User talk:Frze

de.wikipedia >>> Benutzer:Frze(Diskussion) Mentor: John of Reading

Greetings & thanks

Greetings Frze. Thanks for fixing that ref. at Jim Richardson - I took for granted that the article already had a reflist... and didn't preview. Cheers! --Technopat (talk) 18:12, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for tip

Thanks for the referencing tip on Hilton College (South Africa). I have rectified it. Mattpbarry (talk) 20:07, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

Greta Garbo

Hello Frze, Some nut case came along and vandalized (I think this is the right term for what s/he did) the entire p. and you seemed to undo all crazy stuff. Am I right that you returned everything back to normal? If so, out of curiosity, how did you do it? Or, what exactly happened. EVerything is fine now. Thanks in advance for explaining.--Classicfilmbuff (talk) 23:35, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

Look at this page http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Greta_Garbo&action=history and check what's wrong. Then choose the last version without vandalism. Then choose http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Greta_Garbo&diff=prev&oldid=554756492 , click Edit, ignore the warnings and click Save page. That's all. --Frze (talk) 04:42, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, Frze. And thanks for reverting to the right version!--Classicfilmbuff (talk) 22:09, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Frze. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Help desk.
Message added 14:38, 16 May 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Skamecrazy123 (talk) 14:38, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Someone complained to me about the section being too large, don't currently have time to make ref corrects

I addressed a concern about the racial theories section of Nazism being too large. I focused on cutting out material I do not currently have the time to correct every single reference error change resulting from that. I have to get going to do work on a project outside of this site, I don't have the time. Sorry about that.--R-41 (talk) 16:41, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Dungeons & Dragons Basic Set 1st revision

You are currently reverting to the incorrect version as used in the source: The Acaeum: "Eighth (1981) Second Revision of the Basic Set rules, coinciding with the first release of the D&D Expert Set " So the 1st revision is the 1977 revision. You are edit warring on 1R. Spshu (talk) 20:20, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Gather Together in My Name

Frze, I realize that you were probably trying to be helpful, but when you corrected the refs in this article just now, you caused an edit conflict, which basically meant that I lost my last hour of work. Very frustrating, as you can well imagine. I promise, I was in the middle of fixing it. Please--make sure an editor is finished what they're doing and moved on before you step in like that. I appreciate your enthusiasm, really, but thought you'd like to know what happened. I'll let you know when I'm finished improving the article so you can review it for its FAC, if you'd like. Thanks. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 20:09, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Talkback Notice

Hello, Frze. You have new messages at Chihin.chong's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Barnstar

		The Cleanup Barnstar
		For your efforts in tackling Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting -- John of Reading (talk) 11:17, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

My apologies

It appears that, for some reason, I can't connect to Wikipedia through my usual ISP. I tried going through an anonymizer, and it appears that it cannot abide http/https. Please revert all my edits which have damaged Wikipedia since about 3 am (UTC) 30 May 2013. I'll stop editing until I can figure out how to fix the problem. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 09:09, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

John of Reading

Hello, Frze. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Help desk.
Message added John of Reading (talk) 09:17, 1 June 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

What's wrong with this page? It always appears in Category:Pages with missing references list. Thanks --Frze (talk) 08:38, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

It's a side-effect of this nonsense edit, which has now been fixed. Pages using Template:SI units of length may turn up in the error category until the job queue gets round to them; or you can force the software to rebuild the page thoroughly by doing a null edit. -- John of Reading (talk) 08:51, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

If you create User:Frze/common.js with these two lines...

importScript('User:Anomie/util.js');
importScript('User:Anomie/previewtemplatelastmod.js'); // Linkback: [[User:Anomie/previewtemplatelastmod.js]]

...then when you edit a page, the "View templates on this page" section at the bottom gives you much more information about the templates, including the date, time and edit summary of the most recent edit. So if a page has been damaged by a template edit, you can quickly see which template it was; and if a page is in an error category, you can quickly see if a related template has been damaged and then restored. -- John of Reading (talk) 08:58, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Biophilia (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hollow (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:06, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Guns of the Timberland reference problem fix

FRZE - Thanks for looking at the ref issue I had with the Guns of the Timberland. I saw that there were no footnotes showing up on the article after I did the final save and was working on fixing it. It took a bit to figure it out--I thought that since there was a "==references==" included the footnotes would have appeared but I needed the tag that you added. I am curious, how did you find out about my problem so quickly?

I am having a hard time finding sufficient documentation for the <ref>. . .</ref> tag that can be used in Wikipedia. Trying to deduce what <ref name="test">[http://www.example.org Link text], additional text.</ref> will produce in practice is a bit obscure to me. Currently I am looking at previous articles and sort of deduce what is needed and what can be done. Could you tell me where I could find a more complete documentation for how to create a Reference tag?

Thanks osomite — Preceding unsigned comment added by Osomite (talk • contribs) 08:04, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Radical idea

Eg. Akron, Ohio - why not pay attention to what you do, take a look at output, etc.? John of Cromer in transit (talk) mytime= Fri 12:43, wikitime= 11:43, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

chagall

Thanks for fixing this for me... it was some kind of visual editor error, but I was travelling and lost my internet connection midway through so couldn't fix it myself! cheers, -- phoebe / (talk to me) 14:15, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

July 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Superstitions of India may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• |Sweeping the house at night is inauspicious.<ref>Fallon, S.W. (1998) [1886]. (''[http://books.google.com/books?id=IlEFBaBZZ4UC A Dictionary of Hindustani Proverbs]''. Asian

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:07, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

John Paul II

Thank you for fixing that....I was mainly editing it to 'fix and update' the ISBNs (the article was in an error cat I've been working) but I run the advisor script while I am at it, and since that article had so many dashes I ran 'find' on all three types and looked at the context to get which type was which right. I'm guessing I just didn't notice that that 'phrase' was the ref name, and not the title. :/

Mostly, thanks for actually 'fixing' it instead of just reverting me....recalculating all the ISBNs in an article that big was quite a pain.

Lesson learned...don't trust the 'rendering' in the WikEd "show changes below" (the one that gives the red-and-green differences) to catch breaking a ref name. :P Revent (talk) 08:35, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

olive oil etc

I think your edit summary is too generous. To me, any edit by an anonymous editor which causes damage is in the first place vandalism. It is very tedious to report vandalism officially, but I certainly include that on the edit summary. (Or use something like Twinkle which says it for me.) I'm a little more lenient with signed-in editors, and give them the benefit of the doubt. John of Cromer (talk) mytime= Sat 12:56, wikitime= 11:56, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Ich denke, Ihre edit-Zusammenfassung ist zu großzügig. Für mich ist jegliche Bearbeitetung von einem anonymen Editor, der Schaden verursacht, in erster Linie Vandalismus. Es ist sehr mühsam, Vandalismus offiziell berichten. Aber ich vermerke das in der edit-Zusammenfassung. (Oder ich nutze so etwas wie Twinkle, die das für mich tut.) Ich bin ein wenig nachsichtig mit angemeldeten Redakteuren, und gebe ihnen den Vorteil des Zweifels.

Thanks for the information. I don't know how to use Twinkle. --Frze (talk) 15:32, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Sculpturenes

Please remember to notify the article-creator User:Laith-algharagholy for the article you tagged for speedy-deletion...it's his first attempt at editing, so it's possible he's having trouble getting started. DMacks (talk) 19:29, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

@DMacks:: You are right - Thanks and Good night - --Frze (talk) 19:57, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for all your edit-work! DMacks (talk) 20:08, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Tallinn Town Hall

view history I would also like to thank you for the changes you've made on my article Tallinn town hall. You are very kind! Mailaxxx (talk) 17:47, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Costa Concordia disaster

Hello, Frze. I'm the one who was trying to update and condense the three sections you've reverted. First, could you tell me where I went wrong with the citations? I made a point of transferring each one into the new copy at the relevant sentence. Second, do you not think that my edited-down version was an improvement? Thanks. Valetude (talk) 11:17, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

@Valetude:: Hello, Valetude. First: Please take a look at the bottom of the site. I am the one who has to clean all the errors. See my contributions. Best wishes.

• Cite error: A list-defined reference named "bbc_jan_2013" is not used in the content (see the help page).
• Cite error: A list-defined reference named "dailymail3" is not used in the content (see the help page).
• Cite error: A list-defined reference named "bloomberg3" is not used in the content (see the help page).
• Cite error: A list-defined reference named "bbc8" is not used in the content (see the help page).
• Cite error: A list-defined reference named "AFP_24Feb" is not used in the content (see the help page).
• Cite error: A list-defined reference named "nationalpost4" is not used in the content (see the help page).
• Cite error: A list-defined reference named "montrealgazette1" is not used in the content (see the help page).
• Cite error: A list-defined reference named "Jones2" is not used in the content (see the help page).
• Cite error: A list-defined reference named "Pullella" is not used in the content (see the help page).
• Cite error: A list-defined reference named "foxnews1" is not used in the content (see the help page).
• Cite error: A list-defined reference named "Squires_3_February" is not used in the content (see the help page).
• Cite error: A list-defined reference named "abc2" is not used in the content (see the help page).
• Cite error: A list-defined reference named "nationalpost3" is not used in the content (see the help page).
• Cite error: A list-defined reference named "agi2" is not used in the content (see the help page).
• Cite error: A list-defined reference named "AP_21FEB2012" is not used in the content (see the help page).
• Cite error: A list-defined reference named "bbc7" is not used in the content (see the help page).
• Cite error: A list-defined reference named "discovery2" is not used in the content (see the help page).
• Cite error: A list-defined reference named "BBC_10_months" is not used in the content (see the help page).
• Cite error: A list-defined reference named "McKenna" is not used in the content (see the help page).
• Cite error: A list-defined reference named "telegraph9" is not used in the content (see the help page).
• Cite error: A list-defined reference named "gim-international1" is not used in the content (see the help page).
• Cite error: A list-defined reference named "AFP_update" is not used in the content (see the help page).
• Cite error: A list-defined reference named "isprambiente1" is not used in the content (see the help page).
• Cite error: A list-defined reference named "spill-international2" is not used in the content (see the help page).
• Cite error: A list-defined reference named "telegraph8" is not used in the content (see the help page).
• Cite error: A list-defined reference named "UPI_7Feb2012" is not used in the content (see the help page).
• Cite error: A list-defined reference named "spill-international1" is not used in the content (see the help page).
• Cite error: A list-defined reference named "seattlepi1" is not used in the content (see the help page).
• Cite error: A list-defined reference named "abs-cbnnews" is not used in the content (see the help page).
• Cite error: A list-defined reference named "nytimes4" is not used in the content (see the help page).
• Cite error: A list-defined reference named "cnn4" is not used in the content (see the help page).
• Cite error: A list-defined reference named "LA_Times_25_dead" is not used in the content (see the help page).
• Cite error: A list-defined reference named "Kington2" is not used in the content (see the help page).
• Cite error: A list-defined reference named "bloomberg1" is not used in the content (see the help page).
• Cite error: A list-defined reference named "BBC16702046" is not used in the content (see the help page).
• Cite error: A list-defined reference named "Squires" is not used in the content (see the help page).
• Cite error: A list-defined reference named "CNN-15_dead" is not used in the content (see the help page).
• Cite error: A list-defined reference named "vancouversun1" is not used in the content (see the help page).
• Cite error: A list-defined reference named "Kington" is not used in the content (see the help page).
• Cite error: A list-defined reference named "time1" is not used in the content (see the help page).
• Cite error: A list-defined reference named "ABC" is not used in the content (see the help page).
• Cite error: A list-defined reference named "cnn3" is not used in the content (see the help page).
• Cite error: A list-defined reference named "gazettelive" is not used in the content (see the help page).
• Cite error: A list-defined reference named "nytimes3" is not used in the content (see the help page).
• Cite error: A list-defined reference named "dailymail2" is not used in the content (see the help page).
• Cite error: A list-defined reference named "Jones" is not used in the content (see the help page).
• Cite error: A list-defined reference named "heraldsun2" is not used in the content (see the help page).

I think, you can't remove all the editwork by many wikipedian autors. Best wishes --Frze (talk) 11:46, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for that, Frze.

I appreciate that you had some mopping up to do, and can only apologise. But the Wiki page on Footnotes does not seem to show where I went wrong in transferring each citation individually into the new text.

Aside from that, I would just make two points. One is that the article carries a tag, requesting updates. Many of the references and citations that I deleted were topical in the first weeks after the disaster, but would be of no interest afterwards. Second, I don't see what is so sacred about the work of 'other Wikipedian authors'. Long-winded entries often need editing-down. Also many of my own contributions have been savaged for no good reason over the years.

Thanks anyway, and hope not to cause you any more extra work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Valetude (talk • contribs) 10:32, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Hannah Arendt

Thanks for fixing your reflinks but when you make unexplained deletions it is not for me to "watch what I do" it is for you to explain via edit summary or talk page. Yours, Quis separabit? 15:10, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Rawla Mandi > Headquarters

Your reversion to my recent edit on Rawla Mandi, i.e. headquarters→headquarter is not much helpful, or correct. There is no headquarter in a noun, only headquarters, be it singular or plural. See for yourself Oxford dictionary, if you are British user, or Merriam-Webster, if you would prefer American. Chhandama (talk) 12:21, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

@Chhandama::I reverted your edit because of this <nowiki> ||</nowiki> OBC Rawla Mandi <nowiki>|| 100525 || ORBC100525 || Example</nowiki>. You destroyed <ref>http://www.indiapost.gov.in/Pin/pinsearch.aspx?Pin_On=335707</ref>. See difference. Best wishes --Frze (talk) 12:34, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

I did not notice my own vandalism! Thanks for rectifying. Chhandama (talk) 13:01, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

I have just realised that the damage was done by Visual Editor while saving my edit, because I never touched that section. This is perhaps one reason VE should not be publicised to new and anonymous users, it causes unexpected vandalism on its own. And more thanks for correcting the article. Chhandama (talk) 02:41, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

STiki Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback

How is it possible to revert two edits in one step? Please be so kind to explain it to me in simple English. Thank you very much in anticipation. --Frze (talk) 16:41, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi there, Frze. I'm using STiki to revert the edits, so it does two edits at once automatically. The same thing can be done with the Wikipedia:Rollback tool. Very simple to do, hope this helps you! Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback Hair^Talk 16:50, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Thanks a lot --Frze (talk) 16:55, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Welcome to STiki!

Hello, Frze, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Information about STiki, including: Using STiki and its hotkeys Comparison with other tools Information about vandalism on Wikipedia Here are some pages which are a little more fun: The STiki leaderboard - See how you are faring against other STiki users! Userboxes - Do not hesitate to wear the STiki label with pride by choosing from a selection of userboxes! We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (developer) and  Tentinator  09:43, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Cite error Plasmodium falciparum biology

Thank you for the heads up on this problem. This might be tricky to fix. While I use a unique refname for all the referenes I find that more than occasionally some persons(s) try to shorten these. For example ref name= ABC123 becomes shortened to "ABC". This might be fine for short pages but not for one with 500+ refs. While I can and will fix the problem for now, I dont know how to prevent this happening again. DrMicro (talk) 14:40, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

I was wrong. The problem was a malformed ref. It is now working. DrMicro (talk) 14:46, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Nazism

Re your reversion of my edit to replace the text of the lead. The new text was broadly agreed on the talk page as representing an improvement. The fact that it left some technical errors behind does not seem good reason to revert it – you could actually have sorted out the citation errors left behind, or explained to me how to do that. I have never come across this bizarre technical hangover when replacing text before and acknowledged the (minor) problem in my own edit summary. If I've removed the text in the editing window, including the text that appears to provide the references, could you please explain how to remove the cite errors, which suggest that the references exist in some meta-space somewhere? As noted, this is not something I have come across before and seems distinctly user-unfriendly. N-HH talk/edits 18:32, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Re Ihre Rückkehr meiner bearbeiten, um den Text der Leitung ersetzen. Der neue Text wurde im Großen und Ganzen auf der Diskussionsseite als eine Verbesserung vereinbart. Die Tatsache, dass einige technische Fehler zurückgelassen nicht guten Grund, es wieder scheinen - man könnte tatsächlich haben die Fehler Zitat hinterließ sortiert, oder mir erklärt, wie man das macht. Ich habe noch nie über diese bizarre technische Kater kommen, wenn das Ersetzen von Text vor und bestätigte die (kleine) Problem in meinem eigenen edit Zusammenfassung. Wenn ich den Text in das Editor-Fenster entfernt, einschließlich der Texte, die die Referenzen geben scheint, könnten Sie bitte erklären, wie man die Cité Fehler, was bedeutet, dass die Verweise in einigen Meta-Raum existieren irgendwo vorschlagen entfernen? Wie bereits erwähnt, ist dies nicht etwas, was ich über vor gekommen sind und scheint deutlich user-unfreundlich.

A barnstar for you!

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	Thank you very much for your help with Andrew Foster (musician). KatiePerrin26 (talk) 21:15, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Question

Hi Frze, as I have noticed you added this image in the German Wikipedia, could me explain how it works with images from Commons there? Recently I tried to add a couple of images ([1], [2]) with an identical licence to the relevant articles there, here and here, but I was reverted both the times with edit summaries as "Bitte Bildlizenz beachten" and "weder ist das frei...". Thanks in advance if you could explain me in what I was wrong. Cavarrone 09:19, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Sport in Australia

Frze, I note that you have reverted an official Wikimedia Foundation DMCA takedown on the article Sport in Australia, citing issues with the references. Under no circumstances may takedowns that are issued through the Legal Department to be reverted. Doing so places the Foundation (and thus, the projects) at extreme legal risk. I have reverted you. Please don't do this again - doing so will likely result in a block. For more information see WP:OFFICE. I'm certain you were unaware of the gravity of that action, so I'm not taking further action today, but please do familiarize yourself with the contents of that page so that you can avoid this situation in the future. Now, regarding the references errors - the easiest thing would simply have been to fix the problems. I'm doing so now. Thank you. Philippe Beaudette, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 18:33, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

@Philippe (WMF):: Thanks a lot for information and reverting my edit. I didn't know about importance of Wikipedia:Office actions and Digital Millennium Copyright Act. I am very sorry. --Frze (talk) 18:54, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

No problem, I figured that was the case. That's why I flagged it to you.  :) Philippe Beaudette, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 18:57, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

danke für den Hinweis,

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_France&diff=next&oldid=571610582

ich war der Überzeugung, external links dürften nur von Fußoten aus "starten" (zumindesten kenne ich aus de.wp nix anderes). Wenn das bei en.wp für den Abschnitt 'Literature' anders geregelt / gewünscht ist : OK, kann ich so machen. --Neun-x (talk) 07:55, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi Frze,

I've been working on the David Kraiselburd page. I wonder why you call it "vandalizing," when I'm adding bibliographical references to the key points made there, and, surely, I've added important contextual information that makes sense of the historical times he lived in, and the conflicts among the different factions. Why are you undoing the changes and calling them vandalizing? I'd appreciate it if you could let me know. I'm new to Wikipedia but the Dirty War is my area of research, and the article was severely damaged by lack of precise information, context, and so on. I do not know who you are. Perhaps we could discuss the issue instead of doing and undoing each other's work?

Let me know what you think.

Best,

Cortazzar — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cortazzar (talk • contribs) 10:14, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

The David Kraiselburd Page

Dear Frze,

I've been working on the David Kraiselburd page for several hours now. I wonder why you call it "vandalizing," when I'm adding bibliographical references to the key points made there, and, surely, I've added important contextual information that makes sense of the historical times DK lived in, and the conflicts among the different factions at whose crossfire he died. Why are you undoing the changes and calling them vandalizing? I'd appreciate it if you could let me know. I'm new to Wikipedia, but the Dirty War is my area of expertise, and the article was severely damaged and misleading due to lack of precise information, context, and so on. I do not know who you are. Do you work for Wikipedia or are you, too, interested in these issues? Perhaps we could discuss all this instead of doing and undoing each other's work?

Let me know what you think.

Best,

Cortazzar — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cortazzar (talk • contribs) 10:22, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of tallest buildings in Lahore, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gulberg (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:32, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Taxonomy

Please don't add reflist tags to pages that ought not contain them, such as in this edit. The edit caused the taxobox at Veleropilina to stop working. Martin (Smith609 – Talk) 09:33, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

@Smith609:: If you create page with incorrect ref formating, then they appaer in Category:Pages with missing references list.

There are <ref> tags on this page, but the references will not show without a {{reflist}} template.
It was your mistake: ref insted of cite. Best wishes --Frze (talk) 06:34, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Lyme

The reason for the deletion was discussed in the talk page (as per my edit summary on my revert). Please see discussion on talk page before reverting. The content was inappropriate and there was a good reason for deleting it. Sorry I forgot to leave an edit summary for my original revert, which might be the source of the confusion. --sciencewatcher (talk) 18:55, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Frze: I agree with Sciencewatcher in this instance. Per WP:BRD, please gain consensus on the Talk page before re-adding this content. I don't think you will gain that consensus, unless more appropriate sourcing can be found (per MEDRS). -- Scray (talk) 01:08, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

@Sciencewatcher:@Scray: O. k. - I'm not so interested in content, my problem is the Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting. I wrote please clean up the references section - now I did it. Compare old and new version. --Frze (talk) 17:40, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sean Lane (Entrepreneur)

Hello Frze,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Sean Lane (Entrepreneur) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TheLongTone (talk) 14:44, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

@TheLongTone: You can delete this page. Please talk to User talk:Weswolf88, I copied the content from here. --Frze ^Disk 14:52, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Your rollback request

Hi Frze, I have granted rollback rights to your account in accordance with your request. Please be aware that rollback should be used to revert vandalism/spam/blatantly unconstructive edits, and that using it to revert any other type of edit - such as by revert-warring or reverting edits you disagree with - can lead to it being removed from your account...sometimes without any warning depending on the admin who becomes aware of any misuse. If you think an edit should require a reason for reverting, use a manual edit summary instead of using the rollback tool. For practice, you may wish to see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback. Good luck. Acalamari 20:38, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Thanks and good night. --Frze ^{> talk} 21:30, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

See User group rights. --Frze ^{> talk} 21:32, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

User group rights Rollbackers:

• Feature & resolve feedback (aft-editor)
• Hide feedback & request oversight (aft-monitor)
• Post feedback & mark as (un)helpful (aft-member)
• Post feedback & mark as (un)helpful (aft-reader)
• Quickly rollback the edits of the last user who edited a particular page (rollback)

Read the article

I cited Steen twice in Homer Davenport, there was a formatting error where I used quotation marks in the ref name= tag in one place but not the other. So instead of commenting out the source, you could have fixed the formatting error with a simple word search. Or, if you were too lazy to do that, then put a note at talk stating that there appeared to be an error. Your "fix" was not helpful and did not actually identify the problem that required fixing. Next time, don't do drive-by edits unless you understand what is going on. Montanabw^(talk) 18:58, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

• Frze is an habitual drive-by editor who conducts his edit wars on the actual article page instead of using talk pages. He recently did it on 'The Bill' article and when I warned him not to he applied to admin for my warning to be rolled-back and his request was granted. What???