User talk:Piotrus

You have the right to stay informed. Exercise it by reading the Wikipedia Signpost today.

This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot. Any sections older than 7 days are automatically archived. Sections without timestamps (not signed with ~~~~) are archived manually when I get around to it.

"You have new messages" was designed for a purpose: letting people know you have replied to them. I do not watch your talk page and I will likely IGNORE your reply if it is not copied to my page, as I will not be aware that you replied! Oh, Template:Talkback is ok. Thank you.

Please add new comments in new sections if you are addressing a new issue. Please sign it by typing four tildes, like this: ~~~~. Thanks in advance.

Archive

Talk archives:

Reasons for my raising wikistress: Some general observations on Wikipedia governance being broken and good editors trampled by the system Wikipedia is a kawaii mistress :) I agree to the edit counter opt-in terms. Current RfAdminship RfA candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report RfB candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report No RfXs since 00:50, 23 June 2024 (UTC).—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online tb Hello, Piotrus. You have new messages at Volunteer Marek's talk page. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. I'm on Piotrus' talk page to discover if I should thank "Piotrus" (he/she whatever) for creating User Talk Page:Winston Trechane. That's I. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Winston Trechane (talk • contribs) 14:59, 6 March 2012 (UTC) FAI Gliding Commission You placed a split tag on this article and have not edited the article since. Do you intend to split this article? Go away, stay gone. Stay off my talk page.Shajure (talk) 13:40, 29 February 2012 (UTC) This is not optional and is not a request. Stay off. Not add it and then delete it. Stay. Off. No, I will not "tone down", and don't need to: This is toned down. If you don't understand, you may want to see the block history of those who don't accept this injunction. If you have some overwhelming urge to continue this discussion, feel free to do it here.Shajure (talk) 14:22, 1 March 2012 (UTC) Do not ever again post on my talk page. In the the more general case, do not incorrectly warn other users. Seek guidance which you desperately need. "If you don't understand, you may want to see the block history of those who don't accept this injunction." - If you think this is a threat, you need to consider some other way to spend your time. Now to be clear: STAY OFF MY TALK PAGE!!!!! Shajure (talk) 20:28, 1 March 2012 (UTC) ANI thread You have been mentioned in a thread at wp:ANI Shajure (talk) 20:33, 1 March 2012 (UTC) Radzymin Good idea. //Halibutt 01:22, 2 March 2012 (UTC) Merging Commonwealth history articles I merged the texts of the two articles. The technical merge, which will eliminate the now duplicate History of Poland (1569–1795) needs to be done. However the last time I did merges I did something wrong and the history on one of the articles was missing or something like that. May be you could do the merge itself, to avoid this problem. Thank you. Orczar (talk) 17:49, 3 March 2012 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for March 5 Hi. When you recently edited General sejm, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Piotrków (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:10, 5 March 2012 (UTC) A Barnstar for you! The Barnstar of European Merit awarded to Piotrus, who have contributed tirelessly with excellent edits in a broad variety of articles related to the European Union and Europe in general. Poeticbent talk 18:05, 5 March 2012 (UTC) this WikiAward was given to Piotrus by Poeticbent talk on 18:05, 5 March 2012 (UTC) β-testing Hi! You indicated you'd like to help us beta-test the new MediaWiki 1.19 extension for the Education Program. Click here to get started. Thanks, Rob SchnautZ (WMF) (talk • contribs) 18:59, 5 March 2012 (UTC) ---- Stec photo taken in 1946 Reference: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_execution_in_D%C4%99bica_(1946)#A_legendary_photo I'd be happy to contribute a copy of the Stec photo taken in 1946 for this page since it is no longer available at the Debica link. I'm not a frequent contributor and have no idea where to send it. Contact me if you have an interest in the 1946 Stec photo. Dennis Benarz benarz@hotmail.com Editor, http://spuscizna.org/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.39.235.114 (talk) 03:30, 6 March 2012 (UTC) Silesian Military District Some well-meaning wikipedians, plus myself as the originator, have managed to make a bit of a mess of the original Polish translation of this article. Would you mind taking a look at the original and the now translation? Many thanks -- can help as much as I'm able to with this. Buckshot06 (talk) 04:01, 6 March 2012 (UTC) The Signpost: 05 March 2012 News and notes: Chapter-selected Board seats, an invite to the Teahouse, patrol becomes triage, and this week in history In the news: Heights reached in search rankings, privacy and mental health info; clouds remain over content policing Discussion report: COI and NOTCENSORED: policies under discussion WikiProject report: We don't bite: WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles Featured content: Best of the week Arbitration report: AUSC appointments announced, one case remains open Technology report: With the 1.19 deployment now (mostly) complete, developers consider possible "mini" deployment later in the month Read this Signpost in full Single-page Unsubscribe EdwardsBot (talk) 16:39, 6 March 2012 (UTC) Kaytek the Wizard Further information: User talk:Nbarth § Kaytek the Wizard Further information: User talk:Nbarth/Archive 2012 § Kaytek the Wizard Hi Piotrus, No problem, and thanks for the support! I’m not very familiar with the book (I’ve only read the first few chapters, in a friend’s translation), so it would be hard for me to expand the article much. Once I’ve read the whole book, I could add a plot summary, but (presumably since the book is not yet available in English), there are essentially no English references, other than mentioning the title, so the article is hard to expand. I plan to read the book in the near future (friend’s translation), and see if I can find any other references, but likely can’t expand the article much. Any help you could provide (esp. Polish references) would be much appreciated! (Please have a crack at it if you’d like.) The Polish Wikipedia page also isn’t very detailed, but any information from there would be welcome. BTW, one weird point – it’s unclear whether the book was originally published in 1934 or 1935 (sources differ, one even gives 1934/35); would be nice if it could be cleared up, but I’m not holding my breath. Thanks again! —Nils von Barth (nbarth) (talk) 23:26, 6 March 2012 (UTC) Thanks for the great expansion! I copied the text about “as popular as Harry Potter” from the Janusz Korczak page, where it was also uncited. I’ve remove/reworded this, just stating that it was “highly popular”, and made a few minor edits. —Nils von Barth (nbarth) (talk) 23:18, 7 March 2012 (UTC) DYK proposal posted at DYK nominations: March 4, and reproduced below. Feel free to propose alternative hooks, and thanks for the push! —Nils von Barth (nbarth) (talk) 08:07, 8 March 2012 (UTC) DYK for Feeder of lice Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 7 March 2012 (UTC) MOTDs (This space for rent) You may have noticed over the past few days that the MOTD that you link to on your user page has simply displayed a red link. This is due to the fact that not enough people are reviewing pending MOTDs here. Please help us keep the MOTD template alive and simply go and review a few of the MOTDs in the list. That way we can have a real MOTD in the future rather than re-using (This space for rent). Any help would be appreciated! –pjoef (talk • contribs) 12:35, 7 March 2012 (UTC) Possibly unfree File:Znaniecki florian.jpg A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Znaniecki florian.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 20:45, 7 March 2012 (UTC) Disamming I try to be but that's also a 2 year old edit :) --User:Woohookitty Disamming fool! 05:13, 8 March 2012 (UTC) Alfred Jahn I've noticed that there seems to be a good bit of info on Alfred Jahn, on which I've been working, in various Wyborcza articles but I can't access them. If you can see the actual articles then the article could use some help - particularly I think the stuff about his role in the 1968 protests could expandin'. If not any other help with it would be appreciated.VolunteerMarek 02:41, 9 March 2012 (UTC) Pakistan FAC Hi, I was advised by one of the reviewers to ask active FAC editors to review the Pakistan article's FAC at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Pakistan/archive1‎. It has been out for nine days, the problems mentioned in the start were fixed but there have been no further comments. There was a question about a dispute that occurred after the nomination, I've explained about it on the FAC page that there's been no consensus for it on the talk page and the current version is as of consensus. Please take a look at the article and drop your review comments and/or vote. Thanks. --lTopGunl (talk) 17:23, 9 March 2012 (UTC)