|
As a Madonna fan can you tell me what you think about this? I personally like it (for obv reasons lol), but there seems to have a lot of hate from Madonna fans. It's obvious she is lip-syncing in this videos, but in the most of the performances Madonna lip-syncs it too. I love the performance though. — Tom(T2ME) 18:14, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Tomica I like it a lot, yeah "Vogue" is one of my favorites from Madge as well. Rihanna did it brilliantly man! —Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 18:40, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Wow. So glad you like it. Indeed, along with "Like a Prayer" and "Express Yourself" it's one of my Madonna favs too. But Rihanna's version <3 ! — Tom(T2ME) 07:50, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- 2008 was the year when I actually fell in love with Rihanna and GGGB: Reloaded release. "Take a Bow" and "Disturbia" were out jams. —Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 08:15, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- 2007 was the year, 'the real Rihanna' came out of the shelter that she was in during the first 2 years of her career. And tbh, I know how iconic is Madonna and personally believe Rihanna is the "Black Madonna" and the closest thing to her, having the fact she doesn't give a fuck what anyone thinks and has the guts to be edgy and try different things. — Tom(T2ME) 10:29, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, glad that you also think the same. A Madonna and Rihanna collab, I don't think the world would be ready, probably snatch a lot of wigs. —Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 10:30, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, if R8 is planned to be released sometime soon -_- I would be very happy to see a collaboration! And yeah, the world wouldn't be ready, it would just slay on everything. — Tom(T2ME) 11:06, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Riri better at least give the title soon! Also, "Vogue" happens to be one of my favorite Madge songs as well, and it would kick major ass to see them make a collab!! Snuggums (talk / edits) 03:46, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't know what the fuck she is doing tbh. Like FFS came out in January and now we are May. I have this ready for her and she does not want to give me title, cover or at least release date. :( LOL — Tom(T2ME) 07:04, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- She's holding out :P Snuggums (talk / edits) 07:30, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Yeah I don't know what her problem is. The releases following FFS have been messy. None of BBHMM and AO are setting the charts alight so she would need to push R8 now. —Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 13:04, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, surprisingly, BBBHM is doing well in the US having the fact it was not sent to pop radio and the video is yet to be released. However, AO was killed by Tidal -_- so yeah, too bad it flopped. — Tom(T2ME) 13:08, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Wasn't there a video supposed to be there for BBHMM? —Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 13:11, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, she shot one. Last week she responded to a fan that they are still editing it. In their press Christian Dior announced that R8 is gonna be released this month, so maybe simultaneous release. -Hopes this Monday- !!! — Tom(T2ME) 13:15, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh so a surprise release is it? We still don't have an article name it seems. —Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 13:21, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- We don't have an official name (apart R8, she used the same for Unapologetic only as R7 ofc), artwork, actual date or a track listing. So yes, I think it will be a surprise release. There was a rumor while ago that she wanted to release it on the date "Pon de Replay" (May 24) came out -hopes that's true- so the night of May 24 (Sunday) it will be perfect if we get the eight baby <3! — Tom(T2ME) 13:25, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I included Brian Newman because of this article - http://www.digitalspy.com/music/news/a445915/lady-gaga-debuts-jazz-version-of-you-and-i-listen.html#~pdfXcodRJ5VXi7 - thoughts?--Ombase (talk) 18:52, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Hi Ombase, that is not the actual version as present in the album. —Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 05:23, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Understood. I think I saw an article that credited for the album also, I will look. Thanks.--Ombase (talk) 21:43, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- I found the article, you are correct, not on the album. My apologies. --Ombase (talk) 12:45, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- No problem, glad you were able to see this. —Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 12:49, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi IndianBio! Billboard just published an interview with Madge's co-producer Shep Pettibone here. They mostly talk about where the "Vogue" song comes from. Also, I added an interview on the "This Used to Be My Playground" talkpage where M refers to it as an "assignment writing". Have a nice day! Amzer (talk) 13:22, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Mind leaving some comments? Thanks  Azealia911 talk 00:21, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
While I can understand your frustration, this edit summary was not particularly civil and likely won't achieve anything beyond antagonizing that IP editor further. Please try to keep your cool. Thanks, Huon (talk) 13:38, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- @Huon: my bad really, and you are correct I lost my cool for a moment and apologize for not sticking with WP:CIVIL. —Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 13:43, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'd really appreciate you chiming in on this, I've seen you remove similar information in other article so I hope you can demonstrate some viable points, thanks Azealia911 talk 21:06, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi IndianBio. Could you please tell me why you repeatedly removed an edit request from Talk:List of best-selling albums? sample diff of Talk:List of best-selling albums. It looks like a valid edit request, and the two sources check out okay. Thanks, -- Diannaa (talk) 00:00, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- @Diannaa:, the user had been repeatedly responded as to why the edit request cannot be processed, and why primary sources cannot be used for asserting an album/artist's sales parameter. Please also see Talk:List of best-selling music artists. The user was blocked but came back through a different IP and started socking and edit warring on this. Again, the two sources used take content from Streisand's record label press release, which is a big no. —Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 04:07, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Okay I get it now. But obviously the person who is repeatedly adding it does not understand why his addition keeps getting removed. That's why he keeps re-adding it. There's more info here than be conveyed in an edit summary, but it's difficult to communicate with the user since he keeps jumping to different IPs. I don't know what the solution is. -- Diannaa (talk) 04:11, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- @Diannaa: I remember Binksternet raising an ANI thread a few days back about a bunch of Chinese IPs tag-teaming for introducing fanpedia sources and content in the Streisand articles. Maybe its related to that? —Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 04:17, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Maybe, maybe not. It could be the Streisand effect!! (just kidding). Perhaps if he posts the edit request again you could explain why the sources don't work for our purposes. Then if he continues to persist after that, we will know what we are dealing with. -- Diannaa (talk) 04:22, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- @Diannaa: the IP has been explained a number of times see here, by myself, Mlpearc, Harout72 etc. If you see the history of the page the IP kept on resetting the edit request tag continuously and edit warred. —Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 04:27, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for patiently explaining. Your theory is probably correct then, that it was related to the Chinese IP tag-team event. Hopefully it's over. If not, I will be in a better position now to help at AIV if I see further listings there with regards to this issue. -- Diannaa (talk) 04:31, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- It's about to scroll off the page but the Chinese IP ANI thread is here: Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Chinese_IPs_at_Barbra_Streisand. In case it helps. Binksternet (talk) 04:40, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- @Diannaa: I think we all spoke too soon. —Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 05:04, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Not sure if I can add anything here, if I were an Admin I would be looking into a range block as it seems to me that AGF has long gone but, maybe that's why I'm not an Admin :P Mlpearc (open channel) 05:23, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Is there a way to delete that nomination page? I did not expected this from Frank Boy. I think it was a delibrate attempt to put me down or somone elf gave this idea to him? I f yes then I know who he might be. Please tell how this can be deleted. I wanted to take it in one attempt. Now, all my hard work has gone into vain. I feel to stop working here.—Prashant 16:32, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Calm down, nothing happened. But actually it is really an ill-timed nomination without preparation. I don't think the moderators would delete it and I can see that you already notified Nergaal about this. Let him take a decision. But since I'm not an admin, I cannot delete the page. And don't think your hard work is wasted just because a faulty nomination was archived. —Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 16:40, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- How I can calm down? There was a rule to inform prior to nomination for users, who are not contributors but, this guys did not followed that rule. There was Exotic and Miss World left and I was thinking to collected refrences for Miss World 200 but this guys ruined it completely. I feel like I was......Oh my god what to do? —Prashant 16:55, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- See there's nothing you can do rather than calming down and let the moderators sort it out. Yes FrB did a stupid thing, but what's done is done. —Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 16:56, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Your uncivil actions have been duly reported.  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Riot kiddo (talk • contribs) 17:12, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- And i responded there also with your genre fabricatios. So respond there. And learn how to sign your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). —Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 17:14, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi I'm new here and just getting adjusted but I don't know how to attach a source. But Bad Blood has the second highest debut in the history of Pop AirPlay you can look it up yourself. Everything I post is true maybe I can't find a source but I'm only trying to help. Finaltwo (talk) 03:05, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Please refer to this page Wikipedia:Citing sources. —Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 03:06, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi IndianBio. I was reading about Madonna's "Ghosttown" and found that a remix section has been added to the entry. Very cool! Did you do this edit?
If so, I wanted to know if you could correct something. I had created and submitted my remix before the video came out. What I said about the video is that the story I had envisioned in my head was very similar to how the video was done. So I didn't use the video to create my mix.
Thanks.
SimplyRedBear (talk) 11:28, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Hi @SimplyRedBear: are you DJ Andrews himself? Well just to let you know the source supporting the text written there says that you were inspired by the video. I would say you can contact Idolator to rectify it first. —Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 12:06, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
lol. Yes, I am Paul Andrews, but I'm not a DJ. Here is the article that is referenced: http://www.idolator.com/7594570/paul-andrews-madonna-ghosstown-lush-ballad-remix-listen
Here is the section from the article that mentions the video, which is actually my quote from my own webpage: "The lyric of “Ghosttown” created a story for me. In fact, the video that was made for the song was very close to what I had envisioned."
So what was written on here was not a correct interpretation.
SimplyRedBear (talk) 12:11, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- @SimplyRedBear: thanks for pointing it out, I will correct it now. —Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 12:15, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you!
Eventually, I'll get my own page on wiki!
SimplyRedBear (talk) 12:17, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Why is my site, siskelandebert.org, considered spam? The definition here at wikipedia does not correlate to my site https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spamming — Preceding unsigned comment added by Firstmagnitude (talk • contribs) 04:47, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- @Firstmagnitude: your continuous addition of the link as EL makes it spam, there is no indication of it being a notable EL. I have raised concern about the link as well as your Edit warring attitude in both the reliable sources noticeboard and reported for continuous AIV. —Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 05:21, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Your edits are definitely spam, Firstmagnitude. You are here to promote your dubious website instead of improving the encyclopedia, and if you continue spamming, you most definitely will be blocked from editing. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 05:25, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- and not only that you have continued doing this from a long time. I will definitely blacklist your website now. —Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 05:27, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I suggest you review the changes [1] I made in Safe and Sound (Taylor Swift song), because it seems that you are the one misrepresenting the sources. Reviewing the given sources, as well as adding more reliable sources, the genres that you removed (folk and alternative country respectively) are explicitly stated in articles from Billboard and Rolling Stone. I have included quotations from the articles to validate the genres. Riot kiddo (talk) 12:52, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- @Riot kiddo: don't try to act smart. Your original addition to the article did not have any ounce of credibility since it did not even list a source calling the song as folk. You have later added it and with a new source while trying to spew nonsense regarding your edit as usual. Care to explain this? And finally, don't respond here, I'm not interested to discuss anything with a blatant liar, everything will be infront of Administrators now. —Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 12:58, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, could you block Ajp2014 one more time? He started his edits with fake numbers again. I'm not good with this blocking thing here :) Max24 08:21, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Left one final warning, if continues then its blockville for them. PS I am not an admin, but am very strict about vandals like that. —Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 06:29, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Big thanks! Max24 08:31, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Pavanjandhyala has opened the peer review for Mayabazar (1957), the first Telugu film to be attempted for FA class. Feel free to leave comments. — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 05:26, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Did you find any other issues to point out? If yes, please do it. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 12:41, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Living for Love you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.  This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Calvin999 -- Calvin999 (talk) 08:21, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I fully understand the reasons for the reverts you have been making at List of awards and nominations received by Madonna, but I am also sure that an editor with your amount of experience will be aware of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Please remember, being convinced that your edits are "right" does not exempt you from that policy, and you could find yourself blocked if you continue. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 08:53, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- @JamesBWatson: I was under the impression that reverting disruptive edits which introduce blatant false information was not under 3RR? If its not then my understanding was incorrect and I am profusely sorry for since it seems I had edit warred. My deepest apologies. —Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 08:55, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- First of all, I was referring to edit-warring, not to the "3 revert rule". There is a surprisingly widespread idea that the two are synonymous, but they aren't. Secondly, there are various exemptions to the 3 revert rule, including reverting "obvious vandalism—edits that any well-intentioned user would agree constitute vandalism, such as page blanking and adding offensive language", but there is no way that can be construed as covering the reverts you have been making. The editor you have been reverting seems to have been editing in good faith, as far as I can see(even if he or she may be mistaken as to what is appropriate to add to the article) so that it is not vandalism. "Blatant false information" is vandalism if it is added intentionally, but however false it may be, it is not vandalism if it is added in good faith, by an editor who believes it to be true. He or she has also given sources for at least some of the content, as for example in this edit, so it does not seem that the content is "blatant false information" anyway.
- As for your editing, I am 100% sure you are acting in good faith, and I really don't think that a block for edit-warring would be helpful at present, but I have blocked the other editor for personal attacks, and while doing so I thought it best to point out to both of you that you are both running the risk of a block for edit-warring. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 09:15, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks JamesBWatson, thanks for your kind reply and again my deepest apologies and I will see to it that it does not happen again. —Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 09:22, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The article Living for Love you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Living for Love for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Calvin999 -- Calvin999 (talk) 09:01, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The article Living for Love you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Living for Love for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Calvin999 -- Calvin999 (talk) 11:01, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Check it yourself (http://musiccanada.com/gold-platinum/?fwp_gp_search=barbra&fwp_gp_canadian=5&fwp_paged=2),don't use out date cer,please — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skkywill (talk • contribs) 11:57, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- No, it includes Duck Sauce also which is not Barabara's. Take your fancruft somewhere else as well as your socking. —Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 11:59, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The article states in charted on the US Dance chart dated January 3, 2015. It will also appear on other charts after being officially released as a single. The chart title should read 2014/2015.
MCMCTT (talk) 14:35, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- MCMCTT, "It will also appear on other charts after being officially released as a single" is a violation of WP:CRYSTAL policy, since noone knows whether the song will at all chart or not. As for the first statement, Billboard charts are released with an advanced date. That does not mean it charted in 2015. —Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 14:37, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Practice what you preach, baby. And you know Madonna's avarice, if you're any kind of fan, so don't erase the whole effing thing please as not all of it was on Christopher's biography. thanks--A21sauce (talk) 05:16, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- A21sauce learn to write civilly. And add back the unreliable source again, WP:AN3 is where you will find yourself, kapish? —Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 05:17, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Any userbox for Swifties? -- FrankBoy CHITCHAT 11:26, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- FrB.TG you can visit Wikipedia:WikiProject Taylor Swift and there you can find {{Wikipedia:WikiProject Taylor Swift/Userbox}} which you can add in your userpage. Cheers and welcome. —Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 05:46, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
madonna "bitch i'm madonna" change
Hi!
Thank you for contact with me. I put yesterday the tracklist of the digital release of the "Bitch I'm Madonna" remixes which is going to be released next 16 june. The problem was that I didn't put the references. The problem is that you deleted my entry and the one that it was put with the digital single edition.
If you want, you can ad again the facts. I don't know how to put references, but here is the web where you can see the tracklist from where I take the info. http://www.madonnarama.com/posts-en/2015/05/08/bitch-im-madonna-will-be-the-third-single-off-madonnas-rebel-heart/
You can also ad the "release history" box with the date of 16 june for the release of the digital remix ep worldwide.
Thank you very, very much!
Hi IndianBio, thanks for volunteering to undertake the GA review of Jeff Wayne's Musical Version of The War of the Worlds – The New Generation. I see you have plenty of experience with record album articles and I look forward to responding positively to your review. I hope it is a mutually beneficial experience. Cheers. Prhartcom (talk) 15:53, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Hi Prhartcom how are you? Yes I have a little experience with the music articles and would surely review the article thoroughly. :) —Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 05:46, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Earl MacDonald page
Thank you for your suggestions regarding the "Earl MacDonald" page I created. I value your input, as I am by no means an expert in writing Wikipedia articles. I will endeavor to further edit the page, but would certainly welcome your further input. The articles you linked will be helpful. I was unaware that blog sites are not considered credible references. May I pose direct questions to you from time to time, calling upon your expertise?Paul Gruhn 21:41, 11 June 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pgruhn (talk • contribs)
|
