Talk:Clint Eastwood: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 21:47, 29 December 2023

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Clint Eastwood article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3: 30 days

Template:Vital article

Clint Eastwood has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 30, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed
March 22, 2011	Peer review	Reviewed

Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on April 8, 2004, and May 31, 2020.

Current status: Good article

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers / Musicians / Politics and Government GA‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
GA	This article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as Top-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

California: San Francisco Bay Area GA‑class Mid‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
GA	This article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	San Francisco Bay Area portal This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is a selected biography on the California Portal.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Politics: American / Libertarianism GA‑class Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
GA	This article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	Libertarianism portal This article is supported by WikiProject Libertarianism (assessed as Mid-importance).

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Pritzker Military Library GA‑class Low‑importance

	This article is related to the Pritzker Military Museum & Library WikiProject. Please copy assessments of the article from the most major WikiProject template to this one as needed.Pritzker Military LibraryWikipedia:GLAM/PritzkerTemplate:WikiProject Pritzker-GLAMPritzker Military Library-related articles
GA	This article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by a member of the Guild of Copy Editors on April 26, 2011.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Westerns: Television GA‑class Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Westerns, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Western genre on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WesternsWikipedia:WikiProject WesternsTemplate:WikiProject WesternsWesterns articles
GA	This article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Television task force.

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

This article has been mentioned by multiple media organizations:

Bruce Headlam (December 10, 2008). "The Films Are for Him. Got That?". The New York Times.
Emily Yahr (1 January 2020). "Obsessed with Wikipedia 'personal life' entries? You're not alone". The Washington Post. Retrieved 1 January 2020.

Discussion on Infobox Image for Clint Eastwood Page

Hello,

I recently updated the infobox image on Clint Eastwood's page to a 1961 publicity photo from 'Rawhide.' I believe this image is iconic and more representative of Eastwood's early career and notable work in the entertainment industry. However, this edit was reverted by User:FMSky, with the reason being to use a more recent picture. The current image, however, is 13 years old and not a recent representation. The decision to keep that image in the infobox is illogical to me.

I'd like to discuss this matter to reach a consensus on which image best represents Clint Eastwood on his Wikipedia page. Please share your thoughts and reasoning, so we can decide together in accordance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

Thank you, Sleeplessmason (talk) 23:42, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A waste of time. We tend to have more recent photos, unless they are dead. Only then a classic 60s or 70s image of Clint prime might be more suitable. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 08:14, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reconsidering the Infobox Image for Clint Eastwood

Hello fellow editors,

I'd like to revisit the discussion regarding the infobox image on Clint Eastwood's Wikipedia page. The current decision to use a recent image of Mr. Eastwood seems to overlook the trend of using iconic, younger images for notable figures, even those who are still living.

Precedent on Wikipedia: It is not uncommon to see younger images in the infoboxes of notable individuals. For example:

These pages use images that capture the individuals at the peak of their public recognition, highlighting the period when their impact was most significant.

Iconic Representation: The 1961 publicity photo from 'Rawhide' represents a pivotal moment in Clint Eastwood's career. This period is not only iconic but also foundational in establishing his legacy in the entertainment industry.

Public Recognition and Legacy: The public's association with Eastwood is strongly linked to his earlier roles. These roles have become a part of cultural history and are what many people first recall when they think of him.

Quality of the Current Image: Additionally, the quality and visual appeal of an image are important. The current image may not best capture the iconic status and cultural impact associated with Clint Eastwood. In comparison, the 1961 publicity photo offers a more recognizable and historically significant portrayal of his career.

In light of these points, I propose that we reconsider the choice of the infobox image. This proposal aligns with Wikipedia's guidelines on the use of images, ensuring that the choice reflects Eastwood's most recognized and impactful period.

I look forward to a constructive discussion and hope we can reach a consensus that best represents Clint Eastwood's legacy and adheres to Wikipedia's standards.

Thank you, Sleeplessmason (talk) 19:27, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why have you started a new thread? I told you that we generally use photos of people in old age until they die. All the people you cited are dead!! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:30, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, nothing wrong with the current image. - FlightTime (open channel) 20:38, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Based on the comments given, then using that thesis, this should be the Infobox image Clint Eastwood#/media/File:ClintEastwoodGolfing (cropped B).jpg since it is the most current image of Clint Eastwood on the page. I am therefore proposing this be switched out for the current one.

Sleeplessmason (talk) 21:47, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 110: / Line 110: @@
 :Why have you started a new thread? I told you that we generally use photos of people in old age until they die. All the people you cited are dead!! ♦ [[User talk:Dr. Blofeld|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#aba67e">''Dr. Blofeld''</span>]] 20:30, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
 :Agree, nothing wrong with the current image.  - <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">[[User:FlightTime|<span style="color:#800000">'''FlightTime'''</span>]] <small>([[User talk:FlightTime|<span style="color:#1C0978">'''open channel'''</span>]])</small></span> 20:38, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
+::Based on the comments given, then using that thesis, this should be the Infobox image [[Clint Eastwood#/media/File:ClintEastwoodGolfing (cropped B).jpg]] since it is the most current image of Clint Eastwood on the page. I am therefore proposing this be switched out for the current one.
+::[[User:Sleeplessmason|Sleeplessmason]] ([[User talk:Sleeplessmason|talk]]) 21:47, 29 December 2023 (UTC)