User talk:Momo san/Archive 5

Messages go here, put new messages on the bottom of the page. Sign your comments using four ~~~~. Thank you

Say, can you use some good news?

If so, I hope you're sitting down: BellSouth got back to me and they will be investigating the Bambifan101 matter! How's that for an early Christmas present? I just left a more detailed message on Collectonian's talk page. I have to run or I'd fill you in on all the details now. Talk to you soon and THANK YOU for all your fine work. Regards, --PMDrive1061 (talk) 04:17, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Thats great news, lets hope they can disconnect this "weirdo", he's caused enough trouble around here. Momo san ^Gespräch 19:31, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

User:Drhiwaomer

I've gone ahead and deleted the User:Drhiwaomer page. I deleted it as G11, however, and not as something requiring oversight. From what I can tell, this person posted their own resume, and so it's advertising, not something I would send to be oversighted. SchuminWeb (Talk) 19:29, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

It contained email addresses as well as his home address which could be used to track him down or to harass. Momo san ^Gespräch 19:31, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: User:Starcraft brood war

Hello Momusufan, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I declined the speedy deletion of User:Starcraft brood war - a page you tagged - because: The reason given is not a valid speedy deletion criterion. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. JohnCD (talk) 17:07, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

• Users are usually given some latitude for their user pages, and while this is admittedly irrelevant it isn't offensive and is doing no harm. Also, one shouldn't normally remove material other users' talk pages. Regards, JohnCD (talk)

Hi, I don't tag pages for deletion that often unless a vandal did it. I'll review the CSD information either way. Momo san ^Gespräch 18:49, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Jaime Herrera a.k.a K-MEL

Hi, just FYI, G1 is for pages that are totally incomprehensible and gibberish. This particular article was written in Spanish. If you stumble across this sort of thing in future, you may wish to add {{notenglish}} (which can be followed by |Spanish or whatever if you recognise the language, or you could run the text thorugh trnsalre.google.com (it's crap but it gives you a rough translation- enough to work out the subject) and apply a relevant CSD tag if required. I've replaced it with an A7 for now, since the translation doesn't appear to assert notability. Do get in touch if you have any questions and keep up the good work. All the best, HJMitchell You rang? 21:33, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Oral Roberts

That Tulsa World archive on Oral Roberts is actually a first-class collection of information about him--certainly a worthwhile "further reading" link. I understand your concern that this was added by someone apparently connected with the World but would you object if I put it back in? (I am in no way connected with the paper.)--Arxiloxos (talk) 21:36, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. --Arxiloxos (talk) 05:43, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

For watching out for my userpage. Obviously, my response on WP:RPP was a little ... unusual ... and I hope you didn't take offense. To be perfectly clear, I do appreciate others reverting vandalism on my user page, I'd just prefer not to drive vandals to pages people are actually reading. Again, thanks. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 06:52, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

Toyotaconspiracy

Do you know anything about Toyotaconspiracy (talk · contribs)? They seem to be a member of your fan club. Acroterion _(talk) 05:26, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

Just happened to notice it, well I reviewed his edits the first time and he removed certain things which I reverted back to the way it was like removing the romanized translation of the company name in Japanese, like here for instance. Not sure why he blew up on me like that, but if he does it again after 2 days he sure will get the boot for what he's done. Momo san ^Gespräch 06:29, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

I was on the edge of indeffing, but figured I'd let him have one last chance. I'm not optimistic. Just wanted to make sure he wasn't a sockpuppet. Acroterion _(talk) 13:05, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

Wow

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		I've been seeing your requests at WP:RFPP seemingly all day and approving most of them. Keep up the good work, Malinaccier (talk) 02:06, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Looks like someone else beat me to it. PCHS-NJROTC ^(Messages) 06:30, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

PayPal

The diff in question is not "oversighted", it's merely deleted. As an admin, I can still see it. I don't know if this is important, and I don't want to edit a closed discussion. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 18:15, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

That is right, admins can see it but the rest of us can't which is what was needed here. Momo san ^Gespräch 18:33, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Oh I get what you mean now, I happened to find WP:REVDEL which explains everything. It was a deletion not an oversight. Momo san ^Gespräch 18:52, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

My bad on my recent edit to Brittany Murphy

I was pretty sure TMZ wasn't a reliable source. Sorry about that! --Russ is the sex (talk) 19:25, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Not a problem, They may break a story but it's just not that reliable i'm sorry to say. Momo san ^Gespräch 19:26, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

cbbcfan sockpuppet

Hi,

I see that you recently (5 December) identified 82.34.173.149 as a sockpuppet of cbbcfan, who has been blocked indefintely. Since the temporary block on 82.34.173.149 was lifted, I've noticed that 94.168.95.164 has started editing a similar range of articles, and making similar changes/comments. I don't know if you, as an admin, are able to keep an eye on this editor, in case things start going awry again, or of the formal reporting mechanism for such issues. Kind regards, Lynbarn (talk) 09:48, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

I am not an admin but if you feel it's the same user as that 82 IP, try bringing the issue to WP:ANI or file a sockpuppet report at WP:SPI. Momo san ^Gespräch 15:35, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

Howdy! Having noticed a few of your recent 'issues', I wanted to draw your attention to [1]. I want to clarify in bright blazing bold print that I am not out trying to canvas for support or anything of the kind. Rather, I notice you are someone who has had some run-ins with this IP recently, predating mine. As such, you might have context, background, or information on their activities that go beyond mine. If you have some legitimate arguments or evidence to add, even against my report, I wanted you to have the opportunity to since you seem to be in a knowledgeable position due to your previous interactions. Again, please, I'm not looking for a "me too" here, but a further source of information on this case, even if that proves to be in opposition to my observations. In whatever case, thank you very much for taking the time out to read this. I'm very sorry for shooting down your previous AIV report against the IP, by the way. I hope you understand where I was coming from on that. I know you've been around here a good while and, while we don't know each other personally, I trust you know your way around. - Vianello (Talk) 19:27, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for your input! That's exactly the kind of background context I thought might help sort out who's who. I'm pretty sure this will go through though. The user's little faux-polite screed against you, to my eye, pretty well cements that these are the same person. - Vianello (Talk) 19:36, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

And thanks for your continued help/backup through that whole thing. Looks like we sure got that fella's panties in a knot, didn't we? - Vianello (Talk) 21:51, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Thank you.

Thanks for helping me revert vandalism on my talkpage. You are doing a good job patrolling, keep up your work! Also, what an effective TW user you are! Optakeover^(Talk) 19:53, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Thank you and Happy Holidays! Momo san ^Gespräch 19:59, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Thanks again

Thanks for revert on my talk page. Happy holidays! Elockid ^(Talk·_Contribs) 05:05, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

RFPP templates

BTW, since you seem to hang around RFPP a lot, feel free to do NAC marks for the bot if they are very obvious. You don't have to, but it's been done before and for editors that understand, go for it. Or just run already. tedder (talk) 07:06, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

User talk:Carol.Christiansen beim Wixen!

Hi. Any idea what's going on here? Some of the edits to her talk page have been revision deleted, and my block has also vanished from the logs. Rodhullandemu 15:58, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

Judging from the User talk page history, all his edits say that his Username or IP address got removed. My guess is that it got oversighted and deleted as such by an oversighter which basicly deletes everything. Momo san ^Gespräch 16:01, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

I've replied here; this has happened many times before, but I guess it's hidden so well that many people aren't aware of it. -- Soap ^Talk/_{Contributions} 16:58, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

Current cast of Neighbours

Hey there, thank you for reverting the vandalism on this page. I had just seen the page had been edited by that user again and was about to revert their edits, but I saw that you had beaten me to it. Thank you again! :) - JuneGloom07 (talk) 18:19, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Momusufan

I am sorry, but I have closed your Request for adminship prematurely. Simply put, the community doesn't feel you are ready to become an administrator; while your edit count isn't the only determining factor, and numerous people have their own personal standards by which they judge RfA candidates, this particular RfA was all but assured of not passing.

I am sorry about this, and I hope you don't take it personally. If you continue to contribute to the project in a positive fashion, I am confident that you would be able to submit a successful RfA in the future. You may wish to consider applying for an evaluation by other Wikipedia editors for feedback on how to obtain the necessary experience. Once you are ready to request adminship again, there is a great admin coaching program available, as well as a guide to requests for adminship.

If you have any other questions about becoming an administrator, please don't hesitate to ask me. Regards, FASTILY ^(TALK) 22:30, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

Thank you!

Hello Momusufan, HappyInGeneral (talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Thank you for fixing my edit. --HappyInGeneral (talk) 16:43, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

You're welcome :) Momo san ^Gespräch 16:48, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Hello, Momo san. You have new messages at Qwertyisbest's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

RE: Wallflower socks

Re, your message, I'm afraid I don't understand what you mean, or are trying to get at. Delnoy didn't make any of the blocks of the socks I was reporting.— Dædαlus ^Contribs 01:28, 31 December 2009 (UTC)