Jump to content

Stereotype: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 89: Line 89:
===European stereotypes===
===European stereotypes===
{{Main|Anti-Europeanism}}
{{Main|Anti-Europeanism}}
{{See|Albanophobia|Anglophobia| Anti-Armenianism|Anti-British sentiment|Anti-Catalanism|Anti-Estonian sentiment|Francophobia|Anti-German sentiment|Anti-Italianism|Anti-Polish sentiment|Lusophobia|Antiziganism|Anti-Romanian discrimination|
{{See|Albanophobia|Anglophobia|Anti-British sentiment|Anti-Catalanism|Anti-Estonian sentiment|Francophobia|Anti-German sentiment|Anti-Italianism|Anti-Polish sentiment|Lusophobia|Antiziganism|Anti-Romanian discrimination|
Russophobia|Anti-Scottish sentiment |Serbophobia| Anti-Slavism |Anti-Sovietism| Anti-Ukrainian sentiment}}
Russophobia|Anti-Scottish sentiment |Serbophobia| Anti-Slavism |Anti-Sovietism| Anti-Ukrainian sentiment}}
{{See also|List of terms for white people in non-Western cultures}}
{{See also|List of terms for white people in non-Western cultures}}

Revision as of 14:04, 3 April 2011

A stereotype is a popular belief about specific social groups or types of individuals. The concepts of "stereotype" and "prejudice" are often confused with many other different meanings. Stereotypes are standardized and simplified conceptions of groups based on some prior assumptions.

Etymology

The term stereotype (στερεότυπος) derives from the Greek words στερεός (stereos), "firm, solid"[1] and τύπος (typos), "impression,"[2] hence "solid impression".

It was invented by Firmin Didot in the world of printing; it was originally a duplicate impression of an original typographical element, used for printing instead of the original. American journalist Walter Lippmann coined the metaphor, calling a stereotype a "picture in our heads" saying, "Whether right or wrong (...) imagination is shaped by the pictures seen (...) originally printers' words, and in their literal printers' meanings were synonymous. Specifically, cliché was a French word for the printing surface for a stereotype.[3] The first reference to "stereotype," in its modern, English use was in 1850, in the noun, meaning "image perpetuated without change."[4]

The term, in its modern psychology sense, was first used by Walter Lippmann in his 1922 work Public Opinion[5] although in the printing sense it was first coined in 1798.

Dynamics

Social psychologists believe that mental categorizing (or labelling) is necessary and inescapable.[citation needed] In one perspective of the stereotyping process, there are the concepts of ingroups and outgroups. Ingroups are viewed as normal and superior, and are generally the group that one[clarification needed] associates with or aspires to join. An outgroup is simply all the other groups. They are seen as lesser than or inferior to the in-groups.

A second perspective is that of automatic and explicit or subconscious and conscious. Automatic or subconscious stereotyping is that which everyone does without noticing. Automatic stereotyping is quickly preceded by an explicit or conscious check which permits time for any needed corrections. Automatic stereotyping is affected by explicit stereotyping because frequent conscious thoughts will quickly develop into subconscious stereotypes.

A third method to categorizing stereotypes is general types and sub-types. Stereotypes consist of hierarchical systems consisting of broad and specific groups being the general types and sub-types respectively. A general type could be defined as a broad stereotype typically known among many people and usually widely accepted, whereas the sub-group would be one of the several groups making up the general group. These would be more specific, and opinions of these groups would vary according to differing perspectives.

Certain circumstances can affect the way an individual stereotypes. For instance: Studies have shown that women stereotype more negatively than men, and that women read into appearance more than men.[citation needed] Some theorists argue in favor of the conceptual connection and that one's own subjective thought about someone is sufficient information to make assumptions about that individual. Other theorists argue that at minimum there must be a casual connection between mental states and behavior to make assumptions or stereotypes. Thus results and opinions may vary according to circumstance and theory. An example of a common, incorrect assumption is that of assuming certain internal characteristics based on external appearance. The explanation for one's actions is his or her internal state (goals, feeling, personality, traits, motives, values, and impulses), not his or her appearance.

Sociologist Charles E. Hurst, "One reason for stereotypes is the lack of personal, concrete familiarity that individuals have with persons in other racial or ethnic groups. Lack of familiarity encourages the lumping together of unknown individuals."[6]

Stereotypes focus upon and thereby exaggerate differences between groups. Competition between groups minimizes similarities and magnifies differences.[7] This makes it seem as if groups are very different when in fact they may be more alike than different. For example, among African Americans, identity as an American citizen is more salient than racial background; that is, African Americans are more American than African.[8]

Theories on stereotypes

Different disciplines give different accounts of how stereotypes develop: Psychologists may focus on an individual's experience with groups, patterns of communication about those groups, and intergroup conflict. Pioneering psychologist William James cautioned psychologists themselves to be wary of their own stereotyping, in what he called the psychologist's fallacy. Sociologists focus on the relations among groups and the of different groups in a social structure. Psychoanalytically-oriented humanists have argued (e.g., Sander Gilman) that stereotypes, by definition, are representations that are not accurate, but a projection of one to another.

A number of theories have been derived from sociological studies of stereotyping and prejudicial thinking. In early studies it was believed that stereotypes were only used by rigid, repressed, and authoritarian people. Sociologists concluded that this was a result of conflict, poor parenting, and inadequate mental and emotional development. This idea has been overturned; more recent studies have concluded that stereotypes are commonplace.

One theory as to why people stereotype is that it is too difficult to take in all of the complexities of other people as individuals. Even though stereotyping is inexact, it is an efficient way to mentally organize large blocks of information. Categorization is an essential human capability because it enables us to simplify, predict, and organize our world. Once one has sorted and organized everyone into tidy categories, there is a human tendency to avoid processing new or unexpected information about each individual. Assigning general group characteristics to members of that group saves time and satisfies the need to predict the social world in a general sense.

Another theory is that people stereotype because of the need to feel good about oneself. Stereotypes protect one from anxiety and enhance self-esteem. By designating one's own group as the standard or normal group and assigning others to groups considered inferior or abnormal, it provides one with a sense of worth.

Some [who?] believe that childhood influences are some of the most complex and influential factors in developing stereotypes. Though they can be absorbed at any age, stereotypes are usually acquired in early childhood under the influence of parents, teachers, peers, and the media. Once a stereotype is learned, it often becomes self-perpetuating.

Other theories propose that the praising of intelligence and ability rather than effort and hard work inevitably changes the prospective from a malleable sense of self-worth to a definite concept of self-worth as seen from the individual and others around them.

Effects, accuracy, terminology

Stereotypes can have a negative and positive impact on individuals. Joshua Aronson and Claude M. Steele have done research on the psychological effects of stereotyping, particularly its effect on African Americans and women.[9] They argue that psychological research has shown that competence is highly responsive to situation and interactions with others.[10] They cite, for example, a study which found that bogus feedback to college students dramatically affected their IQ test performance, and another in which students were either praised as very smart, congratulated on their hard work, or told that they scored high. The group praised as smart performed significantly worse than the others. They believe that there is an 'innate ability bias'. These effects are not just limited to minority groups. Mathematically competent white males, mostly math and engineering students, were asked to take a difficult math test. One group was told that this was being done to determine why Asians were scoring better. This group performed significantly worse than the control group.[10]: 443 

Possible prejudicial effects of stereotypes are:

  • Justification of ill-founded prejudices or ignorance
  • Unwillingness to rethink one's attitudes and behavior towards stereotyped group
  • Preventing some people of stereotyped groups from entering or succeeding in activities or fields

The effects of stereotyping can fluctuate, but for the most part they are negative, and not always apparent until long periods of time have passed.[citation needed] Stereotypes allow individuals to make better informed evaluations of individuals about whom they possess little or no individuating information, and in many, but not all circumstances stereotyping helps individuals arrive at more accurate conclusions. [11] Over time, some victims of negative stereotypes display self-fulfilling prophecy behavior, in which they assume that the stereotype represents norms to emulate. Negative effects may include forming inaccurate opinions of people, scapegoating, erroneously judgmentalism, preventing emotional identification, distress, and impaired performance.

Yet, the stereotype that stereotypes are inaccurate, resistant to change, overgeneralized, exaggerated, and destructive is not founded on empirical social science research, which instead shows that stereotypes are often accurate and that people do not rely on stereotypes when relevant personal information is available.[12] Indeed, Jussim et al. comment that ethnic and gender stereotypes are surprisingly accurate, while stereotypes concerning political affiliation and nationality [13] are much less accurate; the stereotypes assessed for accuracy concerned intelligence, behavior, personality, and economic status.[11] Stereotype accuracy is a growing area of study and for Yueh-Ting Lee and his colleagues they have created an EPA Model (Evaluation, Potency, Accuracy) to describe the continuously changing variables of stereotypes.

Role in art and culture

Stereotypes are common in various cultural media, where they take the form of dramatic stock characters. These characters are found in the works of playwright Bertolt Brecht, Dario Fo, and Jacques Lecoq, who characterize their actors as stereotypes for theatrical effect. In commedia dell'arte this is similarly common. The instantly recognizable nature of stereotypes mean that they are effective in advertising and situation comedy. These stereotypes change, and in modern times only a few of the stereotyped characters shown in John Bunyan's The Pilgrim's Progress would be recognizable.

In literature and art, stereotypes are clichéd or predictable characters or situations. Throughout history, storytellers have drawn from stereotypical characters and situations, in order to connect the audience with new tales immediately. Sometimes such stereotypes can be sophisticated, such as Shakespeare's Shylock in The Merchant of Venice. Arguably a stereotype that becomes complex and sophisticated ceases to be a stereotype per se by its unique characterization. Thus while Shylock remains politically unstable in being a stereotypical Jew, the subject of prejudicial derision in Shakespeare's era, his many other detailed features raise him above a simple stereotype and into a unique character, worthy of modern performance. Simply because one feature of a character can be categorized as being typical does not make the entire character a stereotype.

Despite their proximity in etymological roots, cliché and stereotype are not used synonymously in cultural spheres. For example a cliché is a high criticism in narratology where genre and categorization automatically associates a story within its recognizable group. Labeling a situation or character in a story as typical suggests it is fitting for its genre or category. Whereas declaring that a storyteller has relied on cliché is to pejoratively observe a simplicity and lack of originality in the tale. To criticize Ian Fleming for a stereotypically unlikely escape for James Bond would be understood by the reader or listener, but it would be more appropriately criticized as a cliché in that it is overused and reproduced. Narrative genre relies heavily on typical features to remain recognizable and generate meaning in the reader/viewer.

In movies and TV the halo effect is often used. This is when, for example, attractive men and women are assumed to be happier, stronger, nicer people .[14]

Racial and ethnic stereotyping

African stereotypes

Africans are typically presented as living in tiny huts in rural villages.

In the Americas

Latino people are stereotyped as needing handouts through welfare and private charity, being Roman Catholic, having many children, and being present in the US illegally. The stereotypes say that they rarely complete high school and cannot speak English well.

Native Americans may be presented positively, as acutely environmentally conscious, spiritual, wise, loyal, or with extraordinary skill in hunting or tracking. They may also be portrayed negatively, as indigent, drunk, violent, or implacable enemies.

Black Americans were stereotyped in the early 20th century as joyous, naive, superstitious, and ignorant. Many portrayals showed them with thick lips, and in cartoons they were often portrayed as crows. By the end of the 20th century, the stereotypes said that they were poor, lazy, ignorant, criminals, and violent, and occasionally ardent adherents of Christianity.

White Americans are also subject to being stereotyped by others, e.g., the ugly American stereotype of American visitors.

East Asian and South Asian stereotypes

European stereotypes

Irish stereotypes

File:Irish-stereotypes.jpg
The cartoon above (New Physiognomy, New York, 1866), contrasts Florence Nightingale, the Crimean War nurse, with "Bridget McBruiser," the stereotypical Irish woman.
Scientific racism from an American magazine, Harper's Weekly, says that the Irish are similar to 'Negroes.'

An analysis of nineteenth-century British attitudes by Mary J. Hickman and Bronwen Walter wrote that the 'Irish Catholic' was one viewed as an "other," or a different race in the construction of the English nationalist myth. Likewise, the Irish considered the English "other" and fought hard to break away.[15]

Some of the more vulgar generalizations against Irish people are characterizations of them as quick-tempered brawlers and alcoholics. One 19th century British cartoonist even depicted Irish immigrants as simian and racially different from Anglo-Saxons. One American doctor in the 1850s, James Redfield, argued that "facial angle" was a sign of intelligence and character; likening the physiognomies of human ethnic groups to animals. Thus Irishmen resembled dogs, Yankees were like bears, Germans like lions, blacks like elephants and Englishmen like bulls.[16] In the 20th century physical stereotypes survived in the comic books until the 1950s, with Irish characters like Mutt and Jeff, and Jiggs and Maggie appearing daily in hundreds of newspapers.[17]

Middle Eastern, West and Central Asian stereotypes

Jewish stereotypes

Antisemitic caricature based on racial stereotypes, 1873

Jewish people have been stereotyped throughout the centuries and made scapegoats for a multitude of societal problems. Jews are still stereotyped as greedy, nit-picky, misers. They have often been shown counting money or collecting diamonds. Antisemitism prevailed for centuries and reached a climax in Nazi Germany during World War II with the Holocaust.

Early films such as Cohen's Advertising Scheme (1904, silent) stereotyped Jews as "scheming merchants."[18]

Australian stereotypes

In Australia, Miss Natalie is considered to be a 'stereotyper' a rare breed who's job it is to stereotype others on windows live messenger conversations.

Sexual stereotypes

The British biologist, Angus John Bateman was the one who first talked about sexual stereotypes in the late 1940s. His theory would say that males are promiscuous and females tend to be more selective when choosing their sexual partners.[19] Although Bateman's principle was based on experiments made of fruitflies, later on he concluded that the theory applies also in the case of humans. His ideas also were based on the fact that males presented an "undiscriminating eagerness" to mate while females displayed "discriminated passivity."

Impact of sexual stereotypes

Living up to stereotypes can have damaging effects. Intending to live up to sexual stereotypes may lead to frustration. Stereotypes have the ability to create an idea that some are better than others based on their sexual abilities and sexual organs.[20]

Sexual orientation stereotypes

Lesbianism

People stereotype lesbians as identifying with a “butch” or “dyke” image. They are commonly perceived to have short haircuts, be overweight and unattractive. People often correlate feminism and misandry with female homosexuality. Some people think women become gay because of their bad experiences with men. While this is true in very few cases, it is definitely not seen as universal.

Male homosexuality

Commonly held beliefs about gay males include identifying with a stereotypical effeminate or twink image. Some people often correlate male homosexuality with issues such as substance abuse and promiscuity.

Bisexuality

Bisexuals are stereotyped in many ways. Male bisexuals are stereotyped as living on the down-low, while female bisexuals are stereotyped as attention-seeking and nymphomaniacs.

Pedophilia stereotypes

Pedophiles and pedophilia, although not under the category of Sexual Orientation such as homosexuality or bisexuality are also victims of stereotypes. In mass media a pedophile is usually depicted a serial child molester or a person with several mental problems, while many organizations remark that most pedophiles, although attracted to young or teenage children, do not molest them and that many of the stereotypes against pedophiles are false or are unacceptable as a generalization .[21][22]

Gender stereotypes

Masculine gender

Feminine gender

See also

Other stereotypes

References

  1. ^ στερεός, Henry George Liddell, Robert Scott, A Greek-English Lexicon, on Perseus Digital Library
  2. ^ τύπος, Henry George Liddell, Robert Scott, A Greek-English Lexicon, on Perseus Digital Libray
  3. ^ <Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of English Usage.> Springfield, Illinois: Merriam-Webster, Inc., 1994. p. 250.
  4. ^ Online Etymology Dictionary
  5. ^ Milton Kleg (August 1993). Hate Prejudice and Racism. State University of New York Press. ISBN 079141535X.
  6. ^ Hurst, Charles E. Social Inequality: Forms, Causes, and. 6. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc, 2007
  7. ^ Brewer, M (1979). "In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis". Psychological Bulletin. 86: 307–324. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.307.
  8. ^ McAndrew, FT (1995). "African of Americans of African and European descent". Journal of Social Psychology. 135 (5): 649–655. doi:10.1080/00224545.1995.9712238. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  9. ^ Steele CM, Aronson J (1995). "Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans". J Pers Soc Psychol. 69 (5): 797–811. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.797. PMID 7473032. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  10. ^ a b Aronson J, Steele CM. (2005). Chapter 24:Stereotypes and the Fragility of Academic Competence, Motivation, and Self-Concept. In Handbook of Competence, [ p. 436].
  11. ^ a b Todd D. Nelson, ed. (February 2009). The unbearable accuracy of stereotypes in Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination. Psychology Press. ISBN 978-0-8058-5952-2.
  12. ^ Stereotype Accuracy: Toward Appreciating Group Differences. American Psychological Association. September 1995. ISBN 978-1-55798-307-7. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |editors= ignored (|editor= suggested) (help)
  13. ^ Terracciano, A (2005). "National character does not reflect mean personality trait levels in 49 cultures". Science. 310: 96-100. doi:10.1126/science.1117199. PMID 16210536.
  14. ^ Greenwald and Banaji from Psychological Review
  15. ^ Deconstructing Whiteness: Irish Women in Britain Mary J. Hickman, Bronwen Walter Feminist Review, No. 50, The Irish Issue: The British Question (Summer, 1995), pp. 5-19 doi:10.2307/
  16. ^ [1]
  17. ^ Kerry Soper, "Performing 'Jiggs': Irish Caricature and Comedic Ambivalence toward Asøsimilation and the American Dream in George McManus's Bringing Up Father." Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era 4.2 (2005): 72 pars. 30 March 2007 online.
  18. ^ The Movies, Race, and Ethnicity: Jews
  19. ^ Sexual stereotypes International weekly journal of science.
  20. ^ The Impact of Gender Role Stereotypes Media Awareness Network.
  21. ^ Anecdotal evidences suggests that many pedophiles and ephebophiles do not act sexually with children or adolescents, but it is not known how many do not [...] Other than the attraction to minors itself, studies fail to find any abnormal or pathological characteristics.|url=http://www.b4uact.org/facts.htm
  22. ^ The problem with all this information about pedophiles is that most of it is not true or is so qualified as to be useless as generalization. Indeed, say some psychologists, there may be no such thing as a "typical" pedophile, if there is such a thing as a pedophile at all. Qualities by which social scientists and the police have marked him, such as his purported shyness or childhood sexual trauma, do not bear out with statistical significance. "Harmful to Minors," Levine, Judith|url=http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/story?id=126179&page=1

Bibliography