User talk:Piotrus: Difference between revisions
→Alfred Jahn: new section |
→Pakistan FAC: new section |
||
Line 134: | Line 134: | ||
I've noticed that there seems to be a good bit of info on [[Alfred Jahn]], on which I've been working, in various Wyborcza articles but I can't access them. If you can see the actual articles then the article could use some help - particularly I think the stuff about his role in the 1968 protests could expandin'. If not any other help with it would be appreciated.[[User:Volunteer Marek|<font color="Orange">Volunteer</font><font color="Blue">Marek</font>]] 02:41, 9 March 2012 (UTC) |
I've noticed that there seems to be a good bit of info on [[Alfred Jahn]], on which I've been working, in various Wyborcza articles but I can't access them. If you can see the actual articles then the article could use some help - particularly I think the stuff about his role in the 1968 protests could expandin'. If not any other help with it would be appreciated.[[User:Volunteer Marek|<font color="Orange">Volunteer</font><font color="Blue">Marek</font>]] 02:41, 9 March 2012 (UTC) |
||
== Pakistan FAC == |
|||
Hi, I was advised by one of the reviewers to ask active FAC editors to review the [[Pakistan]] article's FAC at [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Pakistan/archive1]]. It has been out for nine days, the problems mentioned in the start were fixed but there have been no further comments. There was a question about a dispute that occurred ''after'' the nomination, I've explained about it on the FAC page that there's been no consensus for it on the talk page and the current version is as of consensus. Please take a look at the article and drop your review comments and/or vote. Thanks. --<span style="text-shadow:#396 0.2em 0.2em 0.5em; class=texhtml">[[User:TopGun|<b style="color:#060">lTopGunl</b>]] ([[User talk:TopGun|<b style="color:#000">talk</b>]])</span> 17:23, 9 March 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:23, 9 March 2012
You have the right to stay informed. Exercise it by reading the Wikipedia Signpost today. |
"You have new messages" was designed for a purpose: letting people know you have replied to them. I do not watch your talk page and I will likely IGNORE your reply if it is not copied to my page, as I will not be aware that you replied! Oh, Template:Talkback is ok. Thank you. |
---|
Please add new comments in new sections if you are addressing a new issue. Please sign it by typing four tildes, like this: ~~~~. Thanks in advance. |
---|
Talk archives:
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Current RfAdminship
tbHello, Piotrus. You have new messages at Volunteer Marek's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. I'm on Piotrus' talk page to discover if I should thank "Piotrus" (he/she whatever) for creating User Talk Page:Winston Trechane. That's I. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Winston Trechane (talk • contribs) 14:59, 6 March 2012 (UTC) You placed a split tag on this article and have not edited the article since. Do you intend to split this article? Go away, stay gone.Stay off my talk page.Shajure (talk) 13:40, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
"If you don't understand, you may want to see the block history of those who don't accept this injunction." - If you think this is a threat, you need to consider some other way to spend your time. Now to be clear: STAY OFF MY TALK PAGE!!!!! Shajure (talk) 20:28, 1 March 2012 (UTC) ANI threadYou have been mentioned in a thread at wp:ANI Shajure (talk) 20:33, 1 March 2012 (UTC) RadzyminGood idea. //Halibutt 01:22, 2 March 2012 (UTC) Merging Commonwealth history articlesI merged the texts of the two articles. The technical merge, which will eliminate the now duplicate History of Poland (1569–1795) needs to be done. However the last time I did merges I did something wrong and the history on one of the articles was missing or something like that. May be you could do the merge itself, to avoid this problem. Thank you. Orczar (talk) 17:49, 3 March 2012 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for March 5Hi. When you recently edited General sejm, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Piotrków (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:10, 5 March 2012 (UTC) A Barnstar for you!
β-testingHi! You indicated you'd like to help us beta-test the new MediaWiki 1.19 extension for the Education Program. Click here to get started. Thanks, Rob SchnautZ (WMF) (talk • contribs) 18:59, 5 March 2012 (UTC) ---- Stec photo taken in 1946Reference: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_execution_in_D%C4%99bica_(1946)#A_legendary_photo I'd be happy to contribute a copy of the Stec photo taken in 1946 for this page since it is no longer available at the Debica link. I'm not a frequent contributor and have no idea where to send it. Contact me if you have an interest in the 1946 Stec photo. Dennis Benarz benarz@hotmail.com Editor, http://spuscizna.org/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.39.235.114 (talk) 03:30, 6 March 2012 (UTC) Some well-meaning wikipedians, plus myself as the originator, have managed to make a bit of a mess of the original Polish translation of this article. Would you mind taking a look at the original and the now translation? Many thanks -- can help as much as I'm able to with this. Buckshot06 (talk) 04:01, 6 March 2012 (UTC) The Signpost: 05 March 2012
Hi Piotrus, No problem, and thanks for the support! I’m not very familiar with the book (I’ve only read the first few chapters, in a friend’s translation), so it would be hard for me to expand the article much. Once I’ve read the whole book, I could add a plot summary, but (presumably since the book is not yet available in English), there are essentially no English references, other than mentioning the title, so the article is hard to expand. I plan to read the book in the near future (friend’s translation), and see if I can find any other references, but likely can’t expand the article much. Any help you could provide (esp. Polish references) would be much appreciated! (Please have a crack at it if you’d like.) The Polish Wikipedia page also isn’t very detailed, but any information from there would be welcome. BTW, one weird point – it’s unclear whether the book was originally published in 1934 or 1935 (sources differ, one even gives 1934/35); would be nice if it could be cleared up, but I’m not holding my breath. Thanks again!
DYK proposal posted at DYK nominations: March 4, and reproduced below. Feel free to propose alternative hooks, and thanks for the push!
DYK for Feeder of lice
MOTDs (This space for rent)You may have noticed over the past few days that the MOTD that you link to on your user page has simply displayed a red link. This is due to the fact that not enough people are reviewing pending MOTDs here. Please help us keep the MOTD template alive and simply go and review a few of the MOTDs in the list. That way we can have a real MOTD in the future rather than re-using (This space for rent). Any help would be appreciated! –pjoef (talk • contribs) 12:35, 7 March 2012 (UTC) Possibly unfree File:Znaniecki florian.jpgA file that you uploaded or altered, File:Znaniecki florian.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 20:45, 7 March 2012 (UTC) DisammingI try to be but that's also a 2 year old edit :) --User:Woohookitty Disamming fool! 05:13, 8 March 2012 (UTC) Alfred JahnI've noticed that there seems to be a good bit of info on Alfred Jahn, on which I've been working, in various Wyborcza articles but I can't access them. If you can see the actual articles then the article could use some help - particularly I think the stuff about his role in the 1968 protests could expandin'. If not any other help with it would be appreciated.VolunteerMarek 02:41, 9 March 2012 (UTC) Pakistan FACHi, I was advised by one of the reviewers to ask active FAC editors to review the Pakistan article's FAC at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Pakistan/archive1. It has been out for nine days, the problems mentioned in the start were fixed but there have been no further comments. There was a question about a dispute that occurred after the nomination, I've explained about it on the FAC page that there's been no consensus for it on the talk page and the current version is as of consensus. Please take a look at the article and drop your review comments and/or vote. Thanks. --lTopGunl (talk) 17:23, 9 March 2012 (UTC) |