Jump to content

User talk:Wehwalt: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Ankitbhatt (talk | contribs)
Line 109: Line 109:
There was recently a well-reviewed concert production with the New York Philharmonic, with lots of notable actors. Now someone is [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Carousel_%28musical%29&diff=553490154&oldid=552506522 trying to add some names to the cast table]. Should the notable actors from this concert production be added to the cast table? The production was nearly a full production: off-book, with costumes, dialogue, dancers for the ballet segments, etc. What do you think? -- [[User:Ssilvers|Ssilvers]] ([[User talk:Ssilvers|talk]]) 13:37, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
There was recently a well-reviewed concert production with the New York Philharmonic, with lots of notable actors. Now someone is [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Carousel_%28musical%29&diff=553490154&oldid=552506522 trying to add some names to the cast table]. Should the notable actors from this concert production be added to the cast table? The production was nearly a full production: off-book, with costumes, dialogue, dancers for the ballet segments, etc. What do you think? -- [[User:Ssilvers|Ssilvers]] ([[User talk:Ssilvers|talk]]) 13:37, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
:I think so. It's probably the biggest thing for ''Carousel'' in five years. I'd include it. I've allowed mentions of semi-staged versions of the minor works. So if that was what I reverted, I'm OK with putting it back. Hope you're doing well.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt#top|talk]]) 14:45, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
:I think so. It's probably the biggest thing for ''Carousel'' in five years. I'd include it. I've allowed mentions of semi-staged versions of the minor works. So if that was what I reverted, I'm OK with putting it back. Hope you're doing well.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt#top|talk]]) 14:45, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

==FAC==

Hi. I've put up ''[[Ra.One]]'' for an [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Ra.One/archive4|FAC]], but it's seen little activity for some time. Could you take a look at it, and put up your thoughts? I'd like to get working on the article once more. Thanks. ~*~'''[[User:Ankitbhatt|Ankit]][[User talk:Ankitbhatt|Bhatt]]'''~*~ 15:42, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:42, 5 May 2013

Isabeau

Hi Wehwalt, I wanted to stop by and thank you again for the comments you left on the talk page there. I think I got most of them, but a few need a bit more digging around in the sources. The main source is an ILL book that's long gone but I'll reorder (I should have it anyway) so as to fully address the issues. Until I have it, I won't bring back to FAC, but you've given me a very good starting point and I appreciate it a lot. Truthkeeper (talk) 19:33, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem. Glad I could help.--Wehwalt (talk) 23:05, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ruth

As soon as I finish with this final exam and a research paper, it's on again. I got a few weeks. Secret account 17:10, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK, swell. Ruth is worth the waiting.--Wehwalt (talk) 21:42, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Coin mail

YGM. PumpkinSky talk 22:52, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Meeker PR

Just to let you know I've left one final comment on the peer review page for you to consider. Otherwise I'm all done there. Superb article. Brianboulton (talk) 23:21, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much both for the kind words and the review.--Wehwalt (talk) 00:43, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Your latest FA is quite unusual, I like that, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:34, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Eisenhower dollar

The DYK project (nominate) 16:02, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

  • Great article! That was an interesting read; keep up the great work. Go Phightins! 18:47, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. It's a complicated story, glad you liked it.--Wehwalt (talk) 23:19, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Left a question 4 U...

...at Talk:Oregon_Trail_Memorial_half_dollar#Wondering_about_one_of_your_edits. --Kevjonesin (talk) 15:02, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Way to go

Trail Blazer's Barnstar
Congrats on bringing Ezra Meeker to FA! Hopefully this will be an example for those who wish to bring Oregon Trail to a similar class.  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:02, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I'd be happy to help out, I have references that could be useful. Thanks for your help in the promotion. I'm thinking of Monroe Doctrine Centennial half dollar next, but will take time to think about it.--Wehwalt (talk) 02:20, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Saw that nom. Don't think I can go past an image review on that though (a mid term snuck up on me). — Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:46, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Don't worry about it. I'm doing this instead of the $3 because this has a 90th anniversary in 2 months. The $3's anniversaries are next year. Thanks for all your help, but RL always comes first. And should.--Wehwalt (talk) 14:04, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Not quite sure where I should take this but this user, Lordhavefaith, doesn't seem to grasp the concept that draft picks have not been signed yet and is mindlessly reverting all 32 templates, including the Jets'. They're also not responding to any requests to talk nor any of the issued warnings. -- The Writer 2.0 Talk 20:36, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, I have limited internet access thru the 18th. Perhaps an admin watching the page could pick up on this?--Wehwalt (talk) 01:37, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ezra

Congrats on the FA! PumpkinSky talk 00:32, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks.--Wehwalt (talk) 08:29, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FA Thanks

On behalf of WP:CHICAGO, I would like to thank you for your editorial contributions to Disco Demolition Night, which has recently become a WP:FA.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 08:05, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much.--Wehwalt (talk) 08:29, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There was recently a well-reviewed concert production with the New York Philharmonic, with lots of notable actors. Now someone is trying to add some names to the cast table. Should the notable actors from this concert production be added to the cast table? The production was nearly a full production: off-book, with costumes, dialogue, dancers for the ballet segments, etc. What do you think? -- Ssilvers (talk) 13:37, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think so. It's probably the biggest thing for Carousel in five years. I'd include it. I've allowed mentions of semi-staged versions of the minor works. So if that was what I reverted, I'm OK with putting it back. Hope you're doing well.--Wehwalt (talk) 14:45, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FAC

Hi. I've put up Ra.One for an FAC, but it's seen little activity for some time. Could you take a look at it, and put up your thoughts? I'd like to get working on the article once more. Thanks. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 15:42, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]