User talk:HrZ

Welcome to Wikipedia

Welcome!

Hello, HrZ, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Mushroom (Talk) 00:46, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Sweet Alice

I've gone ahead and started an article for Sweet Alice. I do realize it might not be notable enough to merit an article but I figured it's worth a shot. Shaneymike (talk) 20:12, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Duff McKagan

Thanks for your comment about Duff McKagan and the Betty Blowtorch EP at my talk page. I also have no idea why the EP is controversial. You are correct - it would probably be best to remove the statement altogether. I'll take care of it. DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 16:48, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:IsaacCarpenterLive.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:IsaacCarpenterLive.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 05:11, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:GeoffReadingLive.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:GeoffReadingLive.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 05:19, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:JeffRouseLive.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:JeffRouseLive.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 05:20, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:MikeSquiresLiveBarrowlands.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:MikeSquiresLiveBarrowlands.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 05:22, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:IsaacCarpenterLive.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:IsaacCarpenterLive.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 16:03, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, HrZ. You have new messages at Ww2censor's talk page.
Message added 20:49, 29 March 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

ww2censor (talk) 20:49, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Slash Album

Hi,

You removed the negative review of Slash's album from Tickets There without explanation.

Is there an issue? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.120.247.194 (talk) 12:30, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

Of course, the listing is for professional reviews, the site you provided doesnt seem professional in the slightest especially with the reviewer stating "Myles Kennedy’s whining, pussy vocals ruin it. Like a pre-pubescent Chad Kroeger impersonating Robert Plant and later in the song, the one and only Axl Rose. Wonder why?" And like I said in my edit, not every review should be on there, only ones from the likes of Allmusic, Rolling Stone or any other reliable online publications not some blogger type site. Also how can you say the rest of the site is if this is the type of people working for it?

But thats my opinion anyway, I wont revert it again, but I think you should take it into account should someone else remove the review.HrZ (talk) 12:45, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

I think that's fair enough. I read the site regularly and it's normally alot less harsh on bands, reviewer seems to really dislike the record. I only reverted because I see you edit alot of GN'R related pages so I thought it was a fan.

If another editor reverts, we won't fight it.

If it gets a bad review, nothing I can do, Allmusic (while they havnt given their usually star ratings) have criticized the album as well. It wont effect my opinion either way if I enjoy it.

Thats basically how I started on Wiki, mainly Loaded/Duff McKagan related articles but I try and do others, revert vandalisms etc like other editors as well when I can. But I can see why you would think that. Anyway thanks for understanding. HrZ (talk) 13:00, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

Slash album

So what if theyre credited in the notes! if they arnt on the cover it shouldnt be saying they are featured... manu musicans/band use extra musicans for a song but it still isnt a feat. song (often keyboards and strings)... it isnt different in this case... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.209.214.212 (talk) 14:21, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

Slash album track 9 - Watch This Dave

Did you see the original CD ???

Here are the pictures:

http://img52.imageshack.us/img52/5602/26788116853301661746100.jpg

http://img101.imageshack.us/img101/5242/26788116853418328401100.jpg

and this is the billboard page link:

http://www.billboard.com/charts/billboard-200?tag=chscr1#/album/slash/slash/1325140 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Atilladrjb (talk • contribs) 09:32, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Paradise City

The writing credits for all "Appetite" songs has been given to all band-members at the time... Steven owns 15 % of the writing credits...--Arneandre (talk) 15:02, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Check the Appetite for Destruction page again... This is taken from credits section: "All songs credited to Guns N' Roses; "It's So Easy" co-credited to West Arkeen and "Anything Goes" co-credited to Chris Weber.[24] Actual writers and composers listed."... If all songs are credited to Guns N' Roses, It means they are credited to Axl, Slash, Izzy Duff AND Steven... When they say "Actual writers" it is not an "official" writing credit...

Besides you could look at the book inside the Guns N' Roses Greates Hits Album, there Paradise City's writing is also credited to Axl Rose, Slash, Izzy Stradlin, Duff Makagan and Steven Adler

One more thing... Slash also says so in his Autobiography.... and Steven sued Guns N' Roses, because they tryed to take his writing credits away from him, when they fired him... GnR lost the case, and Steven was promised 15% writing credit on every song he recorded with them besore his depature--Arneandre (talk) 17:56, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

On the first page of the album-book (Appetite for Destruction) the credits are given: "All songs written, arranged and performed by Guns N' Roses except "It´s So Easy" co-written with West Arkeen and "Anything Goes" with Cris Weber." --Arneandre (talk) 18:05, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Yeah its allright! :)--Arneandre (talk) 20:21, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs Love It to Death List of Telecaster players Absolute Radio Movies Extra Podcast Nevada Bachelors Play the Game (song) AOL Sessions EP (iTunes Exclusive) New American Shame Vincent de Moor Road Crew Sirens Sister Guns N' Roses (pinball) Before You Were Punk Nicholas Kazan Cedric Henderson Edgar Jones (basketball) Save Me (Queen song) Ole Beich List of Stratocaster players UZI Suicide

Cleanup Queen (band) Oh My God (Guns N' Roses song) Pete Townshend Merge L.A. Guns band members The Greatest Hits (Mötley Crüe album) Issues (album) Add Sources Eric Burdon Civil War (EP) Bruce Dickinson Wikify Chinese Democracy Tour Series Paul Black Contraband (album) Expand Nu metal Indestructible (Rancid album) The Opposite Side of the Sea

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 10:09, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of B.C. Kochmit

An article that you have been involved in editing, B.C. Kochmit, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/B.C. Kochmit. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.   — Jeff G. ツ 19:22, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Loaded_Lineup_2002.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Loaded_Lineup_2002.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:32, 31 July 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey (talk) 21:32, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

This Is War

For the source that you added for emo on This Is War, you have to read the discussion Talk:List_of_emo_artists#30_Seconds_to_Mars. I deleted that source for the consensus at the talk page. You did a vandalism.--79.46.183.240 (talk) 00:59, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

Do you understand?--79.49.110.113 (talk) 22:44, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

If it was vandalism another editor would have removed it by now. The consensus seems to be discussing the overall genre of the band, not the album and also it doesnt seem like they came to a conclusion. Quote from tail end of the discussion: "All you are giving is opinions. Your opinion. Which doesn't count for anything. Just as my opinion counts for nothing. What matters is policy and guideline. This states that reliably sourced info is entirely worthy of inclusion. Consensus is not a vote. It doesn't matter how many people don't want to see 30STM labeled as emo - as their only argument is their opinion. All that matters is that the genre is reliably sourced. Which it is."

Allmusic is a reliable source (wither you agree or not), they list the albums styles as Emo-pop which redirects to Emo. Removing said source is vandalism. HrZ (talk) 13:30, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

Maybe you don't understand, you read only that you want to read; "Whether an Allmusic profile includes "emo" in its list of bullet-pointed genres and styles is secondary to whether the writer actually describes the artist/album as "emo" in the text of their bio/review. " The writer wrote that the album isn't emo, and you are doing a vandalism.--79.46.183.114 (talk) 18:59, 24 August 2010 (UTC)