Jump to content

Clathrate gun hypothesis: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Bibcode Bot (talk | contribs)
m Adding 0 arxiv eprint(s), 1 bibcode(s) and 0 doi(s). Did it miss something? Report bugs, errors, and suggestions at User talk:Bibcode Bot
Albertttt (talk | contribs)
Current outlook: One kind of exception is recent changes to the Gulf Stream causing widespread gas hydrate destabilization
Line 34: Line 34:


== Current outlook ==
== Current outlook ==

{{main|Arctic methane release}}
Most deposits of methane clathrate are in sediments too deep to respond rapidly, and modelling by Archer (2007) suggests the methane forcing should remain a minor component of the overall [[greenhouse effect]].<ref name="Archer2007">{{cite journal|url=http://geosci.uchicago.edu/~archer/reprints/archer.2007.hydrate_rev.pdf|format=PDF|title=Methane hydrate stability and anthropogenic climate change|last=Archer|first=D.|journal=Biogeosciences|volume=4|issue=4|year=2007|pages=521–544|doi=10.5194/bg-4-521-2007}} See also [http://www.realclimate.org/wp-trackback.php/227 blog summary].</ref> Clathrate deposits destabilize from the deepest part of their [[Gas hydrate stability zone|stability zone]], which is typically hundreds of metres below the seabed. A sustained increase in sea temperature will warm its way through the sediment eventually, and cause the deepest, most marginal clathrate to start to break down; but it will typically take of the order of a thousand years or more for the temperature signal to get through.<ref name="Archer2007" />
Most deposits of methane clathrate are in sediments too deep to respond rapidly, and modelling by Archer (2007) suggests the methane forcing should remain a minor component of the overall [[greenhouse effect]].<ref name="Archer2007">{{cite journal|url=http://geosci.uchicago.edu/~archer/reprints/archer.2007.hydrate_rev.pdf|format=PDF|title=Methane hydrate stability and anthropogenic climate change|last=Archer|first=D.|journal=Biogeosciences|volume=4|issue=4|year=2007|pages=521–544|doi=10.5194/bg-4-521-2007}} See also [http://www.realclimate.org/wp-trackback.php/227 blog summary].</ref> Clathrate deposits destabilize from the deepest part of their [[Gas hydrate stability zone|stability zone]], which is typically hundreds of metres below the seabed. A sustained increase in sea temperature will warm its way through the sediment eventually, and cause the deepest, most marginal clathrate to start to break down; but it will typically take of the order of a thousand years or more for the temperature signal to get through.<ref name="Archer2007" />


One kind of exception is recent changes to the Gulf Stream causing widespread gas hydrate destabilization:<ref>Benjamin J. Phrampus, Recent changes to the Gulf Stream causing widespread gas hydrate destabilization, Nature490,527–530(25 October 2012)doi:10.1038/nature11528, http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v490/n7421/full/nature11528.html?WT.ec_id=NATURE-20121025</ref> "It is unlikely that the western North Atlantic margin is the only area experiencing changing ocean currents; our estimate of 2.5 gigatonnes of destabilizing methane hydrate may therefore represent only a fraction of the methane hydrate currently destabilizing globally."
One exception, however, may be in clathrates associated with the [[Arctic ocean]], where clathrates can exist in shallower water stabilized by lower temperatures rather than higher pressures; these may potentially be marginally stable much closer to the surface of the sea-bed, stabilized by a frozen 'lid' of [[permafrost]] preventing methane escape. Recent research carried out in 2008 in the Siberian Arctic has shown millions of tons of methane being released, apparently through perforations in the seabed permafrost,<ref>Compare: [http://www.mbari.org/news/news_releases/2007/paull-plfs.html Methane bubbling through seafloor creates undersea hills], [[Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute]], 5 February 2007</ref> with concentrations in some regions reaching up to 100 times normal.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/climate-change/exclusive-the-methane-time-bomb-938932.html|title=Exclusive: The methane time bomb|last=Connor|first=Steve|date=September 23, 2008|publisher=[[The Independent]]|accessdate=2008-10-03}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/hundreds-of-methane-plumes-discovered-941456.html|title=Hundreds of methane 'plumes' discovered|last=Connor|first=Steve|date=September 25, 2008|publisher=[[The Independent]]|accessdate=2008-10-03}}</ref> The excess methane has been detected in localized hotspots in the outfall of the [[Lena River]] and the border between the [[Laptev Sea]] and the [[East Siberian Sea]]. Some melting may be the result of geological heating, but more thawing is believed to be due to the greatly increased volumes of meltwater being discharged from the Siberian rivers flowing north.<ref>[http://westerstrand.blogspot.com/2008/09/methane-hot-topic.html Translation of a blog entry by Örjan Gustafsson, expedition research leader], 2 September 2008</ref> Current methane release has previously been estimated at 0.5 [[megatonne|Mt]] per year.<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Shakhova | first1 = N. | last2 = Semiletov | first2 = I. | last3 = Salyuk | first3 = A. | last4 = Kosmach | first4 = D. | last5 = Bel'cheva | first5 = N. | year = 2007 | title = Methane release on the Arctic East Siberian shelf | url = http://www.cosis.net/abstracts/EGU2007/01071/EGU2007-J-01071.pdf?PHPSESSID=e | journal = Geophysical Research Abstracts | volume = 9 | issue = | page = 01071 }}</ref> Shakhova et al. (2008) estimate that not less than 1,400 [[gigatonne|Gt]] of carbon is presently locked up as methane and methane hydrates under the Arctic submarine permafrost, and 5–10% of that area is subject to puncturing by open [[talik]]s. They conclude that "release of up to 50 [[gigatonne|Gt]] of predicted amount of hydrate storage [is] highly



{{main|Arctic methane release}}
Another kind of exception is in clathrates associated with the [[Arctic ocean]], where clathrates can exist in shallower water stabilized by lower temperatures rather than higher pressures; these may potentially be marginally stable much closer to the surface of the sea-bed, stabilized by a frozen 'lid' of [[permafrost]] preventing methane escape. Recent research carried out in 2008 in the Siberian Arctic has shown millions of tons of methane being released, apparently through perforations in the seabed permafrost,<ref>Compare: [http://www.mbari.org/news/news_releases/2007/paull-plfs.html Methane bubbling through seafloor creates undersea hills], [[Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute]], 5 February 2007</ref> with concentrations in some regions reaching up to 100 times normal.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/climate-change/exclusive-the-methane-time-bomb-938932.html|title=Exclusive: The methane time bomb|last=Connor|first=Steve|date=September 23, 2008|publisher=[[The Independent]]|accessdate=2008-10-03}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/hundreds-of-methane-plumes-discovered-941456.html|title=Hundreds of methane 'plumes' discovered|last=Connor|first=Steve|date=September 25, 2008|publisher=[[The Independent]]|accessdate=2008-10-03}}</ref> The excess methane has been detected in localized hotspots in the outfall of the [[Lena River]] and the border between the [[Laptev Sea]] and the [[East Siberian Sea]]. Some melting may be the result of geological heating, but more thawing is believed to be due to the greatly increased volumes of meltwater being discharged from the Siberian rivers flowing north.<ref>[http://westerstrand.blogspot.com/2008/09/methane-hot-topic.html Translation of a blog entry by Örjan Gustafsson, expedition research leader], 2 September 2008</ref> Current methane release has previously been estimated at 0.5 [[megatonne|Mt]] per year.<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Shakhova | first1 = N. | last2 = Semiletov | first2 = I. | last3 = Salyuk | first3 = A. | last4 = Kosmach | first4 = D. | last5 = Bel'cheva | first5 = N. | year = 2007 | title = Methane release on the Arctic East Siberian shelf | url = http://www.cosis.net/abstracts/EGU2007/01071/EGU2007-J-01071.pdf?PHPSESSID=e | journal = Geophysical Research Abstracts | volume = 9 | issue = | page = 01071 }}</ref> Shakhova et al. (2008) estimate that not less than 1,400 [[gigatonne|Gt]] of carbon is presently locked up as methane and methane hydrates under the Arctic submarine permafrost, and 5–10% of that area is subject to puncturing by open [[talik]]s. They conclude that "release of up to 50 [[gigatonne|Gt]] of predicted amount of hydrate storage [is] highly
possible for abrupt release at any time". That would increase the methane content of the planet's atmosphere by a factor of twelve,<ref>N. Shakhova, I. Semiletov, A. Salyuk, D. Kosmach (2008), [http://www.cosis.net/abstracts/EGU2008/01526/EGU2008-A-01526.pdf Anomalies of methane in the atmosphere over the East Siberian shelf: Is there any sign of methane leakage from shallow shelf hydrates?], [[European Geophysical Union|EGU]] General Assembly 2008, ''Geophysical Research Abstracts'', '''10''', EGU2008-A-01526</ref><ref>Volker Mrasek, [http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,547976,00.html A Storehouse of Greenhouse Gases Is Opening in Siberia], ''[[Der Spiegel|Spiegel International Online]]'', 17 April 2008</ref> equivalent in [[greenhouse effect]] to a doubling in the current level of CO<sub>2</sub>.
possible for abrupt release at any time". That would increase the methane content of the planet's atmosphere by a factor of twelve,<ref>N. Shakhova, I. Semiletov, A. Salyuk, D. Kosmach (2008), [http://www.cosis.net/abstracts/EGU2008/01526/EGU2008-A-01526.pdf Anomalies of methane in the atmosphere over the East Siberian shelf: Is there any sign of methane leakage from shallow shelf hydrates?], [[European Geophysical Union|EGU]] General Assembly 2008, ''Geophysical Research Abstracts'', '''10''', EGU2008-A-01526</ref><ref>Volker Mrasek, [http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,547976,00.html A Storehouse of Greenhouse Gases Is Opening in Siberia], ''[[Der Spiegel|Spiegel International Online]]'', 17 April 2008</ref> equivalent in [[greenhouse effect]] to a doubling in the current level of CO<sub>2</sub>.



Revision as of 14:37, 9 December 2012

CambrianOrdovicianSilurianDevonianCarboniferousPermianTriassicJurassicCretaceousPaleogeneNeogene
Marine extinction intensity during Phanerozoic
%
Millions of years ago
CambrianOrdovicianSilurianDevonianCarboniferousPermianTriassicJurassicCretaceousPaleogeneNeogene
The blue graph shows the apparent percentage (not the absolute number) of marine animal genera becoming extinct during any given time interval. It does not represent all marine species, just those that are readily fossilized. The labels of the traditional "Big Five" extinction events and the more recently recognised Capitanian mass extinction event are clickable links; see Extinction event for more details. (source and image info)

The clathrate gun hypothesis is the popular name given to the hypothesis that rises in sea temperatures (and/or falls in sea level) can trigger the sudden release of methane from methane clathrate compounds buried in seabeds and permafrost which, because the methane itself is a powerful greenhouse gas, leads to further temperature rise and further methane clathrate destabilization – in effect initiating a runaway process as irreversible, once started, as the firing of a gun.[1]

In its original form, the hypothesis proposed that the "clathrate gun" could cause abrupt runaway warming in a timescale less than a human lifetime,[1] and might be responsible for warming events in and at the end of the last ice age.[2] This is now thought unlikely.[3][4]

However, there is stronger evidence that runaway methane clathrate breakdown may have caused drastic alteration of the ocean environment and the atmosphere of earth on a number of occasions in the past, over timescales of tens of thousands of years; most notably in connection with the Permian extinction event, when 96% of all marine species became extinct 251 million years ago.[5]

Mechanism

Specific structure of a gas hydrate piece, from the subduction zone off Oregon
Gas hydrate-bearing sediment, from the subduction zone off Oregon

Methane clathrate, also known commonly as methane hydrate, is a form of water ice that contains a large amount of methane within its crystal structure. Potentially large deposits of methane clathrate have been found under sediments on the ocean floors of the Earth, although there are many orders of magnitudes in between the estimates of various experts.[6] In fact, the existence of vast oceanic methane clathrate formation is uncertain and usually only based on reflective seismology and pieces larger than 10 cm have only been recovered from three sites.[7]

The sudden release of large amounts of natural gas from methane clathrate deposits in runaway climate change could be a cause of past, future, and present climate changes. The release of this trapped methane is a potential major outcome of a rise in temperature; it is thought that this is a main factor in the global warming of 6°C that happened during the end-Permian extinction,[8] as methane is much more powerful as a greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide (despite its atmospheric lifetime of around 12 years, it has a global warming potential of 72 over 20 years and 25 over 100 years). The theory also predicts this will greatly affect available oxygen content of the atmosphere.

Possible release events

Two events possibly linked in this way are the Permian-Triassic extinction event and the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum. It may also have had a role in the sudden warm-up of "Snowball Earth", 630 million years ago.[9] However, warming at the end of the last ice age is not thought to be due to methane release.

Focusing on the Permian-Triassic boundary, Gregory Ryskin [1] explores the possibility that mass extinction can be caused by an extremely fast, explosive release of dissolved methane (and other dissolved gases such as carbon dioxide and hydrogen sulfide) that accumulated in the oceanic water masses prone to stagnation and anoxia (e.g., in silled basins).

Current outlook

Most deposits of methane clathrate are in sediments too deep to respond rapidly, and modelling by Archer (2007) suggests the methane forcing should remain a minor component of the overall greenhouse effect.[10] Clathrate deposits destabilize from the deepest part of their stability zone, which is typically hundreds of metres below the seabed. A sustained increase in sea temperature will warm its way through the sediment eventually, and cause the deepest, most marginal clathrate to start to break down; but it will typically take of the order of a thousand years or more for the temperature signal to get through.[10]

One kind of exception is recent changes to the Gulf Stream causing widespread gas hydrate destabilization:[11] "It is unlikely that the western North Atlantic margin is the only area experiencing changing ocean currents; our estimate of 2.5 gigatonnes of destabilizing methane hydrate may therefore represent only a fraction of the methane hydrate currently destabilizing globally."


Another kind of exception is in clathrates associated with the Arctic ocean, where clathrates can exist in shallower water stabilized by lower temperatures rather than higher pressures; these may potentially be marginally stable much closer to the surface of the sea-bed, stabilized by a frozen 'lid' of permafrost preventing methane escape. Recent research carried out in 2008 in the Siberian Arctic has shown millions of tons of methane being released, apparently through perforations in the seabed permafrost,[12] with concentrations in some regions reaching up to 100 times normal.[13][14] The excess methane has been detected in localized hotspots in the outfall of the Lena River and the border between the Laptev Sea and the East Siberian Sea. Some melting may be the result of geological heating, but more thawing is believed to be due to the greatly increased volumes of meltwater being discharged from the Siberian rivers flowing north.[15] Current methane release has previously been estimated at 0.5 Mt per year.[16] Shakhova et al. (2008) estimate that not less than 1,400 Gt of carbon is presently locked up as methane and methane hydrates under the Arctic submarine permafrost, and 5–10% of that area is subject to puncturing by open taliks. They conclude that "release of up to 50 Gt of predicted amount of hydrate storage [is] highly possible for abrupt release at any time". That would increase the methane content of the planet's atmosphere by a factor of twelve,[17][18] equivalent in greenhouse effect to a doubling in the current level of CO2.

In 2008 the United States Department of Energy National Laboratory system[19] and the United States Geological Survey's Climate Change Science Program both identified potential clathrate destabilization in the Arctic as one of four most serious scenarios for abrupt climate change, which have been singled out for priority research. The USCCSP released a report in late December 2008 estimating the gravity of this risk.[20]

According to data released by the EPA[21] atmospheric methane (CH4) concentrations (ppb) remained between 400-800ppb (between years 600,000 BC to 1900) and since 1900 have risen to levels between 1600-1800ppb.

Possible outcomes

According to Gregory Ryskin, a sudden release of methane from the ocean may lead to either global cooling or global warming. The explosions and burning of methane would produce lots of smoke and dust, which would lead to global cooling. The methane and carbon dioxide would "create the greenhouse effect, which may lead to global warming". Professor Ryskin writes that it is "difficult to predict" whether global cooling or warming would result.

The evolution of dust and smoke, if it caused global cooling, would likely only last a short time before the particulates washed out of the atmosphere. Then the raised levels of methane and the derivative carbon dioxide would take over. The likely result would be an alternating series of extra cold and extra warm years, arguably more devastating to crop production than a trend in one direction or the other.

It may be possible to explain past marine extinctions by the scrubbing effect. If an inert gas is bubbled through water, the surface of each bubble acts as a semi permeable membrane. Gases diffuse across this membrane according to their concentration inside and outside the bubble. The result of bubbling methane through the ocean is to deplete the oxygen dissolved in the water, leading to ocean anoxia.

The consequences of a methane-driven oceanic eruption for marine and terrestrial life are likely to be catastrophic. Figuratively speaking, the erupting region "boils over," ejecting a large amount of methane and other gases (e.g., CO2, H2S) into the atmosphere, and flooding large areas of land. Whereas pure methane is lighter than air, methane loaded with water droplets is much heavier, and thus spreads over the land, mixing with air in the process (and losing water as rain). The air-methane mixture is explosive at methane concentrations between 5%

and 15%; as such mixtures form in different locations near the ground and are ignited by lightning, explosions and conflagrations destroy most of the terrestrial life, and also produce great amounts of smoke and of carbon dioxide. Firestorms carry smoke and dust into the upper atmosphere, where they may remain for several years; the resulting darkness and global cooling may provide an additional kill mechanism. Conversely, carbon dioxide and the remaining methane create the greenhouse effect, which may lead to global warming. The outcome of the competition between the cooling and the warming tendencies is difficult to predict.[22]

In fiction

See also

References

  1. ^ a b James P. Kennett, Kevin G. Cannariato, Ingrid L. Hendy, and Richard J. Behl, (2003) Methane Hydrates in Quaternary Climate Change: The Clathrate Gun Hypothesis, Washington, DC: American Geophysical Union. ISBN 0-87590-296-0
  2. ^ James P. Kennett, Kevin G. Cannariato, Ingrid L. Hendy, Richard J. Behl (2000), Carbon Isotopic Evidence for Methane Hydrate Instability During Quaternary Interstadials, Science 288 (5463: Apr 7), 128–133 doi:10.1126/science.288.5463.128
  3. ^ Todd Sowers (2006), Late Quaternary Atmospheric CH4 Isotope Record Suggests Marine Clathrates Are Stable, Science 311 (5762: Feb 10), 838–840 doi:10.1126/science.1121235 PMID 16469923
  4. ^ Hinrich Schaefer, Michael J. Whiticar, Edward J. Brook, Vasilii V. Petrenko, Dominic F. Ferretti, Jeffrey P. Severinghaus (2006), Ice Record of 13C for Atmospheric CH4 Across the Younger Dryas-Preboreal Transition, Science, 313 (5790: Aug 25) 1109–1112 doi:10.1126/science.1126562
  5. ^ The Day The Earth Nearly Died, BBC Horizon, 2002
  6. ^ Collet, Timothy S.; Kuuskraa, Vello A. (1998). "Hydrates contain vast store of world gas resources". Oil and Gas Journal. 96 (19): 90–95.
  7. ^ Laherrere, Jean (May 03, 2000). "Oceanic Hydrates: More Questions Than Answers". Energy Exploration & Exploitation. 18 (4): 349–383. doi:10.1260/0144598001492175. ISSN 0144-5987. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  8. ^ Benton, Michael J.; Twitchet, Richard J. (2003). "How to kill (almost) all life: the end-Permian extinction event" (PDF). Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 18 (7): 358–365. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00093-4. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  9. ^ Kennedy, Martin; Mrofka, David; Von Der Borch, Chris (2008). "Snowball Earth termination by destabilization of equatorial permafrost methane clathrate" (PDF). Nature. 453 (7195): 642–645. Bibcode:2008Natur.453..642K. doi:10.1038/nature06961. PMID 18509441.
  10. ^ a b Archer, D. (2007). "Methane hydrate stability and anthropogenic climate change" (PDF). Biogeosciences. 4 (4): 521–544. doi:10.5194/bg-4-521-2007.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link) See also blog summary.
  11. ^ Benjamin J. Phrampus, Recent changes to the Gulf Stream causing widespread gas hydrate destabilization, Nature490,527–530(25 October 2012)doi:10.1038/nature11528, http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v490/n7421/full/nature11528.html?WT.ec_id=NATURE-20121025
  12. ^ Compare: Methane bubbling through seafloor creates undersea hills, Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute, 5 February 2007
  13. ^ Connor, Steve (September 23, 2008). "Exclusive: The methane time bomb". The Independent. Retrieved 2008-10-03.
  14. ^ Connor, Steve (September 25, 2008). "Hundreds of methane 'plumes' discovered". The Independent. Retrieved 2008-10-03.
  15. ^ Translation of a blog entry by Örjan Gustafsson, expedition research leader, 2 September 2008
  16. ^ Shakhova, N.; Semiletov, I.; Salyuk, A.; Kosmach, D.; Bel'cheva, N. (2007). "Methane release on the Arctic East Siberian shelf" (PDF). Geophysical Research Abstracts. 9: 01071.
  17. ^ N. Shakhova, I. Semiletov, A. Salyuk, D. Kosmach (2008), Anomalies of methane in the atmosphere over the East Siberian shelf: Is there any sign of methane leakage from shallow shelf hydrates?, EGU General Assembly 2008, Geophysical Research Abstracts, 10, EGU2008-A-01526
  18. ^ Volker Mrasek, A Storehouse of Greenhouse Gases Is Opening in Siberia, Spiegel International Online, 17 April 2008
  19. ^ IMPACTS: On the Threshold of Abrupt Climate Changes, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory News Center, 17 September 2008
  20. ^ CCSP, 2008: Abrupt Climate Change. A report by the U.S. Climate Change Science Program and the Subcommittee on Global Change Research (Clark, P.U., A.J. Weaver (coordinating lead authors), E. Brook, E.R. Cook, T.L. Delworth, and K. Steffen (chapter lead authors)). U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA, 459 pp.
  21. ^ "Atmosphere Changes". US Environmental Protection Agency. Retrieved 18 February 2012.
  22. ^ Ryskin, Gregory (2003). "Methane-driven oceanic eruptions and mass extinctions" (PDF). Geology. 31 (9): 741–744. Bibcode:2003Geo....31..741R. doi:10.1130/G19518.1. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)

Further reading

Historical events