dylan Mulvaney have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. --Pokelova (talk) 10:05, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Dylan Mulvaney. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. HeyElliott (talk) 15:16, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

What is your problem with historical fact? DM was in fact born male. No? Ironman1104 15:18, 8 April 2023 (UTC) Ironman1104 15:18, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Dylan Mulvaney shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Beccaynr (talk) 15:18, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Why do you say I’m edit warring? And what’s your issue with fear of facts? Ironman1104 15:20, 8 April 2023 (UTC) Ironman1104 15:20, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, as you did at User talk:Beccaynr, you may be blocked from editing. You may wish to review MOS:GENDERID to help answer your article content question, and to further discuss article content on the article Talk page. Thank you, Beccaynr (talk) 15:37, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Logged warning

Ironman1104, considering your recent poor behaviour at Dylan Mulvaney, as well as past behaviour in similar articles, I'm formally warning you that, if you continue with these types of edits within the gender and sexuality contentious topic, you will be sanctioned. Isabelle Belato ^🏳‍🌈 20:53, 10 April 2023 (UTC)