User talk:Ssilvers: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 378: Line 378:


:Oh, and the whole discussion is also unsourced, providing no information that could be used to create such an article. [[User:Theloavesandthevicious|theloavesandthevicious]] ([[User talk:Theloavesandthevicious|talk]]) 20:00, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
:Oh, and the whole discussion is also unsourced, providing no information that could be used to create such an article. [[User:Theloavesandthevicious|theloavesandthevicious]] ([[User talk:Theloavesandthevicious|talk]]) 20:00, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

You are clearly a moron, so I will go ahead and create the article and paste the goddamn information into it, deleting it from this. The problem with the world today is that inferior people such as yourselves get above themselves. Learn your place. [[User:Theloavesandthevicious|theloavesandthevicious]] ([[User talk:Theloavesandthevicious|talk]]) 03:19, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:19, 8 September 2008

I routinely clean out my talk page, consistent with WP policy.
If you wish to keep a copy of something you post here, please copy it to your own page.


If you have an article about the moon which treats equally the idea that the moon is made of rocks, and the idea that the moon is made of cheese, you don't have neutrality, you have extreme POV pushing for a radical minority view! How, in practice, to sort out a proper sense of proportion and balance is always going to be tricky and involve thoughtful consultation and dialog, of course. There is no magic formula. But a recognition that some views are widely held and grounded in a reasonable analysis of evidence, and that some views are extreme fringe views and not based in evidence, is pretty important to achieving neutrality.

——Jimbo Wales, 18 May 2008


Hello, Ssilvers, and welcome to Wikipedia! I am CTSWyneken. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

If you'd like some help from the community on starting to edit, you can sign yourself up at the new users log. If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk or ask me on my talk page.

Take a look at Consensus of standards. It is always wise to read the talk page of an existing article before making major changes on it. Even then, I typically ask if anyone minds that I make a change. Very often they do! ;-)

Again, welcome! And if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to ask. --CTSWyneken 19:30, 22 May 2006 (UTC)(talk)[reply]

See: Help:Archiving a talk page.

Misc. Notes of Thanks from 2006 and 2007

I think it looks great. Keep up the good work. —Khoikhoi 01:08, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for being helpful. My English music books used Mazeppa, Maria, Andrei, Kochubey (Kochubey is not a Russian, but Tatar name). (meladina 16:06, 2 September 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Thanks for slicing up some of my more grotesquely long sentences in Opera the other day. I'm on a bit of drive to get the article up to GA standard, so thanks for all the help. Cheers, Moreschi 16:37, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kashchey the Immortal (opera) - Thanks for the help; I've just finished off the copy-editing. Cheers, Moreschi 19:03, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much for the kind words.... I'm very tempted to help out at Opera. In fact my next plan was to rework the French Opera section, which has been chopped off that article. Cheers. --Folantin 08:03, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for all the info you added to The Magic Show! - Brian Kendig 13:42, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Boyd Neel - Thank you for your kind words (and the corroborative detail).... It's a pleasure doing business with you, sir! - Tim riley 21:21, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Camelot (musical) thanks you! Wow, Ssilvers, you are awesome! Thanks so much for such a quick fix on the Camelot article! I will add to it as I can. :) Thanks! Estreya 18:34, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tom Eyen - Thank you for cleaning up my mess! I'm speechless - it's so well done! --Eric Eyen 02:25, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much for your kind note and for your careful reviews and help at Encyclopædia Britannica; I think it's an article we all can be proud of.... I'm grateful that you corrected that comma error that had been peppering my writing for ages. Looking forward to working with you again in Wikipedia, Willow 10:44, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the nice welcoming note! I was going to see an amateur production of Princess Ida at MIT last night, so I wanted to learn a little about it. The article was very helpful! I love G&S, but I probably will just do little typo edits here and there as I find them. Thanks again! Purkowitz 14:04, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your effort and added info with Malfitano. She is a great singer and it was sad to notice that the existing writings about her were too brief. It would be great if we could get some photos of her. I will write to her agent, hopefully they could provide us with photos to be published (with written permission, of course). - Jay 02:28, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work on the Buddy - The Buddy Holly Story yesterday/today. Concerning the expanded synopisis version that was severely edited a while back - IT WAS MUCH BETTER. Sorry it kept getting cut. It should simply have been re-written to avoid verbatim website quotes. It should not of been deleted, though. I will support you in defending against any attempts to ruin this article again. Smatprt 14:14, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the help! :-)Nrswanson 07:31, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your work on Michael Mayer (director) - WOW. Thank you! I knew that once people realized this major theatrical figure had no article at all, it'd get fixed quickly, but the early version was so disorganized, and it's lovely to see what you've done with it overnight.

Diana Fortuna Photo - Thanks for cleaning up the summary :) DraxusD 05:02, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the help cleaning up my edits on Parade - I honestly thought I was alone on this one! Docta247 13:36, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the welcome :) I'm Chris Angelico, Savoynetter and fairly active but with no particular qualifications or special skills in G&S. A newbie in editing, which is probably obvious to all, unfortunately. -- Rosuav (talkcontribs) 05:31, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Piano Bar

Hi, Ssilvers, I am Ron Kert from Tampa, FL (wikipedia user-name "ronkert"). Thank You for your additions to the "Piano Bar" article that I submitted. I also am an amateur singer, and a "piano bar junkie". Although I enjoyed "La Boheme" and love most types of music, I sing songs from these genres: "Standards" from the 1920's to 1950's, 50's and 60's Rock'n'Roll, some 70's and 80's light Rock and Rock ballads, Blues, a couple of show tunes, a few Country tunes. I'm currently on one of my bi-annual out-of-state "piano bar" vacations in the DC / northern Virginia area.

Savoyards

Good work. Several of these performers are familiar to me because of the film Topsy Turvy, wihch I've seen at least half a dozen times. They needed to be included in Wikipedia. Charivari 02:35, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations! You took this a lot farther than I ever imagined it would go. Marc Shepherd 19:52, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Golden Legend

Saw your additions and copy edits. Thanks. I had considered adding specific information about the Hyperion release (it is the first full length recording), but wasn't sure it was appropriate. I'll probably be doing some similar work on other compositions by Sullivan. Shsilver 19:39, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your attention to this article - it helps to have another perspective, particularly one from the musicals / G&S point of view, and not the "HEY MY HIGH SCHOOL DID THAT!" point of view.... Thanks again. QBKooky 18:46, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mountebanks; Major article template, etc.

Thanks for the Song list! Added in character names whilst I was at it. Also, I've done a tweak to Template:Gilbert and Sullivan - That look good to you? Vanished user 23:09, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Malcolm Sargent

It turned out very well. I didn't know about that 1936 interview. Did you ever hear the old joke about Sargent? Supposedly he gets into a cab. The driver says, "Where to?" Sargent says, "It doesn't matter; they want me everywhere." Marc Shepherd 13:19, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Early British Musicals

Thanks for the messages. I had only the briefest look after your first, but it all looked like great stuff.... --GuillaumeTell 07:17, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Savoy opera (and curtain raisers)

Nice work! Vanished user 10:25, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

G&S

Thanks very much - I'm actually planning on writing up a few articles about some of the lesser Savoyards, as well as a couple of early G&S creators that really ought to be here (Frank Thornton, Fred Sullivan, and Selina Dolaro spring to mind). --AlbertHerring 17:21, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats on getting the article featured. Your hard work was impressive. Best, Moreschi 12:26, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

First barnstar

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Awarded to Ssilvers for his work on actors and actresses, minor operas, and everything else related to Gilbert and Sullivan and Victorian Theatre. You have single-handedly filled in many huge gaps in Wikipedia coverage. Vanished user 13:13, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
... and that goes from me too, his recent work on filling in the gaps and eliminating stubs in London theatre is only matched by his patience with my lack of knowledge and his ability to collaborate. Kbthompson 18:31, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Theatre Articles: Notes of thanks

Gallery of Illustration - Many thanks for your modest but spot-on improvements to the initial entry on the Royal Gallery of Illustration!! Rapotter 03:46, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Globe, Royalty and St James's Theatres - Gracious me! How much you have improved the presentation. As suggested, I have run up a piece on the Globe, which would benefit from the Ssilvers treatment, had you but world enough and time. Tim riley 10:29, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This corner of the Wikipedia site owes such a lot to you. - Tim riley 23:17, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations on your work on this article. The images make a big difference as well as noting the stars and the plays. David Lauder 08:27, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for making the Haymarket Theatre piece look good. ...Tim Riley 10:10, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't thank you for the addn info on the Empire Theatre. I added a testimonial to your barnstar! But I don't know how these things get decided on, so left it as barnstar + bar. The London theatres have been a joy... Kbthompson 18:40, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

St Georges Theatre - Belated thanks for that, it almost looks like an article now. I took the liberty of adding a gee-gaw to your front page (a case of I saw this and thought of you, I have to wait another month!). I saw the recent comments at G&S, tough crowd. I think that's a bit harsh for GA, but something that definitely needs fixing for FA. Kbthompson 15:29, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Court Theatre - Congratulations on your reworking of the Royal Court Theatre. David Lauder 08:52, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Toye & Norris

Thank you once more for giving my text a wash and brush up. I feel rather guilty: I have all the fun and you do all the work. Well, great will be your reward in heaven. - Tim riley 22:58, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nice rewrite! I was hoping that someone would: Previously it seemed to be saying that Sullivan went to Leipzig twice which looked dubious :-D  uriel8  (talk) 14:23, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Window

Spot on, I'd say.... This was quite a serious gap in the coverage of Sullivan - now, happily, filled. Tim Riley 08:17, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are very kind to take so much trouble, bless you! I'll look into the picture business tomorrow. Tim Riley 19:54, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You asked me to take a look at the work that had been done on this, while I was away. I did look when I came back and thought it excellent - then forgot to let you know! (I probably remember more when I make negative comments). Kbthompson 09:41, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Great article. I added two photos (with fair use rationales, so there will be no problem)...egde 10:47, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Check out WP:Columbia. Questions? E-mail User Talk:Valley2city

David Russell Hulme

You have done a lovely job on the article. Jack1956 18:27, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this. -- Kleinzach 23:35, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Musicals Article Structure

Read over, looks good! Much applause! You deserve a cookie - here's one!
Heck, take two! --omtay38 19:33, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You rock!

'nuff said! --omtay38 00:20, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yet again a fantastic contribution. Many thanks. Regarding David Russell Hulme, I have a photo somewhere that I took when I sang with him in the 1970s. If I can find it I'll scan it and upload it to the article. Jack1956 21:09, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Terence Rees and Scott Fishe

I love this... I write 4 sentences on an article Terence Rees‎ and go to bed and as if by magic the next day it's finished! And it's another brilliant article, much better than I could have created. Many thanks. I'll have a look at those articles you mentioned! Jack1956 17:38, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that. You have done another great job by polishing up the Scott Fishe article to such a good standard. I wish I had your expertise. Jack1956 23:19, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sullivan mss & George Sheringham

Infinitely obliged! -- Tim riley (talk) 22:36, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Imperial triple crown jewels

I, Durova, am very happy to award these imperial triple crown jewels to Ssilvers in appreciation of outstanding content contributions. DurovaCharge! 05:18, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your Imperial Majesty, even if these regalia are just stage props, it's nice to be able to hand them to you. May you wear them well. DurovaCharge! 05:18, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FAC comments

Okay, after implementing some of your suggestions from the FAC page and article talk page, and the work you and I have both done on the Plot Summary section, I think it looks a lot better. Thanks for your help. Diff. I also made some other minor edits and added some more info/analysis about the music/songs in the play. What do you think about the article's present quality status now? Cirt (talk) 11:15, 28 November 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Thanks for great job on Oudin.... Jack1956 (talk) 18:04, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the help on Francoeur. Melbrooksfan101 talk 04:22, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Trial by Jury - Gurneys

Well done on pursuing this. I have just finished reading the Elliott book which answers all the questions and I aspire to finding some time to work on all the articles but ... Cutler (talk) 09:09, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I found a photo of Nancy McIntosh and uploaded it. Ther others weren't really of the show. I will search further and upload as appropriate ThanksBroadwaygal (talk) 18:42, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I added the image to the article. -- Ssilvers (talk) 19:11, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[Re:congrats] ... and to you both. It was a collaborative effort and without sane people around, I was beginning to chew my leg off... as it was, I got off with a limp. Cheers Kbthompson (talk) 09:09, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just started an article on the Boer War Te Deum this morning. It's a rough stub, and I am currently looking for more references. If you have time, could you take a look? Thanks Broadwaygal (talk) 18:25, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"The Bob"

Thanks for your input! Typos will be the death of me, just so you know. I absolutely hate the one image available of Marshall, and I'm positive that he'd hate it too; it's the monkey suit. I contacted the Adirondack Museum to see if they can release an image or two under GFDL for me to use. I would love to get a similar pic to what I've seen in my book sources, with him grinning goofily while posing on mountaintops with grimy, exhausted looking guides. So we'll see. :) María (habla conmigo) 20:20, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Signor Brocolini

Rocked with mirth at reading about the origin of his name! Only one measly correction contributed. Another SSilvers coup. Tim riley (talk) 19:11, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can't fault it- another brilliant piece of research and well-written. Jack1956 (talk) 21:16, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Ss, I am very pleased to know about Sig. Brocolini, of whom I have never previously heard, but I think I have read somewhere that he was especially admired in a trio from La finta giardiniera with Mme Spinaci and the basso cantante Bruschetta, under the baton of the great Vermicelli. Keep up the good work, Eebahgum (talk) 00:42, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back and hello again. Nice job of discovery, and very thorough. And yes, he's a credit to my name, maybe. (Perhaps I need to change mine too. . .) JohnClarknew (talk) 23:40, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The star is totally deserved. I have a programme for the 1975 performance of 'Utopia' somewhere, and will check it out, but presume that, as he is on the recording he must have been in the performance. GD I am less sure about. Jack1956 (talk) 14:33, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again for your help. I think the article looks great now! - certainly better than any other musicals in 2008.... Anyway, thanks again. -- Dave S Light Defender (talk) 15:06, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message. What better way to spend the day after opening night. Nursing a Hangover, Reading the reviews and updating the WIKI page - I forgot to log in Light Defender (talk) 21:16, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

If I could figure out how to give you a Barnstar (or a bouquet of flowers) I would. Thanks for the help on Bernadette Peters, she's looking good. I'll look at the article again next week, with fresh eyes, to see what other bits and pieces it might need. JeanColumbia (talk) 16:48, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

Updated DYK query On 22 April, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Lionel Monckton, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Gatoclass (talk) 08:23, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have now created the Sturgis article, and would appreciate you taking a look and expanding/improving the "literary" sections. I normally write article about (mainly Victorian) footballers, and am not particularly knowledgeable on Opera etc. Cheers --Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 05:54, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On April 28 2008, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Julian Sturgis, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Julian Sturgis), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

--Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 19:37, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Amy Evans

Thanks for the splendid overhaul.... -- Drhoehl (talk) 02:37, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hair Be-In

Hey ssilvers! .. didn't get a chance to trade contact info last night @ the Hair Be-In. Here's a link to my band's website http://www.gladshot.com/home.htm

DYK

Updated DYK query On 7 May, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Robert the Devil (Gilbert), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Gatoclass (talk) 11:38, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Updated DYK query On 11 May, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Amy Evans, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Bedford 22:15, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeston

You've got more stamina than I! Article looks great, I made a few very minor edits, and added external links to articles on a few of his lesser known works.JeanColumbia (talk) 17:52, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dolly

Thanks for editing my Hello, Dolly! Act One synopsis. It's so much more concise and well-written now!MarianKroy (talk) 20:29, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

Updated DYK query On 18 May, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Jack O'Brien (director), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--PFHLai (talk) 00:01, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Updated DYK query On 18 May, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Creatures of Impulse, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Great Job on Hair!

Hey! Just wanted to say thanks for all the great work! Sorry I couldn't be more help these last couple days. Love all the new stuff you added. Talk to you soon - User:Mblaxill 20:24, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

Creatures of Impulse Barnstar
Your work on this article was at the least the equal of mine, and it couldn't have passed without you. This special barnstar commemorates this FA. =) Shoemaker's Holiday (talk) 01:03, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well done

The 25 DYK Medal
Congratulations! Here's a medal for you in appreciation of your hardwork in creating, expanding and nominating 25+ articles for DYK. Keep up the good work, SS, there must be a few music hall articles still to do! -- Victuallers (talk) 09:27, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shoe: G&S articles/scholarship

Wikipedia:WikiProject_Gilbert_and_Sullivan/Marc_Shepherd's_Gilbert_and_Sullivan_Discography. See: Wikipedia:FCDW/June 26, 2008.

I do think it's worth establishing [the G&S journals as reliable] - for one thing, now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure the Trumpet Bray has some articles on scholarly research on Lady Sangazure's song from the Sorcerer that I'd like to use. But, well, it'll wait, and it's not like our little summary page on Marc is ever going to be a high-traffic page. Shoemaker's Holiday (talk) 20:30, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder if it would ever be worth doing an article on G&S scholarship? You know, cover the major discoveries, describe the evolution of the field... or is that too likely to hit problems? Shoemaker's Holiday (talk) 20:38, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Aha! I have suggested this before. I think it would be great. It is a difficult job and requires library access. For journals, you may even have to write to the various different G&S societies to get back issues or whatever. If you have the stomach for it, I'll help as much as I can, and try to give you advice, but I can't go to the library on it. I think that some of the journals have online indexes to their old articles. Maybe Stephen Turnbull and Andrew Crowther can help you. Mitch Gillett might be able to help with GASBAG, and Angie Arnall might be able to help with The Gilbert and Sullivan News. Even more important, is the old Gilbert and Sullivan Journal, which is no longer published. Books are easier, and Ainger's list of references is a good place to start. Also, see this. Crowther's site lists various useful resources. Good luck! -- Ssilvers (talk) 20:49, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh Joy, Oh Rapture will certainly be helpful, but I'd borrow it from the library rather than buying it. It reports interviews and anecdotes rather than what I'd call rigorous research. -- Ssilvers (talk) 18:11, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Imperial Napoleonic triple crown

It gives me great joy to award this Imperial Napoleonic triple crown for exceptional mainspace contributions on Gilbert ad Sullivan and otherwise. Thank you very much for your generous time and diligence on behalf of the project. You are the model of a modern major Napoleon among editors. Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 06:25, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment

You can run [the bot] manually, but, as a courtesy to the bot owner, I'd wait until you're more-or-less done. The page to run the bot is [1] and you put "Gilbert and Sullivan" into the box there. Shoemaker's Holiday (talk) 22:16, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gilbert & Sullivan for All

The Gilbert and Sullivan Barnstar
For your amazing contribution to the new article Gilbert and Sullivan for All I award you the Gilbert and Sullivan Barnstar in recognition of your knowledge and enthusiasm. Jack1956 (talk) 20:47, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hi Ssilvers, the article will appear on DYK tomorrow [Tuesday]. This is entirely due to your contribution. Jack1956 (talk) 22:12, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gilbert Barnstar

The Trial by Jury Barnstar
Please accept this specially-made Gilbert Barnstar for your hard work on Trial by Jury. Seriously, couldn't do it without you. =) Shoemaker's Holiday (talk) 13:26, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the star! Re: Sullivan, you may wish to archive the old discussion so that any new readers focus on the newer discussions. Best regards, -- Ssilvers (talk) 15:11, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Marie Studholme

Updated DYK query On 30 June, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Marie Studholme, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 13:00, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

7/1 DYK

Updated DYK query On 1 July, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Gilbert and Sullivan for All, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Bedford Pray 02:40, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May want to watchlist this, though it's not a particularly good article, and may be unreferenceable. Shoemaker's Holiday (talk) 00:51, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please merge the article into Cultural influence of Gilbert and Sullivan. -- Ssilvers

Summer's over

Summer's almost over so back to work-or whatever it is that we all do! Welcome back, I've missed the conversations (so to speak....)JeanColumbia (talk) 19:58, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Martha Wright (actress)

Updated DYK query On 31 August, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Martha Wright (actress), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 14:12, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vicar of Bray

The information on the evolutionary theory is different enough to be in a different article. I don't know enough about the subject to write that article. I do however know enough to delete it from the article in which it is currently found. theloavesandthevicious (talk) 14:06, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and the whole discussion is also unsourced, providing no information that could be used to create such an article. theloavesandthevicious (talk) 20:00, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are clearly a moron, so I will go ahead and create the article and paste the goddamn information into it, deleting it from this. The problem with the world today is that inferior people such as yourselves get above themselves. Learn your place. theloavesandthevicious (talk) 03:19, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]