User talk:David Fuchs: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by UNSC Fury - "→‎Halo Wars page: new section"
Gavin.collins (talk | contribs)
Notability (Fiction)
Line 24: Line 24:


Can you please unprotect the Halo Wars page? I made a large summary of the Leaders and their units which I cannot post. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:UNSC Fury|UNSC Fury]] ([[User talk:UNSC Fury|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/UNSC Fury|contribs]]) 13:36, 4 March 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Can you please unprotect the Halo Wars page? I made a large summary of the Leaders and their units which I cannot post. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:UNSC Fury|UNSC Fury]] ([[User talk:UNSC Fury|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/UNSC Fury|contribs]]) 13:36, 4 March 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
== Notability (Fiction) ==
There seems to be some progress being made towards redrafting the guideline. Most of the arguments for a permissive guideline seem to have been countered in the sense that they have been found not to be viable. My attempts to obtain a compromise earlier this year seem to be leading towards a slightly stricter applciation of [[WP:V]] for fiction that should discourage topics which are only the subject of in universe plot summary, trivia and cruft. A recent post at [[WT:FICT#The rules]] seems to make this clear. Can you provide some cool and clear support towards drafting a compromise that is compliant with existing Wikipedia policies and guidelines? --[[User:Gavin.collins|Gavin Collins]] ([[User talk:Gavin.collins|talk]]) 19:31, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:31, 4 March 2009

If you ask a question here, I will go to your talk page to respond, unless you state otherwise.
While this makes messages more fragmented, it also saves time. Please note many other users prefer to centralize discussions.
Archives: 01 (10/05-12/10/06), 02 (12/10/06-1/20/07), 03 (1/20/07-2/8/07), 04 (2/8/07-3/31/07), 05 (4/1/07-5/17/07), 06 (5/17/07-6/28/07), 07 (7/1/07-8/19/07), 08 (8/20/07-9/24/07), 09 (9/28/07-10/27/07), 10 (10/27/07-12/02/07), 11 (12/03/07-01/11/08), 12 (01/14/08-02/09/08), 13 (2/09/08-3/05/08), 14 (3/06/08-4/17/08), 15 (4/17/08-5/25/08), 16 (5/26/08-6/29/08), 17 (6/29/08-7/31/08), 18 (7/31/08-09/06/08), 19 (09/07/08-10/01/08), 20 (10/02/08-10/28/08), 21 (10/29/08-11/23/08), 22 (11/24/08-12/29/08), 23 (12/30/08-01/30/09), 24 (1/31/09-?), 25 (01/31/09-03/03/09), 26

Featured content dispatch workshop 
2014

Oct 1: Let's get serious about plagiarism

2013

Jul 10: Infoboxes: time for a fresh look?

2010

Nov 15: A guide to the Good Article Review Process
Oct 18: Common issues seen in Peer review
Oct 11: Editing tools, part 3
Sep 20: Editing tools, part 2
Sep 6: Editing tools, part 1
Mar 15: GA Sweeps end
Feb 8: Content reviewers and standards

2009

Nov 2: Inner German border
Oct 12: Sounds
May 11: WP Birds
May 4: Featured lists
Apr 20: Valued pictures
Apr 13: Plagiarism
Apr 6: New FAC/FAR nominations
Mar 16: New FAC/FAR delegates
Mar 9: 100 Featured sounds
Mar 2: WP Ships FT and GT
Feb 23: 100 FS approaches
Feb 16: How busy was 2008?
Feb 8: April Fools 2009
Jan 31: In the News
Jan 24: Reviewing featured picture candidates
Jan 17: FA writers—the 2008 leaders
Jan 10: December themed page
Jan 3: Featured list writers

2008

Nov 24: Featured article writers
Nov 10: Historic election on Main Page
Nov 8: Halloween Main Page contest
Oct 13: Latest on featured articles
Oct 6: Matthewedwards interview
Sep 22: Reviewing non-free images
Sep 15: Interview with Ruhrfisch
Sep 8: Style guide and policy changes, August
Sep 1: Featured topics
Aug 25: Interview with Mav
Aug 18: Choosing Today's Featured Article
Aug 11: Reviewing free images
Aug 9 (late): Style guide and policy changes, July
Jul 28: Find reliable sources online
Jul 21: History of the FA process
Jul 14: Rick Block interview
Jul 7: Style guide and policy changes for June
Jun 30: Sources in biology and medicine
Jun 23 (26): Reliable sources
Jun 16 (23): Assessment scale
Jun 9: Main page day
Jun 2: Styleguide and policy changes, April and May
May 26: Featured sounds
May 19: Good article milestone
May 12: Changes at Featured lists
May 9 (late): FC from schools and universities
May 2 (late): Did You Know
Apr 21: Styleguide and policy changes
Apr 14: FA milestone
Apr 7: Reviewers achieving excellence
Mar 31: Featured content overview
Mar 24: Taming talk page clutter
Mar 17: Changes at peer review
Mar 13 (late): Vintage image restoration
Mar 3: April Fools mainpage
Feb 25: Snapshot of FA categories
Feb 18: FA promotion despite adversity
Feb 11: Great saves at FAR
Feb 4: New methods to find FACs
Jan 28: Banner year for Featured articles

The WPVG Newsletter (February 2009)

  • Newsletter delivery by xenobot 00:13, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

VG sources

Hi there! I'm just curious why you removed gaygamer.net from the video game WikiProject's sources page. — Levi van Tine (tc) 12:56, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm confused...there are plenty of sites in the checklist section that don't have a discussion. Why haven't you removed those as well? — Levi van Tine (tc) 13:16, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Halo Wars page

Can you please unprotect the Halo Wars page? I made a large summary of the Leaders and their units which I cannot post. —Preceding unsigned comment added by UNSC Fury (talkcontribs) 13:36, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notability (Fiction)

There seems to be some progress being made towards redrafting the guideline. Most of the arguments for a permissive guideline seem to have been countered in the sense that they have been found not to be viable. My attempts to obtain a compromise earlier this year seem to be leading towards a slightly stricter applciation of WP:V for fiction that should discourage topics which are only the subject of in universe plot summary, trivia and cruft. A recent post at WT:FICT#The rules seems to make this clear. Can you provide some cool and clear support towards drafting a compromise that is compliant with existing Wikipedia policies and guidelines? --Gavin Collins (talk) 19:31, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]