Jump to content

Talk:Eurasian Steppe: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 31: Line 31:


== BS Map Vandalism ==
== BS Map Vandalism ==
"The Eurasian Steppe Belt" < The map above that. It's complete BS. Show me where on the planet Earth matches it. It's a horrifically photoshopped/incorrect rendering of Asia (or Eurasia - I can't even tell! It's that bad!) that is not remotely accurate to reality. Compare that vandal trash to a real map. Either it was put up as vandalism, or someone flunks geography big time. --[[Special:Contributions/174.19.234.173|174.19.234.173]] ([[User talk:174.19.234.173|talk]]) 16:27, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
"The Eurasian Steppe Belt" < The map above that. It's complete BS. Show me where on the planet Earth matches it. It's a horrifically photoshopped/incorrect rendering of Asia (or Eurasia - I can't even tell! It's that bad!) that is not remotely accurate to reality. Compare that vandal trash to a real map. Either it was put up as vandalism, or someone flunks geography big time. How that even exists if it's not to vandalize wikipedia is beyond me, because what could one gain by creating such a fake map? It's awful. --[[Special:Contributions/174.19.234.173|174.19.234.173]] ([[User talk:174.19.234.173|talk]]) 16:27, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:29, 24 July 2014

Template:Vital article

Merge

Against merger. The Pontic-Caspian steppe is only a part of the Eurasian steppe which also include the Mongolian steppe the Kazakh steppe etc..are you sure? Nik Sage (talk/contrib) 14:31, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. Tom Radulovich 05:39, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]


hhhheeeeeeellllppppppp!!!

where is the steppes of mongolia —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.71.148.67 (talk) 10:24, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unbalanced section on Indo-European removed

I have removed the paragraph in the introduction about Indo-European languages, on various grounds: 1) It is out of place in the opening section of an entry on a primarily eco-geographical subject. The linguistic question is addressed more appropriately in a later section on the page. 2) It is written in poor English. 3) It presents as fact what is only one hypothesis among others as to the origin of Indo-European. The other leading hypothesis (the Anatolian hypothesis) does not place Proto-Indo-European on the Steppes at all. 79.132.38.138 (talk) 23:25, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good edit. 1brettsnyder (talk) 00:10, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

BS Map Vandalism

"The Eurasian Steppe Belt" < The map above that. It's complete BS. Show me where on the planet Earth matches it. It's a horrifically photoshopped/incorrect rendering of Asia (or Eurasia - I can't even tell! It's that bad!) that is not remotely accurate to reality. Compare that vandal trash to a real map. Either it was put up as vandalism, or someone flunks geography big time. How that even exists if it's not to vandalize wikipedia is beyond me, because what could one gain by creating such a fake map? It's awful. --174.19.234.173 (talk) 16:27, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]