Talk:Devils Diciples Motorcycle Club

untitled

Below moved from article text. Agree article needs cleanup Populus (talk) 20:30, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Devils Diciples Motorcycle Club Objections, by Detroit Mike DDMC

The DDMC does not authorize or contribute any information about it's self to this Encyclopedia other than the correction noted. We do not have Rivals or Allies (the sde notes are completly wrong) and are and have been standing on our own for over 40 years. The inclussion of a header shown as "Criminal Activities" is not only miss-leading on the part of this web site but possibly libal to suit. The Devils Diciples are a Motorcycle Club and not a criminal enterprise. If some members are arrested for some crime; it has to be proven that they have actually commited that crime first and further that it was a club venture. This cannot be proven because we do not plan or commit illegal acts as a club. Labeling us as doing so is libel to suit by any or all members seeing themselves being harmed by the accusation(s).

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Detroit44"

The following is one of Wikipedia Guidlines for article creation which the article about the DDMC does not adhere to and if the original writer or wikipedia does not comply, I will seek legal remidies and damages. Neutral point of view The neutral point of view is a means of dealing with conflicting perspectives on a topic as evidenced by reliable sources. It requires that all majority- and significant-minority views must be presented fairly, in a disinterested tone, and in rough proportion to their prevalence within the source material. The neutral point of view neither sympathizes with nor discourages its subject, nor does it endorse or oppose specific viewpoints. Also, it doesn't represent a lack of viewpoint, but is rather a specific, editorially neutral, point of view — it is not aimed at the absence or elimination of viewpoints. Wikipedia is filled with reliably sourced non-neutral statements, so the elimination of article content cannot be justified under this policy solely on the grounds that it is "POV". Article content should clearly describe, represent, and characterize disputes within topics, but should not endorse any particular point of view. Instead, articles should provide background on who believes what, and why, and on which points of view are more popular. Detailed articles will often contain evaluations of each viewpoint, but these, too, must studiously refrain from taking sides. --24.217.66.22 (talk) 03:48, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

I see that the whole format has been changed and I like it. The inclussion of the Hells Angels- Diciples Artical is still not correct, it was not one of our members and we are not rivals nor do we have problems with the 81, but we both know the truth and as long as the rest of the format--Detroit44 (talk) 17:07, 29 September 2009 (UTC) has been restructured. I rest...for now, but watch what ya say.

Disputed information

It is disputed that "William "Cats" Michaels" was a member of the "Devils Diciples" and instead was a member of the USA MC "Devils Disciples" a smaller club spelled differently and based on the east coast and affiliated with the Outlaws MC. If you read the referenced artical you will see that the club name is not spelled the same. The following URL backs up this premis. http://archive.southcoasttoday.com/daily/07-98/07-27-98/a02wn037.htm Chief suspect arrested in motorcycle shootings.

Added by Detroit44 (talk · contribs)

--Dbratland (talk) 05:20, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

It seems equally likely that the reporter didn't notice the idiosyncratic spelling of the name, as this one did not. A search only turns up the UK affiliates, which evidently embrace the more typical spelling as well. Are there reliable sources pointing to the existence of this other club? A general search on the term isn't helpful, given that it is used in many contexts. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 10:55, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

If you go to the ref I included: http://archive.southcoasttoday.com/daily/07-98/07-27-98/a02wn037.htm , you will see that this is the same club that you are claiming is ours from your source. If you read the whole artical "that you are referencing", even that one spells the name "Disciples" (another club-not ours and not affiliated with our friends with the same name in the UK) You seem to believe that you can take your artical and pull out a piece of it and change the spelling of the Club to point to us. This is your way of creating news about us that is not us and it will stop. Get that shit off the page or I will go to my attorney in the morning and start a suit against you and wikipedia, last warning.Detroit44 (talk) 00:59, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

I have updated our website (DDMC) to include a note about this and other disputed info on the Events page. It is obvious that you at wikipedia would rather print the possible rather than the truth from the horses mouth. I just hope for your sake that it does not come back to bite you in the ass in the future. (well...no I do not hope that)24.217.66.219 (talk) 19:40, 23 October 2009 (UTC)