Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Spxdcz (talk | contribs)
42 edits
Spxdcz (talk | contribs)
42 edits
Line 287: Line 287:


Also, see the Discussion page for Amaxus for further notable third-party websites mentioning the product.--[[User:Spxdcz|Spxdcz]] ([[User talk:Spxdcz|talk]]) 14:09, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
Also, see the Discussion page for Amaxus for further notable third-party websites mentioning the product.--[[User:Spxdcz|Spxdcz]] ([[User talk:Spxdcz|talk]]) 14:09, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Actually, someone's just deleted it, so you can't see the Discussion page any more! Argh! Either way, it's certainly more notable than 80% of the other content management systems that DO have an entry on Wikipedia. --[[User:Spxdcz|Spxdcz]] ([[User talk:Spxdcz|talk]]) 14:49, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:49, 15 February 2010



float
float
float
float
Enter the article's title to request its undeletion:


Current requests

Shortcuts

New Raven Clan Copy

Hello this is Ogan 234 I understand that my artical new raven clan was deleted. But can you please send me a copy to my Gmail. My Gmail is lightningespada@gmail.com thank you please. (P.S If the lowercase l does not work in lightnig try uppercase)Ok my email address was added to my preferences thanks for the tip

Looks like JohnCD handled this in January. Replying now so the 'bot will archive.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 15:25, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Climate Justice

This page was deleted via PROD and I unfortunately did not see the notice within 7 days.

As the original author, I attempted to write this article from a neutral POV, following several examples of other pages in Wikipedia. It is intended to be a separate article from 'Climate Ethics'. Please restore the article or advise on how it can be improved. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JLeland123 (talk • contribs)

 Done. As a contested PROD, the article is automatically restored on request. I will notify Sgroupace (talk · contribs), who PRODded it, in case he wishes to nominate it under the Articles for deletion process; you may like to discuss it with him. JohnCD (talk)
Just getting a date stamp here so the 'bot will archive.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 15:26, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cowboy Logistics

People have asked me to explain the term and the origins of it so many times that I actually took the time to provide a wiki entry to it. This is a genuine question that I answer often and have answered often for the LAST 10 YEARS. I figure the purpose of a wiki is so that I don't have to continue to answer the same question, and provide a location in which someone can search for the answer online. The phrase is so popular that is has been put into national advertisement for a gun company. http://olegvolk.net/gallery/d/34387-2/ammo_belt_7430.jpg. Please undelete the article so that I do not have to constantly answer the question as to the origin of the phrase. -Twoblink (talk) 09:37, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the purpose of this wiki is to be an encyclopedia, and part of the rules of this encyclopedia is that topics need to show notability. If you'd like, we can move a copy to User:Twoblink/Cowboy Logistics, and you can add sources that show notability (being used in an advertisement isn't going to be enough).--Fabrictramp | talk to me 01:24, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

mogens boman

This relates to the article on the Danish site. The article listed an extensive list of this author's books. The page linked so several other articles on Wiki relating to the autor. It is believed that the original article was too advertising -Kimgarsdal (talk) 20:22, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done Admins here don't have any special powers at the Danish wikipedia. You'll need to deal with the issue there - sorry.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 01:31, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Amy Speace

I would like to create an article for singer-songwriter Amy Speace. I will may sure that no copyrighted material is used without proper permission. The admin who deleted the page is on a wikibreak AND has his/her talk page protected. -paulschreiber (talk) 23:03, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see anything keeping you from creating the page (it's not protected against recreation). If you want a second opinion on what you write, you can always create it at User:Paulschreiber/Amy Speace and post a request for feedback at WP:FEED. HTH --Fabrictramp | talk to me 01:33, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

jeremy reading

Not sure why the page was deleted. The page is about one of the winners of the reality TV show Beauty and the Geek which is broadcast in a number of countries around the world. He won the first ever series in Australia. Other Beauty and the Geek contestants have wikipedia pages -58.165.249.91 (talk) 03:22, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Cheers, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 05:03, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Stephen G. Post

There was an article on Stephen G. Post that has been delted. It was highly informative and he is an important writer and scholar. Why was it deleted, and can it be restored please? -24.186.164.142 (talk) 16:03, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done - as the article was a copyright violation of [1], [2], and [3]. Regards, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 17:39, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

croposition

This topic has far reaching interest in the field of digital photography. Just because you can find no reference for it elsewhere on the web does not warrant its deletion from Wiki. Here's a link to Digital-Photography-School.com, and how it is used throughout that site, in 22 articles.[1] -71.214.172.80 (talk) 18:08, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. The rationale for the deletion was "no reliable sources demonstrating that anyone outside of a single forum contributor uses this neologism; no verifiability", so improving on this point might help avoid deletion in the future. Regards, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 04:17, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

specifically human basic need

No reasoning given. -Szalagloria (talk) 00:37, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done - the articles only content was "According to a hypothesis of '''[[Laszlo Garai]]''' a paradoxical ''need for a needfree activity''. The structure of the hypothesized need cor­res­ponds to that of a ''specifically human basic activity'' defined along both technical and social criteria.<ref>Personality dynamics and social existence [In Hungarian]; Budapest: Academic Press, 1969.</ref>". Feel free to recreate the page, but be sure to make sure there is enough content to better identify the article's subject. Cheers, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 16:10, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Henrik_Flyman

This is an artist, composer, producer and multi instrumentalist that has been active since 1992 with about 10 album releases and tours around the world. He is frequently featured in media (radio, magazines, ezines and occasional TV). The page has been around for a long time (and I have been helping with info) but it was deleted by Jclemens because he meant it didn't add anything that other band pages didn't already mention. I wrote him and told him that it at least (as far as I could remember) told about one album guest appearance that no other page mentioned + that it was an important page to link several bands and albums together through Henrik Flyman's name. It is normal for official people to have a Wiki page in their own name (people search for such pages - and that's where new info can be added). He ignored me for 4 days, then refused to undelete it and told the reason to be that I didn't ask him nicely enough (which I did, since I'm not a rude person). I don't want to waste more time begging him to keep valuable information on Wikipedia. This is a page that I know has been used frequently by media and others, so therefore I will ask (someone else) kindly again for undeletion. If the page isn't good enough (which I can't understand) than I suggest that you improve it rather than deleting it. That's what makes Wikipedia great. Isn't it :) -Metallica1980 (talk) 05:14, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Cheers, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 10:58, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. That is very kind of you.

Henrik_Flyman

official person world-wide -87.60.34.219 (talk) 06:18, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Cheers, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 11:00, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

michael hammerschlag

The reasons for this deletion are just lies, and it seems the deleter has a political beef with some articles this author has written (he says the first op-ed is just "a letter to the editor"). This article has been up over 7 years. The subject is a journalist who has been published in all the newspapers listed, some quoted below, has questioned dozens of famous people, and has +100,000 hits on Google. This article should be restored and locked against deletion.

PUTIN'S CHILDREN (Orig.) - exclusive NYT, International Herald Tribune- SCAN July 6 - from Moscow The Putin Youth groups: Nashi, Young Guard, Young Russia; badger and terrorize anyone who even differs with Kremlin positions; By propagandizing the vulnerable, is the Kremlin poisoning the seed corn of young minds? On June 12th, Russian Independence Day, Red Sq. was reserved for the Party faithful po Ryccki ONLINE IHT vers. http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/05/opinion/05iht-edhammer.1.6509812.html?_r=1 http://hammernews.com/putinschildren2.htm

COMET PHOTO ALTERED, UH SCIENTIST SAYS- .. - (Honolulu Advertiser)-Sun Front Page-April 20,'97- Nat. scoop Faking of Univ of Hawaii telescope photo to "show" a "spaceship" following Hale-Bopp comet by psychic "remote viewing" institute; Publicized on Art Bell national radio show + website, may have been incitement for San Diego Heavens Gate cult suicide 

                      AP RELEASE of article  http://hammernews.com/comet2.gif

THE INFINITE PUTIN - Capital Times, Madison WI ORIGINAL Moscow: Putin is supposed to leave office in March, but that was impossible to believe. Appointing unknown crony Viktor Zubkov PM (told only the day before and rammed through rubber stamp Congress 2 days later) ends the doubt. Zubkov will be anointed President (+ win), Putin will become Prime Minister, and Zubkov will resign in 6-12 months to let Vladimir Vladimirovich return as Prez. Massive conflicts of interests in the Kremlin, where mini oligarch ministers control the biggest corporations in the world and can't separate their interests from those of the state, crushing and absorbing competitors.- October 10, 2007 

http://hammernews.com/infintiteputin-captimes.htm

"WHOOPS"- HOW THE NETWORKS GOT IT WRONG- PROBLEM POLLING POLICY - Nat. Scoop- Intellectual Capita1- 11/25/00 - Inside story on the screw-ups (3-4) at the VNS and Florida counties that caused the networks to blow the election call in a strong article/analysis/commentary against the networks projection policy and the squirrelly polls w interviews w TV news execs, Walter Cronkite, Florida officials, pollsters, Sen. Gorton and VNS people, voting machine reps.- MediaChannel- 12/26/00 Anchor of largest media related network. Issue Cover http://hammmernews.com/whoops.htm

GETTING GOOD NEWS: The Government vs. the Press in Times of War (realaudio) windowsmedia- Mike's BROWN U. Lecture (listing)- History of Press restrictions in War since WW2; How Vietnam changed everything and made the media the enemy; 30 min., Salomon Hall, Brown Univ., Dec 13, 2004 POSTER http://hammer0l.tripod.com/goodnews.ram

NEXT STAR of BETHLEHEM – Seattle Times '87 meaning of Israeli nuclear arsenal http://hammernews.com/seatsott.gif

A MORE PERFECT UNION - scroll right (Moscow News- Nov 26,93) Russia's cynical effort to cripple CIS states Georgia, Tajikistan, Azerbaijan, Estonia; Territory lust + yearning for reunifying Soviet Union vs. new morality and poverty HTML vers. PLUS GRAPHIC of BOTH http://hammernews.com/forunion.gif FORTIFYING THE CASTLE- (Moscow News- Jan 10,94) Yeltsin's move to strengthen the presidency + weaken other political groups could lead to disaster when he's gone; Dec '93 elections results- loss of Russia's Choice, Zhirinovsky, crimes of KGB ... HTLM vers.


Michael Hammerschlag (Hammernews.com) is a journalist who has written commentary and articles for many major newspapers and magazines over 20 years, including New York Times, International Herald Tribune, Seattle Times, Providence Journal, Honolulu Advertiser, Columbia Journalism Review, Media Channel, Capital Times, Modern Photography, Outside; and Moscow News, Tribune, Guardian, + Times.[citation needed]

He was a correspondent in the Soviet Union as the largest empire on earth collapsed, was a TV reporter, and has produced TV documentaries, and radio reports.[citation needed] He is now based in Kiev.[citation needed] His specialties include US + international politics, space exploration, chemistry, nuclear strategy, television, and movies.[citation needed] His commentaries have often accurately predicted events 4-12 months before the fact, including the collapse of the Warsaw Pact and possible end of the Cold War 5 months before the Berlin Wall fell, the world-wide 2008 economic crisis -89.252.25.175 (talk) 14:26, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Mind that the deletion concern was "no notability except for one letter to the editor to the NY times.. all other refs appear to be blogs. ", and fixing these issues may prevent deletion in the future. Cheers, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 16:05, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Right, but the "issues" are obviously untrue, if you look at the links. Not only is he not a conspiracy theorist (not a speck of evidence for that), this writer argues against them, but that's a potent and sleazy slander. This was done by Jclemens, who brags of deleting 14,000 articles, and is obviously out of control.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.252.25.175 (talk • contribs)

Your best bet is to add independent, reliable sources to the article. Links to his own site aren't independent of the subject.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 15:29, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Captain Paul Quine

Manx Airlines, and Captain Paul Quine's historical role within it, are fundemantal in the context of travel to and from the Isle of Man. The final day of the airline's operation was covered widely through the local and regional media, and Captain Quine was interviewed concening this. Paul Quine appears in several books concerning Manx Airlines, and several artifacts of his are exhibited at the Isle of Man's aviation mueseum. -Harvey Milligan (talk) 14:58, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done - the article currently exists (see Captain Paul Quine). Cheers! Arbitrarily0 (talk) 16:00, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reality Kings

This pages is linked all over the place and now all the links are red. I tried to look through the history but was unable to complete a search. -208.78.95.50 (talk) 23:31, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Intersting, it looks as though this page has never existed at that location. Is there another location this page might be at? Otherwise, feel free to create the page yourself. Cheers, -Arbitrarily0 (talk) 00:00, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Page has been created. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 00:07, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ctjf83/Admin Coaching

Want page back so I can review for a future RfA. Also, can I get the archive page undeleted too (Can't remember what it is called) -CTJF83 chat 03:56, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Windrush School

Wikipedia has deleted the article on Windrush School (in El Cerrito, CA) twice for "blatant copyright infringement." I assume your administrators think it is a copyright infringement because the text comes from the Windrush School Web site. However, I (the Communication Coordinator at Windrush School) wrote the Web site text so consequently Windrush owns the text. I assume that Wikipedia would agree that is Windrush owns the text it can use it for whatever use it would like, including a wiki. As a Windrush employee who wrote the Web site text I am requesting the wiki for Windrush School be restored. If you have questions about this you can contact me at sworthington@windrush.org. Thanks, Samantha Worthington, Windrush School -63.200.158.9 (talk) 19:26, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done - unfortunately, even as the writer of the text, Wikipedia still must treat this as copyright infringement. Feel free, however, to rewrite the article with different wordings, while linking to the webpage under an 'external links' section. Good luck and cheers! Arbitrarily0 (talk) 04:24, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Isabel Bloom

I was unaware of any PROD tag. Notability established in books and news. -CTJF83 chat 00:08, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Cheers, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 04:12, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pencubitt House

No reasoning given. -88.202.203.72 (talk) 11:23, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Please feel free to see the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pencubitt House. Regards, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 12:32, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lloyd Bryan Adams


1. There is the extensive imdb record

2. Lloyd Bryan Adams is one of the founders of the cable network Extreme Sports Channel

2. Lloyd Bryan Adams is one of the founders of the cable network Extreme Sports Channel

3. Stating that the receiving of a Telly Award [4] is insignificant is laughable...

4. The weak delete comment stating that a producer is more business than creative... is not a very informed statement, george lucas is a producer... is he not creatively involved in the process??There are many roles that said producer can take, in the very wiki article referring to producer Film producer it clearly states, " A film producer or movie producer is someone who creates the scenes and conditions for making movies. The producer initiates, co-ordinates, supervises and controls matters such as fund-raising, hiring key personnel and arranging for distributors. The producer is involved throughout all phases of the film-making process from development to completion of a project."

Specifically this character has proven notability, I believe there is sufficient information regarding this and can supply more.. I missed the previous argument. -Loganis (talk) 16:53, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done - this page has been deleted via a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lloyd Bryan Adams. If you believe that the consensus of the discussion was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Jayjg (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Regards, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 17:05, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tony Samara

The subject is now a published author in English, French, German, Portuguese and Croatian with the book, "Shaman's Wisdom". He is also the object of a recently published biography by Nomi Sharron (independent secondary source): "Tony Samara: v. 1 and 2: The Making of a Modern Shaman... and Beyond". I believe this qualifies for notability and for restoration of the article. -Sud Ram (talk) 16:57, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done - this page has been deleted via a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Samara (2nd nomination). If you believe that the consensus of the discussion was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Fabrictramp (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Regards, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 17:07, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I've userfied per request, with some free advice on the sources.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 13:54, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Robert A. Lawton

Article was originally deleted because of a lack of notability. Reason I disagree is: Subject of article is referenced elsewhere on Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_de_Lauzirika). Also, subject was quoted here: http://www.thestreet.com/story/10356385/1/geron-looks-born-to-run.html http://www.thestreet.com/story/10326563/1/rims-run-slows-to-a-walk.html http://sanjose.bizjournals.com/sanjose/stories/2007/05/28/newscolumn2.html and further referenced here: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1844950/ http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/film/news/e3i7a4f853fe57e4c0b959070bf6bdb2f33 -Kylestafford (talk) 05:15, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Done - the page has been restored to your userspace at User:Kylestafford/Robert A. Lawton. Feel free to make the subject's notability clearer (through use of significant and reliable sources) before restoring it back to the article space. Cheers, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 15:27, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

fillanypdf

I cannot find a reason in the deletion log. It was proposed in the deletion discussion that the site was not notable. However, during the discussion more information was added showing coverage by Kim Komando, coast to coast radio DJ with an entry on Wikipedia, by Lifehacker, that has an entry on Wikipedia, and also by a review in a newspaper's online content. So if it has coverage by 2 entities that are notable enough to be in Wikipedia that would indicate that this site is notable. Therefore I ask you to consider this new information and undelete the article. -Raduser101 (talk) 15:44, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done - this page has been deleted via a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FillAnyPdf. If you believe that the consensus of the discussion was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Stifle (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Regards, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 21:07, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

UNOVELO

We are a real company, please visit www.unovelo.com. We are the same as Argon 18 and Cervelo that is listed in the same category. Please review. Best regards, Scott Gerrie Owner UNOVELO Ltd. 845 764 4393 www.unovelo.com -Sgerrie (talk) 16:14, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done - the article was deleted because it was "unambiguous advertising or promotion". Feel free, however, to try to rewrite the article with a neutral point of view. Cheers, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 21:16, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

One Call

because we would like to put information about this band who are becoming more famous and so people can find out information about them -DaniellePPA (talk) 03:23, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done - this page has been deleted via a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/One Call. If you believe that the consensus of the discussion was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Cirt (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Regards, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 05:15, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mingi

the article was improperly deleted as "patent nonsense" yet it was well written and the phenomenon of mingi is well documented (see the film The Hamar and Karo Tribes: The Search for Mingi' 'http://ffh.films.com/id/1572/The_Hamar_and_Karo_Tribes_The_Search_for_Mingi.htm and the apparent reason for deletion as per the comments was denial based on national pride -Wrotesolid (talk) 21:59, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the article was not deleted as "patent nonsense" -- that request was denied. However, it was deleted as a proposed deletion, with the reason "Unverified, as of now. The links don't corroborate assertions in the article; is not notable without the sources". I've restored it as a contested prod, but I'd suggest you add some better references to avoid having the article taken to WP:AFD. HTH.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:37, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, point taken. Wrotesolid (talk) 23:34, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Future Adults

I'd just like to retrieve the text of the article I started. I hadn't yet finished it. Thanks! I'm not exactly sure if I'm understanding the instructions properly. Thanks for checking this! -Shakeses (talk) 04:08, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. Text restored to User:Shakeses/Future Adults where you can work on it. --Tikiwont (talk) 10:42, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Girlicious Over You

The article was originally deleted because it did not state proper citations, had not charted and information was incorrect. i am a new creator, i have reliable sources(not fan pages as previous) and the song is on the billboard chart so it has charted. i would like the opportunity to make the page. thank you. -L-l-CLK-l-l (talk) 05:45, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done - this page has been deleted via a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Over You (Girlicious song). If you believe that the consensus of the discussion was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Jayjg (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. I also note that Jayjg has already advised you accordingly. --Tikiwont (talk) 10:50, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

several

Retroshare · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Simple Instant Messenger · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]
Serverless Instant Messenger · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Talkonaut · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I request the "return" of theses articles on my user sub page, thanks in advance, regards — Neustradamus (✉) 20:29, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

— Neustradamus (✉) 18:58, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Archaios (band)

The band in the article Archaios, is back together and recording a new CD under a new record label. The band would like to change some things in the article and to add some new data about their reunion. -173.168.217.50 (talk) 19:13, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Cheers, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 20:18, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Also see the relative discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Archaios (band). Regards, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 20:29, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ivory Tower Pictures

The original article was not intended for advertising purposes. It would be linked to existing articles with credits the company e.g. Karosta. -Ivorytowerpictures (talk) 21:58, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Victoria Pynchon, Charis Michelsen, Jeffrey Steinberger

The Victoria Pynchon article has been on Wikipedia for a year and a half. The administrator, Brandon, removed it on Feb 5, and then within minutes removed two other articles I had athored. The reason he gave for the deletion of all three articles was: G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion. The first article was literally about two hours old and was about a lawyer, Jeffrey Steinberger. Brandon deleted it while I was, literally, in the process of adding to it and sourcing it. After he deleted it, I read his reason, along with a three-year-old notation that indicated a page about Jeffrey Steinberger had been deleted in 2007. I was unaware that there was a previous article about this person, otherwise I would have contacted the original administrator who deleted that article (who wasn't Brandon) to inform the administrator that I was writing an article. Brandon replied to my appeal with a broken Craigs List link and the comment "Paid edit?" I responded (it's on both my talk page and Brandon's talk page) that I am an individual and I do not take pay for editing nor have I ever been offered to be paid for editing Wikipedia content. Brandon in one fell swoop, within minutes of deleting the Jeffrey Steinberger article, then deleted the Victoria Pynchon article. Then, within a minute or two, he deleted the Charis Michelsen article. I would like to rewrite these three articles in neutral language and reference all statements with reliable sources. I've already, in a Word document, completely rewritten the Victoria Pynchon article with NPOV and have nearly completed the Charis Michelsen article doing the same thing, and I can do the same thing with the Jeffrey Steinberger article. Brandon has not responded nor discussed with me anything I have written to him since his two-word "Paid editing?" reply. Thank you very much for your time and for you consideration to undelete. -AuthorAuthor (talk) 12:00, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

4Digital Media

We have been trying to create a simple page for 4Digital Media and it gets deleted repeatedly. We have the proper version of it ready to go live and we request that the page is re-activated, please. Many thanks! -Ariaspr (talk) 12:13, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: the ready to go version has zero reliable sources (wikipedia links are not even allowed as references). Materialscientist (talk) 12:26, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Further comment: this is not a request for undeletion but for unprotection - page has been salted after repeated re-creation, and there is no indication that the company is notable per WP:CORP. More advice on user's talk page. JohnCD (talk) 12:31, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Amaxus

Apparently the article was deleted because it wasn't 'notable'. The product is mentioned on numerous respected third-party websites, is used by international clients (including Eidos, Ironman, BBC), has been nominated for awards, and has more coverage than other Content Management Systems that DO have a listing on Wikipedia. The previous article was live on Wikipedia for months, without alteration, before deletion. The product has been in existence for almost 10 years. -Spxdcz (talk) 14:03, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also, see the Discussion page for Amaxus for further notable third-party websites mentioning the product.--Spxdcz (talk) 14:09, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, someone's just deleted it, so you can't see the Discussion page any more! Argh! Either way, it's certainly more notable than 80% of the other content management systems that DO have an entry on Wikipedia. --Spxdcz (talk) 14:49, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  1. ^ http://digital-photography-school.com/forum/search.php?searchid=3499749
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion&oldid=344212446"